Mammographic Screening and “Overdiagnosis”
2011; Radiological Society of North America; Volume: 260; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1148/radiol.11110716
ISSN1527-1315
AutoresDaniel B. Kopans, Robert A. Smith, Stephen W. Duffy,
Tópico(s)Cancer Risks and Factors
ResumoHomeRadiologyVol. 260, No. 3 PreviousNext Reviews and CommentaryControversiesMammographic Screening and "Overdiagnosis"Daniel B. Kopans , Robert A. Smith, Stephen W. DuffyDaniel B. Kopans , Robert A. Smith, Stephen W. DuffyAuthor AffiliationsFrom the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 15 Parkman St, Ambulatory Care Building, Suite 219, Boston, MA 02114 (D.B.K.); Cancer Control Sciences Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Ga (R.A.S.); and Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, England (S.W.D.).Address correspondence to D.B.K. (e-mail: [email protected]).Daniel B. Kopans Robert A. SmithStephen W. DuffyPublished Online:Sep 1 2011https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110716MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookXLinked In AbstractWe must inform women that early detection, although not perfect, has been repeatedly demonstrated to reduce deaths from breast cancer and that the risk of overdiagnosis is small compared with this benefit.References1 Kopans DB. Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 2002;94(2):580–581; author reply 581–583. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2 Altekruse S, Kosary C, Krapcho M, et al.. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2007. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2010. Google Scholar3 Jemal A, Ward E, Thun M. Declining death rates reflect progress against cancer. PLoS ONE 2010;5(3):e9584. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4 Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, et al.. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353(17):1784–1792. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Duffy SW, Tabár L, Chen HH, et al.. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties. Cancer 2002;95(3):458–469. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 Swedish Organised Service Screening Evaluation Group. Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography. I. Further confirmation with extended data. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(1):45–51. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen HH, Yen MF, Duffy SW, Smith RA. Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 2001;91(9):1724–1731. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8 Hellquist BN, Duffy SW, Abdsaleh S, et al.. Effectiveness of population-based service screening with mammography for women ages 40 to 49 years: evaluation of the Swedish Mammography Screening in Young Women (SCRY) cohort. Cancer 2011;117(4):714–722. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar9 Otto SJ, Fracheboud J, Looman CW, et al.. Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality: a systematic review. Lancet 2003;361(9367):1411–1417. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10 Esserman L, Shieh Y, Thompson I. Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer. JAMA 2009;302(15):1685–1692. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar11 Gøtzsche PC, Nielsen M. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011(1):CD001877. Google Scholar12 Welch HG, Black WC. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102(9):605–613. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar13 Jørgensen KJ, Gøtzsche PC. Overdiagnosis in publicly organised mammography screening programmes: systematic review of incidence trends. BMJ 2009;339:b2587. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar14 Zahl PH, Maehlen J, Welch HG. The natural history of invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography. Arch Intern Med 2008;168(21):2311–2316. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar15 Kopans DB, Monsees B, Feig SA. Screening for cancer: when is it valid?—Lessons from the mammography experience. Radiology 2003;229(2):319–327. Link, Google Scholar16 Smith RA, Duffy S, Tabar L. Screening and early detection. In: Barbiera GVEsteva FJSkoracki R, eds. Advanced therapy of breast disease. 3rd ed. Shelton, Conn: People's Medical Publishing House, 2011. Google Scholar17 Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002;137(5 Part 1):347–360. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar18 Welch HG, Black WC. Using autopsy series to estimate the disease "reservoir" for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: how much more breast cancer can we find? Ann Intern Med 1997;127(11):1023–1028. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar19 Duffy SW, Agbaje O, Tabar L, et al.. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: estimates of overdiagnosis from two trials of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2005;7(6):258–265. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar20 Dussan C, Zubor P, Fernandez M, Yabar A, Szunyogh N, Visnovsky J. Spontaneous regression of a breast carcinoma: a case report. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2008;65(3):206–211. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar21 Cole WH, Everson TC. Spontaneous regression of cancer: preliminary report. Ann Surg 1956;144(3):366–383. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar22 Krutchik AN, Buzdar AU, Blumenschein GR, Lukeman JM. Spontaneous regression of breast carcinoma. Arch Intern Med 1978;138(11):1734–1735. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar23 Lewison EF. Spontaneous regression of breast cancer. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1976;44:23–26. Medline, Google Scholar24 Adesunkanmi AR, Lawal OO, Adelusola KA, Durosimi MA. The severity, outcome and challenges of breast cancer in Nigeria. Breast 2006;15(3):399–409. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar25 von Euler-Chelpin M, Njor S, Lynge E. Answer to Jørgensen & Gøtzsche. BMJ [serial online] 2009. http://www.bmj.com.proxy.library.emory.edu/content/339/bmj.b2587.full/reply#bmj_el_217871. Accessed March 22, 2011. Google Scholar26 Johnson A, Shekhdar J. Breast cancer incidence: what do the figures mean? J Eval Clin Pract 2005;11(1):27–31. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar27 Duffy SW, Tabar L, Olsen AH, et al.. Absolute numbers of lives saved and overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening, from a randomized trial and from the Breast Screening Programme in England. J Med Screen 2010;17(1):25–30. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar28 McCann J, Treasure P, Duffy S. Modelling the impact of detecting and treating ductal carcinoma in situ in a breast screening programme. J Med Screen 2004;11(3):117–125. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar29 Lawrence G, O'Sullivan E, Kearins O, Tappenden N, Martin K, Wallis M. Screening histories of invasive breast cancers diagnosed 1989–2006 in the West Midlands, UK: variation with time and impact on 10-year survival. J Med Screen 2009;16(4):186–192. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar30 Zackrisson S, Andersson I, Janzon L, Manjer J, Garne JP. Rate of over-diagnosis of breast cancer 15 years after end of Malmö mammographic screening trial: follow-up study. BMJ 2006;332(7543):689–692. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar31 Zahl PH, Strand BH, Maehlen J. Incidence of breast cancer in Norway and Sweden during introduction of nationwide screening: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2004;328(7445):921–924. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar32 Olsen AH, Agbaje OF, Myles JP, Lynge E, Duffy SW. Overdiagnosis, sojourn time, and sensitivity in the Copenhagen mammography screening program. Breast J 2006;12(4):338–342. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar33 Puliti D, Zappa M, Miccinesi G, Falini P, Crocetti E, Paci E. An estimate of overdiagnosis 15 years after the start of mammographic screening in Florence. Eur J Cancer 2009;45(18):3166–3171. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar34 Allegra CJ, Aberle DR, Ganschow P, et al.. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference statement: diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ September 22–24, 2009. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102(3):161–169. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar35 Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Landenberger M. Intraductal carcinoma of the breast: follow-up after biopsy only. Cancer 1982;49(4):751–758. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar36 Yen MF, Tabár L, Vitak B, Smith RA, Chen HH, Duffy SW. Quantifying the potential problem of overdiagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast cancer screening. Eur J Cancer 2003;39(12):1746–1754. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar37 Duffy SW, Tabar L, Vitak B, et al.. The relative contributions of screen-detected in situ and invasive breast carcinomas in reducing mortality from the disease. Eur J Cancer 2003;39(12):1755–1760. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar38 Fisher ER, Dignam J, Tan-Chiu E, et al.. Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) eight-year update of Protocol B-17: intraductal carcinoma. Cancer 1999;86(3):429–438. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar39 Cuzick J, Sestak I, Pinder SE, et al.. Effect of tamoxifen and radiotherapy in women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in situ: long-term results from the UK/ANZ DCIS trial. Lancet Oncol 2011;12(1):21–29. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar40 Ravdin PM, Cronin KA, Howlader N, et al.. The decrease in breast-cancer incidence in 2003 in the United States. N Engl J Med 2007;356(16):1670–1674. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar41 Jemal A, Ward E, Thun MJ. Recent trends in breast cancer incidence rates by age and tumor characteristics among U.S. women. Breast Cancer Res 2007;9(3):R28. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar42 Osborne CK. Tamoxifen in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1998;339(22):1609–1618. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarArticle HistoryReceived April 6, 2011; revision requested April 11; revision received May 4; final version accepted May 5.Published online: Sept 2011Published in print: Sept 2011 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByImaging Changes and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Active Monitoring for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Seven-Year Follow-up StudyDerek L.Nguyen, E.Shelley Hwang, Marc D.Ryser, Lars J.Grimm2024Jan1 | Academic Radiology, Vol. 26Overdiagnosis Due to Screening Mammography for Breast Cancer among Women Aged 40 Years and Over: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisArwa F.Flemban14 March 2023 | Journal of Personalized Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 3The seven key challenges for life-critical shared decision making systemsEvangelosTriantaphyllou, JuriYanase2021Apr1 | International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 148Mixed-Methods Study to Predict Upstaging of DCIS to Invasive Disease on MammographyLars J.Grimm, BenjaminNeely, RuiHou, VigneshSelvakumaran, Jay A.Baker, Sora C.Yoon, Sujata V.Ghate, RuthWalsh, Tyler P.Litton, AmritaDevalapalli, ConnieKim, Mary ScottSoo, TerryHyslop, E. ShelleyHwang, Joseph Y.Lo2021Apr1 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 216, No. 4Imaging: Controversies and Interventions in Early Breast CancerJanaki P.Dharmarajan2 October 2020Overdiagnosis and Risks of Breast Cancer ScreeningColleen H.Neal, Mark A.Helvie2021Jan1 | Radiologic Clinics of North America, Vol. 59, No. 1Preventive Care: How Mammography Utilization Changes as Women AgeCindyYuan, KirtiKulkarni, Brittany Z.Dashevsky2020Feb1 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 17, No. 2A systematic survey of computer-aided diagnosis in medicine: Past and present developmentsJuriYanase, EvangelosTriantaphyllou2019Dec1 | Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 138Outcomes of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ According to Detection Modality: A Multicenter Study Comparing Recurrence Between Mammography and Breast USJung HyunYoon, KyunghwaHan, JieunKoh, Ga RamKim, Hye JungKim, Young MiPark, Ji HyunYouk, JinChung, In HyeChae, Eun JungChoi, Hee JungMoon2019Oct1 | Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, Vol. 45, No. 10Monitoring Progression of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Using Photoacoustics and Contrast-Enhanced UltrasoundRyanMargolis, CorinneWessner, MariaStanczak, Ji-BinLiu, JingzhiLi, KiboNam, FlemmingForsberg, John R.Eisenbrey2019Jul1 | Translational Oncology, Vol. 12, No. 7Breast and Axilla Treatment in Ductal Carcinoma In SituAmbrogio P.Londero, SerenaBertozzi, Roberta DiVora, Fabrizio DeBiasio, LucaSeriau, Pier CamilloParodi, LorenzaDriul, AndreaRisaliti, LauraMariuzzi, CarlaCedolini20 June 2018How do we manage overdiagnosis/overtreatment in breast screening?M.G.Wallis2018Apr1 | Clinical Radiology, Vol. 73, No. 4Screening and Early DetectionRobert A.Smith, Otis W.Brawley, Richard C.Wender15 December 2017Mammography screening: A major issue in medicinePhilippeAutier, MathieuBoniol2018Feb1 | European Journal of Cancer, Vol. 90Imaging Features of Patients Undergoing Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma in SituLars J.Grimm, Sujata V.Ghate, E. ShelleyHwang, Mary ScottSoo2017Nov1 | Academic Radiology, Vol. 24, No. 11Margin width and local recurrence after breast conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situGregory E.Ekatah, Arran K.Turnbull, Laura M.Arthur, JeremyThomas, ChristineDodds, J. MichaelDixon2017Nov1 | European Journal of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 43, No. 11Excision margins in breast conserving therapyJ MichaelDixon, Christopher WJCartlidge2017Aug1 | Breast Cancer Management, Vol. 6, No. 3Evidence to Support Screening Women AnnuallyPeter R.Eby2017May1 | Radiologic Clinics of North America, Vol. 55, No. 3Evaluation issues in the Swedish Two-County Trial of breast cancer screening: An historical reviewLaszloTabar, Tony Hsiu-HsiChen, Chen-YangHsu, Wendy Yi-YingWu, Amy Ming-FangYen, Sam Li-ShengChen, Sherry Yueh-HsiaChiu, Jean Ching-YuanFann, KerriBeckmann, Robert ASmith, Stephen WDuffy23 June 2016 | Journal of Medical Screening, Vol. 24, No. 1Are We Overtreating Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS)?SadiaKhan, MelindaEpstein, Michael D.Lagios, Melvin J.Silverstein15 August 2016 | Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 24, No. 1Predictive values of BI-RADS ® magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)Gustavo MachadoBadan, SebastiãoPiato, DécioRoveda, Eduardode Faria Castro Fleury2016Oct1 | European Journal of Radiology, Vol. 85, No. 10Improving screening mammography: Perspective of a community radiologistMartin J.Ruocco1 September 2016 | Applied Radiology, Vol. 10Comparison between two-dimensional synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of T1 breast cancerJi SooChoi, Boo-KyungHan, Eun YoungKo, Eun SookKo, Soo YeonHahn, Jung HeeShin, Min JungKim1 December 2015 | European Radiology, Vol. 26, No. 8Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Evaluation of main presentations on magnetic resonance imaging compared with findings on mammogram and histologyGustavo MachadoBadan, DécioRoveda Júnior, SebastiãoPaito, Eduardo de Faria CastroFleury, BiancaMaragno, Mario Sérgio Dantas do AmaralCampos, Carlos Alberto PecciFerreira, Felipe Augusto TrocoliFerreira2016Aug1 | Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, Vol. 62, No. 5Controversies in Screening MammographyMONIQUESWAIN, MYRLENEJEUDY, MARK D.PEARLMAN2016Jun1 | Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology, Vol. 59, No. 2Diagnostic underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ at percutaneous core needle and vacuum-assisted biopsies of the breast in a Brazilian reference institutionGustavo MachadoBadan, DecioRoveda Júnior, SebastiãoPiato, Eduardo de Faria CastroFleury, Mário Sérgio DantasCampos, Carlos Alberto FerreiraPecci, Felipe Augusto TrocoliFerreira, CamilaD'Ávila2016Feb1 | Radiologia Brasileira, Vol. 49, No. 1Benefits and harms of mammography screeningMagnusLøberg, Mette LiseLousdal, MichaelBretthauer, MetteKalager1 May 2015 | Breast Cancer Research, Vol. 17, No. 1Addressing overtreatment of screen detected DCIS; the LORIS trialAdeleFrancis, JeremyThomas, LesleyFallowfield, MatthewWallis, John M.S.Bartlett, CassandraBrookes, TracyRoberts, SarahPirrie, ClaireGaunt, JennieYoung, LucindaBillingham, DavidDodwell, AndrewHanby, Sarah E.Pinder, AndrewEvans, MalcolmReed, ValerieJenkins, LucyMatthews, MaggieWilcox, PatriciaFairbrother, SarahBowden, DanielRea2015Nov1 | European Journal of Cancer, Vol. 51, No. 16Understanding recall rates in screening mammography: A conceptual framework review of the literatureN.Mohd Norsuddin, W.Reed, C.Mello-Thoms, S.J.Lewis2015Nov1 | Radiography, Vol. 21, No. 4A crisis of visibility: The psychological consequences of false‐positive screening mammograms, an interview studyMaryBond, RuthGarside, ChristopherHyde6 May 2015 | British Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 4Will Supplemental Screening Ultrasound Increase Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis?Virginia M.Molleran2015Aug1 | Academic Radiology, Vol. 22, No. 8Characteristics and behaviour of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison with symptomatic patientsValerie Cui YunKoh, Jeffrey Chun TattLim, Aye AyeThike, Poh YianCheok, Minn Minn MyintThu, Veronique Kiak MienTan, Benita Kiat TeeTan, Kong WeeOng, Gay HuiHo, Wai JinTan, YongchengTan, Ahmed SyedSalahuddin, InnyBusmanis, Angela Pek YoonChong, JabedIqbal, ShyamalaThilagaratnam, Jill Su LinWong, Puay HoonTan16 June 2015 | Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Vol. 152, No. 2"Do Unto Others as You Would Have Them Do Unto You": Breast Imagers' Perspectives Regarding Screening Mammography for Others and for Themselves—Do They Practice What They Preach?JiyonLee, Paula B.Gordon, Gary J.Whitman2015Jun1 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 204, No. 6Benefits and Harms of Mammography Screening After Age 74 Years: Model Estimates of OverdiagnosisN. T.van Ravesteyn, N. K.Stout, C. B.Schechter, E. A. M.Heijnsdijk, O.Alagoz, A.Trentham-Dietz, J. S.Mandelblatt, H. J.de Koning6 May 2015 | JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 107, No. 7Breast Cancer Screening: Meeting the Challenges of Today and Exploring the Technologies of TomorrowMonica L.Huang, StephenRose, Wei T.Yang2015Apr1 | Seminars in Roentgenology, Vol. 50, No. 2Use of Ionizing Radiation in Screening Examinations for Coronary Artery Calcium and Cancers of the Lung, Colon, and BreastShuaiLeng, Carrie B.Hruska, Cynthia H.McCollough2015Apr1 | Seminars in Roentgenology, Vol. 50, No. 2Blinded double reading yields a higher programme sensitivity than non-blinded double reading at digital screening mammography: A prospected population based study in the south of The NetherlandsElisabeth G.Klompenhouwer, Adri C.Voogd, Gerard J.den Heeten, Luc J.A.Strobbe, Anton F.J.de Haan, Carla A.Wauters, Mireille J.M.Broeders, Lucien E.M.Duijm2015Feb1 | European Journal of Cancer, Vol. 51, No. 3Extracellular Nucleic Acids and CancerMichaelFleischhacker, BerndSchmidt23 August 2014The LORIS Trial: Addressing Overtreatment of Ductal Carcinoma In SituA.Francis, L.Fallowfield, D.Rea2015Jan1 | Clinical Oncology, Vol. 27, No. 1Cancer screening in the United States, 2015: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screeningRobert A.Smith, DeanaManassaram‐Baptiste, DuradoBrooks, MaryDoroshenk, StaceyFedewa, DebbieSaslow, Otis W.Brawley, RichardWender8 January 2015 | CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, Vol. 65, No. 1Point: Mammography, Breast Cancer, and Overdiagnosis: The Truth Versus the Whole Truth Versus Nothing but the TruthLeonardBerlin2014Jul1 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 11, No. 7Assessing the effect of a true-positive recall case in screening mammography: does perceptual priming alter radiologists' performance?S JLewis, C RMello-Thoms, P CBrennan, WLee, ATan, M FMcEntee, MEvanoff, MPietrzyk, W MReed2014Jul1 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 87, No. 1039Cuidado(!) na prevenção do câncer: ética, danos e equívocosCharles DalcanaleTesser27 December 2013 | Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade, Vol. 9, No. 31Complete internal audit of a mammography service in a reference institution for breast imagingGustavo MachadoBadan, DécioRoveda Júnior, Carlos Alberto PecciFerreira, Ozeas Alves de NoronhaJunior2014Apr1 | Radiologia Brasileira, Vol. 47, No. 2Mortality and recurrence patterns of breast cancer patients diagnosed under a screening programme versus comparable non-screened breast cancer patients from the same population: analytical survey from 2002 to 2012A.García Fernández, C.Chabrera, M.García Font, M.Fraile, J. M.Lain, S.Gónzalez, C.Corral, M.Torras, J.Torres, M.Teixido, IBarco, R.López, C.Gónzalez, A.Pessarrodona, N.Giménez9 October 2013 | Tumor Biology, Vol. 35, No. 3Breast screening saves lives: now is the time to address overtreatmentDanielRea, AdeleFrancis2014Mar1 | Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, Vol. 3, No. 2Time trends and inter-hospital variation in treatment and axillary staging of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the era of screening in Southern NetherlandsL.N.van Steenbergen, A.C.Voogd, J.A.Roukema, W.J.Louwman, L.E.M.Duijm, J.W.W.Coebergh, L.V.van de Poll-Franse2014Feb1 | The Breast, Vol. 23, No. 1Arguments Against Mammography Screening Continue to be Based on Faulty ScienceDaniel B.Kopans27 January 2014 | The Oncologist, Vol. 19, No. 2Digital Breast Tomosynthesis From Concept to Clinical CareDaniel B.Kopans2014Feb1 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 202, No. 2Section Editor's Notebook: Breast Cancer Screening and Overdiagnosis UnmaskedMarcia C.Javitt2014Feb1 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 202, No. 2The Impact of Mammography Screening on the Diagnosis and Management of Early-Phase Breast CancerLászlóTabár, Peter B.Dean, Tony Hsiu-HsiChen, Amy Ming-FangYen, Sherry Yueh-HsiaChiu, TiborTot, Robert A.Smith, Stephen W.Duffy26 August 2013Economic analyses of breast cancer control in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic reviewSten GZelle, Rob MBaltussen8 April 2013 | Systematic Reviews, Vol. 2, No. 1Quantifying the natural history of breast cancerK H XTan, LSimonella, H LWee, ARoellin, Y-WLim, W-YLim, K SChia, MHartman, A RCook1 October 2013 | British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 109, No. 8Grenzen des MammographiescreeningsK.Hellerhoff14 August 2013 | Der Radiologe, Vol. 53, No. 9Positive predictive values of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®) categories 3, 4 and 5 in breast lesions submitted to percutaneous biopsyGustavo MachadoBadan, DécioRoveda Júnior, Carlos Alberto PecciFerreira, Felipe Augusto TrocoliFerreira, Eduardo de Faria CastroFleury, Mário Sérgio Dantas do AmaralCampos, Rodrigo de OliveiraSeleti, Hélio daCruz Júnior2013Aug1 | Radiologia Brasileira, Vol. 46, No. 4The effect of false positive breast screening examinations on subsequent attendance: retrospective cohort studyAnthony JMaxwell, CathrynBeattie, JanetLavelle, IainLyburn, RuchiSinnatamby, ShelaghGarnett, AnnieHerbert12 August 2013 | Journal of Medical Screening, Vol. 20, No. 2If You Don't Find It Often, You Often Don't Find It: Why Some Cancers Are Missed in Breast Cancer ScreeningKarla K.Evans, Robyn L.Birdwell, Jeremy M.Wolfe, Michael J.Proulx30 May 2013 | PLoS ONE, Vol. 8, No. 5Comparison of Digital Mammography Alone and Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in a Population-based Screening ProgramPer Skaane, , Andriy I. Bandos, , Randi Gullien, , Ellen B. Eben, , Ulrika Ekseth, , Unni Haakenaasen, , Mina Izadi, , Ingvild N. Jebsen, , Gunnar Jahr, , Mona Krager, , Loren T. Niklason, , Solveig Hofvind, , and David Gur, 1 April 2013 | Radiology, Vol. 267, No. 1Screening for breast cancerAndrewMurphy, GarthKruger2 February 2013Comparison of Digital Screening Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography in the Early Detection of Clinically Relevant Cancers: A Multicenter StudyAdriana M. J. Bluekens, , Roland Holland, , Nico Karssemeijer, , Mireille J. M. Broeders, , and Gerard J. den Heeten, 1 December 2012 | Radiology, Vol. 265, No. 3Impact of transition from analog screening mammography to digital screening mammography on screening outcome in The Netherlands: a population-based studyJ.Nederend, L.E.M.Duijm, M.W.J.Louwman, J.H.Groenewoud, A.B.Donkers-van Rossum, A.C.Voogd2012Dec1 | Annals of Oncology, Vol. 23, No. 12Effect of Three Decades of Screening Mammography on Breast-Cancer IncidenceArchieBleyer, H. GilbertWelch2012Nov22 | New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 367, No. 21Benefits and Harms of Detecting Clinically Occult Breast CancerEitanAmir, Philippe L.Bedard, AlbertoOcaña, BostjanSeruga17 September 2012 | JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 104, No. 20Summary of the Evidence of Breast Cancer Service Screening Outcomes in Europe and First Estimate of the Benefit and Harm Balance SheetEugenioPaci12 September 2012 | Journal of Medical Screening, Vol. 19, No. 1_supplOverdiagnosis in Mammographic Screening for Breast Cancer in Europe: A Literature ReviewDonellaPuliti, Stephen WDuffy, GuidoMiccinesi, HarryDe Koning, ElsebethLynge, MarcoZappa, EugenioPaci12 September 2012 | Journal of Medical Screening, Vol. 19, No. 1_supplDo not jump too quickly to conclusionsDaniel BKopans23 July 2012 | Breast Cancer Research, Vol. 14, No. 4Breast screening review—a radiologist's perspectiveM JMichell2012Jul1 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 85, No. 1015Cancer screening in the United States, 2012Robert A.Smith, VilmaCokkinides, Otis W.Brawley19 January 2012 | CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, Vol. 62, No. 2Overdiagnosis and Screening MammographyManuel Vazquez-Caruncho, , 1 February 2012 | Radiology, Vol. 262, No. 2Controversies in mammography screening: let us not ignore science in this never-ending debatePerSkaane1 December 2011 | Acta Radiologica, Vol. 52, No. 10Mammography Screening: Keeping Women AliveAndré LMVerbeek1 November 2011 | Women's Health, Vol. 7, No. 6Recommended Articles Obligate Overdiagnosis Due to Mammographic Screening: A Direct Estimate for U.S. WomenRadiology2017Volume: 287Issue: 2pp. 391-397Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography for Detection of Early-Stage Cancers Stratified by Grade: A TOSYMA SubanalysisRadiology2023Volume: 309Issue: 3Change Is Good: The Evolution and Future of Breast ImagingRadiology2023Volume: 306Issue: 3Women 75 Years Old or Older: To Screen or Not to Screen?RadioGraphics2023Volume: 43Issue: 5Diagnostic Performance of and Breast Tissue Changes at Early Breast MR Imaging Surveillance in Women after Breast Conservation TherapyRadiology2017Volume: 284Issue: 3pp. 656-666See More RSNA Education Exhibits Breast Health in the Elderly: Implications for ImagingDigital Posters2020Breast Imaging Controversies In The Elderly PopulationDigital Posters2021High Risk Breast Cancer Screening Digital Posters2020 RSNA Case Collection Locally Advanced Breast CancerRSNA Case Collection2021Secondary Angiosarcoma of the BreastRSNA Case Collection2021Locally Advanced Invasive Lobular CarcinomaRSNA Case Collection2022 Vol. 260, No. 3 Supplemental MaterialAbbreviationsAbbreviations:DCISductal carcinoma in situRCTrandomized controlled trial Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download
Referência(s)