Artigo Revisado por pares

Sex Differences and Incentive Effects on Perceptual and Cardiovascular Responses to Cold Pressor Pain

2003; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 65; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1097/01.psy.0000033127.11561.78

ISSN

1534-7796

Autores

Daniel Lowery, Roger B. Fillingim, Rex A. Wright,

Tópico(s)

Pain Management and Placebo Effect

Resumo

Objective Sex differences in pain perception have been widely reported, with women typically displaying greater pain sensitivity than men, but the mechanisms underlying these differences remain unclear. One possible explanation suggests that men are more motivated to tolerate and suppress expressions of pain because of the masculine sex role, whereas the feminine sex role encourages pain expression and produces lower motivation to tolerate pain among women. Methods To examine the influence of motivation on perceptual and cardiovascular responses to pain among women and men, different levels of monetary incentive (high vs. low incentive) were provided to a group of 81 healthy young adults undergoing the cold pressor pain procedure. It was anticipated that men would have greater endogenous motivation and would therefore be less affected by the external incentive. Results Men had higher pain thresholds and tolerances and lower pain ratings than women, but the incentive condition produced no significant effect on pain responses. Resting blood pressure was positively correlated with pain tolerance among the low incentive group, whereas blood pressure reactivity to the cold pressor predicted pain tolerance in the high incentive group. Conclusions Thus, monetary incentive did not influence pain responses, but the relationship between cardiovascular measures and pain responses was influenced by the incentive manipulation. Potential explanations for the observed results are presented, and the implications for applying the biopsychosocial model to pain research are discussed.

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX