On Handa's "New Theory of Cardinal Utility" and the Maximization of Expected Return
1978; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 86; Issue: 2, Part 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/260670
ISSN1537-534X
Autores Tópico(s)Economic theories and models
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessCommentsOn Handa's "New Theory of Cardinal Utility" and the Maximization of Expected ReturnPeter C. FishburnPeter C. FishburnPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 86, Number 2, Part 1Apr., 1978Part 1 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/260670 Views: 16Total views on this site Citations: 55Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1978 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Peter P. Wakker The correct formula of 1979 prospect theory for multiple outcomes, Theory and Decision 94, no.22 (Mar 2022): 183–187.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-022-09885-wBertrand Munier Sur une importante conjecture historique de Philippe Mongin, Revue économique Vol. 73, no.66 (Jan 2023): 921–941.https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.736.0921Richard Gonzalez, George Wu Composition rules in original and cumulative prospect theory, Theory and Decision 92, no.3-43-4 (Mar 2022): 647–675.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-022-09873-0John Quiggin Production under uncertainty and choice under uncertainty in the emergence of generalized expected utility theory, Theory and Decision 92, no.3-43-4 (Feb 2022): 717–729.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-022-09875-yHaim Levy Experimental Economics and the Theory of Finance, (Sep 2022): 849–876.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91231-4_27Kazuhisa Takemura The contingent focus model and its relation to other theories, (Jan 2021): 391–411.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816032-9.00019-3Johannes Gerd Jaspersen, Marc A. Ragin A Model of Anchoring and Adjustment for Decision-Making under Risk, SSRN Electronic Journal 101 (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3845633Giuseppe M. Ferro, Didier Sornette, Jason Anthony Aimone Stochastic representation decision theory: How probabilities and values are entangled dual characteristics in cognitive processes, PLOS ONE 15, no.1212 (Dec 2020): e0243661.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243661Itzhak Gilboa, Andrew Postlewaite, Larry Samuelson, David Schmeidler What are axiomatizations good for?, Theory and Decision 86, no.3-43-4 (Jan 2019): 339–359.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-018-09685-1Fabrice Le Lec, Serge Macé The curse of hope, Theory and Decision 84, no.33 (Jul 2017): 429–451.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-017-9621-0Itzhak Gilboa, Andrew Postlewaite, Larry Samuelson, David Schmeidler What are Axiomatizations Good for?, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3278957Itzhak Gilboa, Andrew Postlewaite, Larry Samuelson, David Schmeidler What Are Axiomatizations Good For?, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3178761Edi Karni, Fabio Maccheroni, Massimo Marinacci Ambiguity and Nonexpected Utility, (Jan 2015): 901–947.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53766-9.00017-3John Quiggin Non-Expected Utility Models Under Objective Uncertainty, (Jan 2014): 701–728.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53685-3.00012-XPanos L. Lorentziadis Preference under risk in the presence of indistinguishable probabilities, Operational Research 13, no.33 (Feb 2013): 429–446.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-013-0132-7Haim Levy Experimental Economics and the Theory of Finance, (Nov 2012): 395–410.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5360-4_27HAIM LEVY, MICHAL ORKAN ESTIMATING PROSPECT THEORY'S DECISION WEIGHTS WITH STOCHASTIC DOMINANCE: THE SMALL PROBABILITY CASE, Annals of Financial Economics 07, no.0202 (Dec 2012): 1250006.https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010495212500066Michael H. Birnbaum, Jeffrey P. Bahra Separating response variability from structural inconsistency to test models of risky decision making, Judgment and Decision Making 7, no.44 (Jan 2023): 402–426.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500002758Haim Levy Cumulative Prospect Theory: Tests Using the Stochastic Dominance Approach, (Nov 2011): 211–239.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118258415.ch12Han Bleichrodt, Jose Luis Pinto Prades New evidence of preference reversals in health utility measurement, Health Economics 18, no.66 (Jun 2009): 713–726.https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1405Haim Levy First Degree Stochastic Dominance Violations: Decision Weights and Bounded Rationality, The Economic Journal 118, no.528528 (Mar 2008): 759–774.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02141.xHaim Levy Experimental economics and the theory of finance, (Jan 2006): 520–540.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-26336-6_52 References, (Jan 2006): 775–814.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-26336-6_84Michael H. Birnbaum A Comparison of Five Models that Predict Violations of First-Order Stochastic Dominance in Risky Decision Making, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 31, no.33 (Dec 2005): 263–287.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-005-5103-9Chris Starmer Normative notions in descriptive dialogues, Journal of Economic Methodology 12, no.22 (Jun 2005): 277–289.https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780500086206George Wu, Jiao Zhang, Mohammed Abdellaoui Testing Prospect Theories Using Probability Tradeoff Consistency, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 30, no.22 (Mar 2005): 107–131.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-005-6561-9Ulrich Schmidt, Horst Zank What is Loss Aversion?, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 30, no.22 (Mar 2005): 157–167.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-005-6564-6Michael H. Birnbaum Tests of rank-dependent utility and cumulative prospect theory in gambles represented by natural frequencies: Effects of format, event framing, and branch splitting, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 95, no.11 (Sep 2004): 40–65.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.05.004Michael H. Birnbaum Causes of Allais common consequence paradoxes: An experimental dissection, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 48, no.22 (Apr 2004): 87–106.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2004.01.001Robert Sugden Alternatives to Expected Utility: Foundations, (Jan 2004): 685–755.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-7964-1_1Ulrich Schmidt Alternatives to Expected Utility: Formal Theories, (Jan 2004): 757–837.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-7964-1_2Adam Oliver The internal consistency of the standard gamble: tests after adjusting for prospect theory, Journal of Health Economics 22, no.44 (Jul 2003): 659–674.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(03)00023-7Haim Levy, Moshe Levy Experimental test of the prospect theory value function: A stochastic dominance approach, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 89, no.22 (Nov 2002): 1058–1081.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00011-0Rick Harbaugh Skill Signaling, Prospect Theory, and Regret Theory, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2002).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.311409Chris Starmer Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk, Journal of Economic Literature 38, no.22 (Jun 2000): 332–382.https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.2.332Enrico Diecidue, Peter P. Wakker On The Intuition Of Rank-Dependent Utility, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2000).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.244668John M Miyamoto Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) Utility Models under Expected Utility and Rank Dependent Utility Assumptions, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 43, no.22 (Jun 1999): 201–237.https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1999.1256Richard Gonzalez, George Wu On the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function, Cognitive Psychology 38, no.11 (Feb 1999): 129–166.https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0710Michael H. Birnbaum, Jamie N. Patton, Melissa K. Lott Evidence against Rank-Dependent Utility Theories: Tests of Cumulative Independence, Interval Independence, Stochastic Dominance, and Transitivity, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 77, no.11 (Jan 1999): 44–83.https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2816Michael H. Birnbaum The Paradoxes of Allais, Stochastic Dominance, and Decision Weights, (Jan 1999): 27–52.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5089-1_3Peter Wakker, Anne Stiggelbout Explaining Distortions in Utility Elicitation through the Rank-dependent Model for Risky Choices, Medical Decision Making 15, no.22 (Jul 2016): 180–186.https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X9501500212Hein Fennema, Peter Wakker An Explanation and Characterization for the Buying of Lotteries, (Jan 1994): 163–175.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1372-4_12Peter Wakker Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion, Theory and Decision 36, no.11 (Jan 1994): 1–44.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01075296Gérard Colson Prenons-nous assez de risque dans les théories du risque?, L'Actualité économique 69, no.11 (Mar 2009): 111–141.https://doi.org/10.7202/602099arPamela K. Lattimore, Joanna R. Baker, Ann D. Witte The influence of probability on risky choice, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 17, no.33 (May 1992): 377–400.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(95)90015-2P. Kischka, C. Puppe Decisions under risk and uncertainty: A survey of recent developments, ZOR Zeitschrift f� Operations Research Methods and Models of Operations Research 36, no.22 (Mar 1992): 125–147.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01417213Thomas Russell Geometric Models Of Decision Making Under Uncertainty, (Jan 1991): 135–143.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3146-9_10Christopher Maxwell Decision weights and the normal form axiom, Economics Letters 32, no.33 (Mar 1990): 211–215.https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(90)90099-MJohn Quiggin Sure things — Dominance and independence rules for choice under uncertainty, Annals of Operations Research 19, no.11 (Dec 1989): 335–357.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02283528M. Weber, C. Camerer Recent developments in modelling preferences under risk, OR Spektrum 9, no.33 (Sep 1987): 129–151.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01721094Huib van de Stadt, Gerrit Antonides, Bernard M.S. van Praag Empirical testing of the expected utility model, Journal of Economic Psychology 5, no.11 (Mar 1984): 17–29.https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(84)90018-7Jagdish Handa Decisions under imperfect knowledge: The certainty equivalence theory as an alternative to the von Neumann-Morgenstern theory of uncertainty, Erkenntnis 20, no.33 (Nov 1983): 295–328.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166391Mark J Machina Axioms and models in decision making under uncertainty, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 27, no.33 (Sep 1983): 328–334.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(83)90016-0John Quiggin A theory of anticipated utility, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 3, no.44 (Dec 1982): 323–343.https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90008-7Andrew P. Sage Behavioral and Organizational Considerations in the Design of Information Systems and Processes for Planning and Decision Support, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 11, no.99 (Sep 1981): 640–678.https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1981.4308761
Referência(s)