Revisão Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Mass Spectrometry Based Glycoproteomics—From a Proteomics Perspective

2010; Elsevier BV; Volume: 10; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1074/mcp.r110.003251

ISSN

1535-9484

Autores

Sheng Pan, Ru Chen, Ruedi Aebersold, Teresa A. Brentnall,

Tópico(s)

Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Resumo

Glycosylation is one of the most important and common forms of protein post-translational modification that is involved in many physiological functions and biological pathways. Altered glycosylation has been associated with a variety of diseases, including cancer, inflammatory and degenerative diseases. Glycoproteins are becoming important targets for the development of biomarkers for disease diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic response to drugs. The emerging technology of glycoproteomics, which focuses on glycoproteome analysis, is increasingly becoming an important tool for biomarker discovery. An in-depth, comprehensive identification of aberrant glycoproteins, and further, quantitative detection of specific glycosylation abnormalities in a complex environment require a concerted approach drawing from a variety of techniques. This report provides an overview of the recent advances in mass spectrometry based glycoproteomic methods and technology, in the context of biomarker discovery and clinical application. Glycosylation is one of the most important and common forms of protein post-translational modification that is involved in many physiological functions and biological pathways. Altered glycosylation has been associated with a variety of diseases, including cancer, inflammatory and degenerative diseases. Glycoproteins are becoming important targets for the development of biomarkers for disease diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic response to drugs. The emerging technology of glycoproteomics, which focuses on glycoproteome analysis, is increasingly becoming an important tool for biomarker discovery. An in-depth, comprehensive identification of aberrant glycoproteins, and further, quantitative detection of specific glycosylation abnormalities in a complex environment require a concerted approach drawing from a variety of techniques. This report provides an overview of the recent advances in mass spectrometry based glycoproteomic methods and technology, in the context of biomarker discovery and clinical application. With recent advances in proteomics, analytical and computational technologies, glycoproteomics—the global analysis of glycoproteins—is rapidly emerging as a subfield of proteomics with high biological and clinical relevance. Glycoproteomics integrates glycoprotein enrichment and proteomics technologies to support the systematic identification and quantification of glycoproteins in a complex sample. The recent development of these techniques has stimulated great interest in applying the technology in clinical translational studies, in particular, protein biomarker research. While glycomics is the study of glycome (repertoire of glycans), glycoproteomics focuses on studying the profile of glycosylated proteins, i.e. the glycoproteome, in a biological system. Considerable work has been done to characterize the sequences and primary structure of the glycan moieties attached to proteins (1.Cooper C.A. Harrison M.J. Wilkins M.R. Packer N.H. GlycoSuiteDB: a new curated relational database of glycoprotein glycan structures and their biological sources.Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29: 332-335Crossref PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar, 2.Rudd P.M. Dwek R.A. Glycosylation: heterogeneity and the 3D structure of proteins.Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1997; 32: 1-100Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 3.Rudd P.M. Guile G.R. Küster B. Harvey D.J. Opdenakker G. Dwek R.A. Oligosaccharide sequencing technology.Nature. 1997; 388: 205-207Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar), and their structural alterations related to cancer (4.Brooks S.A. Carter T.M. Royle L. Harvey D.J. Fry S.A. Kinch C. Dwek R.A. Rudd P.M. Altered glycosylation of proteins in cancer: what is the potential for new anti-tumour strategies.Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2008; 8: 2-21Crossref PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar, 5.Kobata A. Altered glycosylation of surface glycoproteins in tumor cells and its clinical application.Pigment Cell Res. 1989; 2: 304-308Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 6.Kobata A. Amano J. Altered glycosylation of proteins produced by malignant cells, and application for the diagnosis and immunotherapy of tumours.Immunol. Cell Biol. 2005; 83: 429-439Crossref PubMed Scopus (208) Google Scholar). Recent reports have provided a comprehensive overview of the concept of glycomics and its prospective in biomarker research (7.Kam R.K.T. Poon T.C.W. The potentials of glycomics in biomarker discovery.Clin. Proteom. 2008; 4: 67-79Crossref Google Scholar, 8.Shriver Z. Raguram S. Sasisekharan R. Glycomics: a pathway to a class of new and improved therapeutics.Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2004; 3: 863-873Crossref PubMed Scopus (181) Google Scholar, 9.Sierpina V.S. Murray R.K. Glyconutrients: the state of the science and the impact of glycomics.Explore (NY). 2006; 2: 488-494Crossref PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar, 10.Taniguchi N. Toward cancer biomarker discovery using the glycomics approach.Proteomics. 2008; 8: 3205-3208Crossref PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar). In contrast, this review is focused on recent developments in glycoproteomic techniques and their unique application and technical challenge to biomarker discovery. Most secretory and membrane-bound proteins produced by mammalian cells contain covalently linked glycans with diverse structures (2.Rudd P.M. Dwek R.A. Glycosylation: heterogeneity and the 3D structure of proteins.Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1997; 32: 1-100Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). The glycosylation form of a glycoprotein is highly specific at each glycosylation site and generally stable for a given cell type and physiological state. However, the glycosylation form of a protein can be altered significantly because of changes in cellular pathways and processes resulting from diseases, such as cancer, inflammation, and neurodegeneration. Such disease-associated alterations in glycoproteins can happen in one or both of two ways: 1) protein glycosylation sites are either hypo, hyper, or newly glycosylated and/or; 2) the glycosylation form of the attached carbohydrate moiety is altered. In fact, altered glycosylation patterns have long been recognized as hallmarks in cancer progression, in which tumor-specific glycoproteins are actively involved in neoplastic progression and metastasis (5.Kobata A. Altered glycosylation of surface glycoproteins in tumor cells and its clinical application.Pigment Cell Res. 1989; 2: 304-308Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 6.Kobata A. Amano J. Altered glycosylation of proteins produced by malignant cells, and application for the diagnosis and immunotherapy of tumours.Immunol. Cell Biol. 2005; 83: 429-439Crossref PubMed Scopus (208) Google Scholar, 11.Dennis J.W. Granovsky M. Warren C.E. Glycoprotein glycosylation and cancer progression.Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1999; 1473: 21-34Crossref PubMed Scopus (580) Google Scholar, 12.Ono M. Hakomori S. Glycosylation defining cancer cell motility and invasiveness.Glycoconj. J. 2004; 20: 71-78Crossref PubMed Scopus (114) Google Scholar). Sensitive detection of such disease-associated glycosylation changes and abnormalities can provide a unique avenue to develop glycoprotein biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis. In addition, intervention in the glycosylation and carbohydrate-dependent cellular pathways represent a potential new modality for cancer therapies (6.Kobata A. Amano J. Altered glycosylation of proteins produced by malignant cells, and application for the diagnosis and immunotherapy of tumours.Immunol. Cell Biol. 2005; 83: 429-439Crossref PubMed Scopus (208) Google Scholar, 11.Dennis J.W. Granovsky M. Warren C.E. Glycoprotein glycosylation and cancer progression.Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1999; 1473: 21-34Crossref PubMed Scopus (580) Google Scholar, 13.Vlad A.M. Finn O.J. Glycoprotein tumor antigens for immunotherapy of breast cancer.Breast Dis. 2004; 20: 73-79Crossref PubMed Scopus (25) Google Scholar). Table I lists some of the FDA approved cancer biomarkers (14.Ludwig J.A. Weinstein J.N. Biomarkers in cancer staging, prognosis and treatment selection.Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2005; 5: 845-856Crossref PubMed Scopus (1180) Google Scholar, 15.Polanski M. Anderson N.L. A list of candidate cancer biomarkers for targeted proteomics.Biomark. Insights. 2007; 1: 1-48PubMed Google Scholar) that are glycosylated proteins or protein complexes.Table IListing of some of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved cancer biomarkersProtein targetGlycosylationDetectionSourceDiseaseClinical biomarkerα-FetoproteinYesGlycoproteinSerumNonseminomatous testicular cancerDiagnosisHuman chorionic gonadotropin-βYesGlycoproteinSerumTesticular cancerDiagnosisCA19–9YesCarbohydrateSerumPancreatic cancerMonitoringCA125YesGlycoproteinSerumOvarian cancerMonitoringCEA (carcinoembryonic antigen)YesProteinSerumColon cancerMonitoringEpidermal growth factor receptorYesProteinTissueColon cancerTherapy selectionKITYesProtein (IHC)TissueGastrointestinal (GIST) cancerDiagnosis/Therapy selectionThyroglobulinYesProteinSerumThyroid cancerMonitoringPSA-prostate-specific antigen (Kallikrein 3)YesProteinSerumProstate cancerScreening/Monitoring/DiagnosisCA15–3YesGlycoproteinSerumBreast cancerMonitoringCA27–29YesGlycoproteinSerumBreast cancerMonitoringHER2/NEUYesProtein (IHC), ProteinTissue, SerumBreast cancerPrognosis/Therapy selection/MonitoringFibrin/FDP-fibrin degradation proteinYesProteinUrineBladder cancerMonitoringBTA-bladder tumour-associated antigen (Complement factor H related protein)YesProteinUrineBladder cancerMonitoringCEA and mucin (high molecular weight)YesProtein (Immunofluorescence)UrineBladder cancerMonitoring Open table in a new tab Protein biomarker development is a complex and challenging task. The criteria and approach applied for developing each individual biomarker can vary, depending on the purpose of the biomarker and the performance requirement for its clinical application (16.Hartwell L. Mankoff D. Paulovich A. Ramsey S. Swisher E. Cancer biomarkers: a systems approach.Nat. Biotechnol. 2006; 24: 905-908Crossref PubMed Scopus (145) Google Scholar, 17.Pepe M.S. Etzioni R. Feng Z. Potter J.D. Thompson M.L. Thornquist M. Winget M. Yasui Y. Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2001; 93: 1054-1061Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). In general, it has been suggested that the preclinical exploratory phase of protein biomarker development can be technically defined into four stages (18.Rifai N. Gillette M.A. Carr S.A. Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility.Nat. Biotechnol. 2006; 24: 971-983Crossref PubMed Scopus (1238) Google Scholar), including initial discovery of differential proteins; testing and selection of qualified candidates; verification of a subset of candidates; assay development and pre-clinical validation of potential biomarkers. Thanks to recent technological advances, mass spectrometry based glycoproteomics is now playing a major role in the initial phase of discovering aberrant glycoproteins associated with a disease. Glycoprotein enrichment techniques, coupled with multidimensional chromatographic separation and high-resolution mass spectrometry have greatly enhanced the analytical dynamic range and limit of detection for glycoprotein profiling in complex samples such as plasma, serum, other bodily fluids, or tissue. In addition, candidate-based quantitative glycoproteomics platforms have been introduced recently, allowing targeted detection of glycoprotein candidates in complex samples in a multiplexed fashion, providing a complementary tool for glycoprotein biomarker verification in addition to antibody based approaches. It is clear that glycoproteomics is gaining momentum in biomarker research. Glycoproteomic analysis is complicated not only by the variety of carbohydrates, but also by the complex linkage of the glycan to the protein. Glycosylation can occur at several different amino acid residues in the protein sequence. The most common and widely studied forms are N-linked and O-linked glycosylation. O-linked glycans are linked to the hydroxyl group on serine or threonine residues. N-linked glycans are attached to the amide group of asparagine residues in a consensus Asn-X-Ser/Thr sequence (X can be any amino acid except proline) (19.Bause E. Structural requirements of N-glycosylation of proteins. Studies with proline peptides as conformational probes.Biochem. J. 1983; 209: 331-336Crossref PubMed Scopus (499) Google Scholar). Other known, but less well studied forms of glycosylation include glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors attached to protein carboxyl terminus, C-glycosylation that occurs on tryptophan residues (20.Wei X. Li L. Comparative glycoproteomics: approaches and applications.Brief. Funct. Genomic. Proteomic. 2009; 8: 104-113Crossref PubMed Scopus (42) Google Scholar), and S-linked glycosylation through a sulfur atom on cysteine or methionine (21.Floyd N. Vijayakrishnan B. Koeppe J.R. Davis B.G. Thiyl glycosylation of olefinic proteins: S-linked glycoconjugate synthesis.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed Engl. 2009; 48: 7798-7802Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 22.Lote C.J. Weiss J.B. Identification in urine of a low-molecular-weight highly polar glycopeptide containing cysteinyl-galactose.Biochem. J. 1971; 123: 25PCrossref PubMed Google Scholar). Our following discussion is focused on glycoproteomic analysis of the most common N-linked and O-linked glycoproteins. A comprehensive analysis of glycoproteins in a complex biological sample requires a concerted approach. Although the specific methods for sample preparation can be different for different types of samples (e.g. plasma, serum, tissue, and cell lysate), a glycoproteomics pipeline typically consists of glycoprotein or glycopeptide enrichment, multidimensional protein or peptide separation, tandem mass spectrometric analysis, and bioinformatic data interpretation. For glycoprotein-based enrichment methods, proteolytic digestion can be performed before or after glycan cleavage, depending on the specific workflow and enrichment methods used. For glycopeptide enrichment, proteolytic digestion is typically performed before the isolation step so that glycopeptides, instead of glycoproteins, can be captured. For quantitative glycoproteomics profiling, additional steps, such as differential stable isotope labeling of the sample and controls, are required. Fig. 1 illustrates the general strategy for an integrated glycoproteomics analysis. Glycoproteins or glycopeptides can be effectively enriched using a variety of techniques (see below). Following the enrichment step, the workflow then splits into two directions: glycan analysis and glycoprotein analysis. The strategies for glycan analysis have been discussed in several reviews and will not be covered in this report. For glycoprotein analysis, bottom-up workflows (“shotgun proteomics”—peptide based proteomics analysis) (23.Aebersold R. Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics.Nature. 2003; 422: 198-207Crossref PubMed Scopus (5191) Google Scholar) are still most common, providing not only detailed information of a glycoprotein profile, but also the specific mapping of glycosylation sites. It is notable that the reliable analysis of mass spectrometric data in glycoproteomic studies largely relies on bioinformatic tools and glyco-related databases that are available. An increasing number of algorithms and databases for glycan analysis have been developed and well documented in several recent reviews (24.Aoki-Kinoshita K.F. An introduction to bioinformatics for glycomics research.PLoS. Comput. Biol. 2008; 4: e1000075Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 25.von der Lieth C.W. Lütteke T. Frank M. The role of informatics in glycobiology research with special emphasis on automatic interpretation of MS spectra.Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2006; 1760: 568-577Crossref PubMed Scopus (57) Google Scholar, 26.North S.J. Hitchen P.G. Haslam S.M. Dell A. Mass spectrometry in the analysis of N-linked and O-linked glycans.Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2009; 19: 498-506Crossref PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar). For glycoprotein and glycopeptide sequence analysis, a large number of well-characterized and annotated glycoproteins can be found in the UniProt Knowledgebase. In addition, many glycopeptide mass spectra are now available in the continually expanding PeptideAtlas library (27.Deutsch E.W. Lam H. Aebersold R. PeptideAtlas: a resource for target selection for emerging targeted proteomics workflows.EMBO Rep. 2008; 9: 429-434Crossref PubMed Scopus (414) Google Scholar), which stores millions of high-resolution peptide fragment ion mass spectra acquired from a variety of biological and clinical samples for peptide and protein identification. Ultimately, all the data obtained from different aspects of the workflow need to be merged and interpreted in an integrated fashion so that the full extent of glycosylation changes associated with a particular biological state can be better revealed. To the best of our knowledge, the complete glycoform analysis of any glycoprotein in a specific cell type under any specific condition has not yet been accomplished for any glycoprotein with multiple glycosylation sites. Current technology can define the glycan compliment and profile the glycoproteins, but is not capable of putting them together to define the molecular species present. To date, such integrated studies still remain highly challenging, even with advanced tandem mass spectrometry technologies and growing bioinformatic resources (26.North S.J. Hitchen P.G. Haslam S.M. Dell A. Mass spectrometry in the analysis of N-linked and O-linked glycans.Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2009; 19: 498-506Crossref PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar, 28.Tajiri M. Yoshida S. Wada Y. Differential analysis of site-specific glycans on plasma and cellular fibronectins: application of a hydrophilic affinity method for glycopeptide enrichment.Glycobiology. 2005; 15: 1332-1340Crossref PubMed Scopus (107) Google Scholar, 29.Uematsu R. Furukawa J. Nakagawa H. Shinohara Y. Deguchi K. Monde K. Nishimura S. High throughput quantitative glycomics and glycoform-focused proteomics of murine dermis and epidermis.Mol. Cell Proteomics. 2005; 4: 1977-1989Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (93) Google Scholar, 30.Wada Y. Tajiri M. Yoshida S. Hydrophilic affinity isolation and MALDI multiple-stage tandem mass spectrometry of glycopeptides for glycoproteomics.Anal. Chem. 2004; 76: 6560-6565Crossref PubMed Scopus (276) Google Scholar, 31.Wang Y. Wu S.L. Hancock W.S. Approaches to the study of N-linked glycoproteins in human plasma using lectin affinity chromatography and nano-HPLC coupled to electrospray linear ion trap–Fourier transform mass spectrometry.Glycobiology. 2006; 16: 514-523Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar). Characterization of the glycoproteome in a complex biological sample such as plasma, serum, or tissue, is analytically challenging because of the enormous complexity of protein and glycan constituents and the vast dynamic range of protein concentration in the sample. The selective enrichment of the glycoproteome is one of the most efficient ways to simplify the enormous complexity of a biological sample to achieve an in-depth glycoprotein analysis. Two approaches for glycoprotein enrichment have been widely applied: lectin affinity based enrichment methods (31.Wang Y. Wu S.L. Hancock W.S. Approaches to the study of N-linked glycoproteins in human plasma using lectin affinity chromatography and nano-HPLC coupled to electrospray linear ion trap–Fourier transform mass spectrometry.Glycobiology. 2006; 16: 514-523Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar, 32.Geng M. Zhang X. Bina M. Regnier F. Proteomics of glycoproteins based on affinity selection of glycopeptides from tryptic digests.J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 2001; 752: 293-306Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 33.Kaji H. Saito H. Yamauchi Y. Shinkawa T. Taoka M. Hirabayashi J. Kasai K. Takahashi N. Isobe T. Lectin affinity capture, isotope-coded tagging and mass spectrometry to identify N-linked glycoproteins.Nat. Biotechnol. 2003; 21: 667-672Crossref PubMed Scopus (533) Google Scholar, 34.Yang Z. Hancock W.S. Approach to the comprehensive analysis of glycoproteins isolated from human serum using a multi-lectin affinity column.J. Chromatogr. A. 2004; 1053: 79-88Crossref PubMed Scopus (255) Google Scholar, 35.Durham M. Regnier F.E. Targeted glycoproteomics: serial lectin affinity chromatography in the selection of O-glycosylation sites on proteins from the human blood proteome.J. Chromatogr. A. 2006; 1132: 165-173Crossref PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar, 36.Qiu R. Regnier F.E. Use of multidimensional lectin affinity chromatography in differential glycoproteomics.Anal. Chem. 2005; 77: 2802-2809Crossref PubMed Scopus (163) Google Scholar) and hydrazide chemistry-based solid phase extraction methods (37.Zhang H. Li X.J. Martin D.B. Aebersold R. Identification and quantification of N-linked glycoproteins using hydrazide chemistry, stable isotope labeling and mass spectrometry.Nat. Biotechnol. 2003; 21: 660-666Crossref PubMed Scopus (1195) Google Scholar, 38.Liu T. Qian W.J. Gritsenko M.A. Camp D.G. Monroe M.E. Moore R.J. Smith R.D. Human plasma N-glycoproteome analysis by immunoaffinity subtraction, hydrazide chemistry, and mass spectrometry.J. Proteome Res. 2005; 4: 2070-2080Crossref PubMed Scopus (345) Google Scholar, 39.Pan S. Wang Y. Quinn J.F. Peskind E.R. Waichunas D. Wimberger J.T. Jin J. Li J.G. Zhu D. Pan C. Zhang J. Identification of glycoproteins in human cerebrospinal fluid with a complementary proteomic approach.J. Proteome Res. 2006; 5: 2769-2779Crossref PubMed Scopus (78) Google Scholar, 40.Zhang H. Aebersold R. Isolation of glycoproteins and identification of their N-linked glycosylation sites.Methods Mol. Biol. 2006; 328: 177-185PubMed Google Scholar, 41.Sun B. Ranish J.A. Utleg A.G. White J.T. Yan X. Lin B. Hood L. Shotgun glycopeptide capture approach coupled with mass spectrometry for comprehensive glycoproteomics.Mol. Cell Proteomics. 2007; 6: 141-149Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (146) Google Scholar, 42.Zhou Y. Aebersold R. Zhang H. Isolation of N-linked glycopeptides from plasma.Anal. Chem. 2007; 79: 5826-5837Crossref PubMed Scopus (116) Google Scholar). Recent studies have demonstrated that the two methods are complementary and a very effective means for the enrichment of glycoproteins or glycopeptides from human plasma and other bodily fluids (38.Liu T. Qian W.J. Gritsenko M.A. Camp D.G. Monroe M.E. Moore R.J. Smith R.D. Human plasma N-glycoproteome analysis by immunoaffinity subtraction, hydrazide chemistry, and mass spectrometry.J. Proteome Res. 2005; 4: 2070-2080Crossref PubMed Scopus (345) Google Scholar, 39.Pan S. Wang Y. Quinn J.F. Peskind E.R. Waichunas D. Wimberger J.T. Jin J. Li J.G. Zhu D. Pan C. Zhang J. Identification of glycoproteins in human cerebrospinal fluid with a complementary proteomic approach.J. Proteome Res. 2006; 5: 2769-2779Crossref PubMed Scopus (78) Google Scholar, 43.Yang Z. Hancock W.S. Chew T.R. Bonilla L. A study of glycoproteins in human serum and plasma reference standards (HUPO) using multilectin affinity chromatography coupled with RPLC-MS/MS.Proteomics. 2005; 5: 3353-3366Crossref PubMed Scopus (100) Google Scholar). In addition, glycoprotein and glycopeptide enrichment using boronic acid (44.Sparbier K. Koch S. Kessler I. Wenzel T. Kostrzewa M. Selective isolation of glycoproteins and glycopeptides for MALDI-TOF MS detection supported by magnetic particles.J. Biomol. Tech. 2005; 16: 407-413PubMed Google Scholar, 45.Sparbier K. Wenzel T. Kostrzewa M. Exploring the binding profiles of ConA, boronic acid and WGA by MALDI-TOF/TOF MS and magnetic particles.J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2006; 840: 29-36Crossref PubMed Scopus (83) Google Scholar), size-exclusion chromatography (46.Alvarez-Manilla G. Atwood 3rd, J. Guo Y. Warren N.L. Orlando R. Pierce M. Tools for glycoproteomic analysis: size exclusion chromatography facilitates identification of tryptic glycopeptides with N-linked glycosylation sites.J. Proteome Res. 2006; 5: 701-708Crossref PubMed Scopus (158) Google Scholar), hydrophilic interaction (47.Hägglund P. Bunkenborg J. Elortza F. Jensen O.N. Roepstorff P. A new strategy for identification of N-glycosylated proteins and unambiguous assignment of their glycosylation sites using HILIC enrichment and partial deglycosylation.J. Proteome Res. 2004; 3: 556-566Crossref PubMed Scopus (388) Google Scholar) and a graphite powder microcolumn (48.Larsen M.R. Højrup P. Roepstorff P. Characterization of gel-separated glycoproteins using two-step proteolytic digestion combined with sequential microcolumns and mass spectrometry.Mol. Cell Proteomics. 2005; 4: 107-119Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (130) Google Scholar) have been reported. Lectin affinity enrichment is based on the specific binding interaction between a lectin and a distinct glycan structure attached on a glycoprotein (49.Endo T. Fractionation of glycoprotein-derived oligosaccharides by affinity chromatography using immobilized lectin columns.J. Chromatogr. A. 1996; 720: 251-261Crossref PubMed Scopus (59) Google Scholar, 50.Saleemuddin M. Husain Q. Concanavalin A: a useful ligand for glycoenzyme immobilization–a review.Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1991; 13: 290-295Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar). There are a variety of lectin species that can selectively bind to different oligosaccharide epitopes. For instance, concanavalin A (ConA) binds to mannosyl and glucosyl residues of glycoproteins (51.Becker J.W. Reeke Jr., G.N. Wang J.L. Cunningham B.A. Edelman G.M. The covalent and three-dimensional structure of concanavalin A. Structure of the monomer and its interactions with metals and saccharides.J. Biol. Chem. 1975; 250: 1513-1524Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar); wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) binds to N-acetyl-glucosamine and sialic acid (52.Bakry N. Kamata Y. Simpson L.L. Lectins from Triticum vulgaris and Limax flavus are universal antagonists of botulinum neurotoxin and tetanus toxin.J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1991; 258: 830-836PubMed Google Scholar); and jacalin (JAC) specifically recognizes galactosyl (β-1,3) N acetylgalactosamine and O-linked glycoproteins (53.Saulsbury F.T. Alterations in the O-linked glycosylation of IgA1 in children with Henoch-Schonlein purpura.J. Rheumatol. 1997; 24: 2246-2249PubMed Google Scholar). Lectin affinity enrichment has been designed to enrich glycoproteins with specific glycan attachment from plasma, serum, tissue, and other biological samples through affinity chromatography and other methods. Multiple lectin species can also be combined to isolate multiple types of glycoproteins in complex biological samples (54.Cummings R.D. Kornfeld S. Fractionation of asparagine-linked oligosaccharides by serial lectin-Agarose affinity chromatography. A rapid, sensitive, and specific technique.J. Biol. Chem. 1982; 257: 11235-11240Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 55.Qiu R. Regnier F.E. Comparative glycoproteomics of N-linked complex-type glycoforms containing sialic acid in human serum.Anal. Chem. 2005; 77: 7225-7231Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar, 56.Wuhrer M. Catalina M.I. Deelder A.M. Hokke C.H. Glycoproteomics based on tandem mass spectrometry of glycopeptides.J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2007; 849: 115-128Crossref PubMed Scopus (335) Google Scholar, 57.Wang Y. Wu S.L. Hancock W.S. Monitoring of glycoprotein products in cell culture lysates using lectin affinity chromatography and capillary HPLC coupled to electrospray linear ion trap-Fourier transform mass spectrometry (LTQ/FTMS).Biotechnol. Prog. 2006; 22: 873-880Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 58.Yang Z. Harris L.E. Palmer-Toy D.E. Hancock W.S. Multilectin affinity chromatography for characterization of multiple glycoprotein biomarker candidates in serum from breast cancer patients.Clin. Chem. 2006; 52: 1897-1905Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 59.Kullolli M. Hancock W.S. Hincapie M. Preparation of a high-performance multi-lectin affinity chromatography (HP-M-LAC) adsorbent for the analysis of human plasma glycoproteins.J. Sep. Sci. 2008; 31: 2733-2739Crossref PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar). Concanavalin A and wheat germ agglutinin, as well as jacalin are often used together to achieve a more extensive glycproteome characterization (31.Wang Y. Wu S.L. Hancock W.S. Approaches to the study of N-linked glycoproteins in human plasma using lectin affinity chromatography and nano-HPLC coupled to electrospray linear ion trap–Fourier transform mass spectrometry.Glycobiology. 2006; 16: 514-523Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar, 34.Yang Z. Hancock W.S. Approach to the comprehensive analysis of glycoproteins isolated from human serum using a multi-lectin affinity column.J. Chromatogr. A. 2004; 1053: 79-88Crossref PubMed Scopus (255) Google Scholar, 57.Wang Y. Wu S.L. Hancock W.S. Monitoring of glycoprotein products in cell culture lysates using lectin affinity chromatography and capillary HPLC coupled to electrospray linear ion trap-Fourier transform mass spectrometry (LTQ/FTMS).Biotechnol. Prog. 2006; 22: 873-880Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar, 59.Kullolli M. Hancock W.S. Hincapie M. Preparation of a high-performance multi-lectin affinity chromatography (HP-M-LAC) adsorbent for the analysis of human plasma glycoproteins.J. Sep. Sci. 2008; 31: 2733-2739Crossref PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar, 60.Bunkenborg J. Pilch B.J. Podtelejnikov A.V. Wiśniewski J.R. Screening for N-glycosylated proteins by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry.Proteomics. 2004; 4: 454-465Crossref PubMed Scopus (161) Google Scholar). Several repor

Referência(s)