Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Mechanisms of Defibrillation for Monophasic and Biphasic Waveforms

1994; Wiley; Volume: 17; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb01416.x

1540-8159

GRECORY P. WALCOTT, Katherine T. Walcott, Stephen B. Knisley, Xiaohong Zhou, Raymond E. Ideker,

Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Pacing and Clinical ElectrophysiologyVolume 17, Issue 3 p. 478-498 Mechanisms of Defibrillation for Monophasic and Biphasic Waveforms GRECORY P. WALCOTT, GRECORY P. WALCOTT Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, and the Engineering Research Center for Emerging Cardiovascular Technologies of the School of Engineering, Dnke University, Durham, North CarolinaSearch for more papers by this authorKATHERINE T. WALCOTT, KATHERINE T. WALCOTT Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, and the Engineering Research Center for Emerging Cardiovascular Technologies of the School of Engineering, Dnke University, Durham, North CarolinaSearch for more papers by this authorSTEPHEN B. KNISLEY, STEPHEN B. KNISLEY Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, and the Engineering Research Center for Emerging Cardiovascular Technologies of the School of Engineering, Dnke University, Durham, North CarolinaSearch for more papers by this authorXIAOHONG ZHOU, XIAOHONG ZHOU Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, and the Engineering Research Center for Emerging Cardiovascular Technologies of the School of Engineering, Dnke University, Durham, North CarolinaSearch for more papers by this authorRAYMOND E. IDEKER, Corresponding Author RAYMOND E. IDEKER Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, and the Engineering Research Center for Emerging Cardiovascular Technologies of the School of Engineering, Dnke University, Durham, North CarolinaAddress for reprints: Raymond E. Ideker, M.D., Ph.D., Box 3140, Duke University Medical Cetiler. Durham. NC 27710.Search for more papers by this author GRECORY P. WALCOTT, GRECORY P. WALCOTT Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, and the Engineering Research Center for Emerging Cardiovascular Technologies of the School of Engineering, Dnke University, Durham, North CarolinaSearch for more papers by this authorKATHERINE T. WALCOTT, KATHERINE T. WALCOTT Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, and the Engineering Research Center for Emerging Cardiovascular Technologies of the School of Engineering, Dnke University, Durham, North CarolinaSearch for more papers by this authorSTEPHEN B. KNISLEY, STEPHEN B. KNISLEY Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, and the Engineering Research Center for Emerging Cardiovascular Technologies of the School of Engineering, Dnke University, Durham, North CarolinaSearch for more papers by this authorXIAOHONG ZHOU, XIAOHONG ZHOU Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, and the Engineering Research Center for Emerging Cardiovascular Technologies of the School of Engineering, Dnke University, Durham, North CarolinaSearch for more papers by this authorRAYMOND E. IDEKER, Corresponding Author RAYMOND E. IDEKER Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, and the Engineering Research Center for Emerging Cardiovascular Technologies of the School of Engineering, Dnke University, Durham, North CarolinaAddress for reprints: Raymond E. Ideker, M.D., Ph.D., Box 3140, Duke University Medical Cetiler. Durham. NC 27710.Search for more papers by this author First published: March 1994 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb01416.xCitations: 50 Supported in part by the National Institutes of Health research grants HL-42760, HL-44066 and The National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center Grant CDK-8622201. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References 1 Wiggers CJ. The physiologic basis for cardiac resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation; Method for serial defibriliation. Am Heart J 1940; 20: 413–422. 2 Mower MM, Miruwski M, Spear JF, et al. Patterns of ventricular activity during catheter defibrilla-tion. Circulation 1974; 49: 858–861. 3 Zipes DP, Fischer J, King RM, et al. Termination of ventricular fibrillation in dogs by depolarizing a critical amount of myocardium. Am J Cardiol 1975; 36: 37–44. 4 Zhou X, Daubert IP, Wolf PD, et al. Epicardial mapping of ventricular defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in dogs. Circ Res 1993; 72: 145–160. 5 Chen P-S, Shibata N, Dixon EG, et al. Activation during ventricular defibrillation in open-chest dogs; Evidence of complete cessation and regeneration of ventricular fibrillation after unsuccessful shocks. J Clin Invest 1986; 77: 810–823. 6 Chen P-S, Wolf PD, Melnick SB, et al. Comparison of activation during ventricular fibrillation and following unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in open chest dogs. Circ Res 1990; 66: 1544–1560. 7 Shibata N, Chen P-S, Dixon EG, et al. Epicardial activation following unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in dogs. Am J Physiol 1988; 255: H902–H909. 8 Wharton JM, Wolf PD, Smith WM, et al. Cardiac potential and potential gradient fields generated by single, combined, and sequential shocks during ventricular defibrillation. Circulation 1992; 85: 1510–1523. 9 Frazier DW, Wolf PD, Wharton JM, et al. Stimulusinduced critical point; Mechanism for electrical initiation of reentry in normal canine myocardium. J Clin Invest 1989; 83: 1039–1052. 10 Knisley SB, Afework Y, Li J, et al. Dispersion of repolarization induced by a nonuniform shock field. PACE 1991; 14: 1148–1157. 11 Knisley SB, Hill BC, Smith WM, et al. Implications of electrically-induced action potential prolongation for reentry induction in the heart. In JP Morucci, R Plonsey, JL Coatrieux, et al (eds.): Proc 14th Annual Conf of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Paris , France , IEEE, Inc., 1992, p. 633. 12 Knisley SB, Smith WM, Ideker RE. Effect of field stimulation on cellular repolarization in rabbit myocardium; Implications for reentry induction. Circ Res 1992; 70: 707–715. 13 Daubert JP, Frazier DW, Wolf PD, et al. Response of relatively refractory canine myocardium to monophasic and biphasic shocks. Circulation 1991; 84: 2522–2538. 14 Zhou X, Wolf PD, Rollins DL, et al. Effects of monophasic and biphasic shocks on action potentials during ventricular fibrillation in dogs. Circ Res 1993; 73: 325–334. 15 Zhou X, Knisley SB, Wolf PD, et al. Prolongation of repolarization time by electric field stimulation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in open chest dogs. Circ Res 1991; 68: 1761–1767. 16 Rollins DL, Wolf PD, Ideker RE, et al. A programmable cardiac stimulator. In Murray A, R Arzbaecher. (eds.): Proc Computers in Cardiology. Los Alamitos , CA . IEEE Computer Society Press, 1992, pp. 507–510. 17 Dillon SM. Optical recordings in the rabbit heart show that defibrillation strength shocks prolong the duration of depolarization and the refractory period. Circ Res 1991; 69: 842–856. 18 Kao CY, Hoffman BF. Graded and decremental response in heart muscle fibers. Am J Physiol 1958; 194: 187–196. 19 Swartz JF, Jones JL, Jones RE, et al. Conditioning prepulse of biphasic defibrillator waveforms enhances refractoriness to fibrillation wavefronts. Circ Res 1991; 68: 438–449. 20 Sweeney RJ, Gill RM, Reid PR. Characterization of refractory period extension by transcardiac shock. Circulation 1991; 83: 2057–2066. 21 Chen P-S, Shibata N, Dixon EG, et al. Comparison of the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability. Circulation 1986; 73: 1022–1028. 22 Kavanagh KM, Harrison JH, Dixon EG, et al. Correlation of the probability of success curves for defibrillation and for the upper limit of vulnerability. (abstract) PACE 1990; 13: 536. 23 Kavanagh KM, Harrison JH, Dixon EG, et al. The correlation of the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of vulnerability using catheter-patch defibrillating electrodes. (abstract) J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15: 73A. 24 Wharton JM, Richard VJ, Murry CE Jr, et al. Electrophysiological effects of monophasic and biphasic stimuli in normal and infarcted dogs. PACE 1990; 13: 1158–1172. 25 Bacon ME, Vitullo RN, Kasell JH, et al. Upper limit of vulnerability and its relationship to defibrillation threshold in humans. (abstract) PACE 1992; 15: 530. 26 Ideker RE, Hillsley RE, Wharton JM. Shock strength for the implantable defibrillator: Can you have too much of a good thing PACE 1992; 15: 841–844. 27 Yabe S, Smith WM, Daubert JP, et al. Conduction disturbances caused by high current density electric fields. Circ Res 1990; 66: 1190–1203. 28 Hillsley RE, Wharton JM, Cates AW, et al. Why do some patients have high defibrillation thresholds at defibrillator implantation PACE 1993; 17: 222–239. 29 Chen P-S, Wolf PD, Claydon FJ III, et al. The potential gradient field created by epicardial defibrillation electrodes in dogs, Circulation 1986; 74: 626–636. 30 Witkowski FX, Penkoske PA, Plonsey R. Mechanism of cardiac defibrillation in open-chest dogs with unipolar DG-coupled simultaneous activation and shock potential recordings. Circulation 1990; 82: 244–260. 31 Tang ASL, Wolf PD, Claydon FJ III, et al. Measurement of defibrillation shock potential distributions and activation sequences of the heart in three-dimensions. Proc IEEE 1988; 76: 1176–1186. 32 Tang ASL, Wolf PD, Afework Y, et al. Three-di-mensional potential gradient fields generated by intracardiac catheter and cutaneous patch electrodes. Circulation 1992; 85: 1857–1864. 33 Kavanagh KM, Simpson EV, Wolf PD, et al. Minimum gradient required for biphasic defibrillation. (abstract) PACE 1993; 16: 916. 34 Ideker RE, Wolf PD, Alferness CA, et al. Current concepts for selecting the location, size, and shape of defibrillation electrodes. PACE 1991; 14: 227–240. 35 Davy IM, Fain ES, Dorian P, et al. The relationship between successful defibrillation and delivered energy in open-chest dogs; Reappraisal of the "defibrillation threshold" concept. Am Heart J 1987; 113: 77–84. 36 Merrill JJ, Ideker RE. Mechanisms of ventricular defibrillation. In ME Losephson (ed.): Sudden Cardiac Death. Cambridge , MA , Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1993, pp. 312–344. 37 Kavanagh KM, Tang ASL, Rollins DL, et al. Comparison of the internal defibrillation thresholds for monophasic and double and single capacitor biphasic waveforms. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 14: 1343–1349. 38 Chapman PD, Wetherbee JN, Vetter JW, et al. Strength-duration curves of fixed pulse width variable tilt truncated exponential waveforms for nonthoracotomy internal defibrillation in dogs. PACE 1988; 11: 1045–1050. 39 Dixon EG, Tang ASL, Wolf PD, et al. Improved defibrillation thresholds with large contoured epicardial electrodes and biphasic waveforms. Circulation 1987; 76: 1176–1184. 40 Feeser SA, Tang ASL, Kavanagh KM. et al. Strength-duration and probability of success curves for defibrillation with biphasic waveforms. Circulation 1990; 82: 2128–2141. 41 Swartz J, Jomes JL, Fletcher R. Symmetrical biphasic defibrillator waveforms enhance refractory period stimulation in the human heart. (abstract) J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17: 335A. 42 Bardy GH, Ivey TD, Allen MD, et al. A prospective randomized evaluation of biphasic versus monophasic waveform pulses on defibrillation efficacy in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 14: 728–733. 43 Saksena S, An H, Mehra R, et al. Prospective comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for impiantable cardioverter-defibrillators using endocardial leads. Am J Cardiol 1992; 70: 304–310. 44 Johnson EE, Hagler JA, Alferness CA, et al. Internal and external defibrillation with biphasic and monophasic waveforms of different durations. Submitted. 45 Walcott GP, Hagler JA, Walker RG, et al. Comparison of monophasic, biphasic, and the Edmark waveform for external defibrillation. (abstract) PACE 1992; 15: 563. 46 Cooper RAS, Alferness CA, Smith WM, et al. Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in sheep. Circulation 1993; 87: 1673–1686. 47 Scott BD, Kallok MJ, Birkett C, et al. Transthoracic defibrillation; Effect of dual-pathway sequential pulse shocks and single-pathway biphasic pulse shocks in a canine model. Am Heart J 1992; 125: 99–109. 48 Tang ASL, Yabe S, Wharton IM, et al. Ventricular defibrillation using biphasic waveforms; The importance of phasic duration. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13: 207–214. 49 Chapman PD, Vetter JW, Souza JJ, et al. Comparative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic truncated exponential shocks for nonthoracotomy internal defibrillation in dogs. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12: 739–745. 50 Cooper RAS, Wallenius ST, Smith WM, et al. The effect of phase separation on biphasic waveform defibrillation. PACE 1993; 16: 471–482. 51 Walker RG, Walcott GP, Swanson DK, et al. Relationship of charge distribution between phases in biphasic waveforms. (abstract) Circulation 1992; 86: 1–792. 52 Hillsley RE, Walker RG, Swanson DK, et al. Is the second phase of a biphasic defibrillation waveform the defibrillating phase PACE 1993; 16: 1401–1411. 53 Walcott GP, Rollins DL, Smith WM, et al. Defibrillation efficacy of biphasic waveforms improved by raising phase 2 leading edge voltage. (abstract) PACE 1992; 15: 529. 54 Walcott GP, Rollins DL, Smith WM, et al. Effects of changing capacitors between phases of a biphasic shock on defibrillation efficacy. (abstract) J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 366A. 55 Walcott GP, Rollins DL, Smith WM, et al. Optimal capacitance value for a parallel-series defibrillator. (abstract) J Am Coll Cardiot 1993; 21: 307A. 56 Walker RG, Walcott GP, Smith WM, et al. Strength duration curves for short time constant truncated exponential monophasic waveforms. (abstract) PACE 1993; 16: 915. 57 Blanchard SM, Ideker RE, Cooper RS, et al. The defibrillation waveform. In; MW Kroll, MH Lehmann, eds. Impiantabie Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy; The Engineering/Clinical Interface. Norwell . Kluwer Academic Publishers, In Press. 58 Knisley SB, Smith WM, Ideker RE. Effect of intrastimulus polarity reversal on electric field stimulation thresholds in frog and rabbit myocardium. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1992; 3: 239–254. 59 Gates AW, Souza JI, Hillsley RE, et al. Probability of defibrillation success and incidence of postshock arrhythmias as a function of shock strength. (abstract) J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 305A. 60 Ideker RE, Alferness C, Hagler J, et al. Rotor site correlates with defibrillation waveform efficacy. (abstract) Circulation 1991; 84: II-499. Citing Literature Volume17, Issue3March 1994Pages 478-498 ReferencesRelatedInformation