Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

What Else Justification Could Be 1

2010; Wiley; Volume: 44; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1468-0068.2009.00729.x

ISSN

1468-0068

Autores

Martin Smith,

Tópico(s)

Philosophical Ethics and Theory

Resumo

NoûsVolume 44, Issue 1 p. 10-31 What Else Justification Could Be† Martin Smith, Martin Smith University of GlasgowSearch for more papers by this author Martin Smith, Martin Smith University of GlasgowSearch for more papers by this author First published: 22 February 2010 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2009.00729.xCitations: 97Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Adler, J. (2002) Belief's Own Ethics ( Cambridge , MA : MIT Press) 10.7551/mitpress/1554.001.0001 Web of Science®Google Scholar Bar-Hillel, M. and Wagenaar, W. (1991) 'The perception of randomness' in Advances in Applied Mathematics v12, pp 428–454 Web of Science®Google Scholar Butler, J. 1736 The Analogy of Religion ( London : J.M.Dent and Co., 1906) Google Scholar Carnap, R. (1950) The Logical Foundations of Probability ( Chicago : University of Chicago Press) Google Scholar Cavell, S. (1979) The Claim of Reason ( Oxford : Oxford University Press) Google Scholar Chisholm, R. (1957) Perceiving ( Ithaca , NY : Cornell University Press) Google Scholar Christensen, D. (1999) 'Measuring confirmation Journal of Philosophy v96, pp 437–461 10.2307/2564707 Web of Science®Google Scholar Cohen, S. (1988) ' How to be a fallibilist Philosophical Perspectives v2, pp 91–123 Google Scholar DeRose, K. (1996) 'Knowledge, assertion and lotteries Australasian Journal of Philosophy v74, pp 568–580 10.1080/00048409612347531 Web of Science®Google Scholar Descartes, R. 1628 Rules for the Direction of the Mind ( Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1911) Google Scholar Douven, I. (2006) 'Assertion, knowledge and rational credibility Philosophical Review v115(4) Google Scholar Douven, I. and Williamson, T. (2006) 'Generalising the lottery paradox British Journal for the Philosophy of Science v57(4), pp 755–779 10.1093/bjps/axl022 Web of Science®Google Scholar Diener, D. and Thompson, W. (1985) 'Recognizing randomness American Journal of Psychology v98 pp 433–447 10.2307/1422628 Web of Science®Google Scholar Dudman, V. (1992) 'Probability and assertion Analysis v52, pp 204–211 Web of Science®Google Scholar Eells, E. and Fitelson, B. (2000) 'Measuring confirmation and evidence Journal of Philosophy v97, pp 663–672 10.2307/2678462 Web of Science®Google Scholar Falk, R. (1981) ' The perception of randomness Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education ( Grenoble : Laboratoire IMAG) Google Scholar Falk, R. and Konold, C. (1997) 'Making sense of randomness: Implicit encoding as a basis for judgment Psychological Review v104, pp 301–318 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.301 Web of Science®Google Scholar Field, H. (2003) 'No fact of the matter Australasian Journal of Philosophy, v81, pp 457–480 10.1080/713659756 Web of Science®Google Scholar Foley, R. (1987) The Theory of Epistemic Rationality ( Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press) 10.4159/harvard.9780674334236 Google Scholar Foley, R. (1992) 'The epistemology of belief and the epistemology of degrees of belief American Philosophical Quarterly v29, pp 111–121 Google Scholar Foley, R. (1993) Working Without a Net ( Oxford : Oxford University Press) Google Scholar Fumerton, R. (1995) Metaepistemology and Scepticism ( Lanham , MD : Rowman and Littlefield) Google Scholar Fumerton, R. (2005) ' The challenge of refuting scepticism' in M. Steup and E. Sosa eds. Contemporary Debates in Epistemology ( Malden , MA : Blackwell Publishing) Web of Science®Google Scholar Goldman, A. (1986) Epistemology and Cognition ( Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press) Google Scholar Harman, G. (1986) Change in View ( Cambridge , MA : MIT Press) Google Scholar Hawthorne, James (1996) 'On the logic of nonmonotonic conditionals and conditional probabilities Journal of Philosophical Logic v25, pp 185–218 Google Scholar Hawthorne, James and Bovens, L. (1999) 'The preface, the lottery and the logic of belief Mind v108, pp 241–264 10.1093/mind/108.430.241 Web of Science®Google Scholar Hawthorne, John. (2003) Knowledge and Lotteries ( Oxford : Oxford University Press) 10.1093/0199269556.001.0001 Google Scholar Howson, C. and Urbach, P. (1993) Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach ( Chicago : Open Court) Google Scholar Hume, D. 1739 A Treatise of Human Nature ( London : Dent, 1911) Google Scholar Jeffrey, R. (1968) ' Probable knowledge' in I. Lakatos ed. The Problem of Inductive Logic ( Amsterdam : North Holland) 10.1016/S0049-237X(08)71044-9 Google Scholar Jeffrey, R. (1970) ' Dracula meets wolfman: Acceptance vs. partial belief ', in M. Swain ed., Induction, Acceptance, and Rational Belief ( Dordrecht : Reidel) 10.1007/978-94-010-3390-9_8 Google Scholar Kaplan, M. (1981) 'A Bayesian theory of rational acceptance Journal of Philosophy v78, pp 305–330 10.2307/2026127 Web of Science®Google Scholar Kaplan, M. (1996) Decision Theory as Philosophy ( Cambridge : Cambridge University Press) 10.1017/CBO9780511804847 Google Scholar Kvanvig, J. (2007) ' Assertion, knowledge and lotteries' in D. Pritchard and P. Greenough eds. Williamson on Knowledge ( Oxford : Oxford University Press) Google Scholar Kyburg, H. (1961) Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief ( Middleton : Wesleyan University Press) Google Scholar Lehrer, K. (1974) Knowledge ( Oxford : Clarendon Press) Google Scholar Leslie, S. (2008) 'Generics: Cognition and acquisition Philosophical Review v117(1), pp 1–47 10.1215/00318108-2007-023 Web of Science®Google Scholar Lewis, D. (1980) ' A subjectivist's guide to objective chance' in Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability vol. II (University of California Press) 10.1525/9780520318328-009 Web of Science®Google Scholar Locke, J. 1689 An Essay Concerning Human Understanding ( Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1975) Google Scholar Lopes, L. and Oden, G. (1987) 'Distinguishing between random and non-random events Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition v8, pp 626–636 Google Scholar Maher, P. (1993) Betting on Theories ( Cambridge : Cambridge University Press) 10.1017/CBO9780511527326 Google Scholar Makinson, D. (1965) 'The paradox of the preface', Analysis v25, pp 205–7 Google Scholar Millikan, R. (1984) Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories ( Cambridge , MA : MIT Press) 10.7551/mitpress/4124.001.0001 Google Scholar Nelkin, D. (2000) 'The lottery paradox, knowledge and rationality Philosophical Review v109, pp 373–409 10.1215/00318108-109-3-373 Google Scholar Nickerson, R. (2002) 'The production and perception of randomness Psychological Review v109, pp 330–357 10.1037/0033-295X.109.2.330 Web of Science®Google Scholar Okasha, S. (2004) 'Wright on the transmission of support: A Bayesian analysis Analysis v64, pp 139–146 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2004.00475.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Pietroski, P. and Rey, G. (1995) 'When other things aren't equal: Saving "ceteris paribus" laws from vacuity British Journal for the Philosophy of Science v46, pp 81–110 10.1093/bjps/46.1.81 Web of Science®Google Scholar Pollock, J. (1986) Contemporary Theories of Knowledge (Rowman and Littlefield) Google Scholar Pollock, J. (1990) Nomic Probability and the Foundations of Induction ( Oxford : Oxford University Press) 10.1093/oso/9780195060133.001.0001 Google Scholar Pritchard, D. (2007) ' Sensitivity, safety and anti-luck epistemology' in J. Greco ed. The Oxford Handbook of Scepticism ( Oxford : Oxford University Press) Google Scholar Pryor, J. (2004) 'What's wrong with Moore's argument? Philosophical Issues 14: Epistemology 10.1111/j.1533-6077.2004.00034.x Google Scholar Pryor, J. (2005) ' Is there immediate justification?' in E. Sosa and M. Steup eds. Contemporary Debates in Epistemology ( Oxford : Blackwell) Google Scholar Ross, B. and Levy, N. (1958) 'Patterned prediction of chance events by children and adults Psychological Reports v4, pp 87–124 10.2466/PR0.4..87-124 Google Scholar Russell, B. (1948) Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits ( London : Unwin) Google Scholar Ryan, S. (1991) 'The preface paradox Philosophical Studies v64, pp 293–307 10.1007/BF00365003 Web of Science®Google Scholar Ryan, S. (1996) 'The epistemic virtues of consistency Synthese v109, pp 121–141 10.1007/BF00413765 Web of Science®Google Scholar Savage, L. (1972) Foundations of Statistics ( New York : Dover) Google Scholar Schaffer, J. (2007) 'Deterministic chance? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science vv58, pp 113–140 10.1093/bjps/axm002 Web of Science®Google Scholar Schiffer, S. (2003) The Things We Mean ( Oxford : Oxford University Press) 10.1093/0199257760.001.0001 Google Scholar Shope, R. (1978) 'The conditional fallacy in modern philosophy Journal of Philosophy v75, pp 397–413 10.2307/2025564 Web of Science®Google Scholar Smith, M. (2007) 'Ceteris paribus conditionals and comparative normalcy', Journal of Philosophical Logic, v36(1) Google Scholar Smith, M. (2009) 'Transmission failure explained Philosophy and Phenomenological Research v79(1) Google Scholar Sorensen, Roy, (2006) ' Epistemic paradoxes', The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2006 Edition), E. Zalta ed. URL = Google Scholar Stanley, J. (2005) Knowledge and Practical Interests ( Oxford : Clarendon Press) 10.1093/0199288038.001.0001 Google Scholar Sturgeon, S. (2008) 'Reason and the grain of belief Nous v42(1) Google Scholar Vogel, J. (1990) ' Are there counterexamples to the closure principle?' in M. Roth and G. Ross (eds.), Doubting: Contemporary Perspectives on Skepticism ( Dordrecht : Kluwer) 10.1007/978-94-009-1942-6_2 Web of Science®Google Scholar Vogel, J. (1999) 'The new relevant alternatives theory', Philosophical Perspectives, v13, pp 155–80 Google Scholar Williamson, T. (2000) Knowledge and its Limits ( Oxford : Oxford University Press) Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume44, Issue1March 2010Pages 10-31 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Referência(s)