Allometry and Sexual Differences in Leaf Size
1988; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 131; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/284830
ISSN1537-5323
AutoresWilliam J. Bond, Jeremy J. Midgley,
Tópico(s)Fern and Epiphyte Biology
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsAllometry and Sexual Differences in Leaf SizeW. J. Bond and J. MidgleyW. J. Bond and J. MidgleyPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 131, Number 6Jun., 1988 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/284830 Views: 24Total views on this site Citations: 75Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1988 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Jeremy J. Midgley, Michael D. Cramer Unequal allocation between male versus female reproduction cannot explain extreme vegetative dimorphism in Aulax species (Cape Proteaceae), Scientific Reports 12, no.11 (Jan 2022).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05558-4Sohel Rana, Razia Sultana Jemim, Zhi Li, Xiaodong Geng, Yanmei Wang, Qifei Cai, Zhen Liu Study of the pattern of reproductive allocation and fruit development in young dioecious trees of Idesia polycarpa Maxim, South African Journal of Botany 146 (May 2022): 472–480.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2021.11.044Mathias Scharmann, Anthony G Rebelo, John R Pannell High rates of evolution preceded shifts to sex-biased gene expression in Leucadendron, the most sexually dimorphic angiosperms, eLife 10 (Nov 2021).https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67485Mariola Rabska, Nigel W M Warwick, Grzegorz Iszkuło, Caroline L Gross, Lonnie Aarssen Intersexual differences in leaf size and shape in dioecious Adriana tomentosa, Journal of Plant Ecology 14, no.11 (Nov 2020): 67–83.https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtaa082Veenu Kaul, Madhu Raina Sexual Selection in Angiosperms: Paradox Re-visited, (Aug 2020): 245–274.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4210-7_12Luis Santos del Blanco, Eleri Tudor, John R. Pannell, José Marìa Gomez Low siring success of females with an acquired male function illustrates the legacy of sexual dimorphism in constraining the breakdown of dioecy, Ecology Letters 22, no.33 (Jan 2019): 486–497.https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13207Pierre‐Éric Lauri Corner's rules as a framework for plant morphology, architecture and functioning – issues and steps forward, New Phytologist 221, no.44 (Oct 2018): 1679–1684.https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15503Adam B. Roddy, Justin J. van Blerk, Jeremy J. Midgley, Adam G. West Ramification has little impact on shoot hydraulic efficiency in the sexually dimorphic genus Leucadendron (Proteaceae), PeerJ 7 (May 2019): e6835.https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6835David Bruy, Tom Hattermann, Laure Barrabé, Arnaud Mouly, Daniel Barthélémy, Sandrine Isnard Evolution of Plant Architecture, Functional Diversification and Divergent Evolution in the Genus Atractocarpus (Rubiaceae) for New Caledonia, Frontiers in Plant Science 9 (Dec 2018).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01775Adolfo Rosati, Andrea Paoletti, Raeed Al Hariri, Franco Famiani, Michael Ryan Fruit production and branching density affect shoot and whole-tree wood to leaf biomass ratio in olive, Tree Physiology 38, no.99 (Feb 2018): 1278–1285.https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpy009Jeanne Tonnabel, Patrice David, John R. Pannell Sex-specific strategies of resource allocation in response to competition for light in a dioecious plant, Oecologia 185, no.44 (Oct 2017): 675–686.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3966-5Anne-Marie Labouche, John R. Pannell A test of the size-constraint hypothesis for a limit to sexual dimorphism in plants, Oecologia 181, no.33 (Apr 2016): 873–884.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3616-3Megan R. Welsford, Nina Hobbhahn, Jeremy J. Midgley, Steven D. Johnson Floral trait evolution associated with shifts between insect and wind pollination in the dioecious genus Leucadendron (Proteaceae), Evolution 70, no.11 (Dec 2015): 126–139.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12821Patrick H. Kavanagh, Kevin C. Burns Sexual size dimorphism in island plants: the niche variation hypothesis and insular size changes, Oikos 124, no.66 (Nov 2014): 717–723.https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.01753Michiko Nakagawa, Tomohiro Isogimi, Michiko Inanaga, Kosei Abe, Tomoya Okada, Watanabe Yoichi, Koji Kobayakawa, Chikage Toyama, Keisuke Ito, Naomichi Kawashima, Kanae Otani, Megumi Hori, Saori Tani, Keigo Higuchi, Iku Asano, Kazuma Kawahara, Ayaka Yamauchi, Daisuke Kato, Michinari Matsushita Inter-specific and sexual differences in architectural traits of two dioecious Lindera species (Lauraceae), Plant Ecology 216, no.11 (Oct 2014): 99–109.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0419-7Wendy E. Van Drunen, Marcel E. Dorken Wind pollination, clonality, and the evolutionary maintenance of spatial segregation of the sexes, Evolutionary Ecology 28, no.66 (Aug 2014): 1121–1138.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-014-9733-8Andrew B. Leslie, Jeremy M. Beaulieu, Peter R. Crane, Michael J. Donoghue Cone size is related to branching architecture in conifers, New Phytologist 203, no.44 (May 2014): 1119–1127.https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12864Adam B. Roddy, C. Matt Guilliams, Terapan Lilittham, Jessica Farmer, Vanessa Wormser, Trang Pham, Paul V.A. Fine, Taylor S. Feild, Todd E. Dawson Uncorrelated evolution of leaf and petal venation patterns across the angiosperm phylogeny, Journal of Experimental Botany 64, no.1313 (Aug 2013): 4081–4088.https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert247S. L. Scott, L. W. Aarssen Leaf size versus leaf numbertrade-offs in dioecious angiosperms, Journal of Plant Ecology 6, no.11 (Sep 2012): 29–35.https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rts029Andrew B. Leslie Branching habit and the allocation of reproductive resources in conifers, Annals of Botany 110, no.44 (Jul 2012): 915–921.https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs150Nathaniel T. Wheelwright, Jordan P. Sinclair, Cris Hochwender, Fredric J. Janzen Leaf size in three generations of a dioecious tropical tree, Ocotea tenera (Lauraceae): Sexual dimorphism and changes with age, American Journal of Botany 99, no.88 (Aug 2012): 1350–1355.https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1200182Lynda F. Delph, Christopher R. Herlihy SEXUAL, FECUNDITY, AND VIABILITY SELECTION ON FLOWER SIZE AND NUMBER IN A SEXUALLY DIMORPHIC PLANT, Evolution 66, no.44 (Dec 2011): 1154–1166.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01510.xLeonor Álvarez-Cansino, Mari Cruz Díaz Barradas, María Zunzunegui, Mari Paz Esquivias, Todd E. Dawson Gender-specific variation in physiology in the dioecious shrub Corema album throughout its distributional range, Functional Plant Biology 39, no.1212 (Jan 2012): 968.https://doi.org/10.1071/FP12131P. H. Kavanagh, C. A. Lehnebach, M. J. Shea, and K. C. Burns Allometry of Sexual Size Dimorphism in Dioecious Plants: Do Plants Obey Rensch's Rule?, The American Naturalist 178, no.55 (Jul 2015): 596–601.https://doi.org/10.1086/662175Robert Brus, Dalibor Ballian, Peter Zhelev, Marija Pandža, Martin Bobinac, Jane Acevski, Yannis Raftoyannis, Kristjan Jarni Absence of geographical structure of morphological variation in Juniperus oxycedrus L. subsp. oxycedrus in the Balkan Peninsula, European Journal of Forest Research 130, no.44 (Dec 2010): 657–670.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0457-1ALASTAIR J. POTTS, JEREMY J. MIDGLEY, MATTHEW F. CHILD, CIARA LARSEN, TESSA HEMPSON Coexistence theory in the Cape Floristic Region: revisiting an example of leaf niches in the Proteaceae, Austral Ecology 36, no.22 (Mar 2011): 212–219.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2010.02140.x Elze Hesse and John R. Pannell Sexual Dimorphism in Androdioecious Mercurialis annua, A Wind-Pollinated Herb, International Journal of Plant Sciences 172, no.11 (Jul 2015): 49–59.https://doi.org/10.1086/657279Leonor Álvarez-Cansino, María Zunzunegui, Mari Cruz Díaz Barradas, Mari Paz Esquivias Gender-specific costs of reproduction on vegetative growth and physiological performance in the dioecious shrub Corema album, Annals of Botany 106, no.66 (Sep 2010): 989–998.https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq197J.J. Midgley Causes of secondary sexual differences in plants — Evidence from extreme leaf dimorphism in Leucadendron (Proteaceae), South African Journal of Botany 76, no.33 (Aug 2010): 588–592.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2010.05.001Mark S. Harris, John R. Pannell Canopy seed storage is associated with sexual dimorphism in the woody dioecious genus Leucadendron, Journal of Ecology 98, no.22 (Jan 2010): 509–515.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01623.xKevin C. Burns, Babs Lake Fruit–frugivore interactions in two southern hemisphere forests: allometry, phylogeny and body size, Oikos 118, no.1212 (Nov 2009): 1901–1907.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17661.xAnna L. Jacobsen, Karen J. Esler, R. Brandon Pratt, Frank W. Ewers Water stress tolerance of shrubs in Mediterranean‐type climate regions: Convergence of fynbos and succulent karoo communities with California shrub communities, American Journal of Botany 96, no.88 (Aug 2009): 1445–1453.https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0800424Frédéric Normand, Abdoul Kowir Pambo Bello, Catherine Trottier, Pierre-Éric Lauri Is axis position within tree architecture a determinant of axis morphology, branching, flowering and fruiting? An essay in mango, Annals of Botany 103, no.88 (Apr 2009): 1325–1336.https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp079Mark E. Olson, Rebeca Aguirre‐Hernández, Julieta A. Rosell Universal foliage‐stem scaling across environments and species in dicot trees: plasticity, biomechanics and Corner's Rules, Ecology Letters 12, no.33 (Feb 2009): 210–219.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01275.xTeruya Fujitaka, Satoki Sakai Sexual dimorphism in clonal growth forms and ramet distribution patterns in Rumex acetosella (Polygonaceae), Ecological Research 22, no.22 (Aug 2006): 248–254.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-006-0020-1Åsa M. Hemborg, William J. Bond Do browsing elephants damage female trees more?, African Journal of Ecology 45, no.11 (Aug 2006): 41–48.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.2006.00666.xDAVID KLEIMAN, LONNIE W. AARSSEN The leaf size/number trade‐off in trees, Journal of Ecology 95, no.22 (Feb 2007): 376–382.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01205.xANNA L. JACOBSEN, LIZE AGENBAG, KAREN J. ESLER, R. BRANDON PRATT, FRANK W. EWERS, STEPHEN D. DAVIS Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean‐type climate region of South Africa, Journal of Ecology 95, no.11 (Oct 2006): 171–183.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01186.xN. G. Prasad, S. Bedhomme Sexual conflict in plants, Journal of Genetics 85, no.33 (Dec 2006): 161–164.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02935325M. Medrano, M. C. Castellanos, C. M. Herrera Comparative floral and vegetative differentiation between two European Aquilegia taxa along a narrow contact zone, Plant Systematics and Evolution 262, no.3-43-4 (Nov 2006): 209–224.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-006-0473-2ANDREA LEIGH, MEREDITH J. COSGROVE, ADRIENNE B. NICOTRA Reproductive allocation in a gender dimorphic shrub: anomalous female investment in Gynatrix pulchella ?, Journal of Ecology 94, no.66 (Jul 2006): 1261–1271.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01164.xPierre‐éric Lauri, Karen Maguylo, Catherine Trottier Architecture and size relations: an essay on the apple ( Malus × domestica , Rosaceae) tree, American Journal of Botany 93, no.33 (Mar 2006): 357–368.https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.93.3.357Jaacov Ben‐Jaacov, Avner Silber Leucadendron : A Major Proteaceous Floricultural Crop, (Jul 2010): 167–228.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470767986.ch4C. Hornung-Leoni, V. Sosa Morphological variation in Puya (Bromeliaceae): an allometric study, Plant Systematics and Evolution 256, no.1-41-4 (Sep 2005): 35–53.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-005-0302-z Tia‐Lynn Ashman The Limits on Sexual Dimorphism in Vegetative Traits in a Gynodioecious Plant. T.‐L. Ashman, The American Naturalist 166, no.S4S4 (Jul 2015): S5–S16.https://doi.org/10.1086/444598ÅSA M. HEMBORG, WILLIAM J. BOND Different rewards in female and male flowers can explain the evolution of sexual dimorphism in plants, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 85, no.11 (Apr 2005): 97–109.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00477.xMattieu Bégin, Derek A. Roff FROM MICRO- TO MACROEVOLUTION THROUGH QUANTITATIVE GENETIC VARIATION: POSITIVE EVIDENCE FROM FIELD CRICKETS, Evolution 58, no.1010 (Oct 2004): 2287–2304.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01604.xPierre‐Éric Lauri, Catherine Trottier Patterns of size and fate relationships of contiguous organs in the apple ( Malus domestica ) crown, New Phytologist 163, no.33 (Jul 2004): 533–546.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01136.xMattieu Bégin, Derek A. Roff FROM MICRO- TO MACROEVOLUTION THROUGH QUANTITATIVE GENETIC VARIATION: POSITIVE EVIDENCE FROM FIELD CRICKETS, Evolution 58, no.1010 (Jan 2004): 2287.https://doi.org/10.1554/04-059Taylor S. Feild, Nan Crystal Arens, James A. Doyle, Todd E. Dawson, Michael J. Donoghue Dark and disturbed: a new image of early angiosperm ecology, Paleobiology 30, no.11 (Jan 2004): 82–107.https://doi.org/10.1666/0094-8373(2004)030 2.0.CO;2Katherine A. Preston, David D. Ackerly Hydraulic architecture and the evolution of shoot allometry in contrasting climates, American Journal of Botany 90, no.1010 (Oct 2003): 1502–1512.https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.10.1502L. F. Delph, F. N. Knapczyk, D. R. Taylor Among-population variation and correlations in sexually dimorphic traits of Silene latifolia, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15, no.66 (Nov 2002): 1011–1020.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00467.xMark Westoby, Daniel S. Falster, Angela T. Moles, Peter A. Vesk, Ian J. Wright Plant Ecological Strategies: Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33, no.11 (Nov 2002): 125–159.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150452Carlos M. Herrera Correlated evolution of fruit and leaf size in bird‐dispersed plants: species‐level variance in fruit traits explained a bit further?, Oikos 97, no.33 (Jul 2002): 426–432.https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970312.xS. Bopp Peculiarities of the Inner Calyx Surface of Caryophylloideae with Special Regard to Sexual Dimorphism in two Dioecious Species1, Plant Biology 1, no.22 (Jun 2008): 207–213.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1999.tb00245.xTodd E. Dawson, Monica A. Geber Sexual Dimorphism in Physiology and Morphology, (Jan 1999): 175–215.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03908-3_7William J. Bond, Kristal E. Maze Survival costs and reproductive benefits of floral display in a sexually dimorphic dioecious shrub, Leucadendron xanthoconus, Evolutionary Ecology 13, no.11 (Jan 1999): 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006581412580Joseph A. Antos, Geraldine A. Allen Patterns of reproductive effort in male and female shrubs of Oemleria cerasiformis: a 6‐year study, Journal of Ecology 87, no.11 (Jan 2004): 77–84.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00331.x D. D. Ackerly and M. J. Donoghue Leaf Size, Sapling Allometry, and Corner's Rules: Phylogeny and Correlated Evolution in Maples (Acer) Ackerly Etal, The American Naturalist 152, no.66 (Jul 2015): 767–791.https://doi.org/10.1086/286208R.M Cowling, D Kirkwood, J.J Midgley, S.M. Pierce Invasion and persistence of bird‐dispersed, subtropical thicket and forest species in fire‐prone coastal fynbos, Journal of Vegetation Science 8, no.44 (Feb 2009): 475–488.https://doi.org/10.2307/3237199D. Carl Freeman, Jon Lovett Doust, Ali El-Keblawy, Kathleen J. Miglia, E. Durant McArthur Sexual specialization and inbreeding avoidance in the evolution of dioecy, The Botanical Review 63, no.11 (Jan 1997): 65–92.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02857918Stefan Andersson Flower-fruit size allometry at three taxonomic levels in Crepis (Asteraceae), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 58, no.44 (Jan 2008): 401–407.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01443.xN. Machon, V. Deletre-Le Boulc'h, C. Rameau Quantitative analysis of sexual dimorphism in Asparagus, Canadian Journal of Botany 73, no.1111 (Nov 1995): 1780–1786.https://doi.org/10.1139/b95-190Monica A. Geber Fitness effects of sexual dimorphism in plants, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10, no.66 (Jun 1995): 222–223.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89068-0Joel P. Stafstrom Developmental Potential of Shoot Buds, (Jan 1995): 257–279.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012276460-8/50014-XMARIANNA DE KOCK, KAREN I. THERON, PIETER SWART, ELMAR W. WEILER, DIRK U. BELLSTEDT Cytokinins in the xylem sap of the dioecious fynbos shrub, Leucadendron rubrum Burm. f.: seasonal fluctuations and their possible interaction with morphological characteristics as expressed in the two sexes, New Phytologist 127, no.44 (Apr 2006): 749–759.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb02979.xSTEFAN ANDERSSON Population differentiation in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae): patterns of correlation among characters, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 49, no.22 (Jan 2008): 185–194.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1993.tb00897.x Janet L. Gehring , and Yan B. Linhart Sexual Dimorphisms and Response to Low Resources in the Dioecious Plant Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae), International Journal of Plant Sciences 154, no.11 (Oct 2015): 152–162.https://doi.org/10.1086/297100 How important is biotic pollination and dispersal to the success of the angiosperms?, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 333, no.12671267 (Jan 1997): 209–215.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1991.0069Robin L. Chazdon PLANT SIZE AND FORM IN THE UNDERSTORY PALM GENUS GEONOMA: ARE SPECIES VARIATIONS ON A THEME?, American Journal of Botany 78, no.55 (May 1991): 680–694.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1991.tb12592.xJ.J. Midgley, R.M. Cowling, B.B. Lamont Relationship of follicle size and seed size in Hakea (Proteaceae); isometry, allometry and adaptation, South African Journal of Botany 57, no.22 (Apr 1991): 107–110.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-6299(16)30968-1Martin L. Cipollini, Edmund W. Stiles Costs of reproduction in Nyssa sylvatica: sexual dimorphism in reproductive frequency and nutrient flux, Oecologia 86, no.44 (Jan 1991): 585–593.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00318326Mary F. Willson Sexual selection, sexual dimorphism and plant phylogeny, Evolutionary Ecology 5, no.11 (Jan 1991): 69–87.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02285247Jon Lovett Doust Reply from J. Lovett Doust, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 4, no.1212 (Dec 1989): 380.https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(89)90105-5Jeremy Midgley, William Bond Leaf size and inflorescence size may be allometrically related traits, Oecologia 78, no.33 (Jan 1989): 427–429.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379120
Referência(s)