Artigo Produção Nacional Revisado por pares

The Effects of Palliative Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients With an ECOG Performance Status of 3 and 4

2014; Elsevier BV; Volume: 14; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.clcc.2014.09.010

ISSN

1938-0674

Autores

Marcela Crosara Teixeira, Daniel Fernandes Marques, A. Ferrari, Michel Alves, Alexandra Khichfy Alex, Jorge Sabbaga, Paulo M. Hoff, Rachel P. Riechelmann,

Tópico(s)

Management of metastatic bone disease

Resumo

Background Although chemotherapy is standard for patients with mCRC and ECOG PS of 0/1, the real benefit for patients with ECOG PS > 2 remains uncertain, because they are generally excluded from clinical trials. Our objectives were to compare the survival and safety of ECOG PS 3/4 patients who were administered chemotherapy with those who received BSC only. Patients and Methods We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive mCRC patients who started first-line chemotherapy at our institution in a 4-year period. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to adjust for prognostic factors and logistic regression, to identify predictive factors of Grade 3/4 toxicity. Results From June 2008 to June 2012, 240 consecutive patients were included: 100 (41.7%) had an ECOG PS of 0/1, 75 (31.3%) ECOG PS of 2, and 65 (27%) ECOG PS of 3/4. Median survival for patients treated with chemotherapy was 18.4 months for patients with ECOG PS of 0/1, 10.8 months for those with ECOG PS of 2, and 6.8 months for patients with ECOG PS of 3/4. Among those with ECOG PS of 3/4, chemotherapy use led to a nonsignificant survival gain (median, 6.8 vs. 2.3 months for BSC; P = .13). Factors significantly associated with worse survival in an adjusted analysis were right-sided tumors (hazard ratio [HR], 2.97; P = .005) and ECOG PS status (ECOG PS 2 vs. 0/1; HR, 1.67; P = .025, and ECOG PS 3/4 vs. 0/1; HR, 2.67; P < .0001). The rate of Grade ≥ 3 toxicities during the first cycle did not differ significantly across ECOG groups; likely because 40% of ECOG PS 3/4 patients received upfront dose-reduced therapy. The rates of treatment-related hospitalization were similar across all ECOG groups. All deaths were disease-associated. Conclusion Our retrospective study suggests that chemotherapy might benefit selected mCRC patients with poor PS. With up-front dose reduction and close monitoring for toxicity, the risk of serious adverse events is minimized.

Referência(s)