The Case of the Missing Tanquam: Leibniz, Newton & Clarke
1961; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 52; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/349500
ISSN1545-6994
AutoresAlexandre Koyré, I. Bernard Cohen,
Tópico(s)Historical and Literary Studies
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessThe Case of the Missing Tanquam: Leibniz, Newton & ClarkeAlexandre Koyre, and I. Bernard CohenAlexandre Koyre Search for more articles by this author , and I. Bernard Cohen Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Isis Volume 52, Number 4Dec., 1961 Publication of the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/349500 Views: 15Total views on this site Citations: 18Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1961 History of Science Society, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Scott Mandelbrote Newtonianism on the Continent, (Aug 2022): 1546–1555.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31069-5_120Florian Sprenger Mediating actio in distans : Leibniz, Clarke and Newton on the communicability of forces, Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 12, no.11 (Jun 2021): 57–74.https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc_00028_1John Henry Newton, the sensorium of God, and the cause of gravity, Science in Context 33, no.33 (Jun 2021): 329–351.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889721000077Scott Mandelbrote Newtonianism on the Continent, (Sep 2020): 1–10.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_120-1Paul Greenham Clarifying divine discourse in early modern science: divinity, physico-theology, and divine metaphysics in Isaac Newton’s chymistry, The Seventeenth Century 32, no.22 (Jan 2017): 191–215.https://doi.org/10.1080/0268117X.2016.1271744Gábor A. Zemplén Polarisation in Extended Scientific Controversies: Towards an Epistemic Account of Disunity, (Oct 2016): 47–69.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41978-7_5Patrick J. Connolly Newton and God's Sensorium, Intellectual History Review 24, no.22 (May 2014): 185–201.https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2014.914644Ori Belkind Leibniz and Newton on Space, Foundations of Science 18, no.33 (Apr 2012): 467–497.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-011-9280-5Eric Schliesser Newton's Philosophy of Time, (Jan 2013): 87–101.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118522097.ch6Sarah Hutton Between Newton and Leibniz: Emilie du Châtelet and Samuel Clarke, (Sep 2011): 77–95.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2093-0_3Stephan Günzel Medienästhetik des Raums, (Jan 2009): 217–229.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91472-5_11William Lane Craig The Classical Concept of Time, (Jan 2001): 143–162.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1715-1_5B. J. T. Dobbs Newton’s Alchemy and His ‘Active Principle’ of Gravitation, (Jan 1988): 55–80.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2809-1_3I. Bernard Cohen Alexandre Koyré in America‐some personal reminiscences, History and Technology 4, no.1-41-4 (Oct 1987): 55–70.https://doi.org/10.1080/07341518708581689Brian P. Copenhaver Jewish theologies of space in the scientific revolution: Henry More, Joseph Raphson, Isaac Newton and their predecessors, Annals of Science 37, no.55 (Aug 2006): 489–548.https://doi.org/10.1080/00033798000200381 Kapitel 2: Formen der Apologetik, (May 2014): 546–582.https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666551352.546 I. Bernard Cohen , and Marshall Clagett Alexandre Koyre (1892-1964): Commemoration, Isis 57, no.22 (Oct 2015): 157–166.https://doi.org/10.1086/350110I. Bernard Cohen The First English Version of Newton's Hypotheses non fingo, Isis 53, no.33 (Oct 2015): 379–388.https://doi.org/10.1086/349598
Referência(s)