Binocular rivalry is not chaotic
1995; Royal Society; Volume: 259; Issue: 1354 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1098/rspb.1995.0011
ISSN1471-2954
Autores Tópico(s)Chaos control and synchronization
ResumoRestricted accessMoreSectionsView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Cite this article Lehky Sidney R. 1995Binocular rivalry is not chaoticProc. R. Soc. Lond. B.25971–76http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1995.0011SectionRestricted accessArticleBinocular rivalry is not chaotic Sidney R. Lehky Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author Sidney R. Lehky Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Published:23 January 1995https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1995.0011AbstractTime series of the durations each eye was dominant during binocular rivalry were obtained psychophysically. The oscillations showed an adaptation effect with mean and standard deviations of rivalry dominance durations increasing as a square root function of time over the course of a trial. The data were corrected for this non-stationarity. Dominance durations had a log-normal probability distribution and the autocorrelation function revealed no short term correlations in the time series. In an attempt to distinguish whether the variability of durations was due to a deterministic, low-dimensional chaotic attractor or to a stochastic process, the data were subjected to two tests. The first was calculation of correlation dimensions and the second was nonlinear forecasting of the time series. Both tests included comparisons with randomized 'surrogate data' as controls. In neither case was there a large difference between test results for actual data and surrogate data. We conclude that chaos is not a major factor underlying variability in binocular rivalry.FootnotesThis text was harvested from a scanned image of the original document using optical character recognition (OCR) software. As such, it may contain errors. Please contact the Royal Society if you find an error you would like to see corrected. Mathematical notations produced through Infty OCR. Previous ArticleNext Article VIEW FULL TEXT DOWNLOAD PDF FiguresRelatedReferencesDetailsCited by Higgins N, Scurry A, Jiang F, Little D, Alain C, Elhilali M and Snyder J (2023) Adaptation in the sensory cortex drives bistable switching during auditory stream segregation, Neuroscience of Consciousness, 10.1093/nc/niac019, 2023:1, Online publication date: 4-Feb-2023. Nobukawa S (2022) Long-Tailed Characteristics of Neural Activity Induced by Structural Network Properties, Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 10.3389/fams.2022.905807, 8 Skerswetat J, Bex P and Baron-Cohen S (2022) Visual consciousness dynamics in adults with and without autism, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/s41598-022-08108-0, 12:1 Ziman G, Aleshin S, Unoka Z, Braun J and Kovács I (2022) Alternative female and male developmental trajectories in the dynamic balance of human visual perception, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/s41598-022-05620-1, 12:1 Huguet G and Rinzel J (2022) Multistability in Perception Dynamics Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience, 10.1007/978-1-0716-1006-0_301, (2117-2126), . Chen R, Xiong Y, Jiang L, He Z and Zhou J (2021) Binocular rivalry subjected to noises and time delay, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111439, 152, (111439), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2021. Nobukawa S, Nishimura H, Wagatsuma N, Ando S and Yamanishi T Long-Tailed Characteristic of Spiking Pattern Alternation Induced by Log-Normal Excitatory Synaptic Distribution, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3015208, 32:8, (3525-3537) Leptourgos P, Bouttier V, Jardri R, Denève S and Beierholm U (2020) A functional theory of bistable perception based on dynamical circular inference, PLOS Computational Biology, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008480, 16:12, (e1008480) Riesen G, Norcia A and Gardner J (2019) Humans Perceive Binocular Rivalry and Fusion in a Tristable Dynamic State, The Journal of Neuroscience, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0713-19.2019, 39:43, (8527-8537), Online publication date: 23-Oct-2019. Feng J, Xu W, Xu Y and Wang X (2019) Effects of Lévy noise in a neuronal competition model, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 10.1016/j.physa.2019.121747, 531, (121747), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2019. Baker D, Richard B and Graham L (2019) Dynamic properties of internal noise probed by modulating binocular rivalry, PLOS Computational Biology, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007071, 15:6, (e1007071) Denham S, Farkas D, van Ee R, Taranu M, Kocsis Z, Wimmer M, Carmel D and Winkler I (2018) Similar but separate systems underlie perceptual bistability in vision and audition, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/s41598-018-25587-2, 8:1 Cao T, Wang L, Sun Z, Engel S and He S (2018) The Independent and Shared Mechanisms of Intrinsic Brain Dynamics: Insights From Bistable Perception, Frontiers in Psychology, 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00589, 9 Nobukawa S, Nishimura H and Yamanishi T (2018) Skewed and Long-Tailed Distributions of Spiking Activity in Coupled Network Modules with Log-Normal Synaptic Weight Distribution Neural Information Processing, 10.1007/978-3-030-04167-0_48, (535-544), . Albert S, Schmack K, Sterzer P, Schneider G and Einhäuser W (2017) A hierarchical stochastic model for bistable perception, PLOS Computational Biology, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005856, 13:11, (e1005856) Kanamaru T (2017) Chaotic Pattern Alternations Can Reproduce Properties of Dominance Durations in Multistable Perception, Neural Computation, 10.1162/NECO_a_00965, 29:6, (1696-1720), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2017. Paris R, Bodenheimer B and Blake R (2017) Does direction of walking impact binocular rivalry between competing patterns of optic flow?, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 10.3758/s13414-017-1299-4, 79:4, (1182-1194), Online publication date: 1-May-2017. Devyatko D, Appelbaum L and Mitroff S (2016) A Common Mechanism for Perceptual Reversals in Motion-Induced Blindness, the Troxler Effect, and Perceptual Filling-In, Perception, 10.1177/0301006616672577, 46:1, (50-77), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017. Kanamaru T (2017) The Mixed States of Associative Memories Realize Unimodal Distribution of Dominance Durations in Multistable Perception Advances in Neural Networks - ISNN 2017, 10.1007/978-3-319-59072-1_44, (371-378), . Vattikuti S, Thangaraj P, Xie H, Gotts S, Martin A, Chow C and Latham P (2016) Canonical Cortical Circuit Model Explains Rivalry, Intermittent Rivalry, and Rivalry Memory, PLOS Computational Biology, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004903, 12:5, (e1004903) Skerswetat J, Formankiewicz M and Waugh S (2016) Very few exclusive percepts for contrast-modulated stimuli during binocular rivalry, Vision Research, 10.1016/j.visres.2016.01.002, 121, (10-22), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2016. Russo E and De Pascalis V (2016) Individual variability in perceptual switching behaviour is associated with reversal-related EEG modulations, Clinical Neurophysiology, 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.06.003, 127:1, (479-489), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2016. Brascamp J, Klink P and Levelt W (2015) The 'laws' of binocular rivalry: 50 years of Levelt's propositions, Vision Research, 10.1016/j.visres.2015.02.019, 109, (20-37), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2015. Moors P, Stein T, Wagemans J and van Ee R (2015) Serial correlations in Continuous Flash Suppression, Neuroscience of Consciousness, 10.1093/nc/niv010, 2015:1, Online publication date: 1-Jan-2015. Scocchia L, Valsecchi M and Triesch J (2014) Top-down influences on ambiguous perception: the role of stable and transient states of the observer, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00979, 8 Rankin J, Meso A, Masson G, Faugeras O and Kornprobst P (2013) Bifurcation study of a neural field competition model with an application to perceptual switching in motion integration, Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 10.1007/s10827-013-0465-5, 36:2, (193-213), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2014. Yamashiro H, Yamamoto H, Mano H, Umeda M, Higuchi T and Saiki J (2014) Activity in early visual areas predicts interindividual differences in binocular rivalry dynamics, Journal of Neurophysiology, 10.1152/jn.00509.2013, 111:6, (1190-1202), Online publication date: 15-Mar-2014. Bressloff P (2014) Waves in the Developing and the Diseased Brain Waves in Neural Media, 10.1007/978-1-4614-8866-8_9, (349-404), . Bressloff P (2014) Neural Field Model of Binocular Rivalry Waves Waves in Neural Media, 10.1007/978-1-4614-8866-8_8, (319-345), . Bressloff P (2014) Waves in Excitable Neural Fields Waves in Neural Media, 10.1007/978-1-4614-8866-8_7, (271-318), . Bressloff P (2014) Population Models and Neural Fields Waves in Neural Media, 10.1007/978-1-4614-8866-8_6, (233-269), . Bressloff P (2014) Waves in Synaptically Coupled Spiking Networks Waves in Neural Media, 10.1007/978-1-4614-8866-8_5, (185-231), . Bressloff P (2014) Calcium Waves and Sparks Waves in Neural Media, 10.1007/978-1-4614-8866-8_4, (137-181), . Bressloff P (2014) Wave Propagation Along Spiny Dendrites Waves in Neural Media, 10.1007/978-1-4614-8866-8_3, (101-136), . Bressloff P (2014) Traveling Waves in One-Dimensional Excitable Media Waves in Neural Media, 10.1007/978-1-4614-8866-8_2, (63-99), . Bressloff P (2014) Single Neuron Modeling Waves in Neural Media, 10.1007/978-1-4614-8866-8_1, (3-62), . Huguet G and Rinzel J (2014) Multistability in Perception Dynamics Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience, 10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_301-1, (1-11), . Webber M and Bressloff P (2013) The effects of noise on binocular rivalry waves: a stochastic neural field model, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 10.1088/1742-5468/2013/03/P03001, 2013:03, (P03001) Aydin S, Strang N and Manahilov V (2013) Age-related deficits in attentional control of perceptual rivalry, Vision Research, 10.1016/j.visres.2012.11.010, 77, (32-40), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2013. Denham S, Bendixen A, Mill R, Tóth D, Wennekers T, Coath M, Bőhm T, Szalardy O and Winkler I (2012) Characterising switching behaviour in perceptual multi-stability, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.04.004, 210:1, (79-92), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2012. Kondo H, Kitagawa N, Kitamura M, Koizumi A, Nomura M and Kashino M (2011) Separability and Commonality of Auditory and Visual Bistable Perception, Cerebral Cortex, 10.1093/cercor/bhr266, 22:8, (1915-1922), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2012. Manousakis E (2012) When perceptual time stands still: Long percept-memory in binocular rivalry, Biosystems, 10.1016/j.biosystems.2012.02.004, 109:2, (115-125), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2012. Hunt J, Mattingley J and Goodhill G (2012) Randomly oriented edge arrangements dominate naturalistic arrangements in binocular rivalry, Vision Research, 10.1016/j.visres.2012.05.007, 64, (49-55), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2012. Seely J and Chow C (2011) Role of mutual inhibition in binocular rivalry, Journal of Neurophysiology, 10.1152/jn.00228.2011, 106:5, (2136-2150), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2011. Britz J and Pitts M (2011) Perceptual reversals during binocular rivalry: ERP components and their concomitant source differences, Psychophysiology, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01222.x, 48:11, (1490-1499), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2011. Mudrik L, Deouell L and Lamy D (2011) Scene congruency biases Binocular Rivalry, Consciousness and Cognition, 10.1016/j.concog.2011.01.001, 20:3, (756-767), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2011. Britz J, Pitts M and Michel C (2010) Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation during binocular rivalry, Human Brain Mapping, 10.1002/hbm.21117, 32:9, (1432-1442), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2011. Bressloff P (2010) Metastable states and quasicycles in a stochastic Wilson-Cowan model of neuronal population dynamics, Physical Review E, 10.1103/PhysRevE.82.051903, 82:5 Stuit S, Verstraten F and Paffen C (2010) Saliency in a suppressed image affects the spatial origin of perceptual alternations during binocular rivalry, Vision Research, 10.1016/j.visres.2010.06.014, 50:19, (1913-1921), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2010. Braun J and Mattia M (2010) Attractors and noise: Twin drivers of decisions and multistability, NeuroImage, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.126, 52:3, (740-751), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2010. Fürstenau N (2010) A nonlinear dynamics model for simulating long range correlations of cognitive bistability, Biological Cybernetics, 10.1007/s00422-010-0388-4, 103:3, (175-198), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2010. Ashwin P and Lavric A (2010) A low-dimensional model of binocular rivalry using winnerless competition, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 10.1016/j.physd.2009.06.018, 239:9, (529-536), Online publication date: 1-May-2010. Kang M and Blake R (2010) What causes alternations in dominance during binocular rivalry?, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 10.3758/APP.72.1.179, 72:1, (179-186), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2010. Kilpatrick Z and Bressloff P (2010) Binocular Rivalry in a Competitive Neural Network with Synaptic Depression, SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 10.1137/100788872, 9:4, (1303-1347), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2010. Xu J, He Z and Ooi T (2010) Surface boundary contour strengthens image dominance in binocular competition, Vision Research, 10.1016/j.visres.2009.11.007, 50:2, (155-170), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2010. van Ee R (2009) Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 10.1364/JOSAA.26.002612, 26:12, (2612), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2009. Manousakis E (2009) Quantum formalism to describe binocular rivalry, Biosystems, 10.1016/j.biosystems.2009.05.012, 98:2, (57-66), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2009. Zhou W and Chen D (2009) Binaral Rivalry between the Nostrils and in the Cortex, Current Biology, 10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.052, 19:18, (1561-1565), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2009. Baker D and Graf E (2009) On the relation between dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry, Vision Research, 10.1016/j.visres.2008.12.002, 49:4, (451-459), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2009. Britz J, Landis T and Michel C (2008) Right Parietal Brain Activity Precedes Perceptual Alternation of Bistable Stimuli, Cerebral Cortex, 10.1093/cercor/bhn056, 19:1, (55-65), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2009., Online publication date: 1-Jan-2009. Holcombe A and Seizova-Cajic T (2008) Illusory motion reversals from unambiguous motion with visual, proprioceptive, and tactile stimuli, Vision Research, 10.1016/j.visres.2008.05.019, 48:17, (1743-1757), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2008. Buckthought A, Kim J and Wilson H (2008) Hysteresis effects in stereopsis and binocular rivalry, Vision Research, 10.1016/j.visres.2007.12.013, 48:6, (819-830), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2008. Patterson R, Winterbottom M, Pierce B and Fox R (2016) Binocular Rivalry and Head-Worn Displays, Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 10.1518/001872007X249947, 49:6, (1083-1096), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2007. Suzuki S and Grabowecky M (2007) Long-Term Speeding in Perceptual Switches Mediated by Attention-Dependent Plasticity in Cortical Visual Processing, Neuron, 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.028, 56:4, (741-753), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2007. Yasuo Itoh and Oyama - Higa M (2007) Does the transition of the interval in perceptional alternation have a chaotic rhythm? 2007 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 10.1109/ICSMC.2007.4414185, 978-1-4244-0990-7, (3135-3139) Moreno-Bote R, Rinzel J and Rubin N (2007) Noise-Induced Alternations in an Attractor Network Model of Perceptual Bistability, Journal of Neurophysiology, 10.1152/jn.00116.2007, 98:3, (1125-1139), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2007. Cosmelli D and Thompson E (2007) Mountains and valleys: Binocular rivalry and the flow of experience, Consciousness and Cognition, 10.1016/j.concog.2007.06.013, 16:3, (623-641), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2007. Fürstenau N A Computational Model of Bistable Perception- Attention Dynamics with Long Range Correlations KI 2007: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 10.1007/978-3-540-74565-5_20, (251-263) Koene A (2006) A Model for Perceptual Averaging and Stochastic Bistable Behavior and the Role of Voluntary Control, Neural Computation, 10.1162/neco.2006.18.12.3069, 18:12, (3069-3096), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2006. Pressnitzer D and Hupé J (2006) Temporal Dynamics of Auditory and Visual Bistability Reveal Common Principles of Perceptual Organization, Current Biology, 10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.054, 16:13, (1351-1357), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2006. Gao J, Billock V, Merk I, Tung W, White K, Harris J and Roychowdhury V (2006) Inertia and memory in ambiguous visual perception, Cognitive Processing, 10.1007/s10339-006-0030-5, 7:2, (105-112), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2006. Nakatani H and van Leeuwen C (2006) Transient Synchrony of Distant Brain Areas and Perceptual Switching in Ambiguous Figures, Biological Cybernetics, 10.1007/s00422-006-0057-9, 94:6, (445-457), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2006. Kim Y, Grabowecky M and Suzuki S (2006) Stochastic resonance in binocular rivalry, Vision Research, 10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.009, 46:3, (392-406), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2006. Fürstenau N (2006) Modelling and Simulation of Spontaneous Perception Switching with Ambiguous Visual Stimuli in Augmented Vision Systems Perception and Interactive Technologies, 10.1007/11768029_3, (20-31), . Nakatani H and Leeuwen C (2005) Individual differences in perceptual switching rates; the role of occipital alpha and frontal theta band activity, Biological Cybernetics, 10.1007/s00422-005-0011-2, 93:5, (343-354), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2005. Kornmeier J and Bach M (2005) The Necker cube—an ambiguous figure disambiguated in early visual processing, Vision Research, 10.1016/j.visres.2004.10.006, 45:8, (955-960), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2005. van Ee R (2005) Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry, Vision Research, 10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.039, 45:1, (29-40), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2005. van Ee R, van Dam L and Brouwer G (2005) Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability, Vision Research, 10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.030, 45:1, (41-55), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2005. Meng X, Chen Y and Qian N (2004) Both monocular and binocular signals contribute to motion rivalry, Vision Research, 10.1016/j.visres.2003.08.007, 44:1, (45-55), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2004. Stollenwerk L and Bode M (2003) Lateral Neural Model of Binocular Rivalry, Neural Computation, 10.1162/089976603322518777, 15:12, (2863-2882), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2003. Salinas E (2003) Background Synaptic Activity as a Switch Between Dynamical States in a Network, Neural Computation, 10.1162/089976603321891756, 15:7, (1439-1475), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2003. Carter O and Pettigrew J (2016) A Common Oscillator for Perceptual Rivalries?, Perception, 10.1068/p3472, 32:3, (295-305), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2003. Hupé J and Rubin N (2003) The dynamics of bi-stable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: a fresh look at plaids, Vision Research, 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00593-X, 43:5, (531-548), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2003. Furstenau N A nonlinear dynamics model of binocular rivalry and cognitive multistability SMC '03 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 10.1109/ICSMC.2003.1244556, 0-7803-7952-7, (1081-1088) Suzuki S and Grabowecky M (2002) Evidence for Perceptual "Trapping" and Adaptation in Multistable Binocular Rivalry, Neuron, 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00934-0, 36:1, (143-157), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2002. Blake R and Logothetis N (2002) Visual competition, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10.1038/nrn701, 3:1, (13-21), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2002. Kalarickal G and Marshall J (2000) Neural model of temporal and stochastic properties of binocular rivalry, Neurocomputing, 10.1016/S0925-2312(00)00252-6, 32-33, (843-853), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2000. Wilson H, Krupa B and Wilkinson F (2000) Dynamics of perceptual oscillations in form vision, Nature Neuroscience, 10.1038/72115, 3:2, (170-176), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2000. Leopold D and Logothetis N (1999) Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01332-7, 3:7, (254-264), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1999. Logothetis N (1998) Single units and conscious vision, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 353:1377, (1801-1818), Online publication date: 29-Nov-1998. Dayan P (1998) A Hierarchical Model of Binocular Rivalry, Neural Computation, 10.1162/089976698300017377, 10:5, (1119-1135), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1998. This Issue23 January 1995Volume 259Issue 1354 Article InformationDOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1995.0011PubMed:7700878Published by:Royal SocietyPrint ISSN:0962-8452Online ISSN:1471-2954History: Manuscript received20/09/1994Manuscript accepted19/10/1994Published online01/01/1997Published in print23/01/1995 License:Scanned images copyright © 2017, Royal Society Citations and impact Large datasets are available through Proceedings B's partnership with Dryad
Referência(s)