Cross-resistance between azinphos-methyl and tebufenozide in the greenheaded leafroller, Planotortrix octo
1998; Wiley; Volume: 54; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1002/(sici)1096-9063(1998110)54
ISSN1096-9063
Autores Tópico(s)Insect Pest Control Strategies
ResumoPesticide ScienceVolume 54, Issue 3 p. 203-211 Paper Cross-resistance between azinphos-methyl and tebufenozide in the greenheaded leafroller, Planotortrix octo C. Howard Wearing, Corresponding Author C. Howard Wearing HortResearch, Clyde Research Centre, RD 1, Alexandra, Central Otago, New ZealandHortResearch, Clyde Research Centre, RD 1, Alexandra, Central Otago, New ZealandSearch for more papers by this author C. Howard Wearing, Corresponding Author C. Howard Wearing HortResearch, Clyde Research Centre, RD 1, Alexandra, Central Otago, New ZealandHortResearch, Clyde Research Centre, RD 1, Alexandra, Central Otago, New ZealandSearch for more papers by this author First published: 26 March 1999 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(1998110)54:3 3.0.CO;2-JCitations: 31AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract Organophosphate(OP)-resistant greenheaded leafroller, Planotortrix octo, from Dumbarton, Central Otago, New Zealand, were tested for resistance to tebufenozide and azinphos-methyl. Colonies of P. octo were obtained in 1993 and 1995 by tethering virgin females of an OP-susceptible strain (S×S) in apple orchards at Dumbarton, where they mated with wild males, and then raising their progeny (S×D). To remove susceptible insects, first-instar larvae from these colonies were selected respectively four and three times with discriminating doses of azinphos-methyl (1993–94, direct spray) to create colony S×DSe(Az), or tebufenozide (1995–96, diet-sprayed residue) to produce S×DSe(Te). Dosage mortality tests showed that S×D first-instar larvae were 2- to 4-times resistant to azinphos-methyl and 5- to 8-times resistant to tebufenozide at LD50, compared to S×S. Tests with progeny of isofemale lines of S×D revealed two groups of insects, one 3·5-times resistant and the other 14-times resistant to tebufenozide. After selection, S×DSe(Az) larvae were 14-times resistant to azinphos-methyl and 13-times resistant to tebufenozide, compared to S×S. S×DSe(Te) larvae were 21-times resistant to azinphos-methyl and 76-times resistant to tebufenozide. Resistance of S×DSe(Te) to tebufenozide declined from 269-times at six days to 76-times, 36 days after first exposure. All tests results demonstrated the presence of resistance to azinphos-methyl and tebufenozide in the P. octo population and high cross-resistance between these chemicals. Selection with either chemical conferred resistance to the other. Continued use of mating disruption in a resistance management programme at Dumbarton is recommended. © 1998 Society of Chemical Industry References 1 Suckling, D. M., Chapman, R. B. & Penman, D. R., Insecticide resistance in the lightbrown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): Larval response to azinphos-methyl. J. Econ. Entomol., 77 (1984) 579–82. 10.1093/jee/77.3.579 Web of Science®Google Scholar 2 Wearing, C. H., Resistance of Planotortrix octo to organophosphate insecticides in Dumbarton, Central Otago, Proc. NZ Plant Protection Conf., 48 (1995) 40–5. Web of Science®Google Scholar 3 Dhadialla, T. S., Carlson, G. R. & Le, D. P., New insecticides with ecdysteroidal and juvenile hormone activity. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 43 (1998) 545–69. 10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.545 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 4 Biddinger, D. J., Toxicity, stage specificity, and sublethal effects of abamectin and several classes of insect growth regulators to Platynota idaeusalis (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and Stethorus punctum (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University, 1993. Google Scholar 5 Walker, J. T. S., Baynon, G. T. & White, V., Insect control on apples with RH-5992, a novel insect growth regulator. Proc. NZ Weed and Pest Control Conf., 44 (1991) 66–9. CASGoogle Scholar 6 Suckling, D. M., Armstrong, K. F. & Khoo, J. G. I., Selection with azinphos-methyl influences glutathione-S-trans-ferase activity in the lightbrown apple moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 38 (1990) 9–17. 10.1016/0048-3575(90)90142-O CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 7 Wearing, C. H., Mating disruption for management of organophosphate resistance in the greenheaded leafroller Planotortrix octo. Proc. NZ Plant Protection Conf., 48 (1995) 46–51. Web of Science®Google Scholar 8 Leora Software, Polo-PC. A user's guide to probit and logit analysis. LeOra Software, Berkeley, CA, USA, 1987. Google Scholar 9 Biddinger, D. J., Hull, L. A. & McPheron, B. A., Cross-resistance and synergism in azinphosmethyl resistant and susceptible strains of tufted apple bud moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to various insect growth regulators and abamectin. J. Econ. Entomol., 89 (1996) 274–87. 10.1093/jee/89.2.274 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 10 Moffitt, H. R., Westigard, P. H., Mantey, K. D. & van de Baan, H. E., Resistance to diflubenzuron in codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 81 (1988) 1511–15. 10.1093/jee/81.6.1511 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 11 Welter, S. C., Varela, L. & Freeman, R., Codling moth resistance to azinphos-methyl in California. Resistant Pest Management Newsletter, 3 (1991) 12. Google Scholar 12 Sauphanor, B., Benoit, M., Bouvier, J. C., Perron, G., Malezieux, S. & Fremond, J. C., Un cas de résistance du carpocapse des pommes au diflubenzuron dans le sud-est de la France. Phytoma, 458 (1994) 46–9. Google Scholar 13 Sauphanor, B. & Bouvier, J. C., Cross-resistance between benzoylureas and benzoylhydrazines in the codling moth, Cydia pomonella L. Pestic. Sci., 45 (1995) 369–75. 10.1002/ps.2780450412 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 14 Ishaaya, I., Yablonski, S. & Horowitz, A. R., Comparative toxicity of two ecdysteroid agonists, RH-2485 and RH-5992, on susceptible and pyrethroid-resistant strains of the Egyptian cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis. Phytoparasitica, 23 (1995) 139–45. 10.1007/BF02980973 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 15 Smagghe, G., Audenaert, L. & Degheele, D., Tebufenozide: Is toxicity correlated with pharmacokinetics and metabolism in different strains of the Egyptian cotton leaf-worm? Med. Fac. Landbouww. Univ. Gent, 60/3b (1995) 1015–6. Google Scholar 16 Sundaram, K. M. S., Sundaram, A. & Sloane, L., Foliar persistence and residual activity of tebufenozide against spruce budworm larvae. Pestic. Sci., 47 (1996) 31–40. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199605)47:1 3.0.CO;2-4 CASWeb of Science®Google Scholar 17 Wearing, C. H., Lo, P. & Walker, J. T. S., Insecticide resistance in leafrollers. Orchardist of NZ, October (1997) 5. Google Scholar 18 Lo, P., Walker, J. T. S. & Suckling, D. M., Resistance of Planotortrix octo (greenheaded leafroller) to azinphosmethyl in Hawkes Bay. Proc. NZ Plant Protection Conf., 50 (1997) 409–13. Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume54, Issue3November 1998Pages 203-211 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)