Revisão Revisado por pares

A review of rubric use in higher education

2009; Taylor & Francis; Volume: 35; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1080/02602930902862859

ISSN

1469-297X

Autores

Y. Malini Reddy, Heidi Andrade,

Tópico(s)

Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Resumo

Abstract This paper critically reviews the empirical research on the use of rubrics at the post‐secondary level, identifies gaps in the literature and proposes areas in need of research. Studies of rubrics in higher education have been undertaken in a wide range of disciplines and for multiple purposes, including increasing student achievement, improving instruction and evaluating programmes. While, student perceptions of rubrics are generally positive and some authors report positive responses to rubric use by instructors, others noted a tendency for instructors to resist using them. Two studies suggested that rubric use was associated with improved academic performance, while one did not. The potential of rubrics to identify the need for improvements in courses and programmes has been demonstrated. Studies of the validity of rubrics have shown that clarity and appropriateness of language is a central concern. Studies of rater reliability tend to show that rubrics can lead to a relatively common interpretation of student performance. Suggestions for future research include the use of more rigorous research methods, more attention to validity and reliability, a closer focus on learning and research on rubric use in diverse educational contexts. Keywords: rubrichigher educationformative assessmentreview of empirical researchreliability and validityuser perceptionseffects on performanceprogramme assessment Acknowledgement The authors are grateful to Dr Anders Jönsson for his thoughtful feedback on a draft of this manuscript.

Referência(s)