The Translational Regulation of Lipoprotein Lipase in Diabetic Rats Involves the 3′-Untranslated Region of the Lipoprotein Lipase mRNA
2000; Elsevier BV; Volume: 275; Issue: 52 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1074/jbc.m008775200
ISSN1083-351X
AutoresGouri Ranganathan, Chunling Li, Philip A. Kern,
Tópico(s)Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
ResumoAdipose tissue lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity is decreased in patients with poorly controlled diabetes, and this contributes to the dyslipidemia of diabetes. To study the mechanism of this decrease in LPL, we studied adipose tissue LPL expression in male rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Heparin releasable and extractable LPL activity in the epididymal fat decreased by 75–80% in the diabetic group and treatment of the rats with insulin prior to sacrifice reversed this effect. Northern blot analysis indicated no corresponding change in LPL mRNA levels. However, LPL synthetic rate, measured using [35S]methionine pulse labeling, was decreased by 75% in the diabetic adipocytes, and insulin treatment reversed this effect. These results suggested regulation of LPL at the level of translation. Diabetic adipocytes demonstrated no change in the distribution of LPL mRNA associated with polysomes, suggesting no inhibition of translation initiation. Addition of cytoplasmic extracts from control and diabetic adipocytes to a reticulocyte lysate system demonstrated the inhibition of LPL translation in vitro. Using different LPL mRNA transcripts in this in vitro translation assay, we found that the 3′-untranslated region (UTR) of the LPL mRNA was important in controlling translation inhibition by the cytoplasmic extracts. To identify the specific region involved, gel shift analysis was performed. A specific shift in mobility was observed when diabetic cytoplasmic extract was added to a transcript containing nucleotides 1818–2000 of the LPL 3′-UTR. Thus, inhibition of translation is the predominant mechanism for the decreased adipose tissue LPL in this insulin-deficient model of diabetes. Translation inhibition involves the interaction of a cytoplasmic factor, probably an RNA-binding protein, with specific sequences of the LPL 3′-UTR. Adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity is decreased in patients with poorly controlled diabetes, and this contributes to the dyslipidemia of diabetes. To study the mechanism of this decrease in LPL, we studied adipose tissue LPL expression in male rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Heparin releasable and extractable LPL activity in the epididymal fat decreased by 75–80% in the diabetic group and treatment of the rats with insulin prior to sacrifice reversed this effect. Northern blot analysis indicated no corresponding change in LPL mRNA levels. However, LPL synthetic rate, measured using [35S]methionine pulse labeling, was decreased by 75% in the diabetic adipocytes, and insulin treatment reversed this effect. These results suggested regulation of LPL at the level of translation. Diabetic adipocytes demonstrated no change in the distribution of LPL mRNA associated with polysomes, suggesting no inhibition of translation initiation. Addition of cytoplasmic extracts from control and diabetic adipocytes to a reticulocyte lysate system demonstrated the inhibition of LPL translation in vitro. Using different LPL mRNA transcripts in this in vitro translation assay, we found that the 3′-untranslated region (UTR) of the LPL mRNA was important in controlling translation inhibition by the cytoplasmic extracts. To identify the specific region involved, gel shift analysis was performed. A specific shift in mobility was observed when diabetic cytoplasmic extract was added to a transcript containing nucleotides 1818–2000 of the LPL 3′-UTR. Thus, inhibition of translation is the predominant mechanism for the decreased adipose tissue LPL in this insulin-deficient model of diabetes. Translation inhibition involves the interaction of a cytoplasmic factor, probably an RNA-binding protein, with specific sequences of the LPL 3′-UTR. lipoprotein lipase untranslated region control rats diabetic rats diabetic rats treated with insulin polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction Lipoprotein lipase (LPL)1 hydrolyzes the core of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (chylomicrons and very low density lipoprotein) into free fatty acids and monoacylglycerol, facilitating the removal of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins from the bloodstream. Patients with diabetes, especially insulin-deficient diabetes, often manifest a decrease in adipose tissue LPL activity, and this is accompanied by an increase in plasma triglycerides (1Taskinen M.R. Diabetes Metab. Rev. 1987; 3: 551-570Crossref PubMed Scopus (210) Google Scholar). With insulin treatment, there is an improvement in both LPL activity and triglycerides (2Pfeifer M.A. Brunzell J.D. Best J.D. Judzewitsch R.G. Halter J.B. Porte Jr., D. Diabetes. 1983; 32: 525-531Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 3Simsolo R.B. Ong J.M. Saffari B. Kern P.A. J. Lipid Res. 1992; 33: 89-95Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). The regulation of LPL activity is closely linked to insulin levels and nutritional state, as demonstrated by the changes in LPL during cycles of feeding and fasting (4Eckel R.H. Borensztajn J. Lipoprotein Lipase. Evener, Chicago1987: 79-132Google Scholar, 5Doolittle M.H. Ben-Zeev O. Elovson J. Martin D. Kirchgessner T.G. J. Biol. Chem. 1990; 265: 4570-4577Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 6Ong J.M. Kern P.A. J. Clin. Invest. 1989; 84: 305-311Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar). Both in rat models of diabetes and human diabetes, the use of drugs to improve diabetes control resulted in increased adipose tissue LPL activity (1Taskinen M.R. Diabetes Metab. Rev. 1987; 3: 551-570Crossref PubMed Scopus (210) Google Scholar, 7Taskinen M.-R. Nikkilä E.A. Diabetologia. 1979; 17: 351-357Crossref PubMed Scopus (107) Google Scholar, 8Pykalisto O. Smith P.H. Brunzell J.D. J. Clin. Invest. 1975; 56: 1108-1116Crossref PubMed Scopus (229) Google Scholar). However, recent studies demonstrated that the treatment of diabetes resulted in increases in LPL protein and LPL synthesis with no change in LPL mRNA levels, suggesting posttranscriptional regulation, possibly at the level of LPL translation (3Simsolo R.B. Ong J.M. Saffari B. Kern P.A. J. Lipid Res. 1992; 33: 89-95Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 9Tavangar K. Murata Y. Pedersen M.E. Goers J.F. Hoffman A.R. Kraemer F.B. J. Clin. Invest. 1992; 90: 1672-1678Crossref PubMed Scopus (53) Google Scholar). Translational regulation has been identified as an important mechanism for the regulation of LPL in response to catecholamines and thyroid hormone (10Yukht A. Davis R.C. Ong J.M. Ranganathan G. Kern P.A. J. Clin. Invest. 1995; 96: 2438-2444Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar, 11Kern P.A. Ranganathan G. Yukht A. Ong J.M. Davis R. J. Lipid Res. 1996; 37: 2332-2340Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). In response to catecholamines, cultured adipocytes demonstrate a 4-fold decrease in LPL synthesis mediated by the presence of a RNA-binding protein, which interacts with a region on the proximal 3′-UTR of LPL mRNA (12Ranganathan G. Vu D. Kern P.A. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 2515-2519Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar). Hypothyroid rats demonstrate an increase in LPL translation, and this is thought to be related to the absence of the RNA-binding protein that binds to the same region (11Kern P.A. Ranganathan G. Yukht A. Ong J.M. Davis R. J. Lipid Res. 1996; 37: 2332-2340Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). The expression of many other genes is regulated by translation, and this can occur through RNA-binding proteins that bind to specific regions of either the 5′- or 3′-UTRs of the mRNA, and interfere with translation (13Wormington M. Bioessays. 1994; 16: 533-535Crossref PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar, 14Kozak M. Gene ( Amst. ). 1999; 234: 187-208Crossref PubMed Scopus (1144) Google Scholar). We have studied the mechanism involved in the regulation of LPL activity in the adipose tissue of diabetic rats. This inhibition of LPL activity was accompanied by a corresponding decrease in LPL synthetic rate with no significant change in LPL mRNA. To further characterize the mechanism involved, we made cytoplasmic extracts from adipocytes and studied the effect of cytoplasmic trans-acting factors on translation of various LPL constructs. We have identified a region of the 3′-UTR of LPL mRNA that is involved in an RNA protein interactions, resulting in inhibition of LPL translation in diabetes. Male Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats (175–200 g) were purchased from Harlan Sprague-Dawley (Indianapolis, IN). Three groups of rats were used in these studies: control (C) rats, diabetic (D) rats, and diabetic rats that were treated with insulin (DI). The rats were made diabetic by tail veil injection of Streptozotocin (60 mg/kg body weight) dissolved in 50 mm citrate buffer, pH 4.5. Control rats were injected with the same volume of buffer. Insulin-treated diabetic rats were treated identically to the diabetic rats except that they received 8 units of neutral protamine Hagedorn human insulin subcutaneously on each of the last 2 days before sacrifice. All the animals were sacrificed 14 days after streptozotocin injection. At the time of sacrifice, blood glucose levels in the diabetic group were greater than 375 mg/dl, insulin-treated diabetic rats were higher than the control but considerably lower than the diabetic group (Table I). The epididymal fat pads were immediately removed and processed as described below.Table IEffect of diabetes and insulin treatment on LPL activityLPL activityGlucoseHeparin releasedExtractednmol/min/106cellsmg%C22 ± 0.422 ± 6.0109 ± 5D3.2 ± 0.81-ap < 0.01 versus control.5.9 ± 1.01-ap < 0.01 versus control.405 ± 241-ap < 0.01 versus control.DI73 ± 121-ap < 0.01 versus control.34 ± 7.01-ap < 0.01 versus control.165 ± 71-ap < 0.01 versus control.All data are expressed as mean ± S.E., n = 10–12 for each group.1-a p < 0.01 versus control. Open table in a new tab All data are expressed as mean ± S.E., n = 10–12 for each group. Heparin releasable and extractable LPL activities were determined (15Kern P.A. Marshall S. Eckel R.H. J. Clin. Invest. 1985; 75: 199-208Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar). To measure heparin releasable LPL, 100 mg of minced adipose tissue was incubated in 1 ml of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10 units/ml heparin for 45 min at 37 °C. After collecting the heparin released fraction, tissue LPL was extracted in 50 mmphosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, containing 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, and 0.5% deoxycholate, as described previously (6Ong J.M. Kern P.A. J. Clin. Invest. 1989; 84: 305-311Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar). LPL catalytic activity was measured as described previously (16Nilsson-Ehle P. Schotz M.C. J. Lipid Res. 1976; 17: 536-541Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar), using a substrate containing [3H]triolein and human serum as a source of apoC-II. LPL activity was expressed as nanomoles of free fatty acid released per minute per 106 cells. Cell number was determined using the method of DiGirolamo (17DiGirolamo M. Mendlinger S. Fertig J.W. Am. J. Physiol. 1971; 221: 850-858Crossref PubMed Scopus (272) Google Scholar). The synthetic rate of LPL was measured in adipocytes using a 30-min pulse with [35S]methionine (100 μCi/ml), as described previously (18Ong J.M. Kirchgessner T.G. Schotz M.C. Kern P.A. J. Biol. Chem. 1988; 263: 12933-12938Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Previous studies have demonstrated the linearity of [35S]methionine incorporation into adipocytes for up to 90 min in the presence and absence of insulin and thyroid hormone (18Ong J.M. Kirchgessner T.G. Schotz M.C. Kern P.A. J. Biol. Chem. 1988; 263: 12933-12938Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 19Saffari B. Ong J.M. Kern P.A. J. Lipid Res. 1992; 33: 241-249Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). The unincorporated label was aspirated, and the total cellular proteins were extracted in lysis buffer containing 50 mm phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 2% deoxycholate, 1% SDS, 20 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 mm leupeptin, and 2 mm EDTA. The extracts were immunoprecipitated using specific polyclonal antibodies as described previously (20Goers J.F. Petersen M.E. Kern P.A. Ong J. Schotz M.C. Anal. Biochem. 1987; 166: 27-35Crossref PubMed Scopus (60) Google Scholar). Immunoprecipitated samples were analyzed on 10% SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. RNA was extracted from adipocytes using the method of Chomczynski and Sacchi (21Chomczynski P. Sacchi N. Anal. Biochem. 1987; 162: 156-159Crossref PubMed Scopus (63388) Google Scholar). Equal amounts of total RNA from the various treatment groups were analyzed using 2.2 m formaldehyde, 1% agarose gels. Northern blots were probed using [32P]dCTP-labeled human LPL (22Holm C. Kirchgessner T.G. Svenson K.L. Fredrikson G. Nilsson S. Miller C.G. Shively J.E. Heinzmann C. Sparkes R.S. Mohandas T. Lusis A.J. Belfrage P. Schotz M.C. Science. 1988; 241: 1503-1506Crossref PubMed Scopus (270) Google Scholar) and actin cDNA probes followed by autoradiography. The intensity of the image was quantitated using the Eagle sightTM 3.0 Image Capture and analysis software (Stratagene 2, La Jolla, CA), and the ratio of LPL/actin mRNA was calculated. Polysome profiles were obtained as described previously (10Yukht A. Davis R.C. Ong J.M. Ranganathan G. Kern P.A. J. Clin. Invest. 1995; 96: 2438-2444Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar, 23Rogers J. Munro H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1987; 84: 2277-2281Crossref PubMed Scopus (115) Google Scholar). Postmitochondrial supernatants were prepared from adipocytes isolated from control and diabetic rats. Cytoplasmic extracts were reconstituted with 0.25m sucrose and layered over 10–50% sucrose gradients. Gradients were centrifuged at 180,000 × g for 3 h at 4 °C. To demonstrate the release of all LPL mRNA into the free fraction, 1 mm EDTA was added to a control gradient. Gradients were collected in 12 1-ml fractions, and polysome profiles were recorded by reading UV absorption at 260 nm. Each fraction was precipitated, and RNA was extracted. Measurement of LPL mRNA levels in each fraction was done using RT-PCR, as described previously (24Ong J.M. Simsolo R.B. Saghizadeh M. Pauer A. Kern P.A. J. Lipid Res. 1994; 35: 1542-1551Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). The primers for this reaction were derived from the mouse LPL cDNA sequence, and the upstream primer was nucleotides 1158–1177, and the downstream primer was nucleotides 1369–1389 (25Kirchgessner T.G. Svenson K.L. Lusis A.J. Schotz M.C. J. Biol. Chem. 1987; 262: 8463-8466Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). An equal volume of each fraction (containing 0.1–1 ng of RNA) was reverse-transcribed, followed by PCR for 35 cycles at 55 °C. The resulting ethidium bromide-stained gel was imaged using an Imagestore 5000 scanner and analyzed using the Gelbase/Gelblot software (Ultraviolet Products, Ltd., San Gabriel, CA). An S-100 fraction was prepared from adipocytes isolated from control, diabetic, and insulin-treated diabetic rats, as described previously (10Yukht A. Davis R.C. Ong J.M. Ranganathan G. Kern P.A. J. Clin. Invest. 1995; 96: 2438-2444Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar, 26Walden W.E. Patino M.M. Gaffield L. J. Biol. Chem. 1989; 264: 13765-13769Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Cells were homogenized in 2 volumes of lysis buffer (50 mmTris-HCl, pH 7.4, 250 mm sucrose, 35 mm KCl, 10 mm MgCl2, 0.5 mm EDTA, 7 mm β-mercaptoethanol), using 10 strokes of a glass homogenizer. Homogenates were centrifuged at 10,000 ×g for 15 min at 4 °C, and the postnuclear extract was used to prepare S-100 fraction by centrifugation at 100,000 ×g for 30 min on ice. Proteins were fractionated using 60% ammonium sulfate, and the precipitated proteins were redissolved and dialyzed against Buffer A (20 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 20 mm KCl, 7 mm β-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 mm EDTA, and 10% glycerol). Equal quantities of cytoplasmic extracts (0.1 μg of protein) were used to analyze effects on in vitro translation using the rabbit reticulocyte lysate system (Promega). Clone 2 in Fig. 3 is LPL35, described by Wion et al. (27Wion K.L. Kirchgessner T.G. Lusis A.J. Schotz M.C. Lawn R.M. Science. 1987; 235: 1638-1641Crossref PubMed Scopus (354) Google Scholar). It contains 174 nucleotides of 5′-untranslated sequence, the complete coding sequence (1428 nucleotides), and 822 nucleotides of the 3′-UTR of LPL. Clone 1 is identical to clone 2 except that it includes the 3′-UTR up to the first polyadenylation site at nucleotide 3155, as described earlier (28Ranganathan G. Ong J.M. Yukht A. Saghizadeh M. Simsolo R.B. Pauer A. Kern P.A. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 7149-7155Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar). Clone 3 was made by cutting clone 2 described above withEcoRI. RNA transcripts from human LPL cDNA constructs were used for in vitro translation studies, as described previously (12Ranganathan G. Vu D. Kern P.A. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 2515-2519Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar). Template DNA was linearized with a suitable restriction enzyme to obtain a complete transcript of the cloned DNA. Linearized DNA was transcribed; RNA transcripts (0.1 μg) were translated using a rabbit reticulocyte lysate system (Promega) in the presence of [35S]methionine for 60 min. Cytoplasmic extracts from adipocytes were added to the in vitrotranslation reaction. The translation reaction products were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. Four overlapping DNA segments were synthesized using PCR with a T7 transcription promoter added to the 5′ primer, corresponding to LPL nucleotides 1512–1663, 1645–1833, 1818–2000, and 1981–2144. The template sizes were verified on agarose gels and used to generate [α-32P]UTP-labeled transcript (transcripts 1–4, Fig. 4), using T7 RNA polymerase (Promega). RNA was transcribed in the presence of [α-32P]UTP, 10 mCi/ml (PerkinElmer Life Sciences), 1 mm ATP, CTP, GTP, and 0.1 mm UTP. Transcripts were purified using phenol extraction and ethanol precipitation. Gel shift analysis was performed as described previously (29Leibold E.A. Munro H.N. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1988; 85: 2171-2175Crossref PubMed Scopus (562) Google Scholar). Labeled transcript (50,000 cpm) was incubated with cytosolic extracts (5–10 μg of protein) from adipocytes at 22 °C for 20 min in the presence of yeast tRNA (25 ng) and buffer containing 20 mm Tris, pH 7.4, 50 mmKCl, 10% glycerol, and 1 mm dithiothreitol. Heparin was added to a final concentration of 5 μg/ml, and incubation was continued for an additional 10 min. Samples were separated on 5% polyacrylamide in 1× TBE (0.09 m Tris base, 0.09 m boric acid, 0.002 m EDTA) and analyzed by autoradiography. Rats were sacrificed 14 days after streptozotocin injection. TableI shows the blood glucose and adipose tissue LPL activity in the three groups of rats. Because diabetes results in accelerated lipolysis and a reduction in fat cell size, LPL activity data were expressed per 106 cells (Table I). Blood glucose was uniformly elevated (>375 mg %) in the D rats, and LPL activity was decreased over 75% versus C. In the DI rats, blood glucose was lower than in the D rats, although still elevated compared with C. However, in the DI group of rats, LPL activity was greatly increased, and was higher than in the C group, especially in the heparin released fraction. To study the mechanism of regulation by diabetes and insulin treatment, LPL mRNA levels and LPL synthetic rate were measured. To examine LPL synthetic rate, adipocytes from C, D, and DI rats were pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine followed by immunoprecipitation of LPL. As shown in Fig. 1A, there was a 75% inhibition of LPL synthesis in the cells isolated from diabetic rat adipose tissue, whereas LPL synthetic rate in the DI adipocytes was similar to that in control adipocytes. To compare LPL mRNA levels, Northern blots were performed on the adipocytes from C, D, and DI rats. When expressed as the LPL/actin ratio, LPL mRNA in the D rat adipose tissue was no different from LPL mRNA in the C adipose tissue (Fig. 1 B). In a similar manner, the LPL/actin mRNA ratio in the DI adipocytes was not significantly different from the C group (Fig. 1 B). Thus, these data show that large changes in LPL activity can be explained by changes in LPL synthesis and are not reflected in changes in LPL mRNA. These data suggest that the major step of regulation is at the level of LPL translation. One mechanism of translational regulation involves the interaction of transacting factors with the 5′-UTR, leading to the dissociation of mRNA from the polysomes and an inhibition of translational initiation (30Harford J.B. Klausner R.D. Enzyme ( Basel ). 1990; 44: 28-41Crossref PubMed Scopus (75) Google Scholar). To determine whether such a mechanism also occurred with LPL, we studied the distribution of LPL mRNA on polysome preparations from C and D rat adipocytes. As shown in Fig. 2, we detected no change in the distribution of LPL mRNA associated with the polysomes. In both C and D rat adipose tissue, 40–45% of LPL mRNA was associated with polysomes, suggesting that the 5′-UTR was not be involved in the regulatory mechanism. Another site for regulation by transacting binding proteins is the 3′-UTR, which is involved in the regulation of LPL by catecholamines (10Yukht A. Davis R.C. Ong J.M. Ranganathan G. Kern P.A. J. Clin. Invest. 1995; 96: 2438-2444Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar). To determine whether a similar mechanism is involved with diabetes, we prepared cytoplasmic extracts from control and diabetic rat adipocytes as described under "Materials and Methods" and added these cytosolic extracts to a rabbit reticulocyte lysate in vitro translation system containing LPL transcript. If cytoplasmic factors were present in the adipocyte extracts that bound to the LPL transcript and regulated translation, we would expect to see a change in LPL translation by the reticulocyte lysate system. In this in vitro translation reaction, we used three different constructs (Fig. 3). Each of these constructs contained the full 5′-UTR and coding sequence. The first 3.2-kilobase construct contained essentially the whole LPL mRNA sequence up to the first consensus polyadenylation sequence on the 3′-UTR (27Wion K.L. Kirchgessner T.G. Lusis A.J. Schotz M.C. Lawn R.M. Science. 1987; 235: 1638-1641Crossref PubMed Scopus (354) Google Scholar). The second and third constructs contained progressive deletions of the 3′-UTR of the LPL mRNA and terminated at nucleotide 2435 and 1640, respectively. As shown in Fig. 3, translation of constructs 1 and 2 was inhibited by the addition of diabetic adipocyte extracts. Although there was some inhibition of LPL translation by the control extracts, as described by us previously (11Kern P.A. Ranganathan G. Yukht A. Ong J.M. Davis R. J. Lipid Res. 1996; 37: 2332-2340Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar), the diabetic adipocyte extract significantly inhibited LPL translation in constructs 1 and 2. However, construct 3, which terminated at nucleotide 1640, was not inhibited by the addition of the extracts, indicating that an inhibitory factor was interacting with a sequence on the 3′-UTR beyond nucleotide 1640. To obtain further evidence for the interaction of a protein with the LPL 3′-UTR, we performed gel retardation assays. As described under "Materials and Methods," RNA transcripts were made to fragments of LPL 3′-UTR spanning the region between nucleotides 1512 and 2144 (the end of the coding region is at nucleotide 1599). Equal amounts of adipocyte extract from C, D, and DI adipose tissue were then added to each of the 32P-labeled transcripts. Four overlapping RNA sequences were transcribed corresponding to LPL nucleotides 1512–1663, 1645–1833, 1818–2000, and 1981–2144 (transcripts 1–4, Fig. 4). Whereas RNA transcripts 1, 2, and 4 formed no complex with the diabetic adipose extract, RNA transcript 3, corresponding to nucleotides 1818–2000, formed a complex with the diabetic extract which caused a mobility shift (Fig. 4). Addition of the DI extract caused a mobility shift; however, the complex formed was 10-fold less intense with the same amount of extract protein, indicating a decrease in amount of complex generated. To demonstrate the specificity of this complex formation, we added an excess of unlabeled transcript 3. As shown in Fig. 5, an excess of transcript corresponding to nucleotides 1818–2000 prevented the gel shift, whereas the addition of an excess of irrelevant RNA transcript did not compete for complex formation. Lipoprotein lipase is a central enzyme in lipid metabolism, and the adipose tissue enzyme is important in the regulation of plasma triglyceride levels and in the accumulation of adipose tissue lipid stores (31Mead J.R. Cryer A. Ramji D.P. FEBS Lett. 1999; 462: 1-6Crossref PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar, 32Zechner R. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 1997; 8: 77-88Crossref PubMed Scopus (144) Google Scholar). The regulation of LPL in adipose tissue is complex and occurs at multiple cellular sites (33Enerbäck S. Gimble J.M. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1993; 1169: 107-125Crossref PubMed Scopus (181) Google Scholar). Insulin is an important regulator of adipose tissue LPL, but the mechanism of regulation by insulin is dependent on the species and system studied. For example, in humans and rats LPL activity is increased in the hyperinsulinemic postprandial state, and this increase is due to increased LPL posttranslational processing (5Doolittle M.H. Ben-Zeev O. Elovson J. Martin D. Kirchgessner T.G. J. Biol. Chem. 1990; 265: 4570-4577Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 6Ong J.M. Kern P.A. J. Clin. Invest. 1989; 84: 305-311Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar). Changes in LPL activity are accompanied by increases in LPL mRNA levels in other animal models (34Enerbäck S. Semb H. Tavernier J. Bjursell G. Olivecrona T. Gene ( Amst. ). 1988; 64: 97-106Crossref PubMed Scopus (66) Google Scholar). In vitro studies of the effect of insulin on LPL in adipocytes have demonstrated increases in LPL mRNA levels in rat adipocyte primary cultures (18Ong J.M. Kirchgessner T.G. Schotz M.C. Kern P.A. J. Biol. Chem. 1988; 263: 12933-12938Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar) and increased posttranscriptional processing in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (35Semenkovich C.F. Wims M. Noe L. Etienne J. Chan L. J. Biol. Chem. 1989; 264: 9030-9038Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes manifest decreased adipose LPL activity, which increases following treatment of the diabetes (2Pfeifer M.A. Brunzell J.D. Best J.D. Judzewitsch R.G. Halter J.B. Porte Jr., D. Diabetes. 1983; 32: 525-531Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 3Simsolo R.B. Ong J.M. Saffari B. Kern P.A. J. Lipid Res. 1992; 33: 89-95Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 7Taskinen M.-R. Nikkilä E.A. Diabetologia. 1979; 17: 351-357Crossref PubMed Scopus (107) Google Scholar, 8Pykalisto O. Smith P.H. Brunzell J.D. J. Clin. Invest. 1975; 56: 1108-1116Crossref PubMed Scopus (229) Google Scholar). In humans, this increase in LPL activity was not accompanied by an increase in mRNA levels, but was associated with an increase in LPL protein and synthetic rate (3Simsolo R.B. Ong J.M. Saffari B. Kern P.A. J. Lipid Res. 1992; 33: 89-95Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Similar observations were made in rats, which were rendered diabetic with streptozotocin (9Tavangar K. Murata Y. Pedersen M.E. Goers J.F. Hoffman A.R. Kraemer F.B. J. Clin. Invest. 1992; 90: 1672-1678Crossref PubMed Scopus (53) Google Scholar). Since these data suggested a translational mechanism of regulation, we examined the regulation of LPL by streptozotocin-induced diabetes in greater detail. LPL activity was greatly decreased in the D rats compared with the C and DI rats. Of interest, the DI rats demonstrated LPL activity that was even higher than that of the control rats, which appeared to reflect the rapid rate of new LPL synthesis and processing that accompanied the administration of insulin. Similar finding were observed previously (9Tavangar K. Murata Y. Pedersen M.E. Goers J.F. Hoffman A.R. Kraemer F.B. J. Clin. Invest. 1992; 90: 1672-1678Crossref PubMed Scopus (53) Google Scholar). When the adipose tissues of these rats were examined for LPL gene expression, there were minimal changes in LPL mRNA levels despite over 5-fold changes in LPL activity, indicating that the changes in LPL activity could not be explained based on the changes in LPL transcription. On the other hand, the changes in LPL synthesis, based on [35S]methionine labeling, closely paralleled the changes in LPL activity between the D and C rats. The considerable increase in LPL activity in the DI rats (compared with C) could not be accounted for by the small increase in LPL/actin mRNA and the increase in LPL synthetic rate, suggesting that posttranslational regulation was important, as has been described previously in other hyperinsulinemic states (5Doolittle M.H. Ben-Zeev O. Elovson J. Martin D. Kirchgessner T.G. J. Biol. Chem. 1990; 265: 4570-4577Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Overall, these data suggest that translational regulation is the primary means of LPL regulation in this setting of insulin deficiency. Translational regulation of protein synthesis can occur through the actions of trans-acting binding proteins and can involve sequences on either the 5′-UTR or 3′-UTR of the mRNA (14Kozak M. Gene ( Amst. ). 1999; 234: 187-208Crossref PubMed Scopus (1144) Google Scholar). Involvement of the 5′-UTR has been described in the regulation of ferritin translation, where the binding of a trans-acting protein to the 5′-UTR resulted in the dissociation of ferritin mRNA from the polysomes (29Leibold E.A. Munro H.N. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1988; 85: 2171-2175Crossref PubMed Scopus (562) Google Scholar, 30Harford J.B. Klausner R.D. Enzyme ( Basel ). 1990; 44: 28-41Crossref PubMed Scopus (75) Google Scholar). To examine this mechanism in our system, we performed an analysis of polysomes prepared from control and diabetic adipocytes. We found no change in the distribution of LPL mRNA with the polysomes, suggesting that the translational regulation was not due to a change in initiation of translation. Translational regulation can also occur through interactions of transacting factors with the 3′-UTR (13Wormington M. Bioessays. 1994; 16: 533-535Crossref PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar, 36Ch'ng J.L. Shoemaker D.L. Schimmel P. Holmes E.W. Science. 1990; 245: 1003-1006Crossref Scopus (56) Google Scholar). We reported previously the involvement of trans-acting proteins that inhibited LPL translation by binding to the proximal 3′-UTR between nucleotides 1599 and 1638 (12Ranganathan G. Vu D. Kern P.A. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 2515-2519Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar). We prepared cytoplasmic extracts from adipocytes derived from the C, D, and DI group of rats and added these extracts to an in vitro translation system. The cytoplasmic extract from the D rats inhibited translation of LPL in the reticulocyte lysate system. However, when the transcript used in the assay terminated at nucleotide 1640, the D extract did not inhibit translation, indicating that the motif on the 3′-UTR involved in regulating translation was located beyond nucleotide 1640. To further identify the motif, a gel shift analysis was performed, using overlapping 180–200 nucleotide RNA fragments corresponding to the 3′-UTR. These data indicated the presence of an RNA binding factor in the diabetic extract that interacted specifically with the RNA fragment corresponding to nucleotides 1818–2000. Taking into account the overlapping sequences of the other fragments, the motif for this RNA binding factor probably involves nucleotides 1834–1980. The cytoplasmic extract from DI rats did not inhibit LPL translationin vitro, but the gel shift reaction still demonstrated some residual binding. One explanation for this observation is the formation of an RNA-binding protein or complex that involves enzyme (e.g. kinase) activity. The adipose tissue from DI rats may still contain RNA binding protein, which may bind to the RNA, but it may be catalytically inactive due to the insulin treatment. Translational regulation of LPL has been identified previously following the depletion of PKC from adipocytes (37Ranganathan G. Kaakaji R. Kern P.A. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 9122-9127Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar) and following treatment of adipocytes with epinephrine and thyroid hormone (11Kern P.A. Ranganathan G. Yukht A. Ong J.M. Davis R. J. Lipid Res. 1996; 37: 2332-2340Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 38Ong J.M. Saffari B. Simsolo R.B. Kern P.A. Mol. Endocrinol. 1992; 6: 61-69Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar). In the studies involving epinephrine and thyroid hormone, similar methods were used to identify the RNA binding motif, which was on the proximal 3′-UTR of LPL between nucleotides 1599 and 1638 (12Ranganathan G. Vu D. Kern P.A. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 2515-2519Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar). Thus, the RNA binding motif in the diabetic adipose tissue (between nucleotides 1834 and 1980) is different from that of epinephrine treated cells and suggests that translation inhibition from diabetes may involve a different RNA-binding protein. In summary, insulin-deficient diabetic rats manifest low levels of adipose tissue LPL predominantly due to an inhibition of LPL translation. This decrease in translation is due to the interaction of a cytoplasmic substance with cis-acting sequences on the 3′-UTR of the LPL mRNA. The further characterization of this trans-acting substance will be important in the characterization of the abnormalities associated with the diabetic condition. We are pleased to acknowledge Annadell Fowler for technical assistance and Kimberly Henning for assistance with animal maintenance and experimental procedures.
Referência(s)