Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

A Comparative Evaluation of the Maryland NU 6 Auditory Test

1983; American Speech–Language–Hearing Association; Volume: 48; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1044/jshd.4801.62

2163-6184

G. Donald Causey, Claire L. Hermanson, Linda J. Hood, Lloyd S. Bowling,

Noise Effects and Management

No AccessJournal of Speech and Hearing DisordersResearch Article1 Feb 1983A Comparative Evaluation of the Maryland NU 6 Auditory Test G. Donald Causey, Claire L. Hermanson, Linda J. Hood, and Lloyd S. Bowling G. Donald Causey Requests for reprints should be addressed to G. Donald Causey, Ph.D., Bioeommunications Laboratory, Catholic University of America, 620 Michigan Avenue, NE, Washington, DC 20064. Veterans Administration Medical Center, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar , Claire L. Hermanson Veterans Administration Medical Center, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar , Linda J. Hood Veterans Administration Medical Center, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar and Lloyd S. Bowling George Washington University, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.4801.62 SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In This study was conducted to determine the performance-intensity functions of the Maryland NU 6 Auditory Test (female voice) with normal-hearing and hearing-impaired persons, to examine equivalency of the four lists, and to compare performance scores on this test with those obtained on the CID W-22 Test and the Maryland CNC Test. Three lists were judged to be equivalent, and there was good test-retest reliability. The test made distinctions among individuals with varying degrees of high-frequency hearing loss. Word recognition scores for the Maryland NU 6 and Maryland CNC Tests were remarkably similar, but differed significantly form those obtained on the W-22 Test. Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited by Ear & HearingPublish Ahead of Print3 Apr 2023Clinical Interpretation of Word-Recognition Scores for Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Confidence Intervals, Limits, and LevelsRobert H. Margolis, Richard H. Wilson and George L. Saly The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America152:3 (1404-1415)1 Sep 2022Evaluation of binomial distribution estimates of confidence intervals of speech-recognition test scoresRobert H. Margolis and Richard H. Wilson Otology & Neurotology43:2 (e153-e164)1 Feb 2022Intracochlear New Fibro-Ossification and Neuronal Degeneration Following Cochlear Implant Electrode Translocation: Long-Term Histopathological Findings in HumansRenata M. Knoll, Danielle R. Trakimas, Matthew J. Wu, Rory J. Lubner, Joseph B. Nadol, Akira Ishiyama, Felipe Santos, David H. Jung, Aaron K. Remenschneider and Elliott D. Kozin Audiology and Neurotology27:3 (235-242)Using Clinical Audiologic Measures to Determine Cochlear Implant CandidacyPriyanka Reddy, James R. Dornhoffer, Elizabeth L. Camposeo, Judy R. Dubno and Theodore R. McRackan Journal of the American Academy of Audiology32:07 (445-463)1 Jul 2021Waveform Amplitude and Temporal Symmetric/Asymmetric Characteristics of Phoneme and Syllable Segments in the W-1 Spondaic Words Recorded by Four SpeakersRichard H. Wilson and Nancy J. Scherer Audiology Research11:2 (220-226)26 May 2021Meta-Analysis—Correlation between Spiral Ganglion Cell Counts and Speech Perception with a Cochlear ImplantYew-Song Cheng and Mario A. Svirsky Otology & Neurotology41:9 (1296-1304)1 Oct 2020Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Menière's Disease: Does Disease Activity Affect the Outcome?Armine Kocharyan, Michelle E. Mark, Mustafa S. Ascha, Gail S. Murray, Nauman F. Manzoor, Cliff Megerian, Sarah E. Mowry and Maroun T. Semaan Frontiers in Psychology1116 Jul 2020Reproducibility in Cognitive Hearing Research: Theoretical Considerations and Their Practical Application in Multi-Lab StudiesAntje Heinrich and Sarah Knight Ear & Hearing40:6 (1267-1279)1 Nov 201914 Mar 2019Reliability of Measures Intended to Assess Threshold-Independent Hearing DisordersAryn M. Kamerer, Judy G. Kopun, Sara E. Fultz, Stephen T. Neely and Daniel M. Rasetshwane Otology & Neurotology39:8 (970-978)1 Sep 2018Human Otopathologic Findings in Cases of Folded Cochlear Implant ElectrodesDanielle R. Trakimas, Elliott D. Kozin, Iman Ghanad, Joseph B. Nadol and Aaron K. Remenschneider Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing14:2 (111-118)1 Jun 2011Effect of Filtering on Perception of Monosyllables (CV) and WordsPrashanth Prabhu P, Vijay Kumar Yadav Avilala and Animesh Barman International Journal of Audiology40:3 (123-132)1 Jan 2001Brazilian Portuguese Speech Material and its Application in Occupational Audiology: Material vocal en portugues brasileno y su aplicacion en Audiologia OcupacionalEverardo Andrade Da Costa American Journal of Audiology4:1 (26-34)1 Mar 1995Audiologic PracticesTerry L. Wiley, Daniel T. Stoppenbach, Laura J. Feldhake, Kayce A. Moss and Elin T. ThordardottirJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders55:4 (771-778)1 Nov 1990Normative Data in Quiet, Broadband Noise, and Competing Message for Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by a Female SpeakerRichard H. Wilson, Carol A. Zizz, Janet E. Shanks and G. Donald Causey International Journal of Audiology23:6 (552-568)1 Jan 1984The Maryland CNC Test: Normative StudiesG. Donald Causey, Linda J. Hood, Claire L. Hermanson and Lloyd S. Bowling Volume 48Issue 1February 1983Pages: 62-69 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library HistoryReceived: Sep 16, 1981Accepted: Feb 1, 1982 Published in issue: Feb 1, 1983 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1983 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...