Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Structural basis of the interaction between integrin α6β4 and plectin at the hemidesmosomes

2009; Springer Nature; Volume: 28; Issue: 8 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1038/emboj.2009.48

1460-2075

José M. de Pereda, M. Pilar Lillo, Arnoud Sonnenberg,

Cellular Mechanics and Interactions

Article26 February 2009free access Structural basis of the interaction between integrin α6β4 and plectin at the hemidesmosomes José M de Pereda Corresponding Author José M de Pereda Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas—Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Unamuno, Salamanca, Spain Search for more papers by this author M Pilar Lillo M Pilar Lillo Departamento de Biofísica, Instituto de Química Física Rocasolano, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Serrano, Madrid, Spain Search for more papers by this author Arnoud Sonnenberg Arnoud Sonnenberg Division of Cell Biology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan, CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands Search for more papers by this author José M de Pereda Corresponding Author José M de Pereda Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas—Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Unamuno, Salamanca, Spain Search for more papers by this author M Pilar Lillo M Pilar Lillo Departamento de Biofísica, Instituto de Química Física Rocasolano, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Serrano, Madrid, Spain Search for more papers by this author Arnoud Sonnenberg Arnoud Sonnenberg Division of Cell Biology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan, CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands Search for more papers by this author Author Information José M de Pereda 1, M Pilar Lillo2 and Arnoud Sonnenberg3 1Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas—Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Unamuno, Salamanca, Spain 2Departamento de Biofísica, Instituto de Química Física Rocasolano, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Serrano, Madrid, Spain 3Division of Cell Biology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan, CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands *Corresponding author. Department of Structural Biology, Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas—Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Unamuno s/n, Salamanca 37007, Spain. Tel.: +34 923 294 819; Fax: +34 923 294 795; E-mail: [email protected] The EMBO Journal (2009)28:1180-1190https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.48 PDFDownload PDF of article text and main figures. ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyWechatReddit Figures & Info The interaction between the integrin α6β4 and plectin is essential for the assembly and stability of hemidesmosomes, which are junctional adhesion complexes that anchor epithelial cells to the basement membrane. We describe the crystal structure at 2.75 Å resolution of the primary α6β4–plectin complex, formed by the first pair of fibronectin type III domains and the N-terminal region of the connecting segment of β4 and the actin-binding domain of plectin. Two missense mutations in β4 (R1225H and R1281W) linked to nonlethal forms of epidermolysis bullosa prevent essential intermolecular contacts. We also present two structures at 1.75 and 2.05 Å resolution of the β4 moiety in the absence of plectin, which reveal a major rearrangement of the connecting segment of β4 on binding to plectin. This conformational switch is correlated with the way α6β4 promotes stable adhesion or cell migration and suggests an allosteric control of the integrin. Introduction Integrity of epithelial tissues requires the attachment of basal cells to the underlying basement membrane. In skin and other complex and stratified epithelia, multiprotein junctional complexes, named hemidesmosomes, mediate stable adhesion and provide resistance to mechanical stress by linking the extracellular matrix to the cytokeratin filament system in the cell. Hemidesmosomes contain three transmembrane components: the α6β4 integrin, the type XVII collagen BP180 and the integrin-associated tetraspanin CD151. In addition, two members of the plakin family of cytolinkers: plectin and BP230 (BPAG1e) are present at the cytoplasmic region of hemidesmosomes (Jones et al, 1998; Nievers et al, 1999). The α6β4 integrin is a receptor for laminins, with preference for binding to laminin-332 (laminin-5), which is a major component of the epidermal basement membrane (Tsuruta et al, 2008). α6β4 is linked to the cytokeratin network by plectin and BP230, on which there are binding sites for α6β4, BP180 and intermediate filaments. The α6β4–plectin interaction is crucial for hemidesmosome stability, and it has been proposed that it acts as an initiation step in the assembly of hemidesmosomes facilitating the recruitment of BP180 and BP230 (Schaapveld et al, 1998). In fact, simple epithelia contain more rudimentary adhesion complexes, named type II hemidesmosomes, composed only of α6β4 and plectin (Uematsu et al, 1994). Most of the intracellular interactions of α6β4, including binding to plectin, occur through the cytoplasmic moiety of the β4 subunit, which is unusually large (∼1000 residues) and shares no similarity with that of other integrin β subunits. The β4 cytodomain has a modular organisation with four fibronectin type III (FnIII) domains arranged in two pairs of tandem repeats separated by a region named the connecting segment (CS), upstream of the first FnIII a calx-β domain is present, whereas downstream of the fourth FnIII extends an 85-residue long C-terminal tail (Figure 1A). The N-terminal region of plectin interacts with the β4 subunit (Rezniczek et al, 1998). This region of plectin contains an actin-binding domain (ABD) build up of two calponin homology domains (CH1 and CH2). Adjacent to the ABD extends a region conserved among members of the plakin family named the plakin domain, which is composed of a tandem array of spectrin repeats and an SH3 domain (Sonnenberg et al, 2007). Figure 1.Structure of the integrin β4–plectin complex. (A) Schematic representation of the domain organisation of plectin and the cytoplasmic domains of integrin α6β4. The regions of both proteins corresponding to the primary interaction site, whose crystal structure is presented herein, are highlight by a yellow box. (B) Ribbon representation in two orthogonal views of the integrin β4 (residues 1127–1318 in blue and 1324–1330 in orange) bound to plectin (residues 60–290 in red), with secondary structure elements labelled. Molecular figures were prepared using PyMOL (Delano, 2002). Download figure Download PowerPoint The interaction between plectin and the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin β4 subunit occurs at multiple sites. The primary contact is established between the ABD of plectin and the first pair of FnIII domains (FnIII-1,2) and a small region of the CS of β4 (Geerts et al, 1999). This region of β4 is required for targeting plectin into hemidesmosomes (Niessen et al, 1997). Moreover, two missense mutations in the β4 gene (ITGB4) linked to nonlethal forms of epidermolysis bullosa, introduce point substitutions (R1225H and R1281W) in the second FnIII domain that prevents binding to plectin (Pulkkinen et al, 1998; Koster et al, 2001; Nakano et al, 2001); further illustrating the essential role in vivo of this primary contact. A second interaction is established between the plakin domain of plectin and a discontinuous site in β4 that includes the C-terminal area of the CS and the C-terminal tail downstream of the fourth FnIII domain (Koster et al, 2004). Structural knowledge of the primary α6β4–plectin interaction sites includes the individual crystal structures of the FnIII-1,2 domains of β4 (de Pereda et al, 1999) and the ABD of plectin (Garcia-Alvarez et al, 2003; Sevcik et al, 2004). Using these structures and docking methods, we have previously constructed a theoretical model of the primary α6β4–plectin complex, and the contact interfaces derived from this model have been experimentally validated (Litjens et al, 2005). Despite these advances, the structural basis of the integrin α6β4 linkage to the cytoskeleton remained poorly understood. To decipher the molecular architecture of hemidesmosomes, we have determined the structure of the primary α6β4–plectin complex by X-ray crystallography. Combining structure-based mutagenesis and biophysical data, we have identified critical elements of the β4–plectin interaction. Furthermore, we present structures of the primary plectin-binding site on free β4, which reveals that there is a conformational switch in β4 linked to the binding to plectin. These results provide a molecular basis for diseases that target the hemidesmosome stability and have clear implications for models of hemidesmosome assembly and dynamics. Results and discussion Overall structure of the integrin β4–plectin complex Crystals of the integrin β4–plectin complex were obtained using a fragment of human β4, residues 1126–1370, corresponding to the FnIII-1,2 domains and the N-terminal region of the CS, and a fragment of human plectin, residues 1–293, which contains the N-terminal tail and the ABD. The structure was solved by molecular replacement, and it was refined against data to a resolution of 2.75 Å (Table I). The asymmetric unit of the crystal contains two copies of the β4–plectin complex with one-to-one stoichiometry and a third unbound β4 molecule. Because of the moderate affinity of their interaction (see below), the complexes could not be purified before crystallisation; therefore, crystals were obtained using an equimolar mixture of the two proteins at a concentration about one order of magnitude higher than the equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd). Under these conditions, a small proportion of β4 and plectin is expected to be unbound, which explains the appearance of the free β4 molecule in the crystals. Table 1. Summary of crystallographic analysis β4–plectin complex β4 (1126–1355) β4 (1126–1370) Data collection Space group P3221 P1 C2 Cell dimensions a, b, c (Å) 107.3, 107.3, 204.0 43.1, 49.5, 74.4 137.5, 42.2, 56.9 α, β, γ (°) 90, 90, 120 107.2, 96.1, 06.6 90, 109.9, 90 Wavelength (Å) 1.0723 1.5418 1.5418 Resolution (Å) 2.75 (2.90–2.75)a 1.75 (1.81–1.75)a 2.04 (2.11–2.04)a Unique reflections 35983 50859 19567 Redundancy 9.6 (9.9)a 2.3 (2.2)a 3.9 (3.6)a Completeness (%) 99.8 (100)a 91.5 (84.8)a 97.2 (85.9)a Rmeas (%)b 8.1 (60.7)a 5.4 (36.0)a 6.4 (28.9)a 〈I/σI〉 20.4 (4.6)a 16.3 (3.8)a 16.6 (5.6)a Refinement statistics Resolution range (Å) 85–2.75 22–1.75 36–2.04 Unique reflections, work/free 34 178/1805 48 246/2589 18 568/998 R work/R free (%) 20.4/25.7 15.5/18.2 17.6/21.5 No. of molecules in the a.u.c 2 × plectin/3 × β4 2 1 No. of atoms Protein 8528 6832 3375 Water 20 502 142 PEG 15 56 18 Ion 1 2 1 B-factors Wilson plot 63.6 25.7 31.6 Proteind 66.9/82.2/90.4/87.5/88.8 26.2/25.5 26.2 Water 55.6 36.8 32.6 PEG 71.9 56.4 49.4 Ion 43.4 25.6 26.2 R.m.s. deviations Bond lengths (Å) 0.006 0.005 0.012 Bond angles (°) 0.907 0.878 1.130 Ramachandran plot regions Most favoured 807 311 157 Additionally allowed 114 41 19 Generously allowed 2 0 0 Disallowed 0 0 0 a Numbers in parenthesis correspond to the outer resolution shell. b Multiplicity independent R factor. c Asymmetric unit. d Value per protein chain. The two copies of the β4–plectin complex have a similar structure. Each heterodimer has a 'Y' shape in which the ABD branches at about 45° from the rod-like structure of the FnIII-1,2 domains of β4 (Figure 1B). The main contacts occur between the CH1 domain of plectin and the FnIII-2 domain of β4. Despite the overall similarities between the two copies of the β4–plectin complex, the binding interface is better defined in one of them, which has a lower average B-factor for the CH1 domain of plectin (74.8 versus 93.7 Å2) and the FnIII-2 of β4 (72.5 versus 105.2 Å2). When the β4 molecules from each complex were superimposed on top of each other, a difference in the orientation of the ABD in the poorly defined copy was revealed, that is, the ABD has rotated around an axis running parallel to the long axis of the β4 molecule by about 8°. The description of the structure of the heterodimer is based on what we observed in the well-defined copy. The plectin-binding interface of integrin β4 The structure of the FnIII-1,2 domains of β4 in its complex with the plectin ABD is almost identical to that of the FnIII-1,2 domains, previously described by us, which did not contain the CS (PDB code 1QG3; r.m.s.d. of 0.79 Å for 191 Cα atoms) (de Pereda et al, 1999). The formation of the complex between β4 and plectin buries ∼1150 Å2 of the solvent accessible surface of each molecule, which corresponds to ∼10% of their surface. The core of the interface in the β4 subunit is formed by the ABE β-sheet and the BC loop of the FnIII-2 domain (Figure 2). This area accounts for ∼60% of the total surface buried in the complex. The interface of β4 is centred around a basic strip formed by R1225, K1279 and R1281, which faces an acidic area on the CH1 surface. R1225 and R1281 establish salt bridges with D151 and E95, respectively. A third salt bridge occurs between E1242 of β4 and R98 of plectin. Single point mutations R1225H or R1281W in β4, and E95S or R98Q in plectin abrogate the interaction of the ABD with β4 (Koster et al, 2001; Litjens et al, 2005); thus, the three intermolecular salt bridges are an essential part of the interaction. K1279 is located at the periphery of the interface and does not engage in any ionic interaction, which is in agreement that the K1279W substitution does not compromise the interaction with plectin (Koster et al, 2001). Direct contact between the backbones of both proteins occurs only at the level of the BC loop of β4 and the FG loop of plectin, where the carbonyl of D154 of plectin makes an H-bond with the nitrogen of E1242 of β4. The only large hydrophobic residue in the FnIII-2 domain that contributes to the interface is M1282 in the β-strand E, whose side chain contacts P157 and the aliphatic chain of K158 of plectin. Figure 2.Integrin β4–plectin interface. (A) Open-book view of the complex. Ribbon representation of the β4 (left) and plectin (right) structure with residues that constitute the interface shown as sticks. (B, C) Surface representation coloured by electrostatic potential (from -12 kT/e in red to 12 kT/e in blue) of β4 (B) and plectin (C) in the same orientation as in (A). Residues that form part of the interfaces are labelled on each surface. The backbone of the companion partner is partially shown as a wire, with the side chains that participate in the interaction shown as sticks and labelled with arrows. Download figure Download PowerPoint A seven-residue long fragment extends adjacent to the β-strand A of the FnIII-2 domain of β4 and contributes to the binding interface. This fragment is not connected with any molecule in the crystal as concluded from the electron density. Yet, it is located near the C-terminus of the FnIII-2 and far from the N- or C-terminus of other molecules. Thus, this stretch was assigned to be part of the CS, which forms a short antiparallel β-strand. The CS extends the ABE β-sheet of the FnIII-2 and widens the plectin-binding interface by contacting the EF loop and the N-terminus of helix G in the CH1 of plectin. The contribution of the FnIII-1 domain of β4 to the binding interface is much smaller than that of the FnIII-2 and the CS. The EF and CC′ loops of the FnIII-1 domain face the CE loop of the CH1 of plectin. This surface of β4 contains a hydrophobic crevice formed by I1163, Y1187 and C1190, and an acidic patch containing D1166 and E1170. The side chain of M122 in plectin is oriented toward the hydrophobic crevice of β4. Disruption of this hydrophobic area in the β4 double mutant Y1187R/C1190R inhibits binding to plectin (Litjens et al, 2005). R121 of plectin is located near the acidic CC′ loop of β4, but no electron density was observed for its side chain, suggesting that R121 does not engage in stable contacts. Replacement of the CC′ loop of the FnIII-1 domain by the equivalent loop of the FnIII-2 does not compromise the interaction with plectin (Litjens et al, 2005), which is in agreement with the lack of specific contacts between the CC′ loop of β4 and plectin. In summary, the plectin-binding interface of β4 is composed of three distinct elements: (1) the FnIII-2 domain at the centre of the interface, and additional contacts from (2) the FnIII-1 domain and (3) the CS. Role of β4 regions to the interaction with plectin To better understand the contribution of each of the above β4 elements to the interaction with plectin, we have determined the affinity of various β4 constructs for the ABD, using a fluorescence-based assay (Supplementary data and Supplementary Figure S1). The Kd of the interaction between the fragments used for crystallisation, β4 1126–1370 and plectin 1–293, is ∼49 μM (Table II). The affinity of the β4 fragment 1126–1322, which lacks the CS, for the ABD is approximately six-fold reduced, which is in agreement with the requirement of the 1329–1355 region for the recruitment of plectin into hemidesmosomes in vivo (Niessen et al, 1997). Electron density was observed only for a short region of the CS, which is located at the interface (see above). To more precisely define the sequence of the CS involved in the binding to the ABD of plectin, we have determined the affinity of additional β4 truncation mutants. The β4 fragment 1126–1355 has a slightly higher affinity for plectin than the 1126–1370 fragment, suggesting that residues 1356–1370 do not contribute to the interaction. A shorter β4 fragment, residues 1126–1348, has a three-fold lower affinity for the ABD than the 1126–1355 fragment. Deletion of additional regions of the CS as in the β4 fragments 1126–1343, 1126–1338 and 1126–1333 did not further reduce the affinity for the ABD. Taking together, these data reveal that the N-terminal region of the CS harbours two ABD-binding subsites that correspond to the sequences 1323PMSIPIIPDIP1333 and 1349YSDDVLR1355, respectively. It is reasonable to assume that one of these two subsites corresponds to the electron density located at the binding interface, which is located near to where the fluorescence probe is attached to a Cys engineered at position 162 of plectin. Thus, the region of the CS that occupies this position is expected to be a major determinant for the changes in the fluorescence of the AEDANS on complex formation. Although binding of the β4 fragments 1126–1370, 1126–1355, 1126–1348, 1126–1343, 1126–1338, 1126–1333 induces a similar change in the fluorescence emission spectrum of the AEDANS, as judged by the ratio between the fluorescence intensity of the fully bound and free states (Table II), the 1126–1322 fragment induces a much more moderate change in the fluorescence intensity. Thus, the first ABD-binding site of the CS, residues 1323–1333, is located at the binding surface near helix G of the CH1 of plectin. On the basis of the H-bond pattern of the polypeptide backbone, we have chosen residues 1324–1330 to be the fragment that forms a short antiparallel β-strand with the strand A of the FnIII-2 (Supplementary Figure S2A). The side chains of P1227 and I1329 face the CH1 of plectin and the carbonyl of P1227 makes an H-bond with the carboxamide group of N146 of plectin. On the other side, I1328 and P1330 pack against the FnIII-2 of β4. Simultaneous substitution of P1324A/P1227A in β4 1126–1355 does not alter its affinity for the ABD, suggesting that an Ala in position 1327 provides sufficient hydrophobic contacts to maintain the interaction. Notably, the double mutant P1330A/P1333A has the same affinity for the ABD as the wild-type protein, which is in agreement with a minimal effect of the P1330A/P1333A mutations on the interaction between β4 1115–1355 and plectin 1–339 in yeast two-hybrid experiments (Koster et al, 2004). Table 2. Affinity of the integrin β4–plectin interaction Kd (μM) Ibound/ Ifreea Binding of integrin β4 fragments to plectin 1C (1–293) β4 fragment 1126–1370 (FnIII-1,2+CS) 49±7 1.67±0.03 1126–1355 (FnIII-1,2+CS) 31±4 1.67±0.04 1126–1348 (FnIII-1,2+CS) 95±3 1.66±0.01 1126–1343 (FnIII-1,2+CS) 108±8 1.57±0.01 1126–1338 (FnIII-1,2+CS) 86±11 1.55±0.05 1126–1333 (FnIII-1,2+CS) 90±3 1.59±0.02 1126–1322 (FnIII-1,2) 288±92 1.20±0.04 1218–1355 (FnIII-2+CS) 190±36 1.68±0.08 1126–1355 (FnIII-1,2+CS) P1323A/P1327A 31±4 1.67±0.01 1126–1355 (FnIII-1,2+CS) P1330A/P1333A 30±7 1.69±0.04 1126–1355 (FnIII-1,2+CS) R1225H >5000b ND 1126–1355 (FnIII-1,2+CS) R1225A >10 000b ND 1126–1355 (FnIII-1,2+CS) R1225K 2600±170 ND 1126–1355 (FnIII-1,2+CS) R1281W >10 000b ND 1126–1355 (FnIII-1,2+CS) R1281A >10 000b ND 1126–1355 (FnIII-1,2+CS) R1281K 1300±80 ND 1126–1355 (FnIII-1,2+CS) K1272C/S1345C reduced 36±5 1.81±0.03 1126–1355 (FnIII-1,2+CS) K1272C/S1345C oxidized 226±31 1.43±0.03 Binding of plectin fragments to b4 (1126–1355) Plectin fragment 1C-ABD (1–293) 31±4 1.67±0.04 1C(Δ1–58)-ABD (59–293) 22±2 1.89±0.01 1A-ABD (1–266) 28±5 1.51±0.02 ABD (68–293)c 16±4 2.08±0.12 ND, not determined. Data are presented as mean±standard deviation. a Ratio between the fluorescence intensities in the free and fully bound states (λex 340 nm, λem 475 nm). b Minimal value compatible with the data. c Numbers according to the 1C variant, correspond to 41–266 in the 1A isoform. Finally, deletion of the FnIII-1 domain of β4, as in the fragment 1218–1355, induces an approximately six-fold reduction in the affinity for the ABD compared with β4 1126–1355. The moderate contribution of the first FnIII domain to the affinity of binding is probably due to the fact that there are only few contacts with plectin. In summary, both the FnIII-1 and the CS contribute to the binding site and support the stability of the integrin β4–plectin ABD complex. The β4-binding interface of plectin The ABD of plectin binds to β4 through its CH1 domain, while there is no direct contact between the CH2 domain and β4. Nonetheless, the CH2 is required for binding to β4 (Geerts et al, 1999). There are extensive intramolecular contacts between the CH1 and CH2 of the ABD. Thus, it is likely that the CH2 favours binding to β4 by stabilising and offering the correct presentation of the CH1. The β4-binding surface of the CH1 domain of plectin is centred on the FG loop, which is completely buried in the complex. Additional contacts involve the AC and CE loops, helix F and the N-terminal ends of helices E and G. The interface is characterised by a belt of charged residues (E95, R98 and D151), which establish essential intramolecular salt bridges (see above). The ABD of dystonin binds to the same region of β4 as the ABD of plectin, whereas the ABDs of dystrophin, α-actinin, utrophin and filamins A and B do not (Litjens et al, 2003). The plectin residues that form the β4-binding interface are conserved in dystonin, suggesting that the ABD of these proteins interacts with β4 in the same way. Plectin residues 60–64, which are located upstream of the ABD, form a second interaction site for β4 (Figure 3A). These residues adopt an extended conformation that projects away from the CH1 domain. Hence, it is named the N-terminal arm. The arm packs in antiparallel orientation against strand E of the FnIII-2 of β4 extending the ABE β-sheet on the opposite side from the CS. The plectin arm contacts β4 mainly through interactions between the polypeptide backbones, with the exception of I61 whose side chain makes hydrophobic contacts with V1273 and L1283. No electron density was observed for plectin residues 1–59. The affinity for β4 of the plectin fragment 59–293 is very similar to that of the 1–293 fragment (Table II). Thus, the plectin N-terminal region upstream the arm does not have a noticeable contribution to the interaction. Figure 3.Structure of the N-terminal arm of plectin. (A) Representation of the N-terminal arm of plectin (red) bound to the FnIII-2 of β4 (blue). An omit map (2mFobs-DFcalc, contoured at 1σ) is shown in blue; the map was calculated after simulated annealing refinement of a model in which the plectin arm was omitted. (B) Cα-trace of the N-terminal region of ABD in the absence of plectin (orange, PDB 1MB8) superimposed on the structure of the ABD (red) bound to β4 (blue). (C) Comparison of the sequences of plectin 1C and 1A upstream of the ABD. Only the initial residues of the CH1, which is common to the two isoforms, are shown. The secondary structure elements in the free (orange) and β4-bound (red) structures of the ABD are shown on top. Download figure Download PowerPoint The PLEC-1 gene contains multiple alternative first exons that code for the N-terminal region upstream of the ABD. In humans, this results in four isoforms of which 1A and 1C are present in keratinocytes (Andra et al, 2003) and bind to β4 (Litjens et al, 2003). The complex in our crystals contains the plectin 1C isoform. The N-terminal arm of isoform 1A has no sequence similarity with that of plectin 1C (residues 60–64). Nonetheless, as the arm binds to β4 mainly through the polypeptide backbone, it is likely that the alternative region of the two isoforms interacts with β4 in a similar fashion. The plectin 1A fragment 1–266 has the same affinity for β4 as the analogous fragment of the 1C isoform (residues 1–293). Thus, the N-terminal region encoded by exon-1A does not enhance the interaction with the FnIII-1,2 domains of β4. Notably, the isolated ABD (residues 68–293 in the 1C variant) has a slightly higher affinity for β4 than when the sequences encoded by exon-1A or exon-1C are also present in the fragment. This is in agreement with the observation that in vivo a plectin construct lacking the exon-1 encoded region is more strongly co-localised with β4 than the naturally occurring variants 1A or 1C (Litjens et al, 2003). In the structure of the free ABD (Garcia-Alvarez et al, 2003), the residues 59–64 are part of the helix A of the CH1 domain, while this region is extended in the N-terminal arm in the β4–plectin complex (Figure 3B and C). Therefore, the slight negative effect of the sequence upstream of the ABD on the binding to β4 may be due to an unfavourable energetic balance of the helix-to-strand transition of this segment, which would not be compensated by the interaction of the N-terminal arm with β4. In summary, the selective targeting of the plectin 1A and 1C isoforms to hemidesmosomes does not rely on the interaction of the exon-1 coded regions with the primary binding site in β4. Yet, we cannot exclude that the N-terminal regions of plectin specific for the isoforms may harbour binding sites for other regions of β4 or other hemidesmosomal components. Missense mutations of β4 linked to epidermolysis bullosa disrupt the binding interface Two missense mutations in the ITGB4 gene that result in single amino acid substitutions in the integrin β4 subunit, R1225H and R1281W, have been detected in patients with nonlethal forms of epidermolysis bullosa with pyloric atresia (Nakano et al, 2001; Pulkkinen et al, 1998). These mutations abolish the interaction of β4 with the ABD of plectin as shown in yeast-two-hybrid assays and prevent the recruitment of plectin into hemidesmosomes in vivo (Koster et al, 2001). Both residues are located in the FnIII-2 domain and form part of the plectin-binding surface. R1225 forms an ionic pair with D151 and an H-bond with N146 in plectin. These contacts are likely to be further stabilised by the stacking of the guanidinium groups of R1225 of β4 and R148 of plectin (Figure 4A; Supplementary Figure S2B). R1281 contributes to a network of intermolecular polar contacts; its side chain forms a salt bridge with E95 and H-bonds with the carbonyl groups of G155 and Y94 of plectin. In addition, E95 of plectin establishes an intramolecular salt bridge with R98, which in turn makes an ionic pair with D1242 of β4 (Figure 4B). Figure 4.Structural basis of missense mutations of β4 linked to epidermolysis bullosa. (A) Close-up showing the intermolecular contacts between R1225 of β4 (blue) and plectin (red). A hypothetical conformation of the His side chain in the R1225H mutant is shown to illustrate the effect of this substitution, which prevents the interactions with N146, R148 and D151 in plectin. (B) Detailed view of the contacts established by R1281 of β4, and nearby residues (coloured as in A). A possible structure of the Trp side chain in the disease-linked mutation R1281W is shown. The imidazole ring does not maintain the H-bonds established by R1281 and most likely it causes steric clashes with W1240 of β4 and P157 of plectin. Download figure Download PowerPoint To precisely assess the role of R1225 and R1281 in the binding to plectin and the effect of the disease-linked mutations, we have determined the affinity for the plectin ABD of the β4 fragment 1126–1355, in which R1225 was substituted by His, Ala or Lys, and R1281 by Trp, Ala or Lys (Table II). All these fragments with a single point mutation had the same far-UV circular dichroism spectrum and showed similar guanidinium hydrochloride-induced denaturation profile as the wild type (data not shown)