Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Teacher Evaluation: A Study of Effective Practices

1985; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 86; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/461437

1554-8279

Arthur E. Wise, Linda Darling‐Hammond, Milbrey Wallin McLaughlin, Harriet T. Bernstein,

Educational Assessment and Improvement

Previous articleNext article No AccessTeacher Evaluation: A Study of Effective PracticesArthur E. Wise, Linda Darling-Hammond, Milbrey W. McLaughlin, and Harriet T. BernsteinArthur E. Wise, Linda Darling-Hammond, Milbrey W. McLaughlin, and Harriet T. BernsteinPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Elementary School Journal Volume 86, Number 1Sep., 1985Special Issue: The Master Teacher Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/461437 Views: 45Total views on this site Citations: 43Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1985 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Craig De Voto, Jessica J. Gottlieb The Struggle to Professionalize Teaching: Examining edTPA as a Professionalization and Deprofessionalization Tool, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education 123, no.99 (Dec 2021): 57–86.https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681211052008Jeremy D. Visone, Maria Boeke Mongillo, Yan Liu Teachers' perceptions of collaboration within an evolving teacher evaluation context, Journal of Educational Change 47 (May 2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09424-4Dorothea Anagnostopoulos, Suzanne Wilson, Sian Charles-Harris Contesting quality teaching: Teachers' pragmatic agency and the debate about teacher evaluation, Teaching and Teacher Education 98 (Feb 2021): 103246.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103246David B. Reid School principals acting as middle leaders implementing new teacher evaluation systems, School Leadership & Management 40, no.11 (Sep 2018): 88–104.https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2018.1508013David B. Reid What information do principals consider when evaluating teachers?, School Leadership & Management 39, no.55 (Feb 2019): 457–477.https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1576167Morgaen L. Donaldson, Sarah Woulfin From Tinkering to Going "Rogue": How Principals Use Agency When Enacting New Teacher Evaluation Systems, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 40, no.44 (Jul 2018): 531–556.https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718784205W. Kyle Ingle, Jane Clark Lindle A Policy and Political History of Educational Supervision, (Sep 2018): 15–43.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119128304.ch2Erica Fernández, Kimberly LeChasseur, Morgaen L. Donaldson Responses to including parents in teacher evaluation policy: A critical policy analysis, Journal of Education Policy 33, no.33 (Sep 2017): 398–413.https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1370135Chris Willis, W. Kyle Ingle Profiles of Merit Pay Provisions in Ohio School Districts, Leadership and Policy in Schools 17, no.11 (Sep 2016): 78–114.https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2016.1232835Amber N. Warren, Natalia A. Ward 'This is my new normal': teachers' accounts of evaluation policy at local school board meetings, Journal of Education Policy 20 (Oct 2017): 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1390164Xiao-feng Zhang, Ho-ming Ng An effective model of teacher appraisal, Educational Management Administration & Leadership 45, no.22 (Mar 2017): 196–218.https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215597234Karin J. Keith, LaShay Jennings, Renee Moran Coaching as a Grass Roots Effort for Building Leadership Capacity, (Jan 2017): 207–223.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0669-0.ch011Morgaen L. Donaldson, Sarah Woulfin, Kimberly LeChasseur, Casey D. Cobb The Structure and Substance of Teachers' Opportunities to Learn about Teacher Evaluation Reform: Promise or Pitfall for Equity?, Equity & Excellence in Education 49, no.22 (May 2016): 183–201.https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2016.1144831Sarah L. Woulfin, Morgaen L. Donaldson, Richard Gonzales District Leaders' Framing of Educator Evaluation Policy, Educational Administration Quarterly 52, no.11 (Dec 2015): 110–143.https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616661Morgaen L. Donaldson and John P. Papay An Idea Whose Time Had Come: Negotiating Teacher Evaluation Reform in New Haven, Connecticut, American Journal of Education 122, no.11 (Dec 2015): 39–70.https://doi.org/10.1086/683291William Kyle Ingle, Chris Willis, James Fritz Collective Bargaining Agreement Provisions in the Wake of Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Legislation, Educational Policy 29, no.11 (Dec 2014): 18–50.https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814559249 송인발, Joo Ho Park The Impact of School-Level Variables on Teacher's Professional Development Activities, The Journal of Korean Teacher Education 31, no.44 (Dec 2014): 93–117.https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2014.31.4.93Philip Hallinger, Ronald H. Heck, Joseph Murphy Teacher evaluation and school improvement: An analysis of the evidence, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 26, no.11 (Jan 2014): 5–28.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9179-5Peter Burden Teacher perceptions of the introduction of student evaluation of teaching in Japanese tertiary education, (Jan 2013): 145–169.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-655-5.50007-6Xiao Feng Zhang, Ho Ming Ng A case study of teacher appraisal in Shanghai, China: in relation to teacher professional development, Asia Pacific Education Review 12, no.44 (Apr 2011): 569–580.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-011-9159-8Bong-Woon Ha, Youl-Kwan Sung Teacher reactions to the performance-based bonus program: how the expectancy theory works in the South Korean school culture, Asia Pacific Education Review 12, no.11 (Nov 2010): 129–141.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-010-9131-zXavier Dumay Efficacité des modes locaux de coordination et de gestion des établissements, Revue française de pédagogie , no.167167 (Jun 2009): 101–128.https://doi.org/10.4000/rfp.1483Peter Burden Does the use of end of semester evaluation forms represent teachers' views of teaching in a tertiary education context in Japan?, Teaching and Teacher Education 24, no.66 (Aug 2008): 1463–1475.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.11.012Francine de Clercq School monitoring and change: a critical examination of Whole School-Evaluation, Education as Change 11, no.22 (Dec 2007): 97–113.https://doi.org/10.1080/16823200709487168Su Mi Dahlgaard‐Park, Loukas N. Anninos The archetype of excellence in universities and TQM, Journal of Management History 13, no.44 (Oct 2007): 307–321.https://doi.org/10.1108/17511340710819561Anthony H. Normore Integrating Personnel Evaluation in the Planning and Evaluation of School Improvement Initiatives, American Journal of Evaluation 26, no.33 (Sep 2005): 348–351.https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005278757Ernest R. House, Stephen D. Lapan Policy, Productivity, and Teacher Evaluation, (Jan 1997): 593–620.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4942-6_16Kusum Singh, Linda M. Shifflette Teachers' perspectives on professional development, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 10, no.22 (Jun 1996): 145–160.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00156895Margaret Haughey, Peggy Howard, Stephen Marshall Technical expertise and teacher growth: results of a teacher evaluation policy impact study, Journal of Education Policy 11, no.22 (Mar 1996): 159–168.https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093960110202D. Jean Clandinin, Merle Kennedy, Linda La Rocque, Marni Pearce Living the tension: a case study of teacher stories of teacher evaluation, Journal of Education Policy 11, no.22 (Mar 1996): 169–183.https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093960110203Laura Fulwiler A Beggar in Both Worlds: A Supervisor in the Schools and the University, Journal of Teacher Education 47, no.11 (Jan 1996): 21–26.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487196047001005PEGGY C. LITTRELL, BONNIE S. BILLINGSLEY, LAWRENCE H. CROSS The Effects of Principal Support on Special and General Educators' Stress, Job Satisfaction, School Commitment, Health, and Intent to Stay in Teaching, Remedial and Special Education 15, no.55 (Aug 2016): 297–310.https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259401500505Larry E. Frase, William Streshly Lack of accuracy, feedback, and commitment in teacher evaluation, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 8, no.11 (Feb 1994): 47–57.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00972709Lynn Bosetti Official Policy and Truncated Practice: a need to reconceptualise the evaluation of teachers, School Organisation 14, no.11 (Jan 1994): 49–61.https://doi.org/10.1080/0260136940140105RACHEL MASON New Realities in Teacher Education, Journal of Art & Design Education 12, no.11 (Mar 1993): 53–62.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.1993.tb00573.xWilliam K. Poston, Richard P. Manatt Principals as Evaluators: Limiting Effects on School Reform, International Journal of Educational Reform 2, no.11 (Jan 2019): 41–48.https://doi.org/10.1177/105678799300200106Pamela Brown Clarridge Multiple Perspectives on the Classroom Performance of Certified and Uncertified Teachers, Journal of Teacher Education 41, no.44 (Sep 1990): 15–25.https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719004100404Brian Rowan Chapter 7: Commitment and Control: Alternative Strategies for the Organizational Design of Schools, Review of Research in Education 16, no.11 (Jun 2016): 353–389.https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X016001353Allan C. Ornstein Theoretical Issues Related to Teaching, Education and Urban Society 22, no.11 (Jul 2016): 95–104.https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124589022001010 Susan J. Rosenholtz Workplace Conditions That Affect Teacher Quality and Commitment: Implications for Teacher Induction Programs, The Elementary School Journal 89, no.44 (Oct 2015): 421–439.https://doi.org/10.1086/461584David Hopkins, Robert Bollington Teacher Appraisal for Professional Development: a review of research, Cambridge Journal of Education 19, no.22 (Jan 1989): 163–182.https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764890190207Allan C. Ornstein The Changing Status of the Teaching Profession, Urban Education 23, no.33 (Aug 2016): 261–279.https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085988023003003J. Aaron Hoko Merit Pay—In Search of the Pedagogical Widget, The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 62, no.11 (Jul 2010): 29–31.https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.1988.10114002