Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Dual-energy computed tomography imaging to determine atherosclerotic plaque composition: A prospective study with tissue validation

2014; Elsevier BV; Volume: 8; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.jcct.2014.04.007

1934-5925

Daniel R. Obaid, Patrick A. Calvert, Deepa Gopalan, Richard Parker, Nick E.J. West, Martin Goddard, James H.F. Rudd, Martin R. Bennett,

Radiation Dose and Imaging

BackgroundIdentifying vulnerable coronary plaque with coronary CT angiography is limited by overlap between attenuation of necrotic core and fibrous plaque. Using x-rays with differing energies alters attenuation values of these components, depending on their material composition.ObjectivesWe sought to determine whether dual-energy CT (DECT) improves plaque component discrimination compared with single-energy CT (SECT).MethodsTwenty patients underwent DECT and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS). Attenuation changes at 100 and 140 kV for each plaque component were defined, using 1088 plaque areas co-registered with VH-IVUS. Hounsfield unit thresholds that best detected necrotic core were derived for SECT (conventional attenuation values) and for DECT (using dual-energy indices, defined as difference in Hounsfield unit values at the 2 voltages/their sum). Sensitivity of SECT and DECT to detect plaque components was determined in 77 segments from 7 postmortem coronary arteries. Finally, we examined 60 plaques in vivo to determine feasibility and sensitivity of clinical DECT to detect VH-IVUS–defined necrotic core.ResultsIn contrast to conventional SECT, mean dual-energy indices of necrotic core and fibrous tissue were significantly different with minimal overlap of ranges (necrotic core, 0.007 [95% CI, –0.001 to 0.016]; fibrous tissue, 0.028 [95% CI, 0.016–0.050]; P < .0001). DECT increased diagnostic accuracy to detect necrotic core in postmortem arteries (sensitivity, 64%; specificity, 98%) compared with SECT (sensitivity, 50%; specificity, 94%). DECT sensitivity to detect necrotic core was lower when analyzed in vivo, although still better than SECT (45% vs 39%).ConclusionsDECT improves the differentiation of necrotic core and fibrous plaque in ex vivo postmortem arteries. However, much of this improvement is lost when translated to in vivo imaging because of a reduction in image quality.