Uretero‐intestinal anastomosis in low‐pressure reservoirs: refluxing or antirefluxing?
2007; Wiley; Volume: 100; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1464-410x.2007.07052.x
ISSN1464-410X
AutoresMohamed A. Ghoneim, Yasser Osman,
Tópico(s)Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas
ResumoBJU InternationalVolume 100, Issue 6 p. 1229-1233 Uretero-intestinal anastomosis in low-pressure reservoirs: refluxing or antirefluxing? Mohamed A. Ghoneim, Mohamed A. Ghoneim Department of Urology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura, EgyptSearch for more papers by this authorYasser Osman, Yasser Osman Department of Urology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura, EgyptSearch for more papers by this author Mohamed A. Ghoneim, Mohamed A. Ghoneim Department of Urology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura, EgyptSearch for more papers by this authorYasser Osman, Yasser Osman Department of Urology, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura, EgyptSearch for more papers by this author First published: 15 August 2007 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07052.xCitations: 13 Mohamed A. Ghoneim, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura, Egypt.e-mail: [email protected] Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES 1 Helal M, Pow-Sang J, Sanford E, Figueroa E, Lockhart J. Direct (non-tunneled) ureterocolonic re–implantation in association with continent reservoirs. J Urol 1993; 150: 835–7 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 2 Pantuck AJ, Han K, Perrotti M, Weiss RE, Cummings KB. Ureteroenteric anastomosis in continent urinary diversion. Long-term results and complications of direct versus non-refluxing techniques. J Urol 2000; 163: 450–5 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67898-6 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3 Studer UE, Danuser H, Thalmann GN, Springer JP, Turner WH. Anti-reflux nipples or afferent tubular segments in 70 patients with ileal low pressure bladder substitutes. Long term results of a prospective randomized trial. J Urol 1996; 156: 1913–7 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65390-4 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 4 De Carli P, Micali S, O’Sullivan D et al. Ureteral anastomosis in the orthotopic ileal neo-bladder: comparison of 2 techniques. J Urol 1997; 157: 469–71 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65175-9 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 5 Roth S, Van Ahlen H, Semjonow A, Oberpenning F, Hertle L. Does the success of uretero-intestinal implantation in orthotopic bladder substitution depend more on surgeon level of experience or choice of technique? J Urol 1997; 157: 56–60 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65279-0 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 6 Stein JP, Freeman JA, Esrig D et al. Complications of the afferent antireflux valve mechanism in the Kock ileal reservoir. J Urol 1996; 155: 1579–84 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66131-7 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 7 Elmajian DA, Stein JP, Esrig D et al. The Kock ileal neo-bladder: updated experience in 295 male patients. J Urol 1996; 156: 920–5 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65663-5 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 8 Steven K, Poulsen AL. The orthotopic Kock ileal neo-bladder. Functional results, urodynamic features, complications and survival in 166 men. J Urol 2000; 164: 288–95 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67343-0 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 9 Shaaban AA, Mosbah A, El-Bahnasawy MS, Madbouly K, Ghoneim MA. The urethral Kock pouch. Long-term functional and oncological results in men. BJU Int 2003; 92: 429–35 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04346.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 10 Osman Y, Abol-Enein H, Nabeeh A, Gaballah M, Bazeed M. Long-term results of a prospective randomized study comparing two different anti-reflux techniques in orthotopic bladder substitution. Eur Urol 2004; 45: 82–6 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.08.006 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 11 Abol-Enein H, Ghoneim MA. A novel uretero-ileal re-implantation technique: the serous-lined extramural tunnel. A preliminary report. J Urol 1994; 151: 1193–7 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35211-4 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 12 Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Ginsberg DA, Bochner BH, Skinner DG. The T-pouch: an orthotopic ileal neobladder incorporating a serosal lined ileal anti-reflux technique. J Urol 1998; 159: 1836–42 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63170-7 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 13 Le Duc A, Camey M, Teillac P. An original anti-reflux uretero-ileal implantation technique: long-term follow-up. J Urol 1987; 137: 1156–8 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)44433-8 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 14 Shaaban AA, Gaballah MA, El-Diasty TA, Ghoneim MA. Urethral controlled bladder substitution. A comparison between the intussuscepted nipple valve and the technique of Le Duc as anti-reflux procedures. J Urol 1992; 148: 1156–61 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36847-7 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 15 Lugagne PM, Herve JM, Lebret T, Barre P, Mollier S, Botto H. Uretero-ileal implantation in orthotopic neobladder with the Le-Duc Camey mucosal-Through technique. risk of stenosis and long-term follow-up. J Urol 1997; 158: 765–7 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64311-8 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 16 Minervini R, Morelli G, Fontana N, Minervini A, Fiorentini L. Functional evaluation of different ileal neo-bladders and ureteral re-implantation techniques. Eur Urol 1998; 34: 198–202 10.1159/000019712 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 17 Hautmann RE, De Petriconi R, Gottfried H-W, Kleinschmidt K, Mattes R, Paiss T. The ileal neo-bladder. complications and functional results in 363 patients after 11 years of follow-up. J Urol 1999; 161: 422–8 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)61909-8 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 18 Arai Y, Taki Y, Kawase N et al. Orthotopic ileal neo-bladder in male patients. functional outcome of 66 cases. Int J Urol 1999; 6: 388–92 10.1046/j.1442-2042.1999.00084.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 19 Sevin G, Soyupek S, Armagan A, Hoscan MB, Oksay T. Ileal orthotopic neo-bladder (modified Hautmann) via a shorter detubularized ileal segment. experience and results. BJU Int 2004; 94: 355–9 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04933.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 20 Hautmann S, Chun KHF, Currlin E, Braun P, Huland H, Juenemann KP. Refluxing chimney versus non refluxing Le-Duc uretero-ileal anastomosis for orthotopic ileal neo-bladder: a comparative analysis for patients with bladder cancer. J Urol 2006; 175: 1389–94 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00709-3 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 21 Abol-Enein H, El-Baz M, Ghoneim MA. Optimization of uretero-intestinal anastomosis in urinary diversion: an experimental study in dogs. I. evaluation of the Le Duc technique. Urol Res 1993; 21: 125–9 10.1007/BF01788831 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 22 Muraishi O, Yamashita T, Ishikawa S, Hara Y, Tokue A. Improvement of uretero-ileal anastomosis in orthotopic ileal neo-bladder with modified Le Duc procedure: short submucosal tunnel technique. J Urol 2001; 165: 798–801 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66529-9 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 23 Abol-Enein H, Ghoneim MA. Optimization of uretero-intestinal anastomosis in urinary diversion. an experimental study in dogs. III a new anti-reflux technique for uretero-ileal anastomosis: a serous-lined extramural tunnel. Urol Res 1993; 21: 135–9 10.1007/BF01788833 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 24 Hendry WF. Bladder replacement by ileocystoplasty after cystectomy for cancer. comparison of two techniques. Br J Urol 1996; 78: 74–9 10.1046/j.1464-410X.1996.00214.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 25 Bissada NK. Experience with subserous tunnel for reflux prevention and for continence mechanism in patients undergoing continent urinary diversion. J Urol 1999; 161 (Suppl.): 89 10.1097/00005392-199904010-00359 Google Scholar 26 Siracusano S, Liguori G, Trombetta C, D’Aloia G, Belgrano E. Modified Ghoneim’s technique using a single serous-lined extramural tunnel in detubularized orthotopic ileal W-bladder. Eur Urol 2000; 38: 313–5 10.1159/000020299 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 27 Abol-Enein H, Ghoneim MA. Functional results of orthotopic ileal neobladder with serous-lined extramural ureteral re-implantation: experience with 450 patients. J Urol 2001; 165: 1427–32 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66322-7 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 28 Papadopoulos I, Weichert-Jacobsen K. Experiences with the entero-ureteral anastomosis via the extramural serous-lined tunnel. Procedure of Abol-Enein. Urology 2001; 57: 234–8 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00904-3 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 29 Kato H, Kiyokawa H, Igawa Y, Nishizawa O. The serous-lined tunnel principle for urinary reconstruction: a more rational method. BJU Int 2001; 87: 783–8 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02229.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 30 Kulkarni JN, Pramesh CS, Rathi S, Pantvaidya GH. Long-term results of orthotopic neo-bladder reconstruction after radical cystectomy. BJU Int 2003; 91: 485–8 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04131.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 31 Turkolmez K, Baltaci S, Gogus C, Beduk Y, Gogus O. Results of the ureteral re-implantation with serous-lined extramural tunnel in orthotopic ileal W-neo-bladder. Int J Urol 2004; 11: 368–73 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00807.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 32 Muto G, Bardari F, D’Ursol L. New serosal lined anti-reflux uretero-ileal implantation technique on a Gia stapler detubularised ileal neo-bladder: technical considerations and results. Eur Urol 2005; 48: 826–31 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.011 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 33 Song C, Kang T, Hong JH, Kim CS, Ahn H. Changes in the upper urinary tract after radical cystectomy and urinary diversion: a comparison of anti-refluxing and refluxing orthotopic bladder substitutes and the ileal conduit. J Urol 2006; 175: 185–9 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00068-6 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 34 Shaaban AA, Abdel-Latif M, Mosbah A et al. A randomized study comparing an anti-reflux system with a direct ureteric anastomosis in patients with orthotopic ileal neo-bladders. BJU Int 2006; 97: 1057–62 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06135.x PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 35 Cancrini A, De Carli P, Pompeo V et al. Lower urinary tract reconstruction following cystectomy. Experience and results in 96 patients using the orthotopic ileal bladder substitution of Studer et al. Eur Urol 1996; 29: 204–9 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 36 Gburek BM, Lieber MM, Blute ML. Comparison of Studer ileal neo-bladder and ileal conduit urinary diversion with respect to perioperative outcome and late complications. J Urol 1998; 160: 721–3 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62767-8 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 37 Hollowell CM, Christiano AP, Steinberg GD. Technique of Hautmann ileal neo-bladder with chimney modification: interim results in 50 patients. J Urol 2000; 163: 47–51 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67969-4 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 38 Constantinides C, Manousakas T, Chrisofos M, Giannopoulos A. Orthotopic bladder substitution after radical cystectomy. 5 years of experience with a novel personal modification of the ileal S-pouch. J Urol 2001; 166: 532–7 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65977-0 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 39 Lee KS, Montie JE, Dunn RL, Lee CT. Hautman and Studer orthotopic neo-bladders: a contemporary experience. J Urol 2003; 169: 2188–91 10.1097/01.ju.0000063941.31687.26 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 40 Perimenis P, Burkhard FC, Kessler TM, Gramann TG, Studer UE. Ileal orthotopic bladder substitute combined with an afferent tubular segment. long-term upper urinary tract changes and voiding pattern. Eur Urol 2004; 46: 604–9 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.07.009 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 41 Minervini A, Boni G, Salinitri G, Mariani G, Minervini R. Evaluation of renal function and upper urinary tract morphology in the ileal orthotopic neo-bladder with no anti-reflux mechanism. J Urol 2005; 173: 144–7 10.1097/01.ju.0000146718.15786.e8 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 42 Gschwend JE, Volkmer BG, Liske P, Kleinschmidt K, Hautmann RE. Type of ureteral anastomosis in orthotopic ileal neo-bladders. Impact on the rate of hydronephrosis and renal function. J Urol 2005; 173 (Suppl.): 132 Web of Science®Google Scholar 43 Khafagy M, Abdel-Shaheed F, Abdel-Moneim T. Ileo-caecal vs ileal neo-bladder after radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer: a comparative study. BJU Int 2006; 97: 799–804 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05996.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 44 Jensen JB, Lundbeck F, Jensen KME. Complications and neo-bladder function of the Hautmann orthotopic ileal neo-bladder. BJU Int 2006; 98: 1289–94 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06449.x PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 45 Waidelich R, Rink F, Kriegmair M, Tatsch K, Schmeller N. A study of reflux in patients with an ileal orthotopic bladder. Br J Urol 1998; 81: 241–6 10.1046/j.1464-410X.1998.00536.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 46 Iwakiri J, Gill H, Anderson R, Freiha F. Functional and urodynamic characteristics of an ileal neo-bladder. J Urol 1993; 149: 1072–6 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36299-7 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 47 Gotoh M, Yoshikawa Y, Sahashi M et al. Urodynamic study of storage and evacuation of urine in patients with a urethral Kock pouch. J Urol 1995; 154: 1850–3 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66798-3 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 48 Koraitim MM, Atta MA, Foda MK. Desire to void and force of micturition in patients with intestinal bladders. J Urol 1996; 155: 1214–6 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66221-9 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 49 Mikuma N, Hirose T, Yokoo A, Tsukamoto T. Voiding dysfunction in ileal neo-bladder. J Urol 1997; 158: 1365–8 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64216-2 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 50 Porru D, Madeddu G, Campus G et al. Urodynamic analysis of voiding dysfunction in orthotopic ileal neo-bladder. World J Urol 1999; 17: 285–9 10.1007/s003450050147 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 51 Hinman F Jr, Oppenheimer R. Functional characteristics of the ileal segment as a valve. J Urol 1958; 80: 448–54 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)66206-2 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 52 Sarramon JP, Conte J, Bouisson SH. Uretero-ileoplasty. Urologic and renal consequences. Experimental study in 13 dogs. J Urol Nephrol 1971; 77: 579–93 CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 53 Simon J, Bartsch G Jr, Kufer R, Gschwend JE, Volkmer BG, Hautmann RE. Neo-bladder emptying failure in males. Incidence, etiology and therapeutic options. J Urol 2006; 176: 1468–72 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.048 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 54 Steinberg GD. Editorial comment. J Urol 2006; 176: 1472 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.126 Web of Science®Google Scholar 55 Hautmann RE, Volkmer GG, Schumacher MC, Gschwend JE, Studer UE. Long-term results of standard procedures in Urology: the ileal neo-bladder. World J Urol 2006; 24: 305–14 10.1007/s00345-006-0105-z PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 56 El-Bahnasawy MS, Osman Y, Gomha MA, Shaaban AA, Ashamallah A, Ghoneim MA. Nocturnal enuresis in men with an orthotopic ileal reservoir: urodynamic evaluation. J Urol 2000; 164: 10–3 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67437-X CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 57 Wood DP, Bianco FJ, Pontes JE, Heath MA, DaJusta D. Incidence and significance of positive urine cultures in patients with an orthotopic neo-bladder. J Urol 2003; 169: 2196–9 10.1097/01.ju.0000067909.98836.91 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 58 Inman BA, Lacombe L, Fradet Y. Bacteriologic profile of Studer orthotopic neo-bladders and the risk of urinary tract infection. J Urol 2004; 171 (Suppl.): 14 Web of Science®Google Scholar 59 Wullt B, Holst E, Steven K et al. Microbial flora in ileal and colonic neo-bladders. Eur Urol 2004; 45: 233–9 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.09.002 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 60 Mowat AM. Anatomical basis of tolerance and immunity to intestinal antigens. Nat Rev Immunol 2003; 3: 331–41 10.1038/nri1057 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 61 Kristjansson A, Bajc M, Wallin L, Welliner J, Mansson W. Renal function up to 16 years after conduit (refluxing or anti-reflux anastomosis) or continent urinary diversion. 2. renal scarring and location of bacteriuria. Br J Urol 1995; 76: 546–50 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1995.tb07776.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 62 Hautmann RE. Urinary diversion: ileal conduit to neo-bladder. J Urol 2003; 169: 834–42 10.1097/01.ju.0000029010.97686.eb PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume100, Issue6December 2007Pages 1229-1233 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)