Which Equality? Badiou and Rancière in Light of Ludwig Feuerbach
2009; Taylor & Francis; Volume: 15; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1080/13534640902982744
ISSN1460-700X
Autores Tópico(s)Critical Theory and Political Philosophy
ResumoClick to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1 Jacques Rancière, The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation, trans. Kristin Ross (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991), p.138. 2 Alain Badiou, Metapolitics, trans. Jason Barker (London: Verso, 2005 [orig. 1998]), p.97. 3 Alain Badiou, Metapolitics, pp.98–99. 4 Jacques Rancière, Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy, trans. Julia Rose, Minnesota, p.17. 5 Jacques Rancière, Disagreement, p.140. 6 Ludwig Feuerbach, ‘Principles of the Philosophy of the Future’, The Fiery Brook, trans. Zawar Hanfi, p.224. 7 See ‘Towards an Anthropology of Infinitude: Badiou and the Political Subject’, Cosmos and History, 2:1–2 (2006). 8 Alain Badiou, Metapolitics, p.114. 9 Jacques Rancière, Disagreement, p.32. 10 Peter Hallward, ‘Staging Equality: On Rancière's Theatrocracy, New Left Review 37 (Jan-Feb 2006), pp.109–129, p.110. The quote is from Rancière, On the Shores of Politics, trans. Liz Heron (London and New York: Verso, 1995), pp.32–3. 11 Kristin Ross, ‘Rancière and the Practice of Equality’, Social Text, 29 (1991), pp.57–71, p.70. 12 Kristin Ross, ‘Rancière’, p.70. 13 Jacques Rancière, Disagreement, p.99. 14 Alain Badiou, Metapolitics, p.82. 15 Jacques Rancière, Metapolitics, p.120. 16 Jacques Rancière, Disagreement, p.116. 17 Jacques Rancière, Disagreement, p.49. 18 Jacques Rancière, Disagreement, p.97. 19 It is interesting to compare Hegel on this point to later socialist writers. Lasalle, writing in 1864, will say: ‘Under free competition the relation of an employer to the employed is the same as to any other merchandise … This is the leading feature of the present age. In former times the relations were those of man to man: after all, the relations of the slaveowner to the slave, and of the feudal lord to the serf were human’. Ferdinand Lassalle, ‘What is Capital?’ (1864), German Essays on Socialism in the Nineteenth Century, eds. Frank Mecklenburg and Manfred Stassen (New York: Continuum, 1990), pp.51–8. 20 G.W.F. Hegel, Encyclopaedia Logic (London: Hackett Publishing, 1991), p.214. 21 G.W.F. Hegel, Philosophy of Right, ed. Allen W. Wood, trans. H. B. Nisbet (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), p.239. 22 G.W.F. Hegel, Philosophy, p.207. 23 G.W.F. Hegel, Philosophy, p.200. 24 Jacques Rancière, Disagreement, p.13. 25 G.W.F. Hegel, Encyclopaedia, p.38. 26 G.W.F. Hegel, Encyclopaedia, p.4. 27 G.W.F. Hegel, Philosophy, p.201. A claim not helped by the obvious play on words Gattung (genus) with Gatte/Gattin (spouse). 28 G.W.F. Hegel, Philosophy, p.264. 29 G.W.F. Hegel, Philosophy, p.329. 30 G.W.F. Hegel, Philosophy, p.310. 31 Karl Marx, ‘Critique of Hegel's Doctrine of the State’, Early Writings, trans. Livingstone and Benton (London: Penguin, 1992), p.99. 32 Karl Löwith, From Hegel to Nietzsche, trans. David E. Green (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964), p.242. 33 Ludwig Feuerbach, ‘Principles of the Philosophy of the Future’, The Fiery Book: Selected Writings of Ludwig Feuerbach, trans. Zawar Hanfi (New York: Anchor Books, 1972), p.203. 34 Left, Right, Young, and the movement between various positions, as in Bauer's turn from a relatively orthodox Hegelian to a kind of utopian socialist, as well as non-Hegelian right-wing and theological critiques of Hegel. The ‘Young Hegelians’ were known as Hegelinge (Hegelists) as opposed to Hegelitern (Hegelians). 35 Ludwig Feuerbach, The Fiery Book, p.170. 36 Cf. Warren Breckman, Marx, the Young Hegelians and the Origins of Radical Social Theory: Dethroning the Self (Cambridge: CUP, 1999). 37 Karl Marx, ‘A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right. Introduction’, Early Writings, p.243. As Marx said, ‘the criticism of religion is the prerequisite of all critique’. 38 Jean Hyppolite, ‘Marx and Philosophy’, Studies on Marx and Hegel, trans. John O'Neill (London: Heinemann, 1969 [1955]), p.99. 39 ‘The Legacy of Idealism in the philosophy of Feuerbach, Marx, and Kierkegaard’, in The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism, ed. by Karl Ameriks (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p.262. 40 From ‘System of Economic Contradictions: Or, Philosophy of Poverty’ (1846). 41 Ludwig Feuerbach, The Fiery Book, p.204. 42 Ludwig Feuerbach, The Fiery Book, p.257. 43 Ludwig Feuerbach, The Fiery Book, p.146. 44 Karl Marx, Early Writings, p.99. 45 Jacques Rancière, Disagreement, p.139. 46 Stathis Kouvelakis, Philosophy and Revolution: From Kant to Marx, trans. G. M. Goshgarian (London: Verso, 2003), p.213. 47 Cf. also: ‘The unity of being and nothingness has its positive meaning only as the indifference of the species or of the consciousness of the species towards the particular individual’. Feuerbach, Fiery, pp.92–93. 48 Karl Marx, The German Ideology, ed. C.J. Arthur (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1970), p.86. 49 Karl Marx, Early Writings, p.386. 50 Stathis Kouvelakis, Philosophy and Revolution, p.314. 51 Ludwig Feuerbach, Fiery, p.148. 52 Ludwig Feuerbach, Fiery, p.176. 53 But many, not just personalist thinkers, have argued against this possibility. Schelling in his Ideas for a Philosophy of Nature rails against the anti-intuitionism (and Hegelian dialectical rationalism) of contemporary philosophy: ‘The product of intuition is necessarily a finite one … it is clear why intuition is not – as many pretended philosophers have imagined – the lowest level of knowledge, but the primary one, the highest in the human mind, that which truly constitutes its mental nature’. Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling, Ideas for a Philosophy of Nature, trans. by Errol E. Harris and Peter Heath (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988 [orig. 1797, revised 1803], pp.177–178. 54 Max Stirner, The Ego and His Own [1845] trans. John Carroll (London: Jonathan Cape, 1971), p.55. 55 Kate Soper, Humanism and Anti-Humanism (LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court, 1986), p.38. 56 Marx-Engels Gesamtausgabe, vol 5, p.243 - quoted in Karl Löwith, From Hegel to Nietzsche, p. 105. 57 Cf. John Carroll's introduction to Max Stirner: The Ego and His Own, p.14. 58 Or, as Stirner put it ‘Man’ and ‘I’ (the two divisions of The Ego and His Own). 59 Frederick Engels, ‘Ludwig Feuerbach and the end of Classical German Philosophy’ (Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1976 (orig. 1888)), p.14. 60 See Louis Althusser, ‘On Feuerbach’, The Humanist Controversy, Ed. François Matheron, trans. G.M. Goshgarian (London: Verso, 2003), p.137. 61 Alain Badiou, Metapolitics, p.107. 62 Alain Badiou, Metapolitics, pp.108, 110. 63 Alain Badiou, Metapolitics, p.112. 64 Alain Badiou, Metapolitics, p.115. 65 Alain Badiou, Metapolitics, p.118. 66 Alain Badiou, Metapolitics, p.119.
Referência(s)