Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Does atrial overdrive pacing prevent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in paced patients?

2000; Elsevier BV; Volume: 75; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/s0167-5273(00)00303-x

1874-1754

Terry Levy, S. Walker, S. Rex, В. Paul,

Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

The role of atrial overdrive pacing for the suppression of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation remains unclear. To investigate this we have performed a randomised study evaluating the role of an increased atrial base rate in suppressing this arrhythmia in patients implanted with a permanent pacemaker (Chorum ELA) for sick sinus syndrome with previous documented paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Twenty-seven patients (mean age, 69; 15 female) were randomised to two 3-month single-blinded crossover periods of DDDR pacing. The pacemaker was set with a base rate of 60 bpm (normal) during one period and at 10 bpm (overdrive) above the average heart rate during the other, mean (S.D.) 75±7 beats/min (range, 70–96). The fallback algorithm of the pacemaker was activated to record the number and duration of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation episodes. During the overdrive period there was a significant increase in the total duration of atrial pacing (normal 60±26% vs. overdrive 72±28%, P<0.001). However there was no significant difference in the number of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation episodes (normal 43±109 vs. overdrive 43±106, P=ns), or their total duration (normal 42±108 h vs. overdrive 99±254 h, P=ns). In conclusion, atrial overdrive pacing, achieved by increasing the atrial base rate, has no incremental benefit in the suppression of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation when compared to rate responsive pacing with a base rate of 60 bpm.