A Statistical Analysis of Sentencing in Federal Courts: Defendants Convicted after Trial, 1967-1968
1975; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 4; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/467537
ISSN1537-5366
AutoresLawrence P. Tiffany, Yakov Avichai, Geoffrey W. Peters,
Tópico(s)Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessA Statistical Analysis of Sentencing in Federal Courts: Defendants Convicted after Trial, 1967-1968Lawrence P. Tiffany, Yakov Avichai, and Geoffrey W. PetersLawrence P. Tiffany Search for more articles by this author , Yakov Avichai Search for more articles by this author , and Geoffrey W. Peters Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Legal Studies Volume 4, Number 2Jun., 1975 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/467537 Views: 12Total views on this site Citations: 40Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1975 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Jose Pina-Sánchez, John Paul Gosling Tackling selection bias in sentencing data analysis: a new approach based on a scale of severity, Quality & Quantity 54, no.33 (Feb 2020): 1047–1073.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-00973-zPatricia M. Harris The First-Time Adult-Onset Offender, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 55, no.66 (Jun 2010): 949–981.https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X10372110Christine Tartaro, Christopher M. Sedelmaier A tale of two counties: the impact of pretrial release, race, and ethnicity upon sentencing decisions, Criminal Justice Studies 22, no.22 (Jun 2009): 203–221.https://doi.org/10.1080/14786010902975507Olga Tsoudis Relation of Affect Control Theory to the Sentencing of Criminals, The Journal of Social Psychology 140, no.44 (Aug 2000): 473–485.https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540009600486OLGA TSOUDIS THE LIKELIHOOD OF VICTIM RESTITUTION IN MOCK CASES: ARE THE ‘RULES OF THE GAME’ DIFFERENT FROM PRISON AND PROBATION?, Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 28, no.55 (Jan 2000): 481–498.https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2000.28.5.481Ronald A. Farrell, Victoria Lynn Swigert Prior Offense Record as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy, (Jan 1999): 389–404.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012083170-8/50020-1A.Abigail Payne Does inter-judge disparity really matter? An analysis of the effects of sentencing reforms in three federal district courts, International Review of Law and Economics 17, no.33 (Sep 1997): 337–366.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(97)00023-9Lynette Feder Psychiatric history, due procedural safeguards, and the use of discretion in the criminal justice process, Justice Quarterly 12, no.22 (Aug 2006): 279–305.https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829500092681Thomas A. Petee Recommended for Release on Recognizance: Factors Affecting Pretrial Release Recommendations, The Journal of Social Psychology 134, no.33 (Jun 1994): 375–382.https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1994.9711742Charles L. Cappell, Gresham Sykes Prison commitments, crime, and unemployment: A theoretical and empirical specification for the United States, 1933?1985, Journal of Quantitative Criminology 7, no.22 (Jun 1991): 155–199.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01268628Jimmy J. Williams Predicting decisions rendered in criminal appeals, Journal of Criminal Justice 19, no.55 (Jan 1991): 463–469.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(91)90020-VJohn H. Lindquist, O.Z. White, Terrence Tutchings, Carl D. Chambers Judicial processing of males and females charged with prostitution, Journal of Criminal Justice 17, no.44 (Jan 1989): 277–291.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(89)90033-0JAMES D. UNNEVER, LARRY A. HEMBROFF The Prediction of Racial/Ethnic Sentencing Disparities: An Expectation States Approach, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 25, no.11 (Aug 2016): 53–82.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427888025001004Roger Douglas Tolerated contests? Plea and sentence in the Victorian magistrates' courts, Journal of Criminal Justice 16, no.44 (Jan 1988): 269–290.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(88)90016-5Susette M. Talarico, Martha A. Myers Split sentencing in georgia: A test of two empirical assumptions, Justice Quarterly 4, no.44 (Dec 1987): 611–630.https://doi.org/10.1080/07418828700089551Dean J. Champion Elderly Felons and Sentencing Severity: Interregional Variations in Leniency and Sentencing Trends, Criminal Justice Review 12, no.22 (Sep 2016): 7–14.https://doi.org/10.1177/073401688701200203Cassia Spohn, Susan Welch The effect of prior record in sentencing research: An examination of the assumption that any measure is adequate, Justice Quarterly 4, no.22 (Aug 2006): 287–302.https://doi.org/10.1080/07418828700089331Susan Welch, Cassia Spohn Evaluating the impact of prior record on judges' sentencing decisions: A seven-city comparison, Justice Quarterly 3, no.44 (Aug 2006): 389–407.https://doi.org/10.1080/07418828600089031Terance D. Miethe, Charles A. Moore Racial Differences in Criminal Processing: The Consequences of Model Selection on Conclusions About Differential Treatment, The Sociological Quarterly 27, no.22 (Dec 2016): 217–237.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1986.tb00258.xCANDACE KRUTTSCHNITT, LINDA HEATH, DAVID A. WARD FAMILY VIOLENCE, TELEVISION VIEWING HABITS, AND OTHER ADOLESCENT EXPERIENCES RELATED TO VIOLENT CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR*, Criminology 24, no.22 (May 1986): 235–266.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1986.tb01495.xRobert M. McFAtter Sentencing Disparity: Perforce or Perchance?1, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 16, no.22 (Mar 1986): 150–164.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb02285.xPeter B. Hoffman, James L. Beck, Patricia L. Hardyman, Ronnie M. Scotkin Sentencing reform, sentencing guidelines, and related issues: A partial bibliography, Journal of Criminal Justice 14, no.66 (Jan 1986): 545–569.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(86)90096-6Thomas Orsagh The judicial response to crime and the criminal: A utilitarian perspective, Journal of Quantitative Criminology 1, no.44 (Dec 1985): 369–386.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064187GARY D. LaFREE Official Reactions to Hispanic Defendants in the Southwest, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 22, no.33 (Aug 2016): 213–237.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427885022003003GARY D. LaFREE ADVERSARIAL AND NONADVERSARIAL JUSTICE: A COMPARISON OF GUILTY PLEAS AND TRIALS*, Criminology 23, no.22 (May 1985): 289–312.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1985.tb00338.xSusan Welch, Cassia Spohn, John Gruhl Convicting and sentencing differences among black, Hispanic, and white males in six localities, Justice Quarterly 2, no.11 (Aug 2006): 67–80.https://doi.org/10.1080/07418828500088391Belinda Rodgers McCarthy, Charles A. Lindquist Ambiguity and conflict in sentencing research: Partial resolution through crime-specific analysis, Journal of Criminal Justice 13, no.22 (Jan 1985): 155–169.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(85)90064-9Belinda R. McCarthy, Charles A. Lindquist Factors Influencing Sentences for Violent Offenses: An Exploratory Comparison of Crime-Specific and Undifferentiated Research Strategies, Criminal Justice Review 9, no.22 (Sep 2016): 37–46.https://doi.org/10.1177/073401688400900206CANDACE KRUTTSCHNITT Sex and Criminal Court Dispositions: The Unresolved Controversy, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 21, no.33 (Aug 2016): 213–232.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427884021003003J. Palmer An economic analysis of the right to a jury trial, International Review of Law and Economics 4, no.11 (Jun 1984): 29–53.https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(84)90017-6SUSAN WELCH, JOHN GRUHL, CASSIA SPOHN Sentencing. The Influence of Alternative Measures of Prior Record, Criminology 22, no.22 (May 1984): 215–227.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1984.tb00298.xBrent L. Smith, Edward H. Stevens Sentence Disparity and the Judge-Jury Sentencing Debate: An Analysis of Robbery Sentences in Six Southern States, Criminal Justice Review 9, no.11 (Sep 2016): 1–7.https://doi.org/10.1177/073401688400900101DAVID J. ROBERTS "Effects of Court Officials on Sentence Severity: Do Judges Make a Difference?":. A Comment, Criminology 22, no.11 (Feb 1984): 135–138.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1984.tb00292.xJames L. Croyle Measuring and explaining disparities in felony sentences: Courtroom work group factors and race, sex, and socioeconomic influences on sentence severity, Political Behavior 5, no.11 (Jan 1983): 135–153.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989989Candace Kruttschnitt Respectable Women and the Law, The Sociological Quarterly 23, no.22 (Dec 2016): 221–234.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1982.tb01009.xMartha A. Myers Judges, juries, and the decision to convict, Journal of Criminal Justice 9, no.44 (Jan 1981): 289–303.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(81)90002-7LYNNE GOODSTEIN PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF THE PREDICTABILITY OF PRISON RELEASE. Implications for the Sentencing Debate, Criminology 18, no.33 (Nov 1980): 363–384.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1980.tb01371.xMartha A. Myers Personal and Situational Contingencies in the Processing of Convicted Felons, Sociological Inquiry 50, no.11 (Jan 1980): 65–74.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00832.xJames H. Kuklinski, John E. Stanga Political Participation and Government Responsiveness: The Behavior of California Superior Courts, American Political Science Review 73, no.44 (Aug 2014): 1090–1099.https://doi.org/10.2307/1953991James L. Gibson Judges' Role Orientations, Attitudes, and Decisions: An Interactive Model, American Political Science Review 72, no.0303 (Aug 2014): 911–924.https://doi.org/10.2307/1955111
Referência(s)