Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Narrative, meta-analytic, and systematic reviews: What are the differences and why do they matter?

2014; Wiley; Volume: 35; Issue: S1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/job.1918

1099-1379

Gerard P. Hodgkinson, J. Kevin Ford,

Team Dynamics and Performance

Journal of Organizational BehaviorVolume 35, Issue S1 p. S1-S5 The IRIOP Annual Review Issue Narrative, meta-analytic, and systematic reviews: What are the differences and why do they matter? Gerard P. Hodgkinson, Corresponding Author Gerard P. Hodgkinson Warwick, Business School, University of Warwick, UK Correspondence to: Gerard P. Hodgkinson, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorJ. Kevin Ford, J. Kevin Ford Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, USASearch for more papers by this author Gerard P. Hodgkinson, Corresponding Author Gerard P. Hodgkinson Warwick, Business School, University of Warwick, UK Correspondence to: Gerard P. Hodgkinson, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorJ. Kevin Ford, J. Kevin Ford Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, USASearch for more papers by this author First published: 27 January 2014 https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1918Citations: 38Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Summary This issue comprises the second IRIOP Annual Review Issue, following the incorporation of the International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (IRIOP) into the Journal of Organizational Behavior (JOB). In this editorial, we highlight important differences between narrative, meta-analytic, and systematic review techniques and explain how each of these approaches to the reviewing of scholarly work has the potential to contribute to the continuing development of the IRIOP Annual Review Issue, as the leading outlet for the publication of critical, state-of-the-art overviews and commentary on established knowledge and developments at the forefront of the field. In so doing, we clarify further the sorts of contributions we are looking to publish, exemplified by the seven papers appearing in this second issue. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. References Allen, D. G., Hancock, J. I., Vardaman, J. M., & McKee, D. N. (2014). Analytical mindsets in turnover research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S61–S86. DOI: 10.1002/job.1912 Gubler, M., Arnold, J., & Coombs, C. (2014). Reassessing the protean career concept: Empirical findings, conceptual components, and measurement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S23–S40. DOI: 10.1002/job.1908 G. P. Hodgkinson, & J. K. Ford (Eds.) (2005). International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology –– Volume 20. Chichester: Wiley. G. P. Hodgkinson, & J. K. Ford (Eds.) (2006). International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology –– Volume 21. Chichester: Wiley. G. P. Hodgkinson, & J. K. Ford (Eds.) (2007). International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology –– Volume 22. Chichester: Wiley. G. P. Hodgkinson, & J. K. Ford (Eds.) (2008). International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology –– Volume 23. Chichester: Wiley. G. P. Hodgkinson, & J. K. Ford (Eds.) (2009). International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology –– Volume 24. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. G. P. Hodgkinson, & J. K. Ford (Eds.) (2010). International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology –– Volume 25. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. G. P. Hodgkinson, & J. K. Ford (Eds.) (2011). International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology –– Volume 26. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. G.P. Hodgkinson, & J. K. Ford (Eds.) (2012). International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology –– Volume 27. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Hodgkinson, G. P., & Ford, J. K. (2013). Change and continuity in the advancement of (scholarly) knowledge and its dissemination. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(SI), S1–S6. DOI: 10.1002/job.1895 Horton, K. E., Bayerl, P. S., & Jacobs, G. (2014). Identity conflicts at work: An integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S6–S22. DOI: 10.1002/job.1893 Lyons, S., & Kuron, L. (2014). Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S139–S157. DOI: 10.1002/job.1913 Newman, A., Ucbasaran, D., Zhu, F., & Hirst, G. (2014). Psychological capital: A review and synthesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S120–S138. DOI: 10.1002/job.1916 Podsakoff, N. P., Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Maynes, T. D., & Spoelma, T. M. (2014). Consequences of unit-level organizational citizenship behaviors: A review and recommendations for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S87–S119. DOI: 10.1002/job.1911 D. M. Rousseau (Ed.) (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Evidence-Based Management. New York: Oxford University Press. Rousseau, D. M., Manning, J., & Denyer, D. (2008). Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field's full weight of scientific knowledge through reflective reviews. Annals of the Academy of Management, 2, 475–515. Spain, S. M., Harms, P., & Lebreton, J. M. (2014). The dark side of personality at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S41–S60. DOI: 10.1002/job.1894 Citing Literature Volume35, IssueS1Special Issue: The IRIOP Annual Review IssueFebruary 2014Pages S1-S5 ReferencesRelatedInformation