Cumulative live birth rate after two single frozen embryo transfers (eSFET) versus a double frozen embryo transfer (DFET) with cleavage stage embryos: a retrospective cohort study
2014; Springer Science+Business Media; Volume: 31; Issue: 12 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1007/s10815-014-0346-5
ISSN1573-7330
AutoresMa. Luisa López Regalado, Ana Clavero, M. Carmen Gonzálvo, María José Serrano, Luis Martínez, Juan Mozas, Fernando Rodríguez‐Serrano, Juan Torres Fontes, Bárbara Romero, José Antonio Castilla,
Tópico(s)Ovarian function and disorders
ResumoAccording to the latest ART report for Europe, about 13 % of pregnancies after frozen embryo transfer are multiple. Our objective was to analyse the impact on the multiple pregnancy rate of two eSFET (elective single frozen embryo transfers) versus a DFET (double frozen embryo transfer) in women aged under 38 years, who had not achieved pregnancy in their fresh transfer and who had at least two vitrified embryos of A/B quality. This study was conducted from January 2010 to June 2013 at a public hospital. The couples were divided into three groups. Group DFET: the first cryotransfer of two embryos (105 women); cSFET group: the only cryotransfer of a single vitrified embryo (60 women); eSFET group, individually vitrified embryos: 20 patients included in a clinical trial of single-embryo fresh and frozen transfer and 21 patients who chose to receive eSFET. The clinical pregnancy rate was 38.1 % in the DET group and the cumulative clinical pregnancy rate was 43.3 % in the eSFET group. There were no significant differences between the DFET and eSFET groups (30.0 vs 34.1 %) in cumulative live birth delivery rate. The rate of multiple pregnancies varied significantly between the DFET and eSFET groups (32.5 vs 0 %, p < 0.05). For good-prognosis women aged under 38 years, taking embryo quality as a criterion for inclusion, an eSFET policy can be applied, achieving acceptable cumulative clinical pregnancy and live birth rates and reducing multiple pregnancy rates.
Referência(s)