The Additive Fallacy
1988; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 99; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/293033
ISSN1539-297X
Autores Tópico(s)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessThe Additive FallacyShelly KaganShelly KaganPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 99, Number 1Oct., 1988 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/293033 Views: 62Total views on this site Citations: 93Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1988 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Jonas H. Aaron A Less Bad Theory of the Procreation Asymmetry and the Non-Identity Problem, Utilitas 11 (Nov 2023): 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820823000250Maike Albertzart Moralischer Partikularismus, (Apr 2023): 95–102.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05869-0_13Campbell Brown The Significance of Value Additivity, Erkenntnis 87, no.66 (Sep 2020): 2547–2570.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-020-00315-3Jonas H. Aaron Reply to Spears's 'The Asymmetry of Population Ethics', Economics and Philosophy 5 (Oct 2022): 1–7.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267122000177Matthias Brinkmann In Defence of Non-Ideal Political Deference, Episteme 19, no.22 (Jul 2020): 264–285.https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2020.26Andrew Kernohan How to modify the strength of a reason, Philosophical Studies 179, no.44 (Jul 2021): 1205–1220.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01703-3Federico L. G. Faroldi Common Law Precedent and the Logic of Reasons, (Feb 2021): 301–319.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70084-3_12DAVID O'BRIEN Conservatism Reconsidered, Journal of the American Philosophical Association 8, no.11 (Aug 2021): 149–168.https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2020.50Geoff Keeling A dilemma for reasons additivity, Economics and Philosophy (Dec 2021): 1–23.https://doi.org/10.1017/S026626712100033XDavid O'Brien, Ben Schwan Wrongfulness rewarded?, Synthese 199, no.3-43-4 (Mar 2021): 6897–6916.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03098-4Dana Kay Nelkin Liability, culpability, and luck, Philosophical Studies 178, no.1111 (Feb 2021): 3523–3541.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01612-5Zak A. Kopeikin Bare‐difference methodology and the scientific analogy, Ratio 34, no.33 (Mar 2021): 171–182.https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12300Sümer Şen Doing, Allowing, and Occasionalism, Religious Studies 5 (Apr 2021): 1–17.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412521000056Barry Maguire, Justin Snedegar Normative metaphysics for accountants, Philosophical Studies 178, no.22 (Feb 2020): 363–384.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01435-wZak A. Kopeikin Violent Deaths, Vicious Preferences, and Bare-Differences: A Reply to Hill, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 99, no.11 (Jun 2020): 196–201.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2020.1772330Andrew Stumpf, Dominic Rogalski Getting Real About Killing and Allowing to Die: A Critical Discussion of the Literature, Canadian Journal of Bioethics 4, no.22 (Dec 2021): 8–24.https://doi.org/10.7202/1084448arZak A. Kopeikin Bare-Difference Methodology and a Problematic Separability Principle, The Journal of Value Inquiry 54, no.44 (Dec 2019): 553–570.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-019-09728-yAnton Markoč Draining the pond: why Singer's defense of the duty to aid the world's poor is self-defeating, Philosophical Studies 177, no.77 (Apr 2019): 1953–1970.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01293-1Sven Ove Hansson Good and Better, (Jun 2020): 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee526.pub2Shmuel Nili From Charlottesville to the Nobel: Political Leaders and the Morality of Political Honors, Ethics 130, no.33 (Mar 2020): 415–445.https://doi.org/10.1086/707215Norbert Paulo Moral Consistency Reasoning Reconsidered, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23, no.11 (Nov 2019): 107–123.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-019-10037-3Daniel Kary Regan's Lifeboat Case and the Additive Assumption, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 33, no.11 (Dec 2019): 127–143.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09817-9Geoff Keeling Why Trolley Problems Matter for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles, Science and Engineering Ethics 26, no.11 (Mar 2019): 293–307.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00096-1Daniel Muñoz Defeaters and Disqualifiers, Mind 128, no.511511 (Oct 2018): 887–906.https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzy043Govind Persad Authority without identity: defending advance directives via posthumous rights over one's body, Journal of Medical Ethics 45, no.44 (Dec 2018): 249–256.https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-104971Seth Lazar, Chad Lee‐Stronach Axiological Absolutism and Risk1, Noûs 53, no.11 (Jul 2017): 97–113.https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12210Federico L. G. Faroldi The Scale of Normative Reasons, (Mar 2019): 157–178.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03487-0_7Collis Tahzib Survey Article: Pluralist Neutrality, Journal of Political Philosophy 26, no.44 (Oct 2018): 508–532.https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12169Jacob Blair Autonomy and the Moral Symmetry Principle: Reply to Frowe and Tooley, Res Publica 24, no.44 (Aug 2017): 531–541.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-017-9366-1Scott Hill Murdering an Accident Victim: A New Objection to the Bare-Difference Argument, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96, no.44 (Jan 2018): 767–778.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2017.1414275Norbert Paulo Moral-Epistemic Enhancement, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83 (Oct 2018): 165–188.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246118000346Holly M. Smith, David E. Black The morality of creating and eliminating duties, Philosophical Studies 106 (Sep 2018).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1171-yLuca Gasparini, Timothy J. Norman, Martin J. Kollingbaum Severity-sensitive norm-governed multi-agent planning, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 32, no.11 (Jul 2017): 26–58.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-017-9372-xANDERS HERLITZ Microlevel Prioritizations and Incommensurability, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 27, no.11 (Dec 2017): 75–86.https://doi.org/10.1017/S096318011700041XDalia Drai Reasons Have no Weight, The Philosophical Quarterly 68, no.270270 (Jun 2017): 60–76.https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqx025Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen Pogge, poverty, and war, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 16, no.44 (May 2017): 446–469.https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X17701388David B. Hershenov, Rose J. Hershenov If Abortion, then Infanticide, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 38, no.55 (Aug 2017): 387–409.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-017-9419-7 Bibliography, (Jul 2017): 241–249.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119451266.biblioDaniel Lim Doing, allowing, and the problem of evil, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 81, no.33 (May 2016): 273–289.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-016-9569-yIan Stoner, Jason Swartwood Fanciful Examples, Metaphilosophy 48, no.33 (Apr 2017): 325–344.https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12234Malte Dold, Menusch Khadjavi Jumping the queue: An experiment on procedural preferences, Games and Economic Behavior 102 (Mar 2017): 127–137.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.12.002Jason Swartwood DRINKING, TEXTING, AND MORAL ARGUMENTS FROM ANALOGY, Think 16, no.4545 (Jan 2017): 15–26.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1477175616000312James Wilson VII—Internal and External Validity in Thought Experiments, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 116, no.22 (Sep 2016): 127–152.https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aow008Toby Handfield Essentially Comparative Value Does Not Threaten Transitivity, Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 5, no.11 (Nov 2015): 3–12.https://doi.org/10.1002/tht3.188Nikil Mukerji Metaethical Foundations, (Aug 2016): 17–56.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39249-3_2Thomas Feeney Leibniz, Acosmism, and Incompossibility, (Dec 2016): 145–174.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42695-2_7KASPER LIPPERT-RASMUSSEN Are Enabling and Allowing Harm Morally Equivalent?, Utilitas 27, no.33 (May 2015): 365–383.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820815000035Stephen Kershnar Moral Responsibility and Foundationalism, Philosophia 43, no.22 (Feb 2015): 381–402.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-015-9586-6Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen 'To Serve and Protect': The Ends of Harm by Victor Tadros, Criminal Law and Philosophy 9, no.11 (Mar 2013): 49–71.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-013-9216-yHOWARD NYE On the Equivalence of Trolleys and Transplants: The Lack of Intrinsic Difference between 'Collateral Damage' and Intended Harm, Utilitas 26, no.44 (Aug 2014): 432–479.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820814000181James Wilson Embracing complexity: theory, cases and the future of bioethics, Monash Bioethics Review 32, no.1-21-2 (Oct 2014): 3–21.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-014-0001-zSaba Bazargan Morally Heterogeneous Wars, Philosophia 41, no.44 (Aug 2013): 959–975.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-013-9477-7Carlos Soto Killing, wrongness, and equality, Philosophical Studies 164, no.22 (Feb 2012): 543–559.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9866-yAlastair Norcross Doing and Allowing, (Feb 2013).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee672Ben Bradley Intrinsic Value, (Feb 2013).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee122Sven Ove Hansson Good and Better, (Feb 2013).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee526Robert E. Frederick Cases and Emotions, (Jan 2013): 200–207.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137033383_17MICHAEL HUEMER Against Equality and Priority, Utilitas 24, no.44 (Nov 2012): 483–501.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820812000404Fiona Woollard The Doctrine of Doing and Allowing II: The Moral Relevance of the Doing/Allowing Distinction, Philosophy Compass 7, no.77 (Jun 2012): 459–469.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00492.xB. Skow A Solution to the Problem of Indeterminate Desert, Mind 121, no.481481 (Jun 2012): 37–65.https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzs037James C. Cox, Maroš Servátka, Radovan Vadovic Status Quo Effects in Fairness Games: Reciprocal Responses to Acts of Commission vs. Acts of Omission, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1977853Justin Klocksiem In Defense of the Trichotomy Thesis, Acta Analytica 25, no.33 (Nov 2009): 317–327.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-009-0067-zRE'EM SEGEV Hierarchical Consequentialism, Utilitas 22, no.33 (Jul 2010): 309–330.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820810000221Re'em Segev Second-order Equality and Levelling Down, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87, no.33 (Jul 2009): 425–443.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400802340600David Alm Deontological Restrictions and the Self/Other Asymmetry, Noûs 42, no.44 (Nov 2008): 642–672.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2008.00695.xMark C. Murphy Philosophical Anarchisms, Moral and Epistemological, Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 20, no.11 (Jul 2015): 95–111.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0841820900005713SARA RACHEL CHANT THE SPECIAL COMPOSITION QUESTION IN ACTION, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87, no.44 (Dec 2006): 422–441.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2006.00270.xYitzhak Benbaji Sufficiency or Priority?, European Journal of Philosophy 14, no.33 (Dec 2006): 327–348.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00228.x by Pekka Väyrynen Moral Generalism: Enjoy in Moderation Väyrynen, Ethics 116, no.44 (Jul 2015): 707–741.https://doi.org/10.1086/505232KARSTEN KLINT JENSEN, KASPER LIPPERT-RASMUSSEN Understanding Particularism*, Theoria 71, no.22 (Feb 2008): 118–137.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.2005.tb01010.xAlastair Norcross Killing and Letting Die, (Nov 2007): 451–463.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996621.ch33Michael Tooley Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide, (Nov 2007): 326–341.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996621.ch24 BOOK REVIEWS, Journal of Homosexuality 48, no.11 (Dec 2004): 143–158.https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v48n01_07Stuart Rachels Six Theses About Pleasure, Philosophical Perspectives 18, no.11 (Nov 2004): 247–267.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2004.00028.xRuth Chang Putting Together Morality and Well-Being, (Jan 2004): 118–158.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616402.006Torbjörn Tännsjö Terminal Sedation: A Substitute for Euthanasia?, (Jan 2004): 15–30.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2124-4_2 by Rahul Kumar Reasonable Reasons in Contractualist Moral Argument Kumar, Ethics 114, no.11 (Jul 2015): 6–37.https://doi.org/10.1086/378034 BOOK REVIEWS, Journal of Homosexuality 45, no.11 (Sep 2003): 143–159.https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v45n01_07Simon Kirchin Particularism, Generalism and the Counting Argument, European Journal of Philosophy 11, no.11 (Mar 2003): 54–71.https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0378.00174DAVID WASSERMAN, ALAN STRUDLER Can a Nonconsequentialist Count Lives?, Philosophy Public Affairs 31, no.11 (Jan 2003): 71–94.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2003.00071.xMathias Risse, Richard J. Zeckhauser Racial Profiling, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2003).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.392381Kasper Lippert–rasmussen, Karsten Klint Jensen Does Particularism Solve the Moral Problem?, Philosophical Explorations 5, no.22 (May 2002): 125–140.https://doi.org/10.1080/10002002058538726JOHAN BRANNMARK Rules and Exceptions, Theoria 65, no.2-32-3 (Feb 2008): 127–143.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1999.tb01107.xKASPER LIPPERT‐RASMUSSEN On Denying A Significant Version Of The Constancy Assumption*, Theoria 65, no.2-32-3 (Feb 2008): 90–113.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1999.tb01105.xChristian Munthe The Morality of Interference, Theoria 65, no.11 (Feb 2008): 55–69.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1999.tb00114.x Russ Shafer-Landau Moral Rules, Ethics 107, no.44 (Oct 2015): 584–611.https://doi.org/10.1086/233761 Tyler Cowen What Do We Learn from the Repugnant Conclusion?, Ethics 106, no.44 (Oct 2015): 754–775.https://doi.org/10.1086/233671MATTHEW HANSER Why Are Killing and Letting Die Wrong?, Philosophy Public Affairs 24, no.33 (Jul 1995): 175–201.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1995.tb00028.xGARRETT CULLITY Moral Free Riding, Philosophy Public Affairs 24, no.11 (Jan 1995): 3–34.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1995.tb00020.xChristopher Boorse DUCKING TROLLEYS, Journal of Social Philosophy 25, no.33 (Dec 1994): 146–152.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.1994.tb00339.xTerry L. Price Faultless mistake of fact: Justification or excuse?, Criminal Justice Ethics 12, no.22 (Jun 1993): 14–28.https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.1993.9991948Mark Spranca, Elisa Minsk, Jonathan Baron Omission and commission in judgment and choice, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 27, no.11 (Jan 1991): 76–105.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(91)90011-TIlana Ritov, Jonathan Baron Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 3, no.44 (May 2011): 263–277.https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960030404
Referência(s)