Holdouts and Free Riders
1991; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 20; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/467890
ISSN1537-5366
Autores Tópico(s)Legal principles and applications
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessHoldouts and Free RidersLloyd CohenLloyd CohenPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Legal Studies Volume 20, Number 2Jun., 1991 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/467890 Views: 28Total views on this site Citations: 44Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1991 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Shu-Wen Lin, Hsiao-Jul Su, Hao-Rong Li The Relationship of Land Assembly and Prices of Cost Equivalent Land in the Equalization of Land Rights Act, International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development 11, no.22 (Apr 2023): 222–239.https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.11.2_222Javier E. Portillo Land-Assembly Experiments: A Survey, (Feb 2022): 11–34.https://doi.org/10.1108/S0193-230620220000021002Mitja Kovac, Amira Elkanawati, Vita Gjikolli, Ann-Sophie Vandenberghe The Covid-19 pandemic: collective action and European public policy under stress, Central European Journal of Public Policy 14, no.22 (Oct 2020): 47–59.https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2020-0005Zhihao Yao, Li Tian How did collectivity retention affect land use transformation in peri-urban areas of China? A case of Panyu, Guangzhou, Journal of Rural Studies 79 (Oct 2020): 1–10.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.009Mitja Kovac, Amira Elkanawati, Vita Gjikolli, Ann-Sophie Vandenberghe The COVID-19 Pandemic: Collective Action and European Public Policy under Stress, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2020).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3573417Javier E. Portillo Land-assembly and externalities: How do positive post-development externalities affect land aggregation outcomes?, Regional Science and Urban Economics (Mar 2019).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.03.004Jonathan Hardman The Law and Economics of Grindr: A Response to Carson, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 47, no.33 (Jan 2021): 445–453.https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110519876178Tzu-Chin Lin, Fang-Hsin Huang, Siao-En Lin Land assembly for urban development in Taipei City with particular reference to old neighborhoods, Land Use Policy 78 (Nov 2018): 555–561.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.058Hans-Bernd Schäfer and Ram Singh Takings of Land by Self-Interested Governments: Economic Analysis of Eminent Domain, The Journal of Law and Economics 61, no.33 (Jan 2019): 427–459.https://doi.org/10.1086/699242Iljoong Kim, Sungkyu Park Private takings: Empirical evidence of post-taking performance, Journal of Housing Economics 39 (Mar 2018): 25–32.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2017.12.006Javier E. Portillo The impact of bargaining delays under the threat of eminent domain, Journal of Regional Science 58, no.22 (Sep 2017): 451–482.https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12363Abel M. Winn, Matthew W. McCarter , Journal of Urban Economics 105 ( 2018): 176.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2017.10.001Hans-Bernd Schaefer, Ram Singh Takings of Land by Self-Interested Governments Economic Analysis of Eminent Domain Law, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3026204Thomas J. Miceli The Cost of Kelo, Public Finance Review 44, no.44 (Jul 2015): 500–522.https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142115595914 Anticommons, the Coase Theorem and the problem of bundling inefficiency, International Journal of the Commons 10, no.11 (Feb 2016): 244–264.https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.614John W. Bagby Managing Information Rights to Develop the Energy Informatics Field, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2564257Steven P. Lanza, Thomas J. Miceli, C. F. Sirmans, Moussa Diop The Use of Eminent Domain for Economic Development in the Era of Kelo, Economic Development Quarterly 27, no.44 (Aug 2013): 352–362.https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242413493661Edward J. López, J.R. Clark The Problem with the Holdout Problem, Review of Law & Economics 9, no.22 (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2012-0031Edward J. Lopez, J.R. Clark The Problem with the Holdout Problem, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2239176Lee Anne Fennell Forcings, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2351358Sean M. Collins and R. Mark Isaac Holdout: Existence, Information, and Contingent Contracting, The Journal of Law and Economics 55, no.44 (Jul 2015): 793–814.https://doi.org/10.1086/665830Michael D. Parente, Abel M. Winn Bargaining behavior and the tragedy of the anticommons, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 84, no.22 (Nov 2012): 475–490.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.08.002STEVEN GLOBERMAN The Social Responsibility of Managers: Reassessing and Integrating Diverse Perspectives, Business and Society Review 116, no.44 (Dec 2011): 509–532.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8594.2011.00394.xThomas J. Miceli Free riders, holdouts, and public use: a tale of two externalities, Public Choice 148, no.1-21-2 (Apr 2010): 105–117.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9648-zJohn Cadigan, Pamela Schmitt, Robert Shupp, Kurtis Swope The holdout problem and urban sprawl: Experimental evidence, Journal of Urban Economics 69, no.11 (Jan 2011): 72–81.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2010.08.006Florenz Plassmann, T. Nicolaus Tideman Marginal Cost Pricing and Eminent Domain, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1911278Daniel Göller, Michael Hewer Economic Analysis of Taking Rules: The Bilateral Case, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1975835Ejan Mackaay Good Faith in Civil Law Systems – A Legal-Economic Analysis, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1998924Marc A. Rodwin Patient Data: Property, Privacy & the Public Interest, American Journal of Law & Medicine 36, no.44 (Dec 2010): 586–618.https://doi.org/10.1177/009885881003600403Iljoong Kim, Sungkyu Park Eminent domain power and afterwards: Leviathan's post-taking opportunism, Public Choice 143, no.1-21-2 (Aug 2009): 209–227.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9498-8Ilya Somin Economic Development Takings as Government Failure, (Jan 2010): 123–144.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230109490_7Florenz Plassmann, T. Nicolaus Tideman Providing Incentives for Efficient Land Assembly, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1015820Marc A. Rodwin Patient Data: Property, Privacy & the Public Interest, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1599192Thomas J. Miceli Public goods, taxes, and takings, International Review of Law and Economics 28, no.44 (Dec 2008): 287–293.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2008.07.007Donald Shoup Graduated Density Zoning, Journal of Planning Education and Research 28, no.22 (Dec 2008): 161–179.https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X08321734Thomas J. Miceli, C.F. Sirmans The holdout problem, urban sprawl, and eminent domain, Journal of Housing Economics 16, no.3-43-4 (Nov 2007): 309–319.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2007.06.004Dean Lueck, Thomas J. Miceli Chapter 3 Property Law, (Jan 2007): 183–257.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0730(07)01003-1Guy Pessach Israeli Copyright Law: A Positive Economic Perspective, Israel Law Review 39, no.33 (Jul 2014): 123–179.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700013169Thomas J. Miceli, C. F. Sirmans The Holdout Problem, Urban Sprawl, and Eminent Domain, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2006).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.952511Lloyd Cohen Holdouts, (Jan 2002): 894–898.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_169Lloyd R. Cohen Tender offers, (Jan 2002): 1980–1983.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_373Kofi Oteng Kufuor Forest management in Ghana: towards a sustainable approach, Journal of African Law 44, no.11 (Jul 2009): 52–64.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855300012031Peter Newman T, (Jan 1998): 561–636.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14286-6_5Ronald R. King An experimental investigation of transaction costs, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 25, no.33 (Dec 1994): 391–409.https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(94)90107-4
Referência(s)