Kantian Constructivism and Reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue
1994; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 105; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/293678
ISSN1539-297X
Autores Tópico(s)Critical Theory and Philosophy
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessSymposium on John RawlsKantian Constructivism and Reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in DialogueThomas McCarthyThomas McCarthyPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 105, Number 1Oct., 1994 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/293678 Views: 58Total views on this site Citations: 103Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1994 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Roberto Fumagalli A More Liberal Public Reason Liberalism, Moral Philosophy and Politics 0, no.00 (Jun 2022).https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2021-0068Federico Germán Abal ¿Son compatibles la idea de razón pública de Rawls y la concepción deliberativa de la democracia?, Revista de Filosofía (La Plata) 52, no.11 (Jun 2022): e037.https://doi.org/10.24215/29533392e037Leonardo Fiorespino Jürgen Habermas and the Communicative Sovereignty of Citizens, (Mar 2022): 15–41.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84969-6_2Seyla Benhabib Habermas' neue Phänomenologie des Geistes: Zwei Jahrhunderte nach Hegel, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 69, no.44 (Sep 2021): 507–528.https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2021-0046 References, (Jun 2021): 173–188.https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-720-320211012Leanne Chang, Weiyu Zhang Procedural Justice in Online Deliberation: Theoretical Explanations and Empirical Findings, Journal of Deliberative Democracy 17, no.11 (Apr 2021).https://doi.org/10.16997/10.16997/jdd.968Seyla Benhabib Habermas's new Phenomenology of Spirit : Two centuries after Hegel, Constellations 28, no.11 (May 2021): 33–44.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12550Philippe-Antoine Hoyeck Religion and Democracy: Jürgen Habermas and Charles Taylor on the Public Use of Reason, The European Legacy 26, no.22 (Sep 2020): 111–130.https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2020.1824314Robert A. Carleo On Confucian Public Reason, (Nov 2021): 103–121.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70611-1_5Sandrine Frémeaux, François-Régis Puyou, Grant Michelson Beyond accountants as technocrats: A common good perspective, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 67-68 (Mar 2020): 102054.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.07.003John H. Evans Biotechnology and the Nonreligious Uses of God Talk, (Jun 2019): 123–137.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14580-4_6Laurence Barry Concluding Remarks: Foucault and Contemporary Social Criticism, (Jul 2020): 205–228.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48943-4_9Soyoung Han, Joong Won Kim, Yoonku Kwon Contemporary Spatial Publicness: Its New Characteristics and Democratic Possibilities, Sustainability 11, no.1717 (Aug 2019): 4729.https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174729Amy Allen, Eduardo Mendieta The Cambridge Habermas Lexicon, iii. (Mar 2019).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316771303James Gledhill John Rawls (1921–2002), (Apr 2019): 656–661.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316771303.188Andrea Cassatella Secularism and the politics of translation, Contemporary Political Theory 18, no.11 (Jul 2018): 65–87.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-018-0233-4Chris W. Anderson Journalism as procedure, journalism as values, Journalism 20, no.11 (Dec 2018): 8–12.https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918806732Paul Carls , Critical Research on Religion 7, no.33 ( 2019): 292.https://doi.org/10.1177/2050303218823069John H. Evans Aversion to and Understanding of God Talk in the Public Sphere: A Survey Experiment, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 56, no.33 (Mar 2018): 459–480.https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12368Yves Meinard, Alice Remy, Bernhard Schmid Measuring Impartial Preference for Biodiversity, Ecological Economics 132 (Feb 2017): 45–54.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.007Bradley N. Seeman Korsgaard, Christine, (Jun 2017): 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_274-1James Gordon Finlayson Where the Right Gets in: On Rawls's Criticism of Habermas's Conception of Legitimacy, Kantian Review 21, no.22 (Jun 2016): 161–183.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415416000017Stephen Rainey The Method of Levels of Abstraction in Pluralism and Governance of Dialogical Interaction, Topoi 35, no.11 (Feb 2014): 191–201.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-013-9231-6Alexios Arvanitis Agreement as the convergence of will: A consensualistic approach to negotiation, New Ideas in Psychology 37 (Feb 2015): 24–32.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.12.002Stephen Rainey Governance Theory and Practice, (Jan 2015): 100–116.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6433-3.ch006Linda M. G. Zerilli Against Civility: A Feminist Perspective, (Aug 2014): 107–131.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107479852.005Palle Rasmussen A Space for Critical Research on Education Policy: ECER Paper Sessions and the 'Policy Studies and Politics of Education' Network, European Educational Research Journal 13, no.44 (Aug 2014): 418–424.https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2014.13.4.418Markus Patberg Supranational constitutional politics and the method of rational reconstruction, Philosophy & Social Criticism 40, no.66 (Jul 2014): 501–521.https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453714530987Leonel Pérez Expósito Rethinking political participation: A pedagogical approach for citizenship education, Theory and Research in Education 12, no.22 (Apr 2014): 229–251.https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878514530713Michael S. Evans Religion and Political Decision Making, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 53, no.11 (Mar 2014): 145–163.https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12088Dorothea Baur, Daniel Arenas The Value of Unregulated Business-NGO Interaction, Business & Society 53, no.22 (Jul 2012): 157–186.https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312452868Paul Guyer Rawls and the History of Moral Philosophy, (Jan 2014): 546–566.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118328460.ch31Andrew Koppelman Darwall, Habermas, and the Fluidity of Respect, Ratio Juris 26, no.44 (Nov 2013): 523–537.https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12026Nick O'Donovan Does deliberative democracy need deliberative democrats? Revisiting Habermas' defence of discourse ethics, Contemporary Political Theory 12, no.22 (Aug 2012): 123–144.https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2012.13Neelke Doorn Wide Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Model for Responsible Governance, NanoEthics 7, no.11 (Mar 2013): 29–43.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-013-0169-3Denis Coitinho Silveira, Além da dicotomia fato/valor: justificação e legitimação, Trans/Form/Ação 36, no.11 (Apr 2013): 165–186.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31732013000100010Jane Mummery, Debbie Rodan The role of blogging in public deliberation and democracy, Discourse, Context & Media 2, no.11 (Mar 2013): 22–39.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2012.12.003Stephen Rainey Governance Theory and Practice, (Jan 2013): 187–203.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-3670-5.ch012Stephen Rainey Competing Methodologies, (Jan 2013): 296–311.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-3670-5.ch020Jørgen Pedersen Justification and Application, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42, no.33 (Sep 2012): 399–432.https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393111414723Chris Roberts Public Relations and Rawls: An Ill-Fitting Veil to Wear, Journal of Mass Media Ethics 27, no.33 (Jul 2012): 163–176.https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2012.700207Peter J. Verovšek Meeting Principles and Lifeworlds Halfway: Jürgen Habermas on the Future of Europe, Political Studies 60, no.22 (Jun 2012): 363–380.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00907.xNeelke Doorn Exploring Responsibility Rationales in Research and Development (R&D), Science, Technology, & Human Values 37, no.33 (May 2012): 180–209.https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243911405344Gulshan Khan Politics and morality in Habermas' discourse ethics, Philosophy & Social Criticism 38, no.22 (Feb 2012): 149–168.https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453711427254Dorothea Baur NGOs, Interest Groups and Activists, (Jul 2011): 115–121.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2254-5_11Dorothea Baur Procedural Characteristics of Legitimate Partner NGOs, (Jul 2011): 141–163.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2254-5_14Dorothea Baur Normative Orientation from Political Theory, (Jul 2011): 37–43.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2254-5_3Dorothea Baur The Public Sphere, (Jul 2011): 57–69.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2254-5_6Dorothea Baur Public Reason, (Jul 2011): 71–82.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2254-5_7Dorothea Baur The Political Process, (Jul 2011): 83–96.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2254-5_8Dorothea Baur Legitimacy, (Jul 2011): 97–110.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2254-5_9Dorothea Baur, Guido Palazzo The Moral Legitimacy of NGOs as Partners of Corporations, Business Ethics Quarterly 21, no.44 (Jan 2015): 579–604.https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201121437Henry S. Richardson Interpreting Rawls: An Essay on Audard, Freeman, and Pogge, The Journal of Ethics 15, no.33 (Sep 2011): 227–251.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-010-9078-7Fabian Freyenhagen Taking reasonable pluralism seriously: an internal critique of political liberalism, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 10, no.33 (Aug 2011): 323–342.https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X10388381Denis Coitinho Silveira, Justificação pública: a função da ideia de estrutura básica da sociedade em Rawls, Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia 52, no.123123 (Jun 2011): 197–211.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-512X2011000100011Matthew Barber Freedom and Uncertainty: Contemporary Liberal Theory Examined from the Perspective of Moral Uncertainty, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1873166Neelke Doorn A procedural approach to distributing responsibilities in R&D networks, Poiesis & Praxis 7, no.33 (Sep 2010): 169–188.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-010-0086-2Heidi Rapp Nilsen Overlapping consensus versus discourse in climate change policy: The case of Norway's Sovereign Wealth Fund, Environmental Science & Policy 13, no.22 (Apr 2010): 123–130.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.11.003Stéphane Courtois La religion dans l'espace public : quelques commentaires sur les positions récentes de Habermas., Dialogue 49, no.11 (May 2010): 91–112.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217310000132Todd Hedrick Coping with constitutional indeterminacy, Philosophy & Social Criticism 36, no.22 (Feb 2010): 183–208.https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453709343395Bat-Ami Bar On Normativity, Feminism, and Politics, (Jul 2009): 3–23.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6841-6_1Rolf Uwe Fülbier, Manuel Weller Normative Rechnungslegungsforschung im Abseits? Einige wissenschaftstheoretische Anmerkungen, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 39, no.22 (Mar 2009): 351–382.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-009-9077-1Robert Burns, Marianne Constable, Justin Richland, Winnifred Sullivan Analyzing the Trial: Interdisciplinary Methods, PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 31, no.22 (Nov 2008): 303–329.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1555-2934.2008.00037.xErik Schneiderhan, Shamus Khan Reasons and Inclusion: The Foundation of Deliberation, Sociological Theory 26, no.11 (Mar 2008): 1–24.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00316.xMarek Hrubec On Conditions of Participation: The Deficits of Public Reason, Human Affairs 18, no.11 (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2478/v10023-008-0007-3Andreas Føllesdal Survey Article: The Legitimacy Deficits of the European Union, Journal of Political Philosophy 14, no.44 (Dec 2006): 441–468.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00244.xJoan Vergés-Gifra Why Rawls Should Have Resisted the Hermeneutic Temptation, Journal of Social Philosophy 37, no.44 (Dec 2006): 584–603.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2006.00359.xMaeve Cooke Salvaging and secularizing the semantic contents of religion: the limitations of Habermas's postmetaphysical proposal, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 60, no.1-31-3 (Nov 2006): 187–207.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-006-0006-5Tim Heysse Consensus and Power in Deliberative Democracy, Inquiry 49, no.33 (Aug 2006): 265–289.https://doi.org/10.1080/00201740600725723Brooke Ackerly John Rawls: An Introduction, Perspectives on Politics 4, no.0101 (Feb 2006).https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592706060075Simone Chambers The Politics of Equality: Rawls on the Barricades, Perspectives on Politics 4, no.0101 (Feb 2006).https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592706060087Iris Marion Young Taking the Basic Structure Seriously, Perspectives on Politics 4, no.0101 (Feb 2006).https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592706060099Russell Muirhead, Nancy L. Rosenblum Political Liberalism vs. "The Great Game of Politics": The Politics of Political Liberalism, Perspectives on Politics 4, no.0101 (Feb 2006).https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592706060105Michael W. Doyle One World, Many Peoples: International Justice in John Rawls's The Law of Peoples, Perspectives on Politics 4, no.0101 (Feb 2006).https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592706060117Peter Berkowitz The Ambiguities of Rawls's Influence, Perspectives on Politics 4, no.0101 (Feb 2006).https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592706060129Jocelyn Maclure On the public use of practical reason, Philosophy & Social Criticism 32, no.11 (Aug 2016): 37–63.https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453706059845Kevin Stoker, Kati Tusinski Reconsidering Public Relations' Infatuation With Dialogue: Why Engagement and Reconciliation Can Be More Ethical Than Symmetry and Reciprocity, Journal of Mass Media Ethics 21, no.22 (Jan 2006): 156–176.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327728jmme2102&3_5Sylvain Gallais Approche transdisciplinaire de la délibération (1), Questions de communication , no.77 (Jun 2005): 293–308.https://doi.org/10.4000/questionsdecommunication.5659Pablo Gilabert The substantive dimension of deliberative practical rationality, Philosophy & Social Criticism 31, no.22 (Aug 2016): 185–210.https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453705050607Nancy S. Love Rawlsian Harmonies, Theory, Culture & Society 20, no.66 (Jun 2016): 121–140.https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276403206006J. Donald Moon R AWLS AND H ABERMAS ON P UBLIC R EASON : Human Rights and Global Justice, Annual Review of Political Science 6, no.11 (Jun 2003): 257–274.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085715 by Anthony Simon Laden The House That Jack Built: Thirty Years of Reading Rawls Laden, Ethics 113, no.22 (Jul 2015): 367–390.https://doi.org/10.1086/342855MARC LYNCH Why Engage? China and the Logic of Communicative Engagement, European Journal of International Relations 8, no.22 (Jul 2016): 187–230.https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066102008002002Peter Milley Imagining Good Organizations, Educational Management & Administration 30, no.11 (Jan 2002): 47–64.https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X020301007Peter Niesen Die politische Theorie des politischen Liberalismus: John Rawls, (Jan 2001): 23–54.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-12320-0_2Maeve Cooke Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy, Political Studies 48, no.55 (Nov 2016): 947–969.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00289Shane O'Neill The Politics of Inclusive Agreements: Towards a Critical Discourse Theory of Democracy, Political Studies 48, no.33 (Nov 2016): 503–521.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00272 Triadafilos Triadafilopoulos Politics, Speech, and the Art of Persuasion: Toward an Aristotelian Conception of the Public Sphere, The Journal of Politics 61, no.33 (Oct 2015): 741–757.https://doi.org/10.2307/2647826Ferran Requejo, Pluralismo cultural e cidadania democrática, Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política , no.4747 (Aug 1999): 91–119.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-64451999000200006FERRAN REQUEJO Cultural pluralism, nationalism and federalism: a revision of democratic citizenship in plurinational states, European Journal of Political Research 35, no.22 (Mar 1999): 255–286.https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00449Maeve Cooke Are Ethical Conflicts Irreconcilable?, (Jan 1999): 171–189.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27445-1_11Thomas McCarthy Two Conceptions of Cosmopolitan Justice, (Jan 1999): 191–214.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27445-1_12Percy B. Lehning The coherence of Rawls's plea for democratic equality, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1, no.44 (Dec 1998): 1–41.https://doi.org/10.1080/13698239808403257Samantha Ashenden Pluralism within the limits of reason alone? Habermas and the discursive negotiation of consensus, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1, no.33 (Sep 1998): 117–136.https://doi.org/10.1080/13698239808403251Evan Charney Political Liberalism, Deliberative Democracy, and the Public Sphere, American Political Science Review 92, no.11 (Aug 2014): 97–110.https://doi.org/10.2307/2585931Kai Nielsen Liberal Reasonability a Critical Tool? Reflections After Rawls, Dialogue 37, no.44 (Apr 2010): 739–760.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217300009793Kenneth L. Avio Constitutional Contract and Discourse Ethics, Journal of Theoretical Politics 9, no.44 (Oct 1997): 533–553.https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692897009004005Andreas Follesdal Handmaiden, Gadfly, Midwife? The Roles of Normative Political Theory, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 1996).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1731866Maeve Cooke Salvaging and secularizing the semantic contents of religion: the limitations of Habermas's postmetaphysical proposal, (): 187–207.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5861-5_13Jane Mummery, Debbie Rodan Chewing the Communal Cud, (): 296–318.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-091-4.ch016Mariano C. Melero de La Torre Conclusiones, Bibliografía e Índice analítico y de nombres, (): 423–465.https://doi.org/10.5211/9788492751181.ch11James Gordon Finlayson, Jude Browne Women and the standpoint of concrete others, (): 13–51.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139855938.002Ronald C. Den Otter Competing Conceptions of Public Reason, (): 109–138.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809507.005
Referência(s)