The Possibility of Parity
2002; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 112; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/339673
ISSN1539-297X
Autores Tópico(s)Philosophical Ethics and Theory
ResumoNext article No AccessArticlesThe Possibility of Parity*Ruth ChangRuth Chang Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 112, Number 4July 2002 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/339673 Views: 985Total views on this site Citations: 197Citations are reported from Crossref © 2002 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Cristián Rettig, Giulio Fornaroli Conflicts of Rights and Action‐Guidingness, Ratio Juris 90 (Apr 2023).https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12374Brian Hedden, Daniel Muñoz Dimensions of Value, Noûs 22 (Mar 2023).https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12454Johan E. Gustafsson The possibility of undistinguishedness, Philosophical Studies 180, no.22 (Jan 2023): 609–613.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-022-01889-0Andrea S. Asker, H. Orri Stefánsson Climate Change and Decision Theory, (Mar 2023): 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16960-2_29-1Paul Forrester Epistemicism and commensurability, Inquiry 22 (Dec 2022): 1–34.https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2155870Anna Wienhues Respecting the Nonhuman Other: Individual Natural Otherness and the Case for Incommensurability of Moral Standing, Environmental Values 31, no.66 (Dec 2022): 637–656.https://doi.org/10.3197/096327121X16328186623913Elliott Thornley A dilemma for lexical and Archimedean views in population axiology, Economics and Philosophy 38, no.33 (Sep 2021): 395–415.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267121000213Ralf Poscher, Rafael Giorgio Dalla-Barba Proporcionalidade e a vinculação dos Direitos Fundamentais, Revista de Direitos Humanos e Desenvolvimento Social 3 (Dec 2022).https://doi.org/10.24220/2675-9160v3e2022a7090Tom Parr Automation, unemployment, and insurance, Ethics and Information Technology 24, no.33 (Jun 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09639-wTim Campbell Axiological Retributivism and the Desert Neutrality Paradox, Philosophies 7, no.44 (Jul 2022): 80.https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies7040080Alex Horne Too many cooks, Synthese 200, no.44 (Jul 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03799-4Henrik Andersson, Anders Herlitz Classifying comparability problems in a way that matters, Synthese 200, no.44 (Jul 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03795-8Teresa M. Bejan What Was the Point of Equality?, American Journal of Political Science 66, no.33 (Oct 2021): 604–616.https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12667Leo Yan Seeming incomparability and rational choice, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 10 (Jun 2022): 1470594X2211005.https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X221100568Kerah Gordon-Solmon How (and How Not) to Defend Lesser-Evil Options, Journal of Moral Philosophy 112 (Apr 2022): 1–22.https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-20223735Chris Tucker Parity, Moral Options, and the Weights of Reasons, Noûs 11 (Apr 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12410Mattias Gunnemyr Making a vague difference: Kagan, Nefsky and the Sorites Paradox, Inquiry 78 (Apr 2022): 1–26.https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2052351Philip Swenson Equal Moral Opportunity: A Solution to the Problem of Moral Luck, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 100, no.22 (Jun 2021): 386–404.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2021.1901751Erich H. Rast The Multidimensional Structure of ‘better than’, Axiomathes 32, no.22 (Oct 2020): 291–319.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-020-09525-4Stephen Kershnar, James Delaney On the Ranking of Teams, Philosophia 50, no.22 (Aug 2021): 567–579.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-021-00408-5Atay Kozlovski Parity and the Resolution of Value Conflicts in Design, Science and Engineering Ethics 28, no.22 (Apr 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00375-4Michael Rabenberg Imprecision in the ethics of rescue, Analytic Philosophy 5 (Feb 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12260Cian Dorr, Jacob M. Nebel, Jake Zuehl The case for comparability, Noûs 18 (Feb 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12407Patrick Wu Aggregation and Reductio, Ethics 132, no.22 (Dec 2021): 508–525.https://doi.org/10.1086/716868Daniel Villiger An Ignorance Account of Hard Choices, Res Philosophica 99, no.33 (Jan 2022): 321–337.https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.2193Lucius Caviola, David Althaus, Andreas L. Mogensen, Geoffrey P. Goodwin Population ethical intuitions, Cognition 218 (Jan 2022): 104941.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104941Daniel Muñoz The Many, the Few, and the Nature of Value, Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy 9, no.00 (Dec 2022).https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.2260Benjamin Lennertz Imprecise Credences and Acceptance, Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy 9, no.00 (Dec 2022).https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.2264Brian Talbot Epistemic repugnance four ways, Synthese 199, no.1-21-2 (Oct 2020): 3001–3022.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02919-2Laura Frances Callahan Epistemic Existentialism, Episteme 18, no.44 (Aug 2019): 539–554.https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2019.25Nick Leonard Belief and rational indeterminacy, Synthese 199, no.5-65-6 (Dec 2021): 13523–13542.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03386-zRoel Dobbe, Thomas Krendl Gilbert, Yonatan Mintz Hard choices in artificial intelligence, Artificial Intelligence 300 (Nov 2021): 103555.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2021.103555Daniel Muñoz Exploitation and effective altruism, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 20, no.44 (Feb 2021): 409–423.https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X21994495Thomas Donaldson How Values Ground Value Creation: The practical inference framework, Organization Theory 2, no.44 (Aug 2021): 263178772110367.https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211036712Daniel Muñoz Three paradoxes of supererogation, Noûs 55, no.33 (Feb 2020): 699–716.https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12326Jon Marc Asper Subjective values should be sharp, Synthese 198, no.77 (Nov 2019): 6025–6043.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02448-7Anne Meylan Doxastic divergence and the problem of comparability. Pragmatism defended further, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103, no.11 (Jul 2020): 199–216.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12709Franz Altner A counterfactual account of diachronic structural rationality, Inquiry 10 (Jun 2021): 1–30.https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2021.1934533Stephen M. Campbell, Joseph A. Stramondo, David Wasserman How to (Consistently) Reject the Options Argument, Utilitas 33, no.22 (Jan 2021): 237–245.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820820000473Daniel Muñoz Infinite options, intransitive value, and supererogation, Philosophical Studies 178, no.66 (Aug 2020): 2063–2075.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01523-xJessica J.T. Fischer Counting People and Making People Count, Philosophy 96, no.22 (Dec 2020): 229–252.https://doi.org/10.1017/S003181912000042XAnders Herlitz Putting costs and benefits of ordeals together, Economics and Philosophy 37, no.11 (May 2020): 37–49.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267120000097Christian J. Tarsney Vive la Différence? Structural Diversity as a Challenge for Metanormative Theories, Ethics 131, no.22 (Dec 2020): 151–182.https://doi.org/10.1086/711204Anders Herlitz, Karim Sadek Social Choice, Nondeterminacy, and Public Reasoning, Res Philosophica 98, no.33 (Jan 2021): 377–401.https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.2072Tomáš Sobek, Josef Montag Proportionality Test, (Jan 2022): 1–5.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_721-2Will Fleisher What's Fair About Individual Fairness?, SSRN Electronic Journal 92 (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3819799Zak A. Kopeikin Bare-Difference Methodology and a Problematic Separability Principle, The Journal of Value Inquiry 54, no.44 (Dec 2019): 553–570.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-019-09728-yTim Campbell, Julia Mosquera Transformative experience and the shark problem, Philosophical Studies 177, no.1111 (Jan 2020): 3549–3565.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01382-1Anders Herlitz Spectrum Arguments, Parity and Persistency, Theoria 86, no.44 (May 2020): 463–481.https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12249Brian Hedden Consequentialism and Collective Action, Ethics 130, no.44 (Jun 2020): 530–554.https://doi.org/10.1086/708535Ralf Poscher Resuscitation of a Phantom? On Robert Alexy’s Latest Attempt to Save His Concept of Principle, Ratio Juris 33, no.22 (Jul 2020): 134–149.https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12286Moritz Schulz Uncertain preferences in rational decision, Inquiry 8 (May 2020): 1–23.https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2020.1758767Miguel F. Dos Santos Superhard Choices, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98, no.22 (Jul 2019): 248–265.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2019.1638951Chrisoula Andreou EMPOWERING RATIONALITY, American Philosophical Quarterly 57, no.22 (Apr 2020): 105–116.https://doi.org/10.2307/48570841Anders Herlitz Nondeterminacy, cycles and rational choice, Analysis 19 (Feb 2020).https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anz091Eleonora Viganò, Edoardo Lombardi Vallauri Moral and Vocational Dilemmas Meet the Common Currency Hypothesis: a Contribution to Value Commensurability, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 11, no.11 (Sep 2019): 83–102.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-019-00448-7Karsten Klint Jensen Weak Superiority, Imprecise Equality and the Repugnant Conclusion, Utilitas (Jan 2020): 1–22.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820819000517Michal Masny On Parfit’s Wide Dual Person-Affecting Principle, The Philosophical Quarterly 70, no.278278 (Aug 2019): 114–139.https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqz049Ralf Poscher Resuscitation of a Phantom? On Robert Alexy’s Latest Attempt to Save His Concept of Principle, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2020).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3551104James A. Busser, Lenna V. Shulga Role of commercial friendship, initiation and co-creation types, Journal of Service Theory and Practice 29, no.44 (Dec 2019): 488–512.https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-12-2018-0290Jacob M. Nebel Asymmetries in the Value of Existence, Philosophical Perspectives 33, no.11 (Apr 2020): 126–145.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12128Susanne Mantel Do epistemic reasons bear on the ought simpliciter?, Philosophical Issues 29, no.11 (Sep 2019): 214–227.https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12149Jacob M. Nebel A fixed-population problem for the person-affecting restriction, Philosophical Studies 30 (Aug 2019).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01338-5Chrisoula Andreou Can Every Option Be Rationally Impermissible?, Erkenntnis 103 (Aug 2019).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-019-00155-wJames Fanciullo Imprecise lexical superiority and the (slightly less) Repugnant Conclusion, Philosophical Studies 176, no.88 (May 2018): 2103–2117.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1117-4Ryan Doody Opaque Sweetening and Transitivity, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97, no.33 (Feb 2019): 559–571.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2018.1520269Rohan Sud Moral Vagueness as Semantic Vagueness, Ethics 129, no.44 (Jun 2019): 684–705.https://doi.org/10.1086/702976Benjamin Ferguson, Sebastian Köhler Betterness of permissibility, Philosophical Studies 91 (Jun 2019).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01319-8Ryan Doody Parity, prospects, and predominance, Philosophical Studies 176, no.44 (Feb 2018): 1077–1095.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1048-0Martin Peterson INTERVAL VALUES AND RATIONAL CHOICE, Economics and Philosophy 35, no.11 (Jun 2018): 159–166.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267118000147Anders Herlitz Nondeterminacy, Two-Step Models, and Justified Choice, Ethics 129, no.22 (Dec 2018): 284–308.https://doi.org/10.1086/700032Tomáš Sobek, Josef Montag Value Incommensurability, (Sep 2018): 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_748-1Sergi Oms, Elia Zardini , ( 2019).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316683064Jacob Bronsther , Legal Theory 25, no.11 ( 2019): 26.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325219000016John Broome Against Denialism, The Monist 102, no.11 (Dec 2018): 110–129.https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/ony024Tomáš Sobek, Josef Montag Value Incommensurability, (Apr 2019): 2123–2128.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_748Tomáš Sobek, Josef Montag Proportionality Test, (Apr 2019): 1691–1695.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_721Kenny Easwaran, Reuben Stern The Many Ways to Achieve Diachronic Unity, (Dec 2018): 240–263.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108329170.012Hugh Burling Predicting Divine Action, Philosophia 46, no.44 (Feb 2018): 785–801.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-018-9947-zJacob M. Nebel The Good, the Bad, and the Transitivity of Better Than *, Noûs 52, no.44 (Apr 2017): 874–899.https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12198Mathias S. Sagdahl Conscription as a Morally Preferable Form of Military Recruitment, Journal of Military Ethics 17, no.44 (Mar 2019): 224–239.https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2019.1589766Toby Handfield, Wlodek Rabinowicz Incommensurability and vagueness in spectrum arguments: options for saving transitivity of betterness, Philosophical Studies 175, no.99 (Aug 2017): 2373–2387.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0963-9Ralf M. Bader Stochastic Dominance and Opaque Sweetening, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96, no.33 (Aug 2017): 498–507.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2017.1362566Theron Pummer Spectrum arguments and hypersensitivity, Philosophical Studies 175, no.77 (May 2017): 1729–1744.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0932-3Edmund Tweedy Flanigan, John Halstead THE SMALL IMPROVEMENT ARGUMENT, EPISTEMICISM AND INCOMPARABILITY, Economics and Philosophy 34, no.22 (Feb 2018): 199–219.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267118000019Peter Baumann What Will Be Best for Me? Big Decisions and the Problem of Inter-World Comparisons, Dialectica 72, no.22 (Aug 2018): 253–273.https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-8361.12219Richard Pettigrew The Population Ethics of Belief: In Search of an Epistemic Theory X, Noûs 52, no.22 (Aug 2016): 336–372.https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12164Dieneke Hubbeling The lottery is still an option, Medical Education 52, no.55 (Apr 2018): 574–574.https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13499Erich H. Rast Perspectival Disagreement, Theoria 84, no.22 (Apr 2018): 120–139.https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12143James A. Busser, Lenna V. Shulga Co-created value: Multidimensional scale and nomological network, Tourism Management 65 (Apr 2018): 69–86.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.09.014Anthony Robert Booth The real symbolic limit of markets, Analysis 78, no.22 (Dec 2017): 198–207.https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anx144Tomáš Sobek, Josef Montag Proportionality Test, (Mar 2018): 1–5.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_721-1Erik Carlson Value Theory (Axiology), (Oct 2018): 523–534.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77434-3_28Mozaffar Qizilbash , Economics and Philosophy 34, no.11 ( 2018): 87.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267117000281ANDERS HERLITZ Microlevel Prioritizations and Incommensurability, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 27, no.11 (Dec 2017): 75–86.https://doi.org/10.1017/S096318011700041XAdam Slavny Alon Harel on How to Deliberate Permissibly, Criminal Law and Philosophy 11, no.44 (Nov 2015): 833–846.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-015-9384-zLuke Elson Incommensurability as Vagueness: a Burden-Shifting Argument, Theoria 83, no.44 (Aug 2017): 341–363.https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12129Wlodek Rabinowicz From values to probabilities, Synthese 194, no.1010 (Feb 2015): 3901–3929.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0693-5Michael Messerli, Kevin Reuter Hard cases of comparison, Philosophical Studies 174, no.99 (Oct 2016): 2227–2250.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0796-yJennifer Ryan Lockhart Kant on the motive of (imperfect) duty, Inquiry 60, no.66 (Jan 2017): 569–603.https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2016.1272488Mauro Rossi THE FITTING-ATTITUDE ANALYSIS OF VALUE RELATIONS AND THE PREFERENCES VS. VALUE JUDGEMENTS OBJECTION, Economics and Philosophy 33, no.22 (Mar 2017): 287–311.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267116000286Carla Bagnoli Dilemmas, Moral, (Jun 2017): 1–11.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee107.pub2Peter A. Graham The Numbers Count, Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 6, no.22 (Apr 2017): 129–134.https://doi.org/10.1002/tht3.242Seth Lazar Deontological Decision Theory and Agent-Centered Options, Ethics 127, no.33 (Mar 2017): 579–609.https://doi.org/10.1086/690069J. Robert G. Williams Indeterminate Oughts, Ethics 127, no.33 (Mar 2017): 645–673.https://doi.org/10.1086/690071Ron Aboodi One Thought Too Few: Where De Dicto Moral Motivation is Necessary, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20, no.22 (Aug 2016): 223–237.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-016-9742-5SETH LAZAR Anton's Game: Deontological Decision Theory for an Iterated Decision Problem, Utilitas 29, no.11 (Jun 2016): 88–109.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820816000236Anders Herlitz Indeterminacy and the principle of need, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 38, no.11 (Dec 2016): 1–14.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-016-9393-5RUTH CHANG Hard Choices, Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3, no.11 (May 2017): 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2017.7Johann Frick On the survival of humanity, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47, no.2-32-3 (Jan 2020): 344–367.https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2017.1301764Susanna Rinard Imprecise Probability and Higher Order Vagueness, Res Philosophica 94, no.22 (Jan 2017): 1–17.https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.1538Jason Millar An Ethics Evaluation Tool for Automating Ethical Decision-Making in Robots and Self-Driving Cars, Applied Artificial Intelligence 30, no.88 (Nov 2016): 787–809.https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2016.1229919MAURO ROSSI Value and Preference Relations: Are They Symmetric?, Utilitas 28, no.33 (Sep 2015): 239–253.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820815000369Erich Rast Modeling Value Disagreement, Erkenntnis 81, no.44 (Sep 2015): 853–880.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-015-9772-8Michael Morreau GRADING IN GROUPS, Economics and Philosophy 32, no.22 (Mar 2016): 323–352.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267115000498Johan Brännmark Moral Disunitarianism, The Philosophical Quarterly 66, no.264264 (Nov 2015): 481–499.https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqv114S. Seth Bordner ‘All-things-considered,’ ‘Better-than,’ And Sports Rankings, Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 43, no.22 (Aug 2015): 215–232.https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2015.1079135Espen D. Stabell No sure thing: evaluative uncertainty in ecosystem assessment, (May 2016): 1–5.https://doi.org/10.1109/ETHICS.2016.7560051Gustaf Arrhenius Population Ethics and Different-Number-Based Imprecision, Theoria 82, no.22 (Apr 2016): 166–181.https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12094Ruth Chang Parity, Imprecise Comparability and the Repugnant Conclusion, Theoria 82, no.22 (Apr 2016): 182–214.https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12096Gonzalo Génova, M. Rosario González Teaching Ethics to Engineers: A Socratic Experience, Science and Engineering Ethics 22, no.22 (May 2015): 567–580.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9661-1Vuko Andrić, Attila Tanyi Multi-dimensional consequentialism and degrees of rightness, Philosophical Studies 173, no.33 (Jul 2015): 711–731.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0515-0Henrik Andersson Parity and Comparability—a Concern Regarding Chang’s Chaining Argument, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19, no.11 (Jul 2015): 245–253.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-015-9621-5Johan E. Gustafsson Money Pumps, Incompleteness, and Indeterminacy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92, no.11 (Oct 2015): 60–72.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12248Anders Herlitz The limited impact of indeterminacy for healthcare rationing: how indeterminacy problems show the need for a hybrid theory, but nothing more, Journal of Medical Ethics 42, no.11 (Nov 2015): 22–25.https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2015-102937Joshua Gert Parity, Preference and Puzzlement, Theoria 81, no.33 (Mar 2015): 249–271.https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12069Alex Silk How to Be an Ethical Expressivist, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91, no.11 (Sep 2014): 47–81.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12138Julian Savulescu Procreative Beneficence, Diversity, Intersubjectivity, and Imprecision, The American Journal of Bioethics 15, no.66 (Jun 2015): 16–18.https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2015.1028678JOHN HALSTEAD The Impotence of the Value Pump, Utilitas 27, no.22 (Feb 2015): 195–216.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820814000375Richard Yetter Chappell Value Receptacles, Noûs 49, no.22 (Apr 2013): 322–332.https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12023Jeff Behrends Problems and solutions for a hybrid approach to grounding practical normativity, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45, no.22 (Jan 2020): 159–178.https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2015.1047684Keith Horton The Authority Account of Prudential Options, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 53, no.11 (Mar 2015): 17–35.https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12094Ruth Chang Value Pluralism, (Jan 2015): 21–26.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.63090-8Ruth Chang Transformative Choices, Res Philosophica 92, no.22 (Jan 2015): 237–282.https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.2015.92.2.14Christian List, Wlodek Rabinowicz TWO INTUITIONS ABOUT FREE WILL: ALTERNATIVE POSSIBILITIES AND INTENTIONAL ENDORSEMENT, Philosophical Perspectives 28, no.11 (Dec 2014): 155–172.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12043Miriam Schoenfield DECISION MAKING IN THE FACE OF PARITY, Philosophical Perspectives 28, no.11 (Dec 2014): 263–277.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12044Toby Handfield Rational Choice and the Transitivity of Betterness, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89, no.33 (Jun 2013): 584–604.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12050Mark R Reiff Incommensurability and moral value, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 13, no.33 (May 2013): 237–268.https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X13483481Adam Bales, Daniel Cohen, Toby Handfield Decision Theory for Agents with Incomplete Preferences, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92, no.33 (Oct 2013): 453–470.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2013.843576Sergio Tenenbaum Minimalism about Intention: A Modest Defense, Inquiry 57, no.33 (Apr 2014): 384–411.https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2014.894275Luke Elson Heaps and Chains: Is the Chaining Argument for Parity a Sorites?, Ethics 124, no.33 (Jul 2015): 557–571.https://doi.org/10.1086/674844Morgan Luck Incommensurability, slight pains and God, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 75, no.22 (Jul 2013): 79–85.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-013-9416-3L. S. Temkin Summary, Analysis 74, no.22 (Apr 2014): 265–291.https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anu025Kris McDaniel A Moorean View of the Value of Lives, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95, no.11 (Jan 2014): 23–46.https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12015Mozaffar Qizilbash ‘Incommensurability’ and Vagueness: Is the Vagueness View Defensible?, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17, no.11 (May 2013): 141–153.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-013-9426-3Nikolai Hoberg, Stefan Baumggrtner Value Pluralism, Trade-Offs and Efficiencies, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2505089Mauro Rossi Sur la symétrie présumée entre valeurs et préférences1, Les ateliers de l'éthique 9, no.22 (Sep 2014): 82–98.https://doi.org/10.7202/1026679arDavid Pinkowski Practically Equal: An Analysis of the Practical Nature of Equality and Incomparability, Acta Analytica 28, no.44 (Dec 2012): 457–470.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-012-0180-2JOHAN E. GUSTAFSSON Indeterminacy and the Small-Improvement Argument, Utilitas 25, no.44 (Jul 2013): 433–445.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820813000034Andrew Davis How far can we aspire to consistency when assessing learning?, Ethics and Education 8, no.33 (Nov 2013): 217–228.https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2013.876788Erik Carlson Vagueness, Incomparability, and the Collapsing Principle, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16, no.33 (Mar 2012): 449–463.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-012-9352-9Ruth Chang Grounding practical normativity: going hybrid, Philosophical Studies 164, no.11 (Jan 2013): 163–187.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0092-zRuth Chang Incommensurability (and Incomparability), (Feb 2013).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee030Michael E. Kenneally Intellectual Property Rights and Institutions: A Pluralist Account, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2310986Adam Bales, Daniel Cohen, Toby Handfield Decision Theory for Agents with Incomplete Preferences, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2331859Mozaffar Qizilbash Incommensurability or Vagueness? A Comment on Rabinowicz and Sugden, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) 112, no.33 (Dec 2012): 333–338.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2012.00338.xRuth Chang ARE HARD CHOICES CASES OF INCOMPARABILITY?, Philosophical Issues 22, no.11 (Oct 2012): 106–126.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-6077.2012.00239.xJoshua Gert Moral Worth, Supererogation, and the Justifying/Requiring Distinction, The Philosophical Review 121, no.44 (Oct 2012): 611–618.https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-1630858Brian Hill Confidence in preferences, Social Choice and Welfare 39, no.2-32-3 (Jan 2012): 273–302.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0637-zWlodek Rabinowicz VALUE RELATIONS REVISITED, Economics and Philosophy 28, no.22 (Aug 2012): 133–164.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267112000144ASBJØRN STEGLICH-PETERSEN Clumps and Pumps: Clumpiness, Resolution and Rational Choice, Utilitas 24, no.11 (Feb 2012): 118–125.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820811000367Cristian Constantinescu Value Incomparability and Indeterminacy, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15, no.11 (Mar 2011): 57–70.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9269-8Barbro Fröding, Martin Peterson Virtuous Choice and Parity, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15, no.11 (Mar 2011): 71–82.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9273-zMartijn Boot The Aim of a Theory of Justice, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15, no.11 (Oct 2011): 7–21.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9308-5Johan E. Gustafsson AN EXTENDED FRAMEWORK FOR PREFERENCE RELATIONS – CORRECTED VERSION, Economics and Philosophy 27, no.33 (Nov 2011): 360–367.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267111000307Johan E. Gustafsson AN EXTENDED FRAMEWORK FOR PREFERENCE RELATIONS, Economics and Philosophy 27, no.22 (Jun 2011): 101–108.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267111000010Justin Klocksiem Moorean pluralism as a solution to the incommensurability problem, Philosophical Studies 153, no.33 (Feb 2010): 335–349.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-010-9513-4Attila Tanyi Desires as additional reasons? The case of tie-breaking, Philosophical Studies 152, no.22 (Nov 2009): 209–227.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9475-6Chrisoula Andreou Choosing Well: Value Pluralism and Patterns of Choice, (Jan 2011): 48–63.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305885_4Alec D. Walen Choosing Your Reasons for an Action: Moral Permissibility, Willful Action, and the Doctrine of Double Effect, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1447042 by Joshua Gert Color Constancy and the Color/Value Analogy, Ethics 121, no.11 (Jul 2015): 58–87.https://doi.org/10.1086/656042M. Smith On Normativity, Analysis 70, no.44 (Oct 2010): 715–731.https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anq035Justin Klocksiem In Defense of the Trichotomy Thesis, Acta Analytica 25, no.33 (Nov 2009): 317–327.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-009-0067-zERIK CARLSON Parity Demystified, Theoria 76, no.22 (May 2010): 119–128.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.2010.01063.xC. Hare Take the sugar, Analysis 70, no.22 (Jan 2010): 237–247.https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anp174Caspar Hare PERFECTLY BALANCED INTERESTS1, Philosophical Perspectives 23, no.11 (Dec 2009): 165–176.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2009.00165.xMartijn Boot Parity, incomparability and rationally justified choice, Philosophical Studies 146, no.11 (Jun 2008): 75–92.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-008-9245-xMichael Mandler Indifference and incompleteness distinguished by rational trade, Games and Economic Behavior 67, no.11 (Sep 2009): 300–314.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2008.11.009Donald W. Bruckner Silent prudence, Philosophical Explorations 12, no.33 (Sep 2009): 349–364.https://doi.org/10.1080/13869790903067659Yitzhak Benbaji Parity, Intransitivity, And A Context-Sensitive Degree Analysis of Gradability, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87, no.22 (Jun 2009): 313–335.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400802257754Wlodek Rabinowicz I—Wlodek Rabinowicz: Incommensurability and Vagueness, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83, no.11 (Jun 2009): 71–94.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2009.00173.xRuth Chang II—Ruth Chang: Reflections on the Reasonable and the Rational in Conflict Resolution, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83, no.11 (Jun 2009): 133–160.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2009.00176.xNicolas Espinoza The small improvement argument, Synthese 165, no.11 (Sep 2007): 127–139.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9243-0Douglas W. Portmore Are Moral Reasons Morally Overriding?, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11, no.44 (Mar 2008): 369–388.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-008-9110-1WLODEK RABINOWICZ Value Relations, Theoria 74, no.11 (Mar 2008): 18–49.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.2008.00008.xGeorg Brun, Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn Ranking policy options for sustainable development, Poiesis & Praxis 5, no.11 (Jul 2007): 15–31.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-007-0034-yMARTIN PETERSON Parity, Clumpiness and Rational Choice, Utilitas 19, no.44 (Nov 2007): 505–513.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820807002774Nien-hê Hsieh Maximization, Incomparability, and Managerial Choice, Business Ethics Quarterly 17, no.0303 (Jan 2015): 497–513.https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200717349NIEN-HÊ HSIEH IS INCOMPARABILITY A PROBLEM FOR ANYONE?, Economics and Philosophy 23, no.11 (Mar 2007): 65–80.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267107001228MOZAFFAR QIZILBASH THE PARITY VIEW AND INTUITIONS OF NEUTRALITY, Economics and Philosophy 23, no.0101 (Apr 2007): 107.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267107001265ANDREW DAVIS Consistency, Understanding and Truth in Educational Research, Journal of Philosophy of Education 40, no.44 (Nov 2006): 487–500.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2006.00518.xCarla Bagnoli Breaking Ties: The Significance of Choice in Symmetrical Moral Dilemmas, dialectica 60, no.22 (Jun 2006): 157–170.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2006.01062.xJoshua Gert Breaking the Law of Desire, Erkenntnis 62, no.33 (Jan 2005): 295–319.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-004-6881-1Ryan Wasserman Indeterminacy, Ignorance and the Possibility of Parity, Philosophical Perspectives 18, no.11 (Nov 2004): 391–403.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2004.00034.x by Joshua Gert Value and Parity Gert, Ethics 114, no.33 (Jul 2015): 492–510.https://doi.org/10.1086/381697Henry S. Richardson Incommensurability and Basic Goods: A Tension in the New Natural Law Theory, (Jan 2004): 70–101.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524149_5Erik Schmidt Thresholds, Vagueness and the Psychology of Small Improvements, (): 193–204.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6872-0_11
Referência(s)