Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Critical evaluation of the modified-adult immersion test with discriminating dose bioassay for Boophilus microplus using American and Australian isolates

2007; Elsevier BV; Volume: 146; Issue: 3-4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.02.031

1873-2550

N.N. Jonsson, Robert J. Miller, Jacqueline L. Robertson,

Insect Pest Control Strategies

Similar adult immersion tests (AITs) for acaricide susceptibility of Boophilus microplus were done in Texas, USA (Muñoz strain) and in Queensland, Australia (N-strain and Ultimo isolates). Engorged adult female ticks were immersed in one of a series of dilutions of commercial acaricide in water and then incubated at room temperature for 7 days. Data on oviposition were collected 7 days after exposure to acaricide and subjected to probit analysis. For most data, we observed poor fit to the probit model. Substantial differences in both LC50 and LC99 for the susceptible strains occurred between the respective laboratories and confidence intervals for all acaricides and all strains were unacceptably wide. For amitraz, the discriminating concentration (double the LC99.9 or LC99) recommended by FAO was 0.25%, but our estimates ranged from 0.46% to 9000%. For cypermethrin, the recommended DD was 0.0050%, with our estimates ranging from 0.00022% to 0.74%. For coumaphos the recommended DD was 0.50% but our estimates ranged from 0.66% to 130%. Finally, for moxidectin, the recommended DD was 0.10%, while our estimates ranged from <0.0001% to 5.9%. The method does not provide a means to discriminate between amitraz-susceptible and -resistant, nor between cypermethrin-susceptible and -resistant B. microplus.