Altered nucleotide misinsertion fidelity associated with poliota-dependent replication at the end of a DNA template
2001; Springer Nature; Volume: 20; Issue: 11 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1093/emboj/20.11.2914
ISSN1460-2075
Autores Tópico(s)CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
ResumoArticle1 June 2001free access Altered nucleotide misinsertion fidelity associated with polι-dependent replication at the end of a DNA template Ekaterina G. Frank Ekaterina G. Frank Section on DNA Replication, Repair and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-2725 USA Search for more papers by this author Agnès Tissier Agnès Tissier Section on DNA Replication, Repair and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-2725 USA Present address: UPR 9003, CNRS, Cancérogenèse et Mutagenèse Moléculaire et Structurale, ESBS, Blvd S. Brant, 67400 Strasbourg, France Search for more papers by this author John P. McDonald John P. McDonald Section on DNA Replication, Repair and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-2725 USA Present address: Aptus Genomics, 9700 Great Seneca Hwy, Rockville, MD, 20850 USA Search for more papers by this author Vesna Rapić-Otrin Vesna Rapić-Otrin Section on DNA Replication, Repair and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-2725 USA Present address: University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, E1240 Biomedical Science Tower, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261 USA Search for more papers by this author Xianmin Zeng Xianmin Zeng Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, 21224 USA Search for more papers by this author Patricia J. Gearhart Patricia J. Gearhart Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, 21224 USA Search for more papers by this author Roger Woodgate Corresponding Author Roger Woodgate Section on DNA Replication, Repair and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-2725 USA Search for more papers by this author Ekaterina G. Frank Ekaterina G. Frank Section on DNA Replication, Repair and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-2725 USA Search for more papers by this author Agnès Tissier Agnès Tissier Section on DNA Replication, Repair and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-2725 USA Present address: UPR 9003, CNRS, Cancérogenèse et Mutagenèse Moléculaire et Structurale, ESBS, Blvd S. Brant, 67400 Strasbourg, France Search for more papers by this author John P. McDonald John P. McDonald Section on DNA Replication, Repair and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-2725 USA Present address: Aptus Genomics, 9700 Great Seneca Hwy, Rockville, MD, 20850 USA Search for more papers by this author Vesna Rapić-Otrin Vesna Rapić-Otrin Section on DNA Replication, Repair and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-2725 USA Present address: University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, E1240 Biomedical Science Tower, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261 USA Search for more papers by this author Xianmin Zeng Xianmin Zeng Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, 21224 USA Search for more papers by this author Patricia J. Gearhart Patricia J. Gearhart Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, 21224 USA Search for more papers by this author Roger Woodgate Corresponding Author Roger Woodgate Section on DNA Replication, Repair and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-2725 USA Search for more papers by this author Author Information Ekaterina G. Frank1, Agnès Tissier1,3, John P. McDonald1,4, Vesna Rapić-Otrin1,5, Xianmin Zeng2, Patricia J. Gearhart2 and Roger Woodgate 1 1Section on DNA Replication, Repair and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-2725 USA 2Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, 21224 USA 3Present address: UPR 9003, CNRS, Cancérogenèse et Mutagenèse Moléculaire et Structurale, ESBS, Blvd S. Brant, 67400 Strasbourg, France 4Present address: Aptus Genomics, 9700 Great Seneca Hwy, Rockville, MD, 20850 USA 5Present address: University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, E1240 Biomedical Science Tower, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261 USA *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] The EMBO Journal (2001)20:2914-2922https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.11.2914 PDFDownload PDF of article text and main figures. ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyWechatReddit Figures & Info A hallmark of human DNA polymerase ι (polι) is the asymmetric fidelity of replication at template A and T when the enzyme extends primers annealed to a single-stranded template. Here, we report on the efficiency and accuracy of polι-dependent replication at a nick, a gap, the very end of a template and from a mispaired primer. Polι cannot initiate synthesis on a nicked DNA substrate, but fills short gaps efficiently. Surprisingly, polι's ability to blunt-end a 1 bp recessed terminus is dependent upon the template nucleotide encountered and is highly erroneous. At template G, both C and T are inserted with roughly equal efficiency, whilst at template C, C and A are misinserted 8- and 3-fold more often than the correct base, G. Using substrates containing mispaired primer termini, we show that polι can extend all 12 mispairs, but with differing efficiencies. Polι can also extend a tandem mispair, especially when it is located within a short gap. The enzymatic properties of polι appear consistent with that of a somatic hypermutase and suggest that polι may be one of the low-fidelity DNA polymerases hypothesized to participate in the hypermutation of immunoglobulin variable genes in vivo. Introduction In the past 18 months, the number of known eukaryotic DNA polymerases has more than doubled (Goodman and Tippen, 2000; Hubscher et al., 2000). Many of the new polymerases are related to the UmuC/DinB/Rev1/Rad30 superfamily of proteins (Gerlach et al., 1999; McDonald et al., 1999; Woodgate, 1999). These proteins share little to no sequence homology with any of the previously identified A-, B-, C-, D- or X-polymerase families (Ito and Braithwaite, 1991; Braithwaite and Ito, 1993; Cann and Ishino, 1999) and, as a consequence, it has been proposed that, collectively, the UmuC/DinB/Rev1/Rad30 superfamily be called the 'Y-family' of DNA polymerases (Ohmori et al., 2001). Interestingly, humans possess two RAD30 paralogs: RAD30A and RAD30B (Johnson et al., 1999a; Masutani et al., 1999b; McDonald et al., 1999). Both share roughly equal similarity to Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD30 (McDonald et al., 1997; Roush et al., 1998) which encodes DNA polymerase η (Johnson et al., 1999b). However, biochemical characterization of the human Rad30A protein reveals that it is functionally interchangeable with its S.cerevisiae counterpart and it has therefore been designated as human polη (Johnson et al., 1999a, 2000b; Masutani et al., 1999b). As a consequence, RAD30A is also known by its approved HUGO name of POLH. The physiological role of polη appears to be the efficient and accurate bypass of many replication-blocking lesions (Johnson et al., 1999b, 2000b; Masutani et al., 1999a, 2000). In its absence, translesion replication is severely compromised, and humans with defects in polη exhibit the xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XP-V) phenotype (Johnson et al., 1999a; Masutani et al., 1999b). RAD30B has also been shown to encode a novel DNA polymerase, polι, and it too goes under a pseudonym: POLI. The enzymatic properties of polι are very different from those reported for either S.cerevisiae or human polη (Johnson et al., 2000a; Tissier et al., 2000a,,b; Zhang et al., 2000; Bebenek et al., 2001; McDonald et al., 2001). The in vivo role of polι is presently unknown. Biochemical characterization of the enzyme in vitro indicates that polι can readily misinsert bases opposite a number of replication-blocking lesions (Johnson et al., 2000a; Tissier et al., 2000a; Zhang et al., 2000, 2001; McDonald et al., 2001) and in some cases performs unassisted lesion bypass (Tissier et al., 2000a). However, a more appealing model for lesion bypass hypothesizes that it might be achieved more efficiently through the combined actions of polι together with another enzyme, such as polζ, that is better suited to elongate mispairs (Tissier et al., 2000a). Based on these observations, we suggested that one cellular function of polι (possibly in combination with polζ) is that of a backup to polη in the translesion replication of many DNA lesions (Tissier et al., 2000a). Indeed, such a role may be most evident in XP-V patients, who lack polη, and whose cells are hypermutable by UV light (Wang et al., 1993; Raha et al., 1996; McGregor et al., 1999). Another potential clue as to polι's cellular function comes from the recent discovery that the enzyme also possesses 5′-deoxyribose lyase (dRpase) activity and can substitute for polβ in base excision repair (BER) reactions in vitro (Bebenek et al., 2001). However, it is also clear that polι cannot fully complement all of polβ's cellular functions in vivo as polβ-deficient mice are inviable (Gu et al., 1994; Esposito et al., 2000). Such observations imply that polι might only participate in a specialized form of BER in vivo (Bebenek et al., 2001). In vitro replication reactions utilizing a short primer annealed to a longer single-stranded template revealed that the fidelity of polι is strictly template sequence dependent, with relatively few misinsertions occurring at template A, and most occurring at template T (Johnson et al., 2000a; Tissier et al., 2000b; Zhang et al., 2000). Overall, the average misincorporation frequency is ∼1 × 10−2. Based upon these properties, we previously hypothesized that another potential function for polι might be to generate genetic diversity during somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin (Ig) variable (V) genes (Tissier et al., 2000b). The precise molecular mechanism of somatic hypermutation remains to be elucidated fully. However, it appears to require transcription and enhancer elements that target the process to an ∼1.5 kb region immediately downstream of the start of the rearranged IgV gene (Lebecque and Gearhart, 1990; Betz et al., 1994; Peters and Storb, 1996; Fukita et al., 1998). It was originally hypothesized that the substrate for somatic hypermutation might be a nick, a gap or a double-strand break (Brenner and Milstein, 1966) that was repaired by an error-prone DNA polymerase (Gearhart and Bogenhagen, 1983). Support for the hypothesis that a double-strand break acts as a substrate during somatic hypermutation was reported recently (Sale and Neuberger, 1998; Bross et al., 2000; Papavasiliou and Schatz, 2000). Indeed, strand breaks were shown to occur in a cell cycle-dependent manner within the IgV gene and, perhaps more importantly, most mutations were mapped to the break itself, or within 1–2 bases of it (Papavasiliou and Schatz, 2000). Based upon its initial characterization, it appeared that polι might be a good candidate for at least one of the low-fidelity polymerase(s) hypothesized to function during somatic hypermutation of Ig genes (Goodman and Tippen, 2000; Papavasiliou and Schatz, 2000; Poltoratsky et al., 2000; Tissier et al., 2000b). We were, therefore, interested in characterizing the biochemical properties of polι further, especially its ability to replicate DNA substrates that might be expected to be generated as part of the normal somatic hypermutation process. To this end, we have analyzed the ability of polι to initiate synthesis at a nick, short gaps and at the end of a DNA template. We have also examined its ability to extend single and tandem mispairs, as well as the level of polι expression in B cells undergoing somatic hypermutation compared with resting cells. Results Ability of polι to replicate at nicks, gaps and the end of a DNA template In order to analyze the ability of polι to replicate substrates that might mimic those generated during somatic hypermutation, we utilized a synthetic 70mer oligonucleotide template and a variety of short oligonucleotides, which, when annealed to the template, generated either a nicked substrate or a gapped substrate (gap sizes of 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 or 27 nucleotides; Figure 1). Furthermore, much of the sequence of the template was identical to codons 75–93 in the third framework region of the human VH6 gene (Berman et al., 1988). In particular, the three template nucleotides immediately downstream of the radiolabeled primer (3′-CGA-5′) corresponded to a known hot-spot for somatic hypermutation at codons 81–82 of the VH6 gene (Rogozin and Kolchanov, 1992; Betz et al., 1993) (Figure 1). To determine the ability of polι to replicate near the end of a template, a situation akin to that of a double-strand break, we used a single radiolabeled primer that was located 4, 1 and 0 bp from the end of the template (Figure 1). Figure 1.Nucleotide sequence and structure of DNA templates used in the replication assays described in Figure 2. The various primer–templates are labeled A–L on the left of the figure for ease of reference. The 'class' of substrate, i.e. which ones measure recessed, gapped or end-filling reactions, is given on the right of the figure. Download figure Download PowerPoint As previously reported, polι is a distributive enzyme (Tissier et al., 2000b) and only extends the singly-primed substrate by a few nucleotides (substrate A; Figure 2A). The strongest pause is 4 nucleotides from the primer, and this corresponds to template T. The pause probably reflects the efficient misincorporation of G opposite T and the reduced ability of polι to extend the G·T mispair relative to the correct A·T base pair (Tissier et al., 2000b; Zhang et al., 2000). A similar situation was observed when the template contained a second primer that generates a 27 nucleotide gap (substrate B; Figure 2A). Interestingly, faint replication products corresponding to the extension of the radiolabeled primer by 7–10 nucleotides were observed when the substrate was a short gap of 7–9 nucleotides (substrates C and D; Figure 2A), suggesting that such a context stimulates polι's catalytic activity. Polι was also able to initiate synthesis at shorter gaps of 1, 3, and 5 nucleotides, respectively (substrates E, F and G; Figure 2A). In the case of the 7, 3 and 1 bp gaps, products longer than the expected gap size were observed, indicating that polι can also perform limited strand displacement of a downstream primer. The fidelity of the gap-filling reaction was measured at the template site immediately downstream of the radiolabeled primer (template C) and was found to be similar to that of the singly primed template, with misincorporations occurring in the range of 5–8 × 10−3 (E.G.Frank and R.Woodgate, unpublished observations). Figure 2.(A) Comparison of polι's ability to replicate primed single-stranded DNA and gapped templates. For each template, polι was incubated for 30 min with the substrate in the absence (0) or presence of all four (4) deoxynucleoside triphosphates (100 μM each). The primer–template used in each reaction is denoted by a letter, A–G, under each pair of reactions, and this refers to the sequence and structure of each primer–template shown in Figure 1. Where appropriate, the gap size is indicated above each reaction. The exception are the lanes denoted 'NA', which represent a singly primed template in which no gap exists. In the case of the gapped substrates, the size of the expected product is indicated by an arrow at the right hand side of each pair of reactions. (B) Ability of polι to initiate synthesis at a nick or the end of a DNA template. For each template, polι was incubated for 30 min with the substrate in the absence (0) or presence of all four (4) deoxynucleoside triphosphates (100 μM each). The primer–template used in each reaction is denoted by a letter, H–L, under each pair of reactions, and this refers to the sequence and structure of each primer–template shown in Figure 1. Where appropriate, the presence of a 5′-phosphate or 5′-hydroxyl in the nicked substrate is indicated, as is the distance to the end of the template in substrates J–L, which were used to measure the efficiency of end filling. Download figure Download PowerPoint By comparison, polι was unable to initiate synthesis at a template containing a nick (with either a 5′-phosphate or a 5′-hydroxyl) (substrates H and I; Figure 2B). These findings are consistent with the fact that preparations of glutathione S-transferase (GST)–polι lack any measurable 5′–3′ exonuclease activity. In contrast, robust synthesis was observed with these templates when Escherichia coli polymerase I (polI) was used in control reactions (E.G.Frank and R.Woodgate, unpublished observations). We were also interested in determining the properties of the enzyme at the end of the template. The initial experiments utilized the 70mer template with primers located 4, 1 and 0 bp from the end of the template (substrates J, K and L; Figure 2B). Under these conditions, it appeared that the primers located one and four bases from the end of the template were extended less efficiently than those annealed to the longer gapped templates used in Figure 1. Faint replication products were also detected when the primer was located at the very end of the template (substrate L; Figure 2B), which initially suggested to us that polι might possess template-independent terminal transferase activity. However, we could not exclude the possibility that the 70mer template did not contain very small amounts of a contaminating 71mer, despite the fact that the template was purified multiple times by PAGE prior to use. Fidelity of polι replication at the end of a DNA template To circumvent the problems associated with the longer DNA template, we designed a shorter 20mer DNA template to control purity more accurately. In addition, the sequence of this new template was identical to that used previously in our initial fidelity studies with polι (Tissier et al., 2000b), and allowed a direct comparison between replication fidelities in the context of a long (19 nucleotides) and short (one nucleotide) DNA template. Interestingly, with the shorter template, it became apparent that the efficiency of polι-dependent replication at the end of the template is sequence specific. In the presence of all four nucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs), the template was blunt-ended most efficiently when G was replicated and least efficiently when C was the target (Figure 3). Similar results were obtained when polι extended from a correctly paired G·C primer–template terminus, indicating that the effects are due to the template structure rather than the sequence context (E.G.Frank and R.Woodgate, unpublished observations). Figure 3.Ability of polι to incorporate nucleotides at the end of a DNA template. The primer for each reaction was a radiolabeled 16mer with the sequence 5′-CTTGAAAACATAGCGA-3′. The template was a 22mer with the sequence 5′-XTCGCTATGTTTTCAAGGATTC-3′, where X was either G, A, T or C. The position of the hybridized primer on the template is underlined. The local sequence context of each primer–template is given above each panel. The extent of polι-dependent (mis)incorporation was measured at each template site in the absence of dNTPs (0), with all four dNTPs (4) or with each individual dNTP (100 μM) (G, A, T or C). Reactions were for 30 min at 37°C. Download figure Download PowerPoint With both correctly paired primer–templates (A·T; Figure 3, and G·C; data not shown), the reaction was strictly template dependent and no replication products longer than one base were observed (Figure 3). We conclude, therefore, that the limited amount of replication products seen in Figure 2B (substrate L) represents extension of the primer annealed to a contaminating 71mer template rather than weak terminal transferase activity. We quantitated the fidelity of the end-filling reaction using a steady-state gel assay (Boosalis et al., 1987; Creighton et al., 1995) and discovered that it is very different from that previously reported for a longer DNA template (Table I). In some cases, the fidelity increased several fold, e.g. misincorporation of G or A at template G, where the one-nucleotide end-filling reaction is ∼40-fold more accurate. However, at most sites, there was a decrease in replication fidelity. The most striking case was at template C, where C and A mispairs formed ∼8- and 3-fold more frequently than the correct base, G. In contrast, the formation of C·C and C·A mispairs on the longer template occurred at a lower frequency of ∼7 × 10−3 (Table I; Tissier et al., 2000b). Thus, when replicating C at the end of a template, polι is ∼500- to 1000-fold more likely to insert C or A than when it encounters a C in a longer template. Replication remained most accurate at template A, but overall fidelities were 5- to 13-fold lower than that observed with the longer template DNA. Table 1. Fidelity of human polι on a recessed primed DNA template and at the end of a DNA template as determined by steady-state kinetics Recessed templatea One nucleotide from the end Fold difference in fidelityd dNTP·template Vmax/Kmb (μM−1 min−1) fincc dNTP·template Vmax/Kmb (μM−1 min−1) fincc dGTP·G 0.005 6.5 × 10−3 dGTP·G 0.0002 1.5 × 10−4 ↑43.3 dATP·G 0.02 2.2 × 10−2 dATP·G 0.0007 5.4 × 10−4 ↑40.1 dTTP·G 0.100 1.3 × 10−1 dTTP·G 0.64 4.9 × 10−1 ↓3.8 dCTP·G 0.76 1 dCTP·G 1.3 1 N/A dGTP·A 0.008 1.0 × 10−4 dGTP·A 0.024 5.1 × 10−4 ↓5.1 dATP·A 0.02 2.0 × 10−4 dATP·A 0.11 2.3 × 10−3 ↓11.5 dTTP·A 73.5 1 dTTP·A 47.2 1 N/A dCTP·A 0.009 1.0 × 10−4 dCTP·A 0.06 1.3 × 10−3 ↓13.0 dGTP·T 0.33 3 dGTP·T 0.006 3.3 × 10−1 ↑9.1 dATP·T 0.11 1 dATP·T 0.018 1 N/A dTTP·T 0.078 6.7 × 10−1 dTTP·T 0.01 5.6 × 10−1 ↑0.8 dCTP·T nd <1.0 × 10−5 dCTP·T nd <1.0 × 10−5 N/A dGTP·C 3.0 1 dGTP·C 0.0016 1 N/A dATP·C 0.019 6.3 × 10−3 dATP·C 0.0055 3.4 ↓540 dTTP·C 0.023 7.7 × 10−3 dTTP·C 0.0014 8.8 × 10−1 ↓114 dCTP·C 0.022 7.4 × 10−3 dCTP·C 0.013 8.1 ↓1095 N/A, not applicable. nd, not detected. a The data for the recessed template were taken from Tissier et al. (2000b) and are shown for comparison. b The Vmax/Km ratio was the average of three or more experiments with standard deviations not exceeding 20% of the Vmax/Km value. c The nucleotide misincorporation ratio, finc = (Vmax/Km)incorrect/(Vmax/Km)correct.. d The ↑ indicates that there was an increase in replication fidelity, while ↓ indicates that there was a decrease. Ability of polι to extend single and tandem base mispairs To determine whether polι can extend past mispairs, primer–templates were designed so as to generate all 12 mispairs in addition to the four correct base pairs (Figure 4A). We then analyzed the ability of polι to extend the paired/mispaired primers in the presence of all four dNTPs. In these experiments, the first base encountered by the polymerase is template A. This template base was chosen as polι prefers to insert T opposite A with catalytic efficiencies greater than any other nucleotide (Johnson et al., 2000a; Tissier et al., 2000b; Zhang et al., 2000; Bebenek et al., 2001), and we hypothesized that this would most probably represent the best sequence context for mismatch extension. As can be seen in Figure 4B, all mispairs are extended, but some mispairs are clearly favored over others. The T·G mispair appears to be the most efficiently extended, and in this qualitative assay appears similar to that of the correct A·T base pair. Many of the mispairs were extended by one nucleotide, but no further, suggesting that the mispair still represents a kinetic block to elongation even when it is no longer in the active site of the enzyme. The G·G, A·A and T·T mispairs were extended with the lowest efficiency. A more detailed analysis of polι-dependent extension from a mispair and the effects of nearest-neighbor bases will be presented elsewhere (A.Vaisman, A.Tissier, E.G.Frank, M.F. Goodman and R.Woodgate, submitted). Figure 4.(A) Nucleotide sequence of the primer and templates utilized to measure polι-dependent primer extension. In both cases, N is either G, A, T or C. (B) Comparison of polι's ability to extend a correctly paired or mispaired primer terminus. The sequence of the pair/mispair is given below each track. These reactions were performed for 15 min in the presence of all four dNTPs. Download figure Download PowerPoint Our studies with mice deficient in the PMS2 mismatch repair protein suggested that tandem mutations occur in the IgV gene and may be repaired by a PMS2-dependent pathway (Winter et al., 1998). Polι clearly has the ability to insert an erroneous base as well as extend it (albeit with varying efficiencies). We were, therefore, interested in determining whether polι might be able to extend a tandem mispair. The template for these studies was the 70mer used in Figure 1, and we followed the ability of polι to extend correctly paired and tandem mismatched primers on a single-stranded template as well as within the context of a short gap (Figure 5A). The A·C and T·G mispairs were chosen as they represent the most common mutational events recovered at the somatic hypermutation hot-spot found at codons 81–82 within the VH6 gene (Rosner et al., 2001). Given the structural distortions imposed by the tandem mispair, it was not surprising that the mispaired primer was poorly extended when in the context of single-stranded DNA (Figure 5B). Interestingly, however, extension from the tandem mispair was stimulated greatly when it was located within the context of a 1 or 3 bp gap (Figure 5B). Figure 5.(A) Nucleotide sequence and structure of DNA templates used in replication assays to measure polι-dependent extension from a correctly paired 22mer and a 22mer with two terminal mismatches. (B) Ability of polι to extend a tandem mispair. For each template, polι was incubated for 30 min with the substrate in the absence (0) or presence of all four (4) deoxynucleoside triphosphates (100 μM each). Download figure Download PowerPoint Tissue-specific expression of polι The expression pattern of human POLI (encoding polι) in various adult tissues was examined initially by northern blot analysis and was detected in most tissues as an ∼3 kb transcript, except in ovary, where the transcript appeared slightly longer (Figure 6). As previously noted, expression of human POLI is highest in testis, and in this respect is similar to the related mouse Poli gene, which is highly expressed in post-meiotic round spermatids (McDonald et al., 1999). The human POLI messenger is also abundant in heart and pancreas, and is present at low levels in other tissues. In addition, nearly 50 human expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences have been identified in the EST database that correspond to POLI. These ESTs come from various human tissue sources including fetal heart (DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession No. AI14880), uterus (AA156602), placenta (AI277458), neuroendocrine lung carcinoid (AA878207), testis (AI1223233), parathyroid tumor cells (AI167389), umbilical vein endothelial cells (AA181126) and germinal center B cells (AA856713) and, as a consequence, we conclude that the expression of POLI is ubiquitous but elevated in certain tissues. Figure 6.Northern blot analysis of POLI mRNA in adult tissues. Upper panel: human POLI cDNA probes were hybridized with 2 μg of poly(A)+ RNA from each tissue as indicated. A β-actin cDNA was used as a control. Lower panel: autoradiograms were quantitated and relative expression was normalized to the level of β-actin in each tissue. The extent of POLI expression in the various tissue sources is indicated as a percentage of that observed in the testis (100%). Download figure Download PowerPoint The fact that human POLI was identified in germinal center B cells is of particular importance as that is where hypermutation of IgV genes takes place (Jacob et al., 1991, 1993). We therefore sought to quantitate its in vivo expression more accurately. To do so, the level of murine Poli transcript was measured in resting, non-germinal center B cells (B220+PNA−) and activated, germinal center B cells (B220+PNA+) by relative quantitative RT–PCR, which compares the levels of transcripts with an internal 18S rRNA standard. As shown in Table II, polι is expressed 1.6-fold more in the germinal center cells compared with the non-germinal center cells. In contrast, the catalytic subunit of polα is not expressed at detectable levels in the resting cells, but is up-regulated in the activated cell
Referência(s)