Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Under The Pretence of the Shell: Psychoanalysis and the Inscr(i/y)ption of the Trace

2009; Taylor & Francis; Volume: 15; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1080/13534640802604414

1460-700X

Mark Dawson,

Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1. Nicolas Abraham, ‘L'écorce et le noyau’, in: Nicolas Abraham and Maria Torok, L'écorce et le noyau (Paris: Flammarion, 1987), pp.203–26. 2. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, trans. Nicholas T. Rand, in The Shell and the Kernel, vol. 1 (London: The University of Chicago Press, 1994), pp.79–98 (p.79). 3. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, p.98. 4. Jacques Derrida, ‘Me––Psychoanalysis’, trans. Richard Klein, in: Psyche: Inventions of the Other, vol. 1, eds. Peggy Kamuf and Elizabeth Rottenberg (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007), pp.129–42 (p.135). 5. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, p.85. 6. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, p.84. 7. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, p.84. 8. Jacques Derrida, ‘Me––Psychoanalysis’, p.140. 9. Nicholas T. Rand, ‘Editor's Note’, in: The Shell and the Kernel, vol. 1 (London: The University of Chicago Press, 1994), pp.75–78 (p.77). 10. Nicolas Abraham, quoted in: Jacques Derrida, ‘Me––Psychoanalysis’, p.137. 11. Jacques Derrida, ‘Me––Psychoanalysis’, p.138. 12. Jacques Derrida, ‘Me––Psychoanalysis’, p.138. 13. Jacques Derrida, ‘Me––Psychoanalysis’, p.138. [translation modified]. 14. Jacques Derrida, ‘Moi – la psychanalyse’, in: Psyché: Inventions de l'autre (Paris: Galilée, 1998), pp.145–58 (p.145). 15. Jacques Derrida, ‘Me––Psychoanalysis’, p.138. 16. Jacques Derrida, ‘Me––Psychoanalysis’, p.139. 17. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, pp.86–7. 18. See: Nicholas T. Rand, ‘Editor's Note’, p.77. 19. For this definition see: OED online, ⟨www.oed.com⟩[03/09/08]. 20. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, p.86. 21. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, p.86. 22. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, p.86. 23. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, p.86. 24. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, p.87. 25. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, p.86. 26. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, pp.90–91. 27. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, p.91. 28. Sigmund Freud, ‘Letter 52’, from The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol 1 (London: Vintage, 2001), p.235. 29. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, p.91. 30. This ‘and’ is not found in the English translation; the French reads: ‘…qu'une telle duplicité est constitutive et de l'Enveloppe et du Noyau’: Nicolas Abraham, ‘L'écorce et le noyau’, p.219. This slight omission does lend an extra doubleness to the operation of the trace which I attempt to explain above. 31. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, pp.91–92. [Translation modified; see note above]. 32. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, p.92. 33. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, p.92. 34. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, p.92. 35. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, p.92. 36. Jean Laplanche & Jean‐Bertrand Pontalis, The Language of Psychoanalysis, trans. Donald Nicholson‐Smith (London: Karnac, 2004), p.253. 37. Nicolas Abraham, ‘The Shell and the Kernel: The Scope and Originality of Freudian Psychoanalysis’, p.92. 38. Jacques Derrida, ‘Freud and the Scene of Writing’, trans. Alan Bass, in Writing and Difference (London: Routledge, 2002), pp.246–91 (p.289). 39. Jacques Derrida, ‘Freud and the Scene of Writing’, pp.281–82. Derrida's suggestions here can be seen at varying places throughout his work; see for example: ‘Spéculer – sur «Freud»’, in La Carte Postale, in which he discusses the ‘authority’ of the PP. 40. Jacques Derrida, ‘Freud and the Scene of Writing’, p.285. 41. Jacques Derrida, ‘Freud and the Scene of Writing’, p.265–66. 42. Jacques Derrida, ‘FORS: Les mots anglés de Nicolas Abraham et Maria Torok’, in: Nicolas Abraham and Maria Torok, Cryptonymie: Le Verbier de L'Homme aux Loups (Paris: Flammarion, 1976), pp.7–73 (p.25). The English text: Jacques Derrida, ‘Fors: The Anglish Words of Nicolas Abraham and Maria Torok’, trans. Barbara Johnson, in: Nicolas Abraham and Maria Torok, The Wolf Man's Magic Word: A Cryptonymy (Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 1986), pp.xi–xlviii (p.xxi). 43. Maria Torok, ‘Maladie du deuil et fantasme du cadavre exquis’, in: Nicolas Abraham and Maria Torok, L'écorce et le noyau (Paris: Flammarion, 1987), pp.229–51. 44. Maria Torok, ‘The Illness of Mourning and the Fantasy of the Exquisite Corpse’, trans. Nicholas T. Rand, The Shell and the Kernel, vol. 1 (London: The University of Chicago Press, 1994), pp.107–24 (p.114). Although a parenthesis in the French text has been omitted in the English translation, this would appear to be under the direction of Maria Torok; in this case, it is to the English version that my own essay refers. 45. For Abraham and Torok's discussion of the crypt as housing an idyll see: Nicolas Abraham and Maria Torok, ‘“The Lost Object––Me”: Notes on Endocryptic Identification’ [1975], trans. Nicholas T. Rand, in The Shell and the Kernel, vol. 1 (London: The University of Chicago Press, 1994), pp.139–56 (p.141). 46. Nicolas Abraham and Maria Torok, ‘The Topography of Reality: Sketching a Metapsychology of Secrets’ [1971], p.160. 47. Jacques Derrida, ‘FORS: Les mots anglés de Nicolas Abraham et Maria Torok’, p.25. The English reference: Jacques Derrida, ‘Fors: The Anglish Words of Nicolas Abraham and Maria Torok’, p.xxi. 48. Jacques Derrida, ‘Fors: The Anglish Words of Nicolas Abraham and Maria Torok’, p.xix. 49. Jacques Derrida, ‘Fors: The Anglish Words of Nicolas Abraham and Maria Torok’, p.xii. 50. Jacques Derrida, ‘FORS: Les mots anglés de Nicolas Abraham et Maria Torok’, p.17.