Incontinence after prostatectomy: the artificial urinary sphincter
2003; Wiley; Volume: 92; Issue: 9 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1464-410x.2003.04517.x
ISSN1464-410X
AutoresVincent Tse, Anthony R. Stone,
Tópico(s)Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
ResumoBJU InternationalVolume 92, Issue 9 p. 886-889 Incontinence after prostatectomy: the artificial urinary sphincter V. Tse, V. Tse Department of Urology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USASearch for more papers by this authorA.R. Stone, Corresponding Author A.R. Stone Department of Urology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USAA. Stone, MD, Professor and Vice-Chair, Department of Urology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Suite 3500, 4860 Y Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA. e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author V. Tse, V. Tse Department of Urology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USASearch for more papers by this authorA.R. Stone, Corresponding Author A.R. Stone Department of Urology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USAA. Stone, MD, Professor and Vice-Chair, Department of Urology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Suite 3500, 4860 Y Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA. e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 24 November 2003 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2003.04517.xCitations: 22Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES 1 McConnell JD, Barry MJ, Bruskewitz RC et al. Benign prostatic hyperplasia. diagnosis and treatment. Clinical practice guidelines, no. 8. AHCPR Publication No. 94–0582. Rockville. Maryland: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services, 1994 Google Scholar 2 Committee 17. Surgical treatment of urinary incontinence in men. In P Abrams, S Khoury, A Wein eds Incontinence. First International Consultation on Incontinence. Health Publication Ltd., 1999 : 691–729 Web of Science®Google Scholar 3 Catalona WJ, Basler JW. Return of erections and urinary incontinence following nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 1993; 150: 905–7 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35645-8 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 4 Weldon VE, Tavel FR, Neuwirth H. Continence, potency and morbidity after radical perineal prostatectomy. J Urol 1997; 158: 1470–5 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64245-9 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 5 Foley FEB. Artificial sphincter. new device and operation for control of enuresis and urinary incontinence. J Urol 1947; 58: 250–9 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 6 Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW, Kothari D. Treatment of incontinence secondary to myelodysplasia by an implantable prosthetic urinary sphincter. South Med J 1973; 66: 987–90 10.1097/00007611-197309000-00006 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 7 Hajivassiliou CA. The development and evolution of artificial urethral sphincters. J Med Eng Technol 1998; 22: 154–8 10.3109/03091909809032533 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 8 Craggs MD. An adjustable pressure regulated artificial urinary sphincter. J Physiol, 1986; 377: 6 Google Scholar 9 Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Treatment of urinary incontinence by an implantable prosthetic urinary sphincter. J Urol 1974; 112: 75–80 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)59647-0 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 10 Diokno AC, Peters KM. Artificial urinary sphincter for treatment of male urinary incontinence. In CC Carson, ed. Urologic Prostheses. Totowa: Humana Press, 2002: 263–84 Google Scholar 11 Leo ME, Barrett DM. Success of the narrow-backed cuff design of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: analysis of 144 patients. J Urol 1993; 150: 1412–4 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35793-2 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 12 Wilson SK, Delk JR, Henry GD, Siegel AL. New surgical technique for sphincter urinary control system using upper transverse scrotal incision. J Urol 2003; 169: 216–64 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64082-7 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 13 Gousse AE, Madjar S, Lambert MM, Fishman IJ. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results. J Urol 2001; 166: 1755–8 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65668-6 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 14 Gundian JC, Barrett DM, Parulkar BG. Mayo Clinic experience with the use of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter for urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1989; 142: 1459–61 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)39126-7 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 15 Montague DK. The artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800): experience in 166 consecutive patients. J Urol 1992; 147: 380–2 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37242-7 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 16 Perez LM, Webster GD. Successful outcome of artificial urinary sphincters in men with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence despite adverse implantation features. J Urol 1992; 148: 1166–70 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36850-7 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 17 Fleshner N, Herschorn S. The artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence. Impact on urinary symptoms and quality of life. J Urol 1996; 155: 1260–4 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66236-0 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 18 Litwiller SE, Kim KB, Fone PD, White RW, Stone AR. Post-prostatectomy incontinence and the artificial urinary sphincter: along-term study of patient satisfaction and criteria for success. J Urol 1996; 156: 1975–80 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65408-9 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 19 Petrou SP, Elliott DS, Barrett DM. Artificial urethral sphincter for incontinence. Urology 2000; 56: 353–9 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00683-X CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 20 Elliott DS, Barrett DM. Mayo Clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: a review of 323 cases. J Urol 1998; 159: 1206–8 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63557-2 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 21 Fulford SC, Sutton C, Bales G, Hickling M, Stephenson TP. The fate of the ‘modern’ artificial urinary sphincter with a follow-up of more than 10 years. Br J Urol 1997; 79: 713–6 10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.00151.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 22 Couillard DR, Vapnek JM, Stone AR. Proximal artificial sphincter cuff repositioning for urethral atrophy. Urology 1994; 45: 653–6 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80058-2 Web of Science®Google Scholar 23 Brito CG, Mulcahy JJ, Mitchell ME, Adams MC. Use of a double cuff AMS 800 urinary sphincter for severe stress incontinence. J Urol 1993; 149: 283–5 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36057-3 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 24 Saffarian A, Walsh K, Walsh IK, Stone AR. Urethral atrophy after artificial urinary sphincter placement: is cuff downsizing effective? J Urol 2003; 169: 567–9 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)63954-7 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 25 Kabalin JN. Addition of a second urethral cuff to enhance performance of the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol 1996; 156: 1302–4 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65574-5 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 26 Fishman IJ, Shabsingh R, Scott FB. Experience with the artificial urinary sphincter model AMS 800 in 148 patients. J Urol 1989; 141: 307–10 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)40748-8 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 27 Light JK, Reynolds JC. Impact of the new cuff design on reliability of the AS800 artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol 1992; 147: 609–11 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37319-6 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 28 Gomha MA, Boone TB. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence in men who had prior radiotherapy. a risk and outcome analysis. J Urol 2002; 167: 591–6 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)69091-8 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 29 Walsh IK, Williams SG, Mahendra V, Nambirajan T, Stone AR. Artificial urinary sphincter implantation in the irradiated patient: safety, efficacy and satisfaction. BJU Int 2002; 89: 364–8 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.01759.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 30 Gomes CM, Broderick GA, Sanchez-Ortiz RF, Preate D Jr, Rovner ES, Wein AJ. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: impact of prior collagen injection on cost and clinical outcome. J Urol 2000; 163: 87–90 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67979-7 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 31 Bugel H, Pfister C, Sibert L, Cappele O, Khalaf A, Grise P. Intraurethral Macroplastique injections in the treatment of urinary incontinence after prostatic surgery. Prog Urol 1999; 9: 1068–76 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 32 Schaeffer AJ, Clemens JQ, Ferrari M, Stamey TA. The male bulbourethral sling procedure for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol 1998; 159: 1510–5 10.1097/00005392-199805000-00026 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 33 Clemens JQ, Bushman W, Schaeffer AJ. Questionnaire based results of the bulbourethral sling procedure. J Urol 1999; 162: 1972–6 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68081-0 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 34 Janknegt RA, Heesakkers JPFA, Weil EHJ, Baeten CG. Electrically stimulated gracilis sphincter (dynamic graciloplasty) for treatment of intrinsic sphincter deficiency: a pilot study on feasibility and side-effects. J Urol 1995; 154: 1830–3 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66794-6 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 35 Chancellor MB, Heesakers JFPA, Janknegt RA. Gracilis muscle transposition with electrical stimulation for urinary incontinence: a new approach. World J Urol 1997; 15: 320–8 10.1007/BF02202019 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 36 Mundy AR, Knight SL, Dunglison N, Craggs MD. A new artificial urinary sphincter with conditional occlusion for genuine stress incontinence. J Urol 2001; 165 (Suppl.): 158 Google Scholar 37 Lee JY, Cannon TW, Pruchnic R, Fraser MO, Huard J, Chancellor MB. The effects of periurethral muscle-derived stem cell injection on leak point pressure in a rat model of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2003; 14: 31–7 10.1007/s00192-002-1004-5 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume92, Issue9December 2003Pages 886-889 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)