The State of Radiology in 2006: Very High Spatial Resolution but No Visibility
2006; Radiological Society of North America; Volume: 241; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1148/radiol.2411051910
ISSN1527-1315
AutoresJulie A. Ruiz, Gary M. Glazer,
Tópico(s)Innovations in Medical Education
ResumoHomeRadiologyVol. 241, No. 1 PreviousNext Reviews and CommentaryEditorialThe State of Radiology in 2006: Very High Spatial Resolution but No VisibilityJulie A. Ruiz, Gary M. GlazerJulie A. Ruiz, Gary M. GlazerAuthor Affiliations1From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Room P-263, 1201 Welch Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94304. Received November 23, 2005; accepted January 6, 2006; final version accepted May 17.Address correspondence to G.M.G. (e-mail: [email protected]).Julie A. RuizGary M. GlazerPublished Online:Oct 1 2006https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2411051910MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookXLinked In References1 Kolata G. Sick and scared, and waiting, waiting, waiting. New York Times. August 20, 2005;sect A1:3. Google Scholar2 Korsch BM, Gozzi EK, Francis V. Gaps in doctor-patient communication: doctor-patient interaction and patient satisfaction. Pediatrics 1968;42(5):855–871. Medline, Google Scholar3 Francis V, Korsch BM, Morris MJ. Gaps in doctor-patient communication: patients' response to medical advice. N Engl J Med 1969;280(10):535–540. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4 Browne K, Freeling P. The doctor-patient relationship: communication and language. Practitioner 1966;196(1171):730–734. Medline, Google Scholar5 Bogdonoff MD, Nichols CR, Klein RF, Eisdorfer C. The doctor-patient relationship: a suggested practical and purposeful approach. JAMA 1965;192(1):45–48. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 Woolley FR, Kane RL, Hughes CC, Wright DD. The effects of doctor-patient communication on satisfaction and outcome of care. Soc Sci Med 1978;12:123–128. Medline, Google Scholar7 Secundy MG, Katz V. Factors in patient/doctor communication: a communication skills elective. J Med Educ 1975;50(7):689–691. Medline, Google Scholar8 Cormican JD. Breaking language barriers between the patient and his doctor. Geriatrics 1975;30(12):104–110. Medline, Google Scholar9 Raimbault G, Cachin O, Limal JM, Eliacheff C, Rappaport R. Aspects of communication between patients and doctors: an analysis of the discourse in medical interviews. Pediatrics 1975;55(3):401–405. Medline, Google Scholar10 Decastro FJ. Doctor-patient communication: exploring the effectiveness of care in a primary care clinic. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1972;11(2):86–87. Google Scholar11 Schreiber MH, Winslade WJ. Rights, roles, and relationships in radiology. Radiology 1987;163(1):269–270. Link, Google Scholar12 Roberts DK. Prevention: patient communication. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1988;31(1):153–161. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar13 Avery JK. The right to know, the duty to communicate. J Tenn Med Assoc 1986;79(9):570. Medline, Google Scholar14 Smith WL, Altmaier EM, Ross RR, Johnson BD, Berberoglu LS. Patient expectations of radiology in noninteractive encounters. Radiology 1989;172:275–276. Link, Google Scholar15 Stewart DA. The radiologist as communicator: assessments and impressions. Radiology 1995;196(2):37A–42A. Link, Google Scholar16 Lind SE, Kopans D, Delvecchio Good MJ. Patients' preferences for learning the results of mammographic examinations. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1992;23:223–232. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar17 Charig M, Wright FW. Should radiologists talk to patients? [letter]. BMJ 1990;300(6724):610. Crossref, Google Scholar18 Liu S, Bassett LW, Sayre J. Women's attitudes about receiving mammography results directly from radiologists. Radiology 1994;193(3):783–786. Link, Google Scholar19 Bassett LW, Bomyea K, Liu S, Sayre J. Communication of mammography results to women by radiologists: attitudes of referring health care providers. Radiology 1995;195(1):235–238. Link, Google Scholar20 Schreiber MH. Direct disclosure by radiologists of imaging findings to patients: a survey of radiologists and medical staff members. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167(5):1091–1093. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar21 Schreiber MH, Leonard M, Rieniets CY. Disclosure of imaging findings to patients directly by radiologists: survey of patients' preferences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165(2):467–469. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar22 Song HH, Park SH, Shinn KS. Radiologists' responses to patients' inquiries about imaging results: a pilot study on opinions of various groups. Invest Radiol 1993;28(11):1043–1048. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar23 Armstrong JD. Radiologists' responses to patients' inquiries about results. Invest Radiol 1993;28(11):1049–1051. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar24 Heilman RS. What radiologists really do [editorial]. RadioGraphics 1990;10(1):13–14. Link, Google Scholar25 Friedenberg RM. The radiologist: a middleman (person) of medicine. Radiology 1994;190(1):49A–51A. Link, Google Scholar26 Levitsky DB, Frank MS, Richardson ML, Shneidman RJ. How should radiologists reply when patients ask about their diagnoses? a survey of radiologists' and clinicians' preferences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;161(2):433–436. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar27 Vallely SR, Mills JO. Should radiologists talk to patients? BMJ 1990;300(6720):305–306. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar28 Hammond I, Franche RL, Black DM, Gaudette S. The radiologist and the patient: breaking bad news. Can Assoc Radiol J 1999;50(4):233–234. Medline, Google Scholar29 Wiseman JC. Should radiologists and pathologists talk to patients? [letter]. Med J Aust 2002;177(9):528. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar30 Laing DP. A radiologist's duty to directly communicate with the treating physician. WMJ 2003;102(5):13–17. Google Scholar31 Berlin L. Communicating findings of radiologic examinations: whither goest the radiologist's duty? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:809–815. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar32 Poon EG, Haas JS, Puopolo AL, et al. Communication factors in the follow-up of abnormal mammograms. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19:316–323. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar33 Raza S, Rosen MP, Chorny K, Mehta TS, Hulka CA, Baum JK. Patient expectations and costs of immediate reporting of screening mammography: talk isn't cheap. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:579–583. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar34 Levin KS, Braeuning MP, O'Malley MS, Pisano ED, Barrett ED, Earp JA. Communicating results of diagnostic mammography: what do patients think? Acad Radiol 2000;7(12):1069–1076. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar35 Fernald DH, Pace WD, Harris DM, West DR, Main DS, Westfall JM. Event reporting to a primary care patient safety reporting system: a report from the ASIPS collaborative. Ann Fam Med 2004;2:327–332. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar36 Schoen C, Osborn R, Huynh PT, et al. Taking the pulse of health care systems: experiences of patients with health problems in six countries. Health Aff (Millwood) doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.W5.509. http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/reprint/hlthaff.w5.509v3. Published online November 3, 2005. Accessed November 3, 2005. Google Scholar37 Thrall JH. The radiologist in the 1990s: new practice expectations and management responsibilities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163(1):11–15. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar38 The communicating radiologist. Aust Radiol 1967;11(4):302–303. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar39 Sherman RS. The roentgenologist as a consultant [editorial]. Radiology 1960;75:293–295. Link, Google Scholar40 Sherman R. Whom do we serve? [letter]. Radiology 1966;87(1):147–148. Link, Google Scholar41 Homer MJ. A radiologist's point of view [editorial]. JAMA 1981;246(22):2581–2582. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar42 Green LN. The radiologist as a consultant [letter]. JAMA 1982;248(15):1831. Medline, Google Scholar43 McGraner RC. Consumer research in radiology: focus on physician relations. Radiol Manage 1987;9(1):17–21. Medline, Google Scholar44 Rogers LF, Potchen EJ, Maynard CD. The radiologist as a primary care extender. Radiology 1995;194(1):19–22. Link, Google Scholar45 Fuchs VR, Sox HC. Physicians' views of the relative importance of thirty medical innovations. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20(5):30–42. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar46 Friedman TL. The world is flat: a brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2005; 16. Google Scholar47 American College of Radiology. ACR standard for communication: diagnostic radiology. In: Standards. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 1991. Google Scholar48 Berlin L. Standards, guidelines, and roses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181(4):945–950. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar49 American College of Radiology. ACR practice guideline for communication of diagnostic imaging findings. American College of Radiology Web site. http://www.acr.org. Accessed October 12, 2005. Google Scholar50 Berlin L. Communication of radiologic findings: is the landscape changing? [editorial]. Imaging Economics 2005. http://www.imagingeconomics.com/library/200509-06.asp. Accessed October 20, 2005. Google Scholar51 American Cancer Society. Cancer in America 2003. American Cancer Society Web site. http://www.cancer.org. Accessed November 14, 2005. Google Scholar52 Pasko T, Smart DR, eds. Physician characteristics and distribution in the U.S. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association, 2005; 1. Google Scholar53 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Competencies as defined by RRC. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Web site. http://www.apdr.org/directors/pdffiles/Competency_definitions.pdf. Accessed October 19, 2005. Google Scholar54 Ragavendra N, Laifer-Narin SL, Melany ML, Grant EG. Disclosure of results of sonographic examinations to patients by sonologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170(6):1423–1425. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar55 U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Mammography Quality Standards Act regulations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Web site. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/mammography/frmamcom2.html. Accessed August 29, 2005. Google Scholar56 Bryan N. Clinical perspectives on quality and safety. Presented at the International Society of Strategic Studies in Radiology meeting, Boston, Mass, August 25–27, 2005. Google ScholarArticle HistoryPublished in print: 2006 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByLos estudiantes de medicina en los Servicios de Radiología: ¿problema u oportunidad?J.M.García Santos2023Sep1 | Radiología, Vol. 50United States lung cancer screening program websites: radiology representation, multimedia and multilingual contentBrent P.Little, Staci M.Gagne, Florian J.Fintelmann, ShaunaghMcDermott, Dexter P.Mendoza, MilenaPetranovic, Melissa C.Price, Justin T.Stowell, Anand K.Narayan, Efren J.Flores2022 | Clinical Imaging, Vol. 86El paciente y su relación con el médico radiólogoAnamariPerochena González2019 | Revista de la Facultad de Medicina, Vol. 62, No. 2Clinical History Provided by Referring Clinicians and Patients for Musculoskeletal MRIDerik L.Davis, Michael E.Mulligan, ArieMoszkowicz, Charles S.Resnik2017 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 14, No. 9Voices emerging from the shadows: Radiologic practitioners' experiences of challenging conversationsElaine C.Meyer, GiuliaLamiani, DonnaLuff, Stephen D.Brown2017 | Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 100, No. 1Does Direct Radiologist-Patient Verbal Communication Affect Follow-Up Compliance of Probably Benign Assessments?Melissa S.Bosma, Colleen H.Neal, Katherine A.Klein, MitraNoroozian, Stephanie K.Patterson, Mark A.Helvie2016 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 13, No. 3Rethinking the Role of the Radiologist: Enhancing Visibility through Both Traditional and Nontraditional Reporting PracticesAndrew J. Gunn, Mark D. Mangano, Garry Choy, Dushyant V. Sahani, 12 March 2015 | RadioGraphics, Vol. 35, No. 2Patient-Centered Care in Diagnostic RadiologyDerik L.Davis, Michael E.Mulligan, ArieMoszkowicz, Charles S.Resnik2015 | Quality Management in Health Care, Vol. 24, No. 1Added Value of Radiologist Consultation for Pediatric Ultrasound: Implementation and Survey AssessmentEvan J.Zucker, BeverleyNewman, David B.Larson, ErikaRubesova, Richard A.Barth2015 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 205, No. 4The "Open Letter": Radiologists' Reports in the Era of Patient Web PortalsMichael A.Bruno, Jonelle M.Petscavage-Thomas, Michael J.Mohr, Sigall K.Bell, Stephen D.Brown2014 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 11, No. 9The practice of neuroimaging within a neurology office settingJ. V.Fritz4 October 2013 | Neurology: Clinical Practice, Vol. 3, No. 6Excellence and Professionalism in RadiologyRichard B.Gunderman, Brandon P.Brown2013 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 200, No. 6Stepping Out Further from the Shadows: Disclosure of Harmful Radiologic Errors to PatientsStephen D. Brown, , Constance D. Lehman, , Robert D. Truog, , David M. Browning, , and Thomas H. Gallagher, 1 February 2012 | Radiology, Vol. 262, No. 2Communication of Findings of Radiologic Examinations: Medicolegal ConsiderationsFabioPinto, GiuseppeCapodieci, Francesca RosaSetola, StefanoLimone, FrancescoSomma, AngelaFaggian, LuigiaRomano2012 | Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI, Vol. 33, No. 4Reviewing Imaging Examination Results With a Radiologist Immediately After Study Completion: Patient Preferences and Assessment of Feasibility in an Academic DepartmentJayPahade, CoreyCouto, Roger B.Davis, PayalPatel, BettinaSiewert, Max P.Rosen2012 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 199, No. 4Handoffs Between Radiologists and Patients: Threat or Opportunity?NabileSafdar, NarendraShet, DorothyBulas, NancyKnight2011 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 8, No. 12Should We Inform Patients of Radiology Results1?J. Nathan Smith, , and Richard B. Gunderman, 8 April 2010 | Radiology, Vol. 255, No. 2How often do patients ask for the results of their radiological studies?EnricoCapaccio, AndreaPodestà, DanieleMorcaldi, Maria PiaSormani, Lorenzo EgildoDerchi2010 | Insights into Imaging, Vol. 1, No. 2Ultrasound: a strategic issue for radiology?Lorenzo E.Derchi, MichelClaudon2009 | European Radiology, Vol. 19, No. 1Informatics Methods to Enable Patient-centered RadiologyDaniel L.Rubin2009 | Academic Radiology, Vol. 16, No. 5The ACR Needs You: Serve as a Resident Grassroots Committee LiaisonPeter H.van Geertruyden, PatBasu, MelodyBallesteros2009 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 6, No. 5Communication: The Needs of the Patient Come FirstThomas H.Berquist2009 | American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 192, No. 3Work-based assessment for trainees — more than just a few new tools?G.J.C.Burkill2008 | Clinical Radiology, Vol. 63, No. 1Outsourcing and Teleradiology: Potential Benefits, Risks and Solutions From a UK/European PerspectiveAdrian K.Dixon, RichardFitzGerald2008 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 5, No. 1Public RelationsMurray L. Janower, 1 August 2007 | Radiology, Vol. 244, No. 2Accuracy of Information on Imaging Requisitions: Does It Matter?Mervyn D.Cohen2007 | Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 4, No. 9Re: Interventional Radiology: Veni, Vidi, Vanished?Maurice A.van den Bosch2007Jan1 | Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 18, No. 1Recommended Articles Contemporary Risk Management for RadiologistsRadioGraphics2018Volume: 38Issue: 6pp. 1717-1728Customer Service in Radiology: Satisfying Your Patients and ReferrersRadioGraphics2018Volume: 38Issue: 6pp. 1872-1887Annual Oration: Driving Value through ImagingRadiology2017Volume: 285Issue: 1pp. 3-11Impact of COVID-19 on Clinical Care and Research in Cancer Imaging: Where We Are NowRadiology: Imaging Cancer2021Volume: 3Issue: 1The Radiology Report: A Guide to Thoughtful Communication for Radiologists and Other Medical ProfessionalsRadiology2016Volume: 278Issue: 3pp. 677-678See More RSNA Education Exhibits Pandemic Preparedness: Streamlining the Breast Imaging Patient Care and Teaching Experience During COVID-19Digital Posters2020Communication Tools Returning Our Focus To Patient Centered Care: Principles, Blind-spots, Structured Communication And ChecklistsDigital Posters2021Urban Mobile Mammography: Bringing Mammography to the UnderservedDigital Posters2020 RSNA Case Collection Bilateral ParagangliomasRSNA Case Collection2022 Congenital adhesion with small bowel obstructionRSNA Case Collection2021Appendico-cecal IntusussceptionRSNA Case Collection2021 Vol. 241, No. 1 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download
Referência(s)