A Solution in Search of a Problem? Discrimination, Affirmative Action, and the New Public Service
2006; Wiley; Volume: 66; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00659.x
ISSN1540-6210
Autores Tópico(s)Gender Politics and Representation
ResumoPublic Administration ReviewVolume 66, Issue 6 p. 911-923 A Solution in Search of a Problem? Discrimination, Affirmative Action, and the New Public Service Sally Coleman Selden, Corresponding Author Sally Coleman Selden Lynchburg CollegeSally Coleman Selden is an associate professor at Lynchburg College. Her current research focuses on strategic human resource management in state governments and the impact of collaboration on nonprofit organizational effectiveness. She has published articles in the American Journal of Political Science, Administration & Society, American Review of Public Administration, Review of Public Personnel Administration, Journal of Public Administration Education, Public Administration Review, and Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.E-mail:[email protected].Search for more papers by this author Sally Coleman Selden, Corresponding Author Sally Coleman Selden Lynchburg CollegeSally Coleman Selden is an associate professor at Lynchburg College. Her current research focuses on strategic human resource management in state governments and the impact of collaboration on nonprofit organizational effectiveness. She has published articles in the American Journal of Political Science, Administration & Society, American Review of Public Administration, Review of Public Personnel Administration, Journal of Public Administration Education, Public Administration Review, and Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.E-mail:[email protected].Search for more papers by this author First published: 15 November 2006 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00659.xCitations: 21AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Aher, Martin, and Joel Popkin. 1984. The Effect of Gender and Race Differences on Public–Private Wage Comparisons: A Study of Postal Workers. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38(1): 16–25. Alliance for Board Diversity. 2005. New Report Shows Severe Under-Representation of Women and Minorities on Corporate Boards. News release, May 11. www.catalystwomen.org/files/pr/ABD_pr.pdf [accessed August 2, 2006]. American Association for University Professors (AAUP). 2006. Update on Affirmative Action in Higher Education: A Current Legal Overview. www.aaup.org/issues/affirmativeaction/aalegal.htm [accessed August 2, 2006]. Americans for a Fair Chance. 2005. Anti-Affirmative Action Threats in the States: 1997–2004. Washington, DC: Leadership Conference on Civil Rights Education Fund. http://fairchance.civilrights.org/the_facts/reports/aa_state_2005.pdf [accessed August 2, 2006]. Andrews, Rhys, George A. Boyne, Kenneth J. Meier, Laurence J. O’Toole, Jr., and Richard M. Walker. 2005. Representative Bureaucracy, Organizational Strategy, and Public Service Performance: An Empirical Analysis of English Local Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(4): 489–503. Ashenfelter, Orley, and James Heckman. 1976. Measuring the Effect of an Antidiscrimination Program. In Evaluating the Labor Market Effects of Social Programs, edited by Orley Ashenfelter and James Blum, 46–84. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Baldwin, J. Norman. 1996. Female Promotions in Male-Dominant Organizations: The Case of the United States Military. Journal of Politics 58(4): 1184–97. Barbezat, Debra A. 1989. Affirmative Action in Higher Education: Have Two Decades Altered Salary Differentials by Sex and Race? Research Labor Economics 10: 107–56. Becker, Gary S. 1985. Human Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labor. Journal of Labor Economics 3(1): S33–58. Berkner, Lutz, Stephanie Cuccaro-Alamin, and Alexander C. McCormick. 1996. Descriptive Summary of 1989–90 Beginning Postsecondary Students: Five Years Later, with an Essay on Postsecondary Persistence and Attainment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. NCES 96–155. Bierman, Noah. 2006. Women Are Besting Men in College, but Not Salary. Miami Herald, April 28. www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/local/14448191.htm [accessed August 2, 2006]. Blau, Francine. 1998. Trends in the Well-Being of American Women, 1970–1995. Journal of Economic Literature 36(1): 112–65. Blau, Francine, and Lawrence M. Kahn. 1997. Swimming Upstream: Trends in the Gender Wage Differential in the 1980s. Journal of Labor Economics 15(1): 1–42. Bowen, William G., and Derek Bok. 1998. The Shape of the River. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Brudney, Jeffrey L., F. Ted Hebert, and Deil S. Wright. 2000. From Organizational Values to Organizational Roles: Examining Representative Bureaucracy in State Administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(3): 491–512. Cayer, N. Joseph, and Lee Sigelman. 1980. Minorities and Women in State and Local Government: 1973–1975. Public Administration Review 40(5): 443–50. CBS News. 2003. U.S. Favors Affirmative Action. Opinion poll, January 23. www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/04/01/opinion/polls/main547089.shtml [accessed February 20, 2006]. CBS News. 2006. Race and Ethnicity [polling data]. Pollingreport.com, January 5–8. www.pollingreport.com/race.htm [accessed August 2, 2006]. Chay, Kenneth. 1998. The Impact of Federal Civil Rights Policy on Black Economic Progress: Evidence from the Equal Opportunity Act of 1972. Industrial Labor Relations Review 51(4): 608–32. Clinton, William Jefferson. 1995. Remarks by William Jefferson Clinton on Affirmative Action. National Archives Rotunda, July 19. http://clinton4.nara.gov/Initiatives/OneAmerica/19970610-1444.vcs [accessed August 2, 2006]. Clune, Michael S., Anne-Marie Nuñez, and Susan P. Choy. 2001. Competing Choices: Men’s and Women’s Paths after Earning a Bachelor’s Degree. Education Statistics Quarterly 3(3). http://nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly/vol_3/3_3/q4-5.asp [accessed August 2, 2006]. Coleman, Major G. 1999. Merit, Cost, and the Affirmative Action Policy Debate. Review of Black Political Economy 27(1): 99–127. Daniels, Cora. 2002. The Most Powerful Black Executives in America Meet 50 Black Business Men and Women Who Wield Unprecedented Clout. Fortune, July 22. http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2002/07/22/326294/index.htm [accessed August 2, 2006]. Darity, William A., and Patrick L. Mason. 1998. Evidence on Discrimination in Employment: Codes of Color, Codes of Gender. Journal of Economic Perspective 12(2): 63–90. Datcher, Loury, Linda Garman, and David Garman. 1993. Affirmative Action in Higher Education. American Economic Review 83(2): 99–103. Datcher, Loury, Linda Garman, and David Garman. 1995. College Selectivity and Earnings. Journal of Labor Economics 13(2): 289–308. Davidson, Robert, and Ernest Lewis. 1997. Affirmative Action and Other Special Consideration Admissions at the University of California, Davis School of Medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association 278(14): 1153–58. Day, Jennifer Cheeseman. 2001. National Population Projections. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. www.census.gov/population/www/pop-profile/natproj.html [accessed August 2, 2006]. Dodge, Lola R. 1997. Intergovernmental Relations and the Administrative Enforcement of Equal Employment Opportunity Laws. Public Administration Review 57(5): 431–40. Dolan, Julie. 2002. Representative Bureaucracy in the Federal Executive: Gender and Spending Priorities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12(3): 353–75. Dometrius, Nelson C. 1984. Minorities and Women among State Agency Leaders. Social Science Quarterly 65(3): 127–37. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). 2004. Annual Report on the Federal Work Force: Fiscal Year 2004. www.eeoc.gov/federal/fsp2004/index.html [accessed August 2, 2006]. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). 2005. New Gallup Poll on Employment Discrimination Shows Progress, Problems 40 Years after Founding of EEOC. News release, December 8. www.eeoc.gov/press/12-8-05.html [accessed August 2, 2006]. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). 2006. Charge Statistics: FY 1992 Through FY 2005. www.eeoc.gov/stats/charges.html [accessed August 2, 2006]. Gallup Poll. 2003. Race and Ethnicity [polling data]. Pollingreport.com, June 12–18. www.pollingreport.com/race.htm [accessed August 2, 2006]. Gibson, Frank K., and Samuel Yeager. 1975. Trends in the Federal Employment of Blacks. Public Personnel Management 4(3): 189–95. Goldstein, Morris, and Robert Smith. 1976. The Estimated Impact of the Antidiscrimination Program Aimed at Federal Contractors. Industrial Labor Relations Review 29(3): 524–43. Grabosky, Peter N., and David H. Rosenbloom. 1975. Racial and Ethnic Integration in Federal Service. Social Science Quarterly 56(2): 71–84. Greene, Vernon, Sally Coleman Selden, and Gene Brewer. 2001. Measuring Power and Presence: Bureaucratic Representation in the American States. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11(3): 379–402. Hardy-Fanta, Carol. 2000. A Latino Gender Gap? Evidence from the 1996 Election. Milenio Series 2. Austin, TX: Inter-University Program for Latino Research. Heckman, James J. 1998. Detecting Discrimination. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12(2): 101–16. Hellerstein, Judith, David Neumark, and Kenneth R. Troske. 1999. Wages, Productivity, and Worker Characteristics: Evidence from Plan-Level Production Functions and Wage Equations. Journal of Labor Economics 17(3): 409–46. Hellriegel, Don, and Larry Short. 1972. Equal Employment Opportunity in the Federal Government: A Comparative Analysis. Public Administrative Review 32(6): 851–67. Hindera, John J. 1993a. Representative Bureaucracy: Imprimis Evidence of Active Representation in the EEOC District Offices. Social Science Quarterly 74: 95–108. Hindera, John J. 1993b. Representative Bureaucracy: Further Evidence of Active Representation in the EEOC District Offices. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 3(4): 415–29. Hindera, John J., and Cheryl D. Young. 1998. Representative Bureaucracy: The Theoretical Implications of Statistical Interaction. Political Research Quarterly 51(3): 655–71. Holzer, Harry, and David Neumark. 2000a. Assessing Affirmative Action? Journal of Economic Literature 38(3): 483–568. Holzer, Harry, and David Neumark. 2000b. What Does Affirmative Action Do? Industrial and Labor Relations Review 53(2): 240–72. Institute for Women’s Policy Research. 2006. The Gender Wage Ratio: Women’s and Men’s Earnings. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research. Jones, Jeffrey. 2005. Race, Ideology, and Support for Affirmative Action. Gallup Poll, August 23. http://poll.gallup.com/content/default.aspx?ci=18091 [accessed August 2, 2006]. Kane, Thomas. 1998. Racial Preferences and Higher Education. In The Black–White Test Score Gap, edited by Christopher Jencks and Meredith Phillips, 431–56. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Katz, Michael B., Mark J. Stern, and Jamie J. Fader. 2005. Women and the Paradox of Economic Inequality in the Twentieth-Century. Journal of Social History 39(1): 65–88. Keiser, Lael R., Vicky M. Wilkins, and Kenneth J. Meier. 2002. Lipstick and Logarithms: Gender, Institutional Context, and Representative Bureaucracy. American Political Science Review 96(3): 553–64. Kellough, J. Edward. 1989. Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Policy and Numerical Goals and Timetables: An Impact Assessment. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Kellough, J. Edward. 1990a. Federal Agencies and Affirmative Action for Blacks and Women. Social Science Quarterly 71: 83–92. Kellough, J. Edward. 1990b. Integration in the Public Workplace: Determinants of Minority and Female Employment in Federal Agencies. Public Administration Review 50(5): 557–66. Kelly, Erin, and Frank Dobbin. 2001. How Affirmative Action Became Diversity Management. In Color Lines: Affirmative Action, Immigration, and Civil Rights Options for America, edited by John David Skrentny, 87–117. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kelly, Rita Mae, and Meredith Newman. 2001. The Gendered Bureaucracy: Agency Mission, Equality of Opportunity and Representative Bureaucracies. Women and Politics 22(3): 1–33. Kim, Pan Suk. 1993. Racial Integration in the American Federal Government: With Special Reference to Asian-Americans. Review of Public Personnel Administration 13(1): 52–66. Kolpin, Van, and Larry Singell. 1990. The Impact of Affirmative Action Regulation and Equal Employment Opportunity Law on Black Employment. Journal of Economic Perspectives 4(4): 47–63. Kolpin, Van, and Larry Singell. 1996. The Gender Composition and Scholarly Performance of Economics Departments: A Test for Employment Discrimination. Industrial Labor Relations Review 49(3): 408–23. Leonard, Jonathan S. 1984. Employment and Occupational Advance under Affirmative Action. Review of Economics and Statistics 66(3): 377–85. Leonard, Jonathan S. 1990. The Impact of Affirmative Action Regulation and Equal Employment Opportunity Law on Black Employment. Journal of Economic Perspectives 4(4): 47–63. Lewis, Gregory P. 1985. Sexual Segregation of Occupations and Earnings Differentials in Federal Employment. Public Administration Quarterly 9(3): 274–90. Lewis, Gregory P. 1988. Progress toward Racial and Sexual Equality in the Federal Civil Service? Public Administration Review 50(3): 700–06. Lewis, Gregory P. 1996. Gender Integration of Occupations in the Federal Civil Service: Extent and Effects on Male-Female Earnings. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 49(3): 472–83. Lewis, Gregory P. 1998. Continuing Progress toward Racial and Gender Pay Equality in the Federal Service: An Update. Review of Public Personnel Administration 18(2): 23–40. Lim, Hong-Hai. 2006. Representative Bureaucracy: Rethinking Substantive Effects and Active Representation. Public Administration Review 66(2): 193–204. Ludwig, Jack. 2003. Public Warming to Affirmative Action as Supreme Court Hears Michigan Case. Gallup Poll, April 1. http://poll.gallup.com/content/default.aspx?ci=8092 [accessed August 2, 2006]. McCabe, Barbara Coyle, and Christopher Stream. 2000. Diversity by the Numbers: Changes in State and Local Government Workforces 1980–1995. Public Personnel Management 29(1): 93–106. Meier, Kenneth J. 1993. Latinos and Representative Bureaucracy: Testing the Thompson and Henderson Hypotheses. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 3(4): 393–414. Meier, Kenneth J., and Jill Nicholson-Crotty. 2006. Gender, Representative Bureaucracy, and Law Enforcement: The Case of Sexual Assault. Public Administration Review 66(6): 848–858. Meier, Kenneth J., and Joseph Stewart, Jr. 1992. The Impact of Representative Bureaucracies: Educational Systems and Public Policies. American Review of Public Administration 22: 157–71. Meier, Kenneth J., Michael S. Pennington, and Warren S. Eller. 2005. Race, Sex, and Clarence Thomas: Representation Change in the EEOC. Public Administration Review 65(2): 171–79. Nachmias, David, and David H. Rosenbloom. 1973. Measuring Bureaucratic Representation and Integration. Public Administration Review 33(6): 590–97. Naff, Katherine. 2001. To Look Like America: Dismantling Barriers for Women and Minorities in the Federal Civil Service. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Naff, Katherine. 2004. From Bakke to Grutter and Gratz: The Supreme Court as a Policy Making Institution. Review of Policy Research 21(3): 405–26. Naylor, Lorenda A., and David H. Rosenbloom. 2004. Adarand, Grutter, and Gratz: Does Affirmative Action in Federal Employment Matter? Review of Public Personnel Administration 24(2): 150–74. Page, Paul. 1994. African-Americans in Executive Branch Agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration 14(1): 25–50. Rodgers, William, and William Spriggs. 1996. The Effect of Federal Contractor Status on Racial Differences in Establishment-Level Employment Shares, 1979–1992. American Economic Review 86(2): 290–93. Rose, Winfield H., and Tiang Ping Chia. 1978. The Impact of the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972 on Black Employment in the Federal Service: A Preliminary Analysis. Public Administration Review 38(3): 245–51. Sabbagh, Daniel. 2003. Judicial Uses of Subterfuge: Affirmative Action Reconsidered. Political Science Quarterly 118(3): 411–38. Saidel, Judith R., and Karyn Loscocco. 2005. Agency Leaders, Gendered Institutions, and Representative Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review 65(2): 158–70. Sander, Richard S. 2004. A Systematic Analysis of Affirmative Action in American Law Schools. Stanford Law Review 57: 367–483. Selden, Sally. 1997. The Promise of Representative Bureaucracy: Diversity and Responsiveness in a Government Agency. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe. Smith, Sharon P. 1976. Government Wage Differentials by Sex. Journal of Human Resources 11(2): 185–99. Sorensen, Elaine. 1989. Measuring the Effect of Occupational Sex and Race Composition on Earnings. In Pay Equity: Empirical Inquiries, edited by Robert T. Michaels, Heidi I Hartmann, and Brigid O’Farrell, 49–69. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Sowa, Jessica E., and Sally Coleman Selden. 2003. Administrative Discretion and Active Representation: An Expansion of the Theory of Representative Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review 63(6): 700–10. Stanley, T. D., and Stephen B. Jarrell. 1998. Gender Wage Discrimination Bias? Journal of Human Resources 33(4): 947–73. Stephanopoulos, George, and Christopher Edley, Jr. 1995. Review of Federal Affirmative Action Programs. Unpublished White House document. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. 2000. Toward an Understanding of Percentage Plans in Higher Education: Are They Effective Substitutes for Affirmative Action? Washington, DC: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. www.usccr.gov/pubs/percent/stmnt.htm [accessed August 2, 2006]. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 1999. 93 Bachelor’s Degree Recipients in 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. NCES 1999–1555. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2004a. Higher Education General Information Survey, Table 183: College Enrollment and Enrollment Rates of Recent High School Completers, by Sex: 1960 to 2003. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d04/tables/dt04_183.asp [accessed August 2, 2006]. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2004b. Higher Education General Information Survey, Table 182: College Enrollment and Enrollment Rates of Recent High School Completers, by Race/Ethnicity: 1960 to 2003. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d04/tables/dt04_182.asp [accessed August 2, 2006]. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2004c. Higher Education General Information Survey, Table 206: Total Fall Enrollment in Degree-Granting Institutions, by Race/Ethnicity, Sex, Attendance Status, and Level of Student: Selected Years, 1976 to 2002. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d04/tables/dt04_206.asp [accessed August 2, 2006]. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2004d. Higher Education General Information Survey, Table 271: First-Professional Degrees Conferred by Degree-Granting Institutions, by Racial/Ethnic Group and Sex of Student. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d04/tables/dt04_271.asp [accessed August 2, 2006]. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). 2004e. Higher Education General Information Survey, Table 187: Total Graduate Fall Enrollment in Degree-Granting Institutions, by Attendance Status, Sex of Student, and Control of Institution: 1969 to 2002. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d04/tables/dt04_187.asp [accessed August 2, 2006]. U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 1991. Federal Workforce: Continuing Need for Federal Affirmative Employment. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. GAO/GGD-92–27BR. U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 2003. Women’s Earnings: Work Patterns Partially Explain Differences between Men’s and Women’s Earnings. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. GAO-04–35. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2005. Equal Employment Opportunity: DOD’s EEO Pilot Program Under Way. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. GAO-06–538. U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM). 2006. Federal Equal Opportunity Recruitment Program: FY 2005. www.opm.gov/feorpreports/2005/feorp2005.pdf [accessed August 2, 2006]. Vars, Frederick E., and William G. Bowen. 1998. Scholastic Aptitude, Test Scores, Race, and Academic Performance in Selective Colleges and Universities. In The Black–White Test Score Gap, edited by Christopher Jencks and Meredith Phillips, 457–79. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Waldfogel, Jane. 1998. Understanding the “Family Gap” in Pay for Women with Children. Journal of Economic Perspective 12(1): 137–56. Wilkins, Vicky M., and Lael R. Keiser. 2006. Linking Passive and Active Representation by Gender: The Case of Child Support Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(1): 87–102. Willoughby, Katherine. 1991. Gender-Based Wage Gap: The Case of the State Budget Analyst. Review of Public Personnel Administration 12(1): 33–46. Wright, Peter, Stephen P. Ferris, Janine S. Hiller , and Mark Kroll. 1995. Competitiveness through Management of Diversity: Effects on Stock Price Valuation. Academy of Management Journal 38(1): 272–87. Citing Literature Volume66, Issue6November|December 2006Pages 911-923 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)