Sexual Selection for Small Size in Male Butterflies
1982; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 119; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/283924
ISSN1537-5323
Autores Tópico(s)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsSexual Selection for Small Size in Male ButterfliesMichael C. SingerMichael C. SingerPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 119, Number 3Mar., 1982 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/283924 Views: 18Total views on this site Citations: 61Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1982 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Tiit Teder, Ants Kaasik, Kristiina Taits, Toomas Tammaru Why do males emerge before females? Sexual size dimorphism drives sexual bimaturism in insects, Biological Reviews 96, no.66 (Jun 2021): 2461–2475.https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12762Janko Šet, Eva Turk, Rok Golobinek, Tjaša Lokovšek, Matjaž Gregorič, Shakira Guaní Quiñones Lebrón, Matjaž Kuntner, Charles R. Haddad, Klemen Čandek, Simona Kralj-Fišer Sex-specific developmental trajectories in an extremely sexually size dimorphic spider, The Science of Nature 108, no.66 (Oct 2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-021-01754-wGabriela Montejo‐Kovacevich, Jennifer E. Smith, Joana I. Meier, Caroline N. Bacquet, Eva Whiltshire‐Romero, Nicola J. Nadeau, Chris D. Jiggins Altitude and life‐history shape the evolution of Heliconius wings, Evolution 73, no.1212 (Nov 2019): 2436–2450.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13865Priya Singh, Geetanjali Mishra, Omkar Influence of body size and familiarity on mating and reproductive parameters in the zig-zag ladybird beetle, Menochilus sexmaculatus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), Canadian Journal of Zoology 97, no.55 (May 2019): 453–463.https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2017-0344Elena Rosa, Marjo Saastamoinen Sex-dependent effects of larval food stress on adult performance under semi-natural conditions: only a matter of size?, Oecologia 184, no.33 (Jul 2017): 633–642.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3903-7Harshad Vijay Mayekar, Ullasa Kodandaramaiah, William J. Etges Pupal colour plasticity in a tropical butterfly, Mycalesis mineus (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae), PLOS ONE 12, no.22 (Feb 2017): e0171482.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171482Daniel Pincheira-Donoso, John Hunt Fecundity selection theory: concepts and evidence, Biological Reviews 92, no.11 (Nov 2015): 341–356.https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12232Brian Hollis, Laurent Keller, Tadeusz J. Kawecki Sexual selection shapes development and maturation rates in Drosophila, Evolution 71, no.22 (Nov 2016): 304–314.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13115Marie E. Herberstein, Christina J. Painting, Gregory I. Holwell Scramble Competition Polygyny in Terrestrial Arthropods, (Jan 2017): 237–295.https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.asb.2017.01.001Rubén Guillermo Medina, Daphne Janice Fairbairn, Arturo Bustillos, Humberto Moo-Valle, Salvador Medina, José Javier Guadalupe Quezada-Euán Variable patterns of intraspecific sexual size dimorphism and allometry in three species of eusocial corbiculate bees, Insectes Sociaux 63, no.44 (Jun 2016): 493–500.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-016-0491-1Marie-Claire Chelini, Eileen A. Hebets Polyandry in the absence of fitness benefits in a species with female-biased sexual size dimorphism, Animal Behaviour 119 (Sep 2016): 213–222.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.07.008Hadass Steinitz, Adi Sadeh, Martin Tremmel, Ally R. Harari Methods to Separate Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Males from Females for the Implementation of Sterile Insect-Inherited Sterility Technique Control Tactics, Florida Entomologist 99, no.sp1sp1 (Jun 2016): 192–199.https://doi.org/10.1653/024.099.sp123Pamella Akoth Ogada, Hans-Michael Poehling Sex-Specific Influences of Frankliniella occidentalis (Western Flower Thrips) in the Transmission of Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus (Tospovirus), Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 122, no.5-65-6 (Mar 2016): 264–274.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03356562W James Davies, Ilik J. Saccheri Male emergence schedule and dispersal behaviour are modified by mate availability in heterogeneous landscapes: evidence from the orange-tip butterfly, PeerJ 3 (Jan 2015): e707.https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.707D. M. Firake, G. T. Behere, P. D. Firake, Marianne Shockley, N. S. Azad Thakur, S. V. Ngachan Rapid Technique of Sex Differentiation in Immature Stage of a Parasitoid Wasp, Hyposoter Ebeninus Gravenhorst (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), Entomological News 124, no.33 (Nov 2014): 193–203.https://doi.org/10.3157/021.124.0304Chihiro Himuro, Kenji Fujisaki Evolutionary causes of male-biased sexual size dimorphism from a female perspective in the seed bug Togo hemipterus (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae), Applied Entomology and Zoology 49, no.22 (Mar 2014): 347–352.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-014-0258-yGunnary León-Finalé, Alejandro Barro Immature Stages and Life Cycle of the Wasp Moth, Cosmosoma auge (Lepidoptera: Erebidae: Arctiinae) under Laboratory Conditions, Psyche: A Journal of Entomology 2014 (Jan 2014): 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/328030A L Klein, A M de Araújo Sexual Size Dimorphism in the Color Pattern Elements of Two Mimetic Heliconius Butterflies, Neotropical Entomology 42, no.66 (Aug 2013): 600–606.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-013-0157-xYolanda E. Morbey Protandry, sexual size dimorphism, and adaptive growth, Journal of Theoretical Biology 339 (Dec 2013): 93–99.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.05.009WENDEL J. TELES PONTES, ERIVELTON G. CUNHA, HERNANE D. ARAÚJO, REGINALDO BARROS, ERALDO LIMA Virgin and recently mated males are equally able to achieve new matings in Neoleucinodes elegantalis, Physiological Entomology 38, no.44 (Sep 2013): 313–317.https://doi.org/10.1111/phen.12036W. JAMES DAVIES, ILIK J. SACCHERI Maintenance of body-size variation and host range in the orange-tip butterfly: evidence for a trade-off between adult life-history traits, Ecological Entomology 38, no.11 (Jan 2013): 49–60.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2012.01402.xC. S. Anjos-Duarte, A. M. Costa, I. S. Joachim-Bravo Sexual behaviour of the Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae): the influence of female size on mate choice, Journal of Applied Entomology 135, no.55 (May 2011): 367–373.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2010.01552.xJuhan Javoiš, Freerk Molleman, Toomas Tammaru Quantifying income breeding: using geometrid moths as an example, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 139, no.33 (May 2011): 187–196.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2011.01120.xN. Hernández-L., Á.R. Barragán, S. Dupas, J.-F. Silvain, O. Dangles Wing shape variations in an invasive moth are related to sexual dimorphism and altitude, Bulletin of Entomological Research 100, no.55 (Jan 2010): 529–541.https://doi.org/10.1017/S000748530999054XBas J. Zwaan, Wilte G. Zijlstra, Marieke Keller, Jeroen Pijpe, Paul M. Brakefield Potential constraints on evolution: sexual dimorphism and the problem of protandry in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana, Journal of Genetics 87, no.44 (Dec 2008): 395–405.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-008-0062-yClaudio J. Bidau, Dardo A. Martí Contrasting patterns of sexual size dimorphism in the grasshoppers Dichroplus vittatus and D. pratensis (Acrididae, Melanoplinae)*, Journal of Orthoptera Research 17, no.22 (Dec 2008): 201–211.https://doi.org/10.1665/1082-6467-17.2.201Gabriel Nève, Michael C. Singer Protandry and postandry in two related butterflies: conflicting evidence about sex-specific trade-offs between adult size and emergence time, Evolutionary Ecology 22, no.66 (Jul 2007): 701–709.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-007-9192-6Takahiro Irie and Naoko Morimoto Phenotypic Plasticity and Sexual Dimorphism in Size at Post-Juvenile Metamorphosis: Common-Garden Rearing of an Intertidal Gastropod With Determinate Growth, The Biological Bulletin 215, no.22 (Sep 2016): 126–134.https://doi.org/10.2307/25470693 Wolf U. Blanckenhorn , Anthony F. G. Dixon , Daphne J. Fairbairn , Matthias W. Foellmer , Patricia Gibert , Kim van der Linde , Rudolf Meier , Sören Nylin , Scott Pitnick , Christopher Schoff , Martino Signorelli , Tiit Teder , and Christer Wiklund Proximate Causes of Rensch's Rule: Does Sexual Size Dimorphism in Arthropods Result from Sex Differences in Development Time? W. U. Blanckenhorn et al., The American Naturalist 169, no.22 (Jul 2015): 245–257.https://doi.org/10.1086/510597Josée Doyon, Guy Boivin Impact of the Timing of Male Emergence on Mating Capacity of Males in Trichogramma evanescens Westwood, BioControl 51, no.66 (Jun 2006).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-006-9001-0Kenji Matsuura Early Emergence of Males in the Termite Reticulitermes speratus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae): Protandry as a Side Effect of Sexual Size Dimorphism, Annals of the Entomological Society of America 99, no.33 (May 2006): 625–628.https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2006)99[625:EEOMIT]2.0.CO;2Wolf U. Blanckenhorn, Cornelia Henseler Temperature-dependent ovariole and testis maturation in the yellow dung fly, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 116, no.33 (Sep 2005): 159–165.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2005.00316.xTiit Teder Male-biased size dimorphism in ichneumonine wasps (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) - the role of sexual selection for large male size, Ecological Entomology 30, no.33 (Jun 2005): 342–349.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00693.xDenis Thiéry, Jérôme Moreau Relative performance of European grapevine moth (Lobesia botrana) on grapes and other hosts, Oecologia 143, no.44 (Mar 2005): 548–557.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0022-7Alexei A. Maklakov, Trine Bilde, Yael Lubin Sexual selection for increased male body size and protandry in a spider, Animal Behaviour 68, no.55 (Nov 2004): 1041–1048.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.02.010José Manuel Tierno De Figueroa, Julio Miguel Luzón-Ortega, Antonino Sánchez-Ortega Protandry and Its Relationship with Adult Size in Some Spanish Stoneflies Species (Plecoptera), Annals of the Entomological Society of America 96, no.44 (Jul 2003): 560–562.https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2003)096[0560:PAIRWA]2.0.CO;2Masanori Kohda, Kanako Yonebayashi, Miyako Nakamura, Nobuhiro Ohnishi, Satoko Seki, Daisuke Takahashi, Tomohiro Takeyama Male Reproductive Success in a Promiscuous Armoured Catfish Corydoras Aeneus (Callichthyidae), Environmental Biology of Fishes 63, no.33 (Mar 2002): 281–287.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014317009892Andria E. Beeler, Claudia M. Rauter, Allen J. Moore Mate discrimination by females in the burying beetle Nicrophorus orbicollis : the influence of male size on attractiveness to females, Ecological Entomology 27, no.11 (Mar 2002): 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.0371a.xYolanda E. Morbey, Ronald C. Ydenberg Protandrous arrival timing to breeding areas: a review, Ecology Letters 4, no.66 (Nov 2001): 663–673.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00265.xPhilip H. Crowley SEXUAL DIMORPHISM WITH FEMALE DEMOGRAPHIC DOMINANCE: AGE, SIZE, AND SEX RATIO AT MATURATION, Ecology 81, no.99 (Sep 2000): 2592–2605.https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2592:SDWFDD]2.0.CO;2F. HAYASHI Ejaculate production schedule and the degree of protandry in fishflies (Megaloptera: Corydalidae), Functional Ecology 13, no.22 (Mar 2002): 178–189.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00289.xU.M. Savalli, C.W. Fox The effect of male size, age, and mating behavior on sexual selection in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus, Ethology Ecology & Evolution 11, no.11 (Jan 1999): 49–60.https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.1999.9522841X. Langlet, G. Boivin, E. Brunel, J.P. Nénon VARIATION IN WEIGHT OF ALEOCHARA BILINEATA (COLEOPTERA: STAPHYLINIDAE) IN RELATION TO HOST SIZE AND REPRODUCTION, The Canadian Entomologist 130, no.33 (May 2012): 257–265.https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent130257-3UDO M SAVALLI, CHARLES W FOX Sexual selection and the fitness consequences of male body size in the seed beetleStator limbatus, Animal Behaviour 55, no.22 (Feb 1998): 473–483.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0622S. Nylin, K. Gotthard Plasticity in Life-History Traits, Annual Review of Entomology 43, no.11 (Jan 1998): 63–83.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.63William E. Bradshaw, Christina M. Holzapfel, Cheryl A. Kleckner, Jeffrey J. Hard HERITABILITY OF DEVELOPMENT TIME AND PROTANDRY IN THE PITCHER-PLANT MOSQUITO, WYEOMYIA SMITHII, Ecology 78, no.44 (Jun 1997): 969–976.https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[0969:HODTAP]2.0.CO;2M. Mackauer, R. Sequeira, M. Otto Growth and Development in Parasitoid Wasps: Adaptation to Variable Host Resources, (Jan 1997): 191–203.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60725-7_11Fred Singer, Susan E. Riechert Tests for sex differences in fitness-linked traits in the spiderAgelenopsis aperta (Araneae: Agelenidae), Journal of Insect Behavior 7, no.44 (Jul 1994): 517–532.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02025447Leigh W. Simmons, Marlene Zuk Age Structure of Parasitized and Unparasitized Populations of the Field Cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus, Ethology 98, no.3-43-4 (Apr 2010): 333–340.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1994.tb01081.xKarl Gotthard, S�ren Nylin, Christer Wiklund Adaptive variation in growth rate: life history costs and consequences in the speckled wood butterfly,Pararge aegeria, Oecologia 99, no.3-43-4 (Jan 1994): 281–289.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627740Angelo Bisazza Male competition, female mate choice and sexual size dimorphism in poeciliid fishes, Marine Behaviour and Physiology 23, no.1-41-4 (Oct 1993): 257–286.https://doi.org/10.1080/10236249309378869SÖREN NYLIN Seasonal plasticity in life history traits: growth and development in Polygonia c-album (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 47, no.33 (Jan 2008): 301–323.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1992.tb00672.xC. Zonneveld, J.A.J. Metz Models on butterfly protandry: Virgin females are at risk to die, Theoretical Population Biology 40, no.33 (Dec 1991): 308–321.https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(91)90058-NYoshimi Hirose, S. B. Vinson, Yasuko Hirose Protandry in the parasitoid Cardiochiles nigriceps , as related to its mating system, Ecological Research 3, no.33 (Nov 2018): 217–226.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02348581 Christer Wiklund , and Bengt Karlsson Sexual Size Dimorphism in Relation to Fecundity in Some Swedish Satyrid Butterflies, The American Naturalist 131, no.11 (Oct 2015): 132–138.https://doi.org/10.1086/284779Jan Kozłowski, Richard G. Wiegert Optimal age and size at maturity in annuals and perennials with determinate growth, Evolutionary Ecology 1, no.33 (Jul 1987): 231–244.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02067553STEVEN A. JULIANO The effects of body size on mating and reproduction in Brachinus lateralis (Coleoptera: Carabidae), Ecological Entomology 10, no.33 (Aug 1985): 271–280.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1985.tb00724.xCharles G. Oliver DISTURBANCE OF ECLOSION SEQUENCE IN HYBRID LEPIDOPTERA, The Canadian Entomologist 115, no.1111 (May 2012): 1445–1452.https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent1151445-11Craig S. Hieber, James A. Cohen SEXUAL SELECTION IN THE LOVEBUG, PLECIA NEARCTICA : THE ROLE OF MALE CHOICE, Evolution 37, no.55 (May 2017): 987–992.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05626.xM.G. Bulmer Models for the evolution of protandry in insects, Theoretical Population Biology 23, no.33 (Jun 1983): 314–322.https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(83)90021-7 M. G. Bulmer The Significance of Protandry in Social Hymenoptera, The American Naturalist 121, no.44 (Oct 2015): 540–551.https://doi.org/10.1086/284081
Referência(s)