Sexual Selection and Imitation: Females Copy the Mate Choice of Others
1992; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 139; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/285392
ISSN1537-5323
Autores Tópico(s)Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsSexual Selection and Imitation: Females Copy the Mate Choice of OthersLee Alan DugatkinLee Alan DugatkinPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 139, Number 6Jun., 1992 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/285392 Views: 197Total views on this site Citations: 269Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1992 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Alyce S. Jarrett, Ryan C. Anderson Is the Grass Really Greener? The Influence of Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation on Mate Copying Behaviors, The Journal of Sex Research 60, no.33 (Jun 2022): 418–427.https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2022.2078949Sabine Nöbel, Xiaobo Wang, Marion Cristante, Marine Guëll, Juliette Tariel, Etienne Danchin, Myriam Roussigné No evidence for mate copying in Danio rerio, Behavioural Processes 206 (Mar 2023): 104837.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2023.104837Linda Taimre, Ryan C. Anderson, Olivia Paisley Female mate copying explored: an inconsistent effect, Current Psychology 41, no.88 (Aug 2020): 5065–5074.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01016-4 Precopulatory Adaptations, (Jul 2022): 1–206.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108943567.002Jasna Hudek-Knezevic, Igor Kardum, Nermina Mehić Mate Poaching, (Jul 2022): 174–206.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108943567.009Sabine Nöbel, Xiaobo Wang, Laurine Talvard, Juliette Tariel, Maëva Lille, Julien Cucherousset, Myriam Roussigné, Etienne Danchin The importance of population heterogeneities in detecting social learning as the foundation of animal cultural transmission, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 289, no.19771977 (Jun 2022).https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.0431Yoichi Amano, Yoshinori Wakao Women's Sensitivity to Men's Past Relationships: Reliable Information Use for Mate-Choice Copying in Humans, Evolutionary Psychological Science 8, no.22 (Aug 2021): 107–119.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-021-00295-9Martin Kavaliers, Indra R. Bishnoi, Klaus-Peter Ossenkopp, Elena Choleris Odor-based mate choice copying in deer mice is not affected by familiarity or kinship, Animal Cognition 25, no.22 (Aug 2021): 241–248.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-021-01550-zCody A Freas, Ken Cheng Neuroecology beyond the brain: learning in Echinodermata, Learning & Behavior 50, no.11 (Dec 2021): 20–36.https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-021-00492-3Tingting Liu, Zhuanzhuan Wang, Anrun Zhu, Xi Zhang, Cai Xing The Effectiveness of Mating Induction on Men's Financial Risk-Taking: Relationship Experience Matters, Frontiers in Psychology 12 (Jan 2022).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.787686Thomas R. Zentall Stimulus and Local Enhancement, (May 2022): 6714–6716.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55065-7_1874Mauro Santos, Susana A. M. Varela Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Mate Choice, (Oct 2022): 187–199.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3246-5_15Ioanna Gavriilidi, Simon Baeckens, Gilles De Meester, Lisa Van Linden, Raoul Van Damme The gullible genius: fast learners fall for fake news, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 76, no.11 (Dec 2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-03122-0John O Martin, Nancy Tyler Burley, Marc Naguib Elucidating mutual mate choice: effects of trial design on preferences of male zebra finches, Behavioral Ecology 32, no.66 (Aug 2021): 1306–1320.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arab097Cagla Tekin, Ryan C. Anderson Non-Independent Mate Choice in Humans: An Investigation of Online Mate Choice Copying and Sex Differences, Evolutionary Psychological Science 7, no.44 (Jul 2021): 338–345.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-021-00291-zLarissa Mendoza Straffon The Peacock Fallacy: Art as a Veblenian Signal, Frontiers in Psychology 12 (Nov 2021).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.767409Renata S. Mendonça, Pandora Pinto, Sota Inoue, Monamie Ringhofer, Raquel Godinho, Satoshi Hirata Social determinants of affiliation and cohesion in a population of feral horses, Applied Animal Behaviour Science 51 (Nov 2021): 105496.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105496 Social Learning and Teaching, (Jul 2021): 441–558.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108564113.023Matthew J. Hasenjager, William Hoppitt Fish Social Networks, (Jul 2021): 486–502.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108564113.026Heidi M. Thomsen, Thorsten J. S. Balsby, Torben Dabelsteen, Cheryl S. Rosenfeld Follow the leader? Orange-fronted conures eavesdrop on conspecific vocal performance and utilise it in social decisions, PLOS ONE 16, no.66 (Jun 2021): e0252374.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252374Jin-Ying Zhuang, Jiajia Xie, Peng Li, Mingxia Fan, Stefan Bode Neural profiles of observing acceptance and rejection decisions in human mate choice copying, NeuroImage 233 (Jun 2021): 117929.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117929Manuel Sapage, Susana A. M. Varela, Hanna Kokko, Christine Miller Social learning by mate‐choice copying increases dispersal and reduces local adaptation, Functional Ecology 35, no.33 (Dec 2020): 705–716.https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13735Mylene M. Mariette On nest-site copying, owner aggression, and mimicry: the adaptive significance of interspecific information use in a landscape of fear, acta ethologica 24, no.11 (Nov 2020): 71–77.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-020-00357-4Mark A. Elgar, Christina Riehl Editorial: Mechanisms of Communication and Recognition in Social Evolution, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 8 (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.625831David Waynforth Mate Copying, (Apr 2021): 4834–4836.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_20Peter M. Kappeler Intersexual Selection: How Females Choose, (Jan 2022): 199–239.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82879-0_10Emilie Dion, Li Xian Pui, Katie Weber, Antónia Monteiro Early-exposure to new sex pheromone blends alters mate preference in female butterflies and in their offspring, Nature Communications 11, no.11 (Jan 2020).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13801-2Alice D Davies, Zenobia Lewis, Liam R Dougherty, Michael D Jennions A meta-analysis of factors influencing the strength of mate-choice copying in animals, Behavioral Ecology 31, no.66 (Jul 2020): 1279–1290.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/araa064Robert C Brooks The imitation game: a comment on Davies et al., Behavioral Ecology 31, no.66 (Sep 2020): 1294–1294.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/araa086Kosuke Ozeki, Atsuko Mutoh, Koichi Moriyama, Tohgoroh Matsui, Nobuhiro Inuzuka Evolution of Mate-choice Copying Adapted to Environmental Changes, (Oct 2020): 140–143.https://doi.org/10.1109/GCCE50665.2020.9291998Liam R. Dougherty Designing mate choice experiments, Biological Reviews 95, no.33 (Feb 2020): 759–781.https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12586Ryan J.P. Pusiak, Heather L. Auld, Jean-Guy J. Godin Relative sexual attractiveness does not influence mate-choice copying in male Trinidadian guppies, Poecilia reticulata, Animal Behaviour 162 (Apr 2020): 123–133.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.02.008Elvira Fatsini, Wendy González, Zohar Ibarra-Zatarain, Juvenal Napuchi, Neil J. Duncan The presence of wild Senegalese sole breeders improves courtship and reproductive success in cultured conspecifics, Aquaculture 519 (Mar 2020): 734922.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.734922Peter M. Kappeler Intersexuelle Selektion: wie Weibchen wählen, (Sep 2020): 225–273.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60546-2_10H. Clark Barrett The Search for Human Cognitive Specializations, (Jan 2020): 917–929.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820584-6.00039-8Susanne Stückler, Max Ringler, Andrius Pašukonis, Steffen Weinlein, Walter Hödl, Eva Ringler Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of the Prolonged Courtship in Brilliant-Thighed Poison Frogs, Allobates femoralis, Herpetologica 75, no.44 (Dec 2019): 268.https://doi.org/10.1655/Herpetologica-D-19-00010.1Ryan C Scauzillo, Michael H Ferkin Factors that affect non-independent mate choice, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 128, no.33 (Aug 2019): 499–514.https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blz112Blake Carlton Jones, Emily H. DuVal Mechanisms of Social Influence: A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Social Information on Female Mate Choice Decisions, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7 (Oct 2019).https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00390Ronald D. MacLaren Evidence of an emerging female preference for an artificial male trait and the potential for spread via mate choice copying in Poecilia latipinna, Ethology 106 (May 2019).https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12885Theodora Fuss, Sabine Nöbel, Klaudia Witte It's in the eye of the beholder: visual lateralisation in response to the social environment in poeciliids, Journal of Fish Biology 94, no.55 (Apr 2019): 759–771.https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13953Saori Nojo, Yasuo Ihara The effect of sexual selection on phenotypic diversification among human populations: A simulation study, Journal of Theoretical Biology 462 (Feb 2019): 1–11.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.10.058Timothy J. Rowell, Octavio Aburto-Oropeza, Juan J. Cota-Nieto, Mark A. Steele, Brad E. Erisman Reproductive behaviour and concurrent sound production of Gulf grouper Mycteroperca jordani (Epinephelidae) at a spawning aggregation site, Journal of Fish Biology 94, no.22 (Jan 2019): 277–296.https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13888Eileen A. Hebets, Rowan H. McGinley Multimodal Signaling, (Jan 2019): 487–499.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.90730-1Michael J. Ryan, Rachel A. Page, Kimberly L. Hunter, Ryan C. Taylor 'Crazy love': nonlinearity and irrationality in mate choice, Animal Behaviour 147 (Jan 2019): 189–198.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.04.004Eileen A. Hebets, Laura Sullivan-Beckers Mate Choice and Learning, (Jan 2019): 306–314.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.20871-6Elliot G. Aguilar and Erol Akçay Gene-Culture Coinheritance of a Behavioral Trait, The American Naturalist 192, no.33 (Jul 2018): 311–320.https://doi.org/10.1086/698872Armando Ferreira-Nuño, Jesús Olayo-Lortia, Antonio Cruz-Benites, Raúl G. Paredes Sexual Incentive and Choice, Current Sexual Health Reports 10, no.33 (Jul 2018): 132–141.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-018-0158-1Ryan C. Anderson, Michele K. Surbey, David A. Mitchell Mate Copying Is Moderated by Relationship Recency and Potentially by Breakup Responsibility, Evolutionary Psychological Science 4, no.33 (Feb 2018): 301–311.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0141-0Ryan Corley Anderson Mate Copying and the Effects of Sexual History on Romantic Desirability, Evolutionary Psychological Science 4, no.33 (Mar 2018): 322–330.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0143-yMartin Kavaliers, Elena Choleris The role of social cognition in parasite and pathogen avoidance, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 373, no.17511751 (Jun 2018): 20170206.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0206Katja Heubel, Ingo Schlupp Female mating competition alters female mating preferences in common gobies, Current Zoology 64, no.33 (Apr 2018): 351–361.https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoy024Susana A. M. Varela, Margarida Matos, Ingo Schlupp The role of mate-choice copying in speciation and hybridization, Biological Reviews 93, no.22 (Feb 2018): 1304–1322.https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12397Kandace M. Flanary, Jerald B. Johnson, J. Jaime Zúñiga-Vega Anal fin pigmentation in Brachyrhaphis fishes is not used for sexual mimicry, PLOS ONE 13, no.33 (Mar 2018): e0194121.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194121Stefanie Gierszewski, Melissa Keil, Klaudia Witte Mate-choice copying in sailfin molly females: public information use from long-distance interactions, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 72, no.22 (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2441-6Thomas Zentall Stimulus and Local Enhancement, (Nov 2017): 1–3.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1874-1Jin-Ying Zhuang, Xiaoqing Ji, Zhiyong Zhao, Mingxia Fan, Norman P. Li The neural basis of human female mate copying: An empathy-based social learning process, Evolution and Human Behavior 38, no.66 (Nov 2017): 779–788.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.05.006Martin Kavaliers, Elena Choleris Social Cognition and the Neurobiology of Rodent Mate Choice, Integrative and Comparative Biology 57, no.44 (Jul 2017): 846–856.https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icx042R. David MacLaren Social environment affects female preference for male body color during development in artificially selected varieties of Poecilia latipinna, Ethology Ecology & Evolution 29, no.55 (Sep 2016): 421–435.https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2016.1220427David J. White, Eliza Watts, Kelsey Pitchforth, Samuel Agyapong, Noam Miller 'Sociability' affects the intensity of mate-choice copying in female guppies, Poecilia reticulata, Behavioural Processes 141 (Aug 2017): 251–257.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.017Mauro Santos, Manuel Sapage, Margarida Matos, Susana A. M. Varela Mate-choice copying: A fitness-enhancing behavior that evolves by indirect selection, Evolution 71, no.66 (Apr 2017): 1456–1464.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13235Peter Kappeler Intersexuelle Selektion: was Weibchen wollen, (Aug 2016): 326–413.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53145-7_9H. Clark Barrett The Search for Human Cognitive Specializations, (Jan 2017): 355–366.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804042-3.00122-6Martin Kavaliers, Richard Matta, Elena Choleris Mate-choice copying, social information processing, and the roles of oxytocin, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 72 (Jan 2017): 232–242.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.003Matthew J. Hasenjager, Lee Alan Dugatkin Familiarity affects network structure and information flow in guppy ( Poecilia reticulata ) shoals, Behavioral Ecology 28, no.11 (Oct 2016): 233–242.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw152Heather L. Auld, Indar W. Ramnarine, Jean-Guy J. Godin Male mate choice in the Trinidadian guppy is influenced by the phenotype of audience sexual rivals, Behavioral Ecology 11 (Dec 2016): arw170.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw170Edward J. Enriquez, Frances P. Gelwick, Jane M. Packard Reproductive Seasonality, Courtship and Nesting in Guadalupe Bass (Micropterus treculii), The American Midland Naturalist 176, no.22 (Oct 2016): 173.https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-176.2.173Malin Ah‐King, Patricia Adair Gowaty A conceptual review of mate choice: stochastic demography, within‐sex phenotypic plasticity, and individual flexibility, Ecology and Evolution 6, no.1414 (Jun 2016): 4607–4642.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2197Christopher D. Rodeheffer, Randi P. Proffitt Leyva, Sarah E. Hill Attractive Female Romantic Partners Provide a Proxy for Unobservable Male Qualities, Evolutionary Psychology 14, no.22 (May 2016): 147470491665214.https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916652144Sergio Castellano, Olivier Friard, Andrea Pilastro The audience effect and the role of deception in the expression of male mating preferences, Animal Behaviour 115 (May 2016): 273–282.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.02.016Jin-Ying Zhuang, Jiajia Xie, Die Hu, Mingxia Fan, Li Zheng A Role of DLPFC in the Learning Process of Human Mate Copying, Frontiers in Psychology 7 (Apr 2016).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00546David Waynforth Mate Copying, (Sep 2016): 1–3.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_20-1H. Martin Schaefer, Graeme D. Ruxton Signal Diversity, Sexual Selection, and Speciation, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 46, no.11 (Dec 2015): 573–592.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054158Heather L. Auld, Jean-Guy J. Godin Sexual voyeurs and copiers: social copying and the audience effect on male mate choice in the guppy, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 69, no.1111 (Aug 2015): 1795–1807.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1992-zDavid L. Clark, Corinna Kizer Zeeff, Gabriel Sabovodny, Aaron Hollenberg, J. Andrew Roberts, George W. Uetz The role of social experience in eavesdropping by male wolf spiders (Lycosidae), Animal Behaviour 106 (Aug 2015): 89–97.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.05.001Anthony G. E. Mathiron, Adam L. Crane, Maud C. O. Ferrari Individual vs. social learning of predator information in fish: does group size affect learning efficacy?, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 69, no.66 (Apr 2015): 939–949.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1905-1Douglas P. Chivers, Maud C.O. Ferrari The effect of group size and tutor-to-observer ratio on socially learned antipredator responses in woodfrog tadpoles, Animal Behaviour 104 (Jun 2015): 25–29.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.03.003V. Schluessel Who would have thought that 'Jaws' also has brains? Cognitive functions in elasmobranchs, Animal Cognition 18, no.11 (Jun 2014): 19–37.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0762-zThomas R. Zentall Cognitive and Noncognitive Aspects of Social Learning, (Jan 2015): 335–374.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800648-1.00012-7C. M. V. Nunez, J. S. Adelman, D. I. Rubenstein Sociality increases juvenile survival after a catastrophic event in the feral horse (Equus caballus), Behavioral Ecology 26, no.11 (Sep 2014): 138–147.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru163Yan Deng, Yong Zheng Mate-Choice Copying in Single and Coupled Women: The Influence of Mate Acceptance and Mate Rejection Decisions of other Women, Evolutionary Psychology 13, no.11 (Jan 2015): 147470491501300.https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491501300106Matthew J. Hasenjager, Lee Alan Dugatkin Social Network Analysis in Behavioral Ecology, (Jan 2015): 39–114.https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.asb.2015.02.003Glauco Machado, Gustavo S. Requena, Carlos Toscano-Gadea, Estefanía Stanley, Rogelio Macías-Ordóñez Male and Female Mate Choice in Harvestmen: General Patterns and Inferences on the Underlying Processes, (May 2015): 169–201.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17894-3_7Shane Golden, Reuven Dukas, Johan J. Bolhuis The Value of Patch-Choice Copying in Fruit Flies, PLoS ONE 9, no.1111 (Nov 2014): e112381.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112381Mauro Santos, Margarida Matos, and Susana A. M. Varela Negative Public Information in Mate Choice Copying Helps the Spread of a Novel Trait., The American Naturalist 184, no.55 (Jul 2015): 658–672.https://doi.org/10.1086/678082 References, (Oct 2014): 391–450.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118891360.refsMaria Norevik Andrén, Charlotta Kvarnemo Filial cannibalism in a nest-guarding fish: females prefer to spawn in nests with few eggs over many, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 68, no.1010 (Jul 2014): 1565–1576.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1766-zAneesh P.H. Bose, Karen M. Cogliati, Holly S. Howe, Sigal Balshine Factors influencing cannibalism in the plainfin midshipman fish, Animal Behaviour 96 (Oct 2014): 159–166.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.08.008Ryan C. Anderson, Michele K. Surbey I Want What She's Having, Human Nature 25, no.33 (Jun 2014): 342–358.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-014-9202-7Jeffery L. Dunning, Santosh Pant, Aaron Bass, Zachary Coburn, Jonathan F. Prather, Melissa J. Coleman Mate Choice in Adult Female Bengalese Finches: Females Express Consistent Preferences for Individual Males and Prefer Female-Directed Song Performances, PLoS ONE 9, no.22 (Feb 2014): e89438.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089438Michael H. Ferkin, Javier delBarco-Trillo The behavior of female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, during postpartum estrus and the responses of males to them, Mammalian Biology 79, no.22 (Feb 2014): 81–89.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2013.06.003Christine W. Miller, Erik I. Svensson Sexual Selection in Complex Environments, Annual Review of Entomology 59, no.11 (Jan 2014): 427–445.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-162044Patricia L. Jones, Michael J. Ryan, Victoria Flores, Rachel A. Page When to approach novel prey cues? Social learning strategies in frog-eating bats, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280, no.17721772 (Dec 2013): 20132330.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2330Dalton W. Chaffee, Hayes Griffin, R. Tucker Gilman SEXUAL IMPRINTING: WHAT STRATEGIES SHOULD WE EXPECT TO SEE IN NATURE?, Evolution 67, no.1212 (Aug 2013): 3588–3599.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12226Yukio Matsumoto, Takeshi Takegaki Female mate choice copying increases egg survival rate but does not reduce mate-sampling cost in the barred-chin blenny, Animal Behaviour 86, no.22 (Aug 2013): 339–346.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.05.024Sebastian Wacker, Kenyon Mobley, Elisabet Forsgren, Lise Cats Myhre, Karen de Jong, Trond Amundsen OPERATIONAL SEX RATIO BUT NOT DENSITY AFFECTS SEXUAL SELECTION IN A FISH, Evolution 67, no.77 (Apr 2013): 1937–1949.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12092Karen M. Cogliati, Bryan D. Neff, Sigal Balshine High degree of paternity loss in a species with alternative reproductive tactics, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 67, no.33 (Dec 2012): 399–408.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1460-ySabine Nöbel, Klaudia Witte, Gabriele Sorci Public Information Influences Sperm Transfer to Females in Sailfin Molly Males, PLoS ONE 8, no.11 (Jan 2013): e53865.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053865Victoria R. Franks, Rupert C. Marshall Mechanisms and extent of information transfer in socially foraging guppies, Poecilia reticulata, Animal Behaviour 85, no.11 (Jan 2013): 103–108.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.10.013Denice N. Robertson, Mark J. Butler Mate choice and sperm limitation in the spotted spiny lobster, Panulirus guttatus, Marine Biology Research 9, no.11 (Jan 2013): 69–76.https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2012.727429Karen Pacheco, Jeff W. Dawson, Michael Jutting, Susan M. Bertram How age influences phonotaxis in virgin female Jamaican field crickets ( Gryllus assimilis ), PeerJ 1 (Aug 2013): e130.https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.130Nathan Oesch, Igor Miklousic The Dating Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Emerging Science of Human Courtship, Evolutionary Psychology 10, no.55 (Dec 2012): 147470491201000.https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491201000511Sara Arganda, Alfonso Pérez-Escudero, Gonzalo G. de Polavieja A common rule for decision making in animal collectives across species, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, no.5050 (Nov 2012): 20508–20513.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210664109Erica L. Westerman, Andrea Hodgins-Davis, April Dinwiddie, Antónia Monteiro Biased learning affects mate choice in a butterfly, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, no.2727 (Jun 2012): 10948–10953.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118378109David L. Clark, J. Andrew Roberts, George W. Uetz Eavesdropping and signal matching in visual courtship displays of spiders, Biology Letters 8, no.33 (Jan 2012): 375–378.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.1096Elena Choleris, Amy E. Clipperton-Allen, Anna Phan, Paola Valsecchi, Martin Kavaliers Estrogenic involvement in social learning, social recognition and pathogen avoidance, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 33, no.22 (Apr 2012): 140–159.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2012.02.001Antonios Vakirtzis, S. Craig Roberts Human Nonindependent Mate Choice: Is Model Female Attractiveness Everything?, Evolutionary Psychology 10, no.22 (Apr 2012): 147470491201000.https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491201000205M. Aaron Owen, Karl Rohrer, Richard D. Howard Mate choice for a novel male phenotype in zebrafish, Danio rerio, Animal Behaviour 83, no.33 (Mar 2012): 811–820.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.029Maud C. O. Ferrari, Rachel P. Manassa, Danielle L. Dixson, Philip L. Munday, Mark I. McCormick, Mark G. Meekan, Andrew Sih, Douglas P. Chivers, Howard Browman Effects of Ocean Acidification on Learning in Coral Reef Fishes, PLoS ONE 7, no.22 (Feb 2012): e31478.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031478Peter M. Kappeler Intersexuelle Selektion: was Weibchen wollen, (Jan 2012): 326–413.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20653-5_9Dustin J. Wilgers, Eileen A. Hebets Age-related female mating decisions are condition dependent in wolf spiders, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 66, no.11 (Sep 2011): 29–38.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1248-5Robert I. Bowers, Skyler S. Place, Peter M. Todd, Lars Penke, Jens B. Asendorpf Generalization in mate-choice copying in humans, Behavioral Ecology 23, no.11 (Oct 2011): 112–124.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr164F. Dubois, D. Drullion, K. Witte Social information use may lead to maladaptive decisions: a game theoretic model, Behavioral Ecology 23, no.11 (Nov 2011): 225–231.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr179David Bierbach, Matthias Schulte, Nina Herrmann, Michael Tobler, Stefan Stadler, Christian T Jung, Benjamin Kunkel, Rüdiger Riesch, Sebastian Klaus, Madlen Ziege, Jeane Rimber Indy, Lenin Arias-Rodriguez, Martin Plath Predator-induced changes of female mating preferences: innate and experiential effects, BMC Evolutionary Biology 11, no.11 (Jul 2011).https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-190Laura K. Easty, Amy K. Schwartz, Swanne P. Gordon, Andrew P. Hendry Does sexual selection evolve following introduction to new environments?, Animal Behaviour 82, no.55 (Nov 2011): 1085–1095.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.08.001Michael H. Ferkin Odor-related behavior and cognition in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus (Arvicolidae, Rodentia), Folia Zoologica 60, no.33 (Oct 2011): 262–276.https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.v60.i3.a11.2011David Bierbach, Claudia Kronmarck, Carmen Hennige-Schulz, Stefan Stadler, Martin Plath Sperm competition risk affects male mate choice copying, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65, no.99 (Apr 2011): 1699–1707.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1177-3Culum Brown, Kevin Laland Social Learning in Fishes, (Jul 2011): 240–257.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444342536.ch11Klaudia Witte, Sabine Nöbel Learning and Mate Choice, (Jul 2011): 81–107.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444342536.ch5Richard N. C. Milner, Michael D. Jennions, Patricia R. Y. Backwell Non-independent mate choice in a fiddler crab: a case of stimulus enhancement, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65, no.77 (Feb 2011): 1419–1424.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1152-zBenedict C. Jones, Lisa M. DeBruine, Anthony C. Little, Christopher D. Watkins, David R. Feinberg 'Eavesdropping' and perceived male dominance rank in humans, Animal Behaviour 81, no.66 (Jun 2011): 1203–1208.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.03.003Martin Plath, David Bierbach Sex and the public, Communicative & Integrative Biology 4, no.33 (Nov 2014): 276–280.https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.4.3.14916K. N. Laland, N. Atton, M. M. Webster From fish to fashion: experimental and theoretical insights into the evolution of culture, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366, no.15671567 (Apr 2011): 958–968.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0328Antonios Vakirtzis Mate Choice Copying and Nonindependent Mate Choice: A Critical Review, Annales Zoologici Fennici 48, no.22 (Apr 2011): 91–107.https://doi.org/10.5735/086.048.0202James R. Liddle, Todd K. Shackelford Teaching the Evolution of the Mind, Teaching of Psychology 38, no.22 (Apr 2011): 128–132.https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311401586Paul Bouissac Chapitre 1. L'invisible et l'impensé du spectacle vivant, (Apr 2011): 103–114.https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.helbo.2011.01.0103Damian O. Elias, Maydianne C.B. Andrade, Michael M. Kasumovic Dynamic Population Structure and the Evolution of Spider Mating Systems, (Jan 2011): 65–114.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-415919-8.00002-1C. S. ASA, K. TRAYLOR-HOLZER, R. C. LACY Can conservation-breeding programmes be improved by incorporating mate choice?, International Zoo Yearbook 45, no.11 (Dec 2010): 203–212.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1090.2010.00123.xAmy K. Schwartz, Dylan J. Weese, Paul Bentzen, Michael T. Kinnison, Andrew P. Hendry, Stewart Plaistow Both Geography and Ecology Contribute to Mating Isolation in Guppies, PLoS ONE 5, no.1212 (Dec 2010): e15659.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015659Susan N. Gershman, Scott K. Sakaluk Mate Quality and Novelty Influence Post-Copulatory Female Choice in Decorated Crickets, Gryllodes sigillatus, Ethology 116, no.1111 (Sep 2010): 1113–1117.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01826.xChristine Stanik, Robert Kurzban, Phoebe Ellsworth Rejection Hurts: The Effect of Being Dumped on Subsequent Mating Efforts, Evolutionary Psychology 8, no.44 (Oct 2010): 147470491000800.https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491000800410Michael H. Ferkin, Daniel A. Ferkin, Benjamin D. Ferkin, Christian T. Vlautin Olfactory Experience Affects the Response of Meadow Voles to the Opposite-Sex Scent Donor of Mixed-Sex Over-Marks, Ethology 115 (Jun 2010): no–no.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01795.xChristian T. Vlautin, Nicholas J. Hobbs, Michael H. Ferkin Male and Female Meadow Voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, Differ in Their Responses to Heterospecific/Conspecific Over-Marks, Ethology 115 (Jun 2010): no–no.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01803.xRocio Garcia-Retamero, Masanori Takezawa, Mirta Galesic Simple mechanisms for gathering social information, New Ideas in Psychology 28, no.11 (Apr 2010): 49–63.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.05.002J. M. Refsnider, C. H. Daugherty, S. N. Keall, N. J. Nelson Nest-site choice and fidelity in tuatara on Stephens Island, New Zealand, Journal of Zoology 280, no.44 (Apr 2010): 396–402.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00676.xAntonios Vakirtzis, S. Craig Roberts Mate Quality Bias: Sex Differences in Humans, Annales Zoologici Fennici 47, no.22 (Apr 2010): 149–157.https://doi.org/10.5735/086.047.0208I. Schlupp Mate Choice and the Amazon Molly: How Sexuality and Unisexuality Can Coexist, Journal of Heredity 101, no.Supplement 1Supplement 1 (Apr 2010): S55–S61.https://
Referência(s)