Preventing Bacterial Suicide: A Novel Toxin-Antitoxin Strategy
2013; Elsevier BV; Volume: 52; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1016/j.molcel.2013.11.018
ISSN1097-4164
AutoresMonica Markovski, Sue Wickner,
Tópico(s)DNA Repair Mechanisms
ResumoIn this issue of Molecular Cell, Aakre et al., 2013Aakre C.D. Phung T.N. Huang D. Laub M.T. Mol. Cell. 2013; 52 (this issue): 617-628Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (147) Google Scholar identify a toxin-antitoxin system in Caulobacter crescentus that acts by a unique mechanism. The toxin, which blocks DNA replication, is constitutively degraded by ClpXP, and this degradation requires the antitoxin, a ClpXP adaptor. In this issue of Molecular Cell, Aakre et al., 2013Aakre C.D. Phung T.N. Huang D. Laub M.T. Mol. Cell. 2013; 52 (this issue): 617-628Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (147) Google Scholar identify a toxin-antitoxin system in Caulobacter crescentus that acts by a unique mechanism. The toxin, which blocks DNA replication, is constitutively degraded by ClpXP, and this degradation requires the antitoxin, a ClpXP adaptor. Toxin-antitoxin (TA) modules are highly abundant on the chromosomes of many bacteria. Traditional TA systems encode both a stable toxin and a labile small noncoding RNA or protein antitoxin. Under normal growth conditions, this antitoxin either prevents the translation of the toxic protein or counteracts its activity. Stress conditions can allow the toxic protein to be freed from the inhibitory effects of the antitoxin. In its active form, the toxin prevents cell growth by affecting essential cellular processes (Gerdes et al., 2005Gerdes K. Christensen S.K. Løbner-Olesen A. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005; 3: 371-382Crossref PubMed Scopus (864) Google Scholar, Schuster and Bertram, 2013Schuster C.F. Bertram R. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2013; 340: 73-85Crossref PubMed Scopus (163) Google Scholar). Under environmental stress conditions, these TA systems may potentially function to modulate growth. In this issue of Molecular Cell, Aakre et al., 2013Aakre C.D. Phung T.N. Huang D. Laub M.T. Mol. Cell. 2013; 52 (this issue): 617-628Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (147) Google Scholar identify a new TA locus, socAB, in Caulobacter crescentus and describe a novel, atypical mechanism of TA action. They find that the toxin, SocB, interacts with its antitoxin, SocA, and is delivered by SocA to the ClpXP protease where it is degraded (Figure 1A). In the absence of SocA or ClpXP, SocB forms a complex with the β sliding clamp, an essential component of the DNA replication elongation machinery, thereby inhibiting DNA replication. All TA systems contain a protein toxin. However, they vary based on the nature of the antitoxin and the mechanism of action the antitoxin exerts on its toxin partner. To date, five TA classes have been identified (Figure 1B) (Mruk and Kobayashi, 2013Mruk I. Kobayashi I. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; (in press. Published online August 13, 2013)https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt711Crossref PubMed Scopus (161) Google Scholar, Schuster and Bertram, 2013Schuster C.F. Bertram R. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2013; 340: 73-85Crossref PubMed Scopus (163) Google Scholar). Type I TA systems transcribe a small noncoding RNA toxin that base pairs with the toxin mRNA and prevents its translation. In Type II TA systems, the protein antitoxin directly binds to the protein toxin to prevent toxin activity. The Type III class encodes numerous small noncoding RNAs that interact directly with the protein toxin to inactivate it. Type IV systems have a protein toxin that destabilizes cytoskeletal protein polymerization and a protein antitoxin that counteracts this effect. Finally, in Type V TA systems, the mRNA of the toxin-encoding gene is cleaved by the protein antitoxin. In this report, Aakre et al., 2013Aakre C.D. Phung T.N. Huang D. Laub M.T. Mol. Cell. 2013; 52 (this issue): 617-628Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (147) Google Scholar identify a toxin-antitoxin system in Caulobacter crescentus that acts by a unique mechanism where the protein antitoxin functions as a proteolytic adaptor to target the toxin for degradation. They began the study by asking why the conserved AAA+ protease, ClpXP (Sauer and Baker, 2011Sauer R.T. Baker T.A. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2011; 80: 587-612Crossref PubMed Scopus (517) Google Scholar), is absolutely essential in Caulobacter. This requirement for ClpXP in C. crescentus has been puzzling for many years since homologous proteasome-like proteases are nonessential in other well-studied bacteria. They devised a transposon mutagenesis selection to identify suppressors that allowed cells to grow in the absence of ClpP and identified the socB locus. It was noted that the gene encoding SocB was in an operon with a gene that was predicted to be essential, which they named socA. They hypothesized that SocAB might encode a TA system. Indeed, although repression of SocB in ΔsocA cells allowed colonies to grow well, artificial induction of SocB in ΔsocA cells prevented colony formation, thus indicating that socAB behaves genetically like other TA systems. Together these results suggested that SocB might be a ClpXP substrate. In an unorthodox twist to the TA story, Aakre et al., 2013Aakre C.D. Phung T.N. Huang D. Laub M.T. Mol. Cell. 2013; 52 (this issue): 617-628Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (147) Google Scholar found that ClpXP degrades the SocB toxin. This ClpXP requirement for SocB degradation provides a compelling reason why ClpXP is essential for viability in Caulobacter: SocB is toxic to cells without ClpXP. Also, a novel component of the system is the SocA antitoxin. Instead of functioning as a specific inhibitor of SocB, SocA is an essential ClpXP adaptor necessary for the degradation of SocB. Adaptor proteins, such as SspB, RssB, and ClpS, bind to a substrate and deliver the substrate to the Clp protease (Battesti and Gottesman, 2013Battesti A. Gottesman S. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2013; 16: 140-147Crossref PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar). The SocAB TA module acts by a mechanism not previously described and thus is the founding member of a new class of TA systems (Figure 1A). To pinpoint the cellular target of SocB, Aakre et al., 2013Aakre C.D. Phung T.N. Huang D. Laub M.T. Mol. Cell. 2013; 52 (this issue): 617-628Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (147) Google Scholar screened for mutants that could tolerate high levels of the toxin. Aside from the expected mutations in clpX, they identified dnaN mutants that bypassed the toxicity of increased SocB. DnaN encodes the β sliding clamp, a central component of the DNA elongation machinery that binds DNA polymerase III (Pol III) and increases the processivity of Pol III during replication (Johnson and O'Donnell, 2005Johnson A. O'Donnell M. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2005; 74: 283-315Crossref PubMed Scopus (437) Google Scholar, Kurth and O'Donnell, 2013Kurth I. O'Donnell M. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2013; 38: 195-203Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar). Additionally, DnaN plays roles in trans-lesion DNA synthesis and mismatch repair and is known to interact with several other proteins, including DNA Pol I, II, IV, and V; a replication regulator, Hda; and mismatch repair proteins, MutS and MutL (Dalrymple et al., 2001Dalrymple B.P. Kongsuwan K. Wijffels G. Dixon N.E. Jennings P.A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001; 98: 11627-11632Crossref PubMed Scopus (254) Google Scholar, Fernandez-Fernandez et al., 2013Fernandez-Fernandez C. Grosse K. Sourjik V. Collier J. Microbiology. 2013; 159: 2237-2248Crossref PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar). The dnaN mutations identified by Aakre et al., 2013Aakre C.D. Phung T.N. Huang D. Laub M.T. Mol. Cell. 2013; 52 (this issue): 617-628Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (147) Google Scholar led to amino acid substitutions located in a hydrophobic groove shown to interact with Pol III and the other DnaN-interacting proteins (Dalrymple et al., 2001Dalrymple B.P. Kongsuwan K. Wijffels G. Dixon N.E. Jennings P.A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001; 98: 11627-11632Crossref PubMed Scopus (254) Google Scholar) (Johnson and O'Donnell, 2005Johnson A. O'Donnell M. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2005; 74: 283-315Crossref PubMed Scopus (437) Google Scholar). One interpretation of the results is that SocB inhibits DNA replication elongation by directly interacting with DnaN and preventing its interaction of Pol III. This inhibition leads to replication fork collapse and induction of the DNA damage response. TA systems are prevalent throughout bacteria, and a single organism generally encodes multiple TA systems. It has been hypothesized that these modules may play regulatory roles that allow the cell to withstand stress in the natural habitat of the organism (Gerdes et al., 2005Gerdes K. Christensen S.K. Løbner-Olesen A. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005; 3: 371-382Crossref PubMed Scopus (864) Google Scholar). It is not known yet why this unique TA system is needed for Caulobacter. Could the SocAB TA system promote cellular adaptation to the ever-changing aquatic environment where Caulobacter is normally found and where nutrients may periodically be limited? By preventing DNA replication, SocB may initiate a global regulatory response that allows cells to adapt to environmental changes and stresses quickly. This work raises some broader questions as well. What is the environmental signal or stressor that would activate a TA system of this type? Why are multiple TA systems so prevalent in bacteria? Perhaps elucidating the mechanism by which SocB becomes active in Caulobacter can provide us with insight into why TA systems are needed. A Bacterial Toxin Inhibits DNA Replication Elongation through a Direct Interaction with the β Sliding ClampAakre et al.Molecular CellNovember 14, 2013In BriefToxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are ubiquitous on bacterial chromosomes, yet the mechanisms regulating their activity and the molecular targets of toxins remain incompletely defined. Here, we identify SocAB, an atypical TA system in Caulobacter crescentus. Unlike canonical TA systems, the toxin SocB is unstable and constitutively degraded by the protease ClpXP; this degradation requires the antitoxin, SocA, as a proteolytic adaptor. We find that the toxin, SocB, blocks replication elongation through an interaction with the sliding clamp, driving replication fork collapse. Full-Text PDF Open Archive
Referência(s)