Importance of bowel preparation in screening colonoscopy
2012; Future Medicine; Volume: 1; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2217/crc.12.46
ISSN1758-1958
AutoresReena V. Chokshi, Dayna S. Early, Jean S. Wang,
Tópico(s)Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
ResumoColorectal CancerVol. 1, No. 5 EditorialImportance of bowel preparation in screening colonoscopyReena V Chokshi, Dayna S Early & Jean S WangReena V ChokshiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030, USA, Dayna S EarlyDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8124, St Louis, MO 63110, USA & Jean S Wang* Author for correspondenceDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8124, St Louis, MO 63110, USA. Published Online:17 Nov 2012https://doi.org/10.2217/crc.12.46AboutSectionsView ArticleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInReddit View articleReferences1 Rex DK, Johnson DA, Lieberman DA et al. Colorectal cancer prevention 2000: screening recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am. J. Gastroenterol.95,868–877 (2000).Medline, CAS, Google Scholar2 Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H et al. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am. J. Gastroenterol.96,1797–1802 (2001).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar3 Chung YW, Han DS, Park KH et al. Patient factors predictive of inadequate bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol: a prospective study in Korea. J. Clin. Gastroenterol.43,448–452 (2009).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4 Kilgore TW, Abdinoor AA, Szary NM et al. Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest. Endosc.73,1240–1245 (2011).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am. J. Gastroenterol.101(4),873–885 (2006).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology134,1570–1595 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar7 Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest. Endosc.61,378–384 (2005).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8 Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest. Endosc.58,76–79 (2003).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar9 Ben-Horin S, Bar-Meir S, Avidan B. The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists' recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy. Am. J. Gastroenterol.102,2680–2685 (2007).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10 Chokshi RV, Hovis CE, Hollander T, Early DS, Wang JS. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc.75,1197–1203 (2012).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar11 Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers AA et al. Rate and predictors of early/missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy in Manitoba: a population-based study. Am. J. Gastroenterol.105,2588–2596 (2010).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar12 Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M et al. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc.73,1207–1214 (2011).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar101 GLOBOCAN 2008 v1.2, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2010. http://globocan.iarc.fr (Accessed June 2012)Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Vol. 1, No. 5 Follow us on social media for the latest updates Metrics Downloaded 26 times History Published online 17 November 2012 Published in print October 2012 Information© Future Medicine LtdFinancial & competing interests disclosureThe authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.PDF download
Referência(s)