The Myth of P: Epistemology and Formal Analysis 1
1969; Wiley; Volume: 71; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1525/aa.1969.71.1.02a00080
ISSN1548-1433
Autores Tópico(s)Philosophy and Theoretical Science
ResumoAmerican AnthropologistVolume 71, Issue 1 p. 71-79 The Myth of P: Epistemology and Formal Analysis1 Stephen A. Tyler, Stephen A. Tyler Tulane UniversitySearch for more papers by this author Stephen A. Tyler, Stephen A. Tyler Tulane UniversitySearch for more papers by this author First published: February 1969 https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1969.71.1.02a00080Citations: 5 1 An earlier version of this paper was read in November 1967 at the American Anthropological Association annual meeting in Washington, D. C. I am indebted to John Fischer, Mike Micklin, and Jan Brukman for providing useful comments on previous drafts. AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL REFERENCES CITED Burling, Robbins 1964 Componential analysis: god's truth or hocus-pocus? American Anthropologist 66: 20– 28. Burling, Robbins 1965 Burmese kinship terminology. American Anthropologist 67: 106– 117. Conklin, H. C. 1964 Ethnogenealogical method. In Explorations in cultural anthropology. W. H. Goodenough, ed New York, McGraw-Hill. Fischer, J. L. 1966 The basic semantic variables of kinship terminology. Human Mosaic 1: 68– 77. Frake, C. O. 1964 Further discussion of Burling. American Anthropologist 66: 119. Greenberg, Joseph H. 1949 The logical analysis of kinship. Philosophy of Science 16: 58– 64. Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966 Language universals. The Hague, Mouton. Hammel, E. A. 1965 Introduction. In Formal semantic analysis. American Anthropologist 67 (5), pt. 2: 1– 8. Hoffman, Hans 1959 Symbolic logic and the analysis of social organization. Behavioral Science 4: 288– 298. Hymes, Dell 1964 Discussion of Burling's paper. American Anthropologist 66: 116– 119. Katz, Jerrold J. 1966 The philosophy of language. New York, Harper and Row. Kay, Paul 1966 Comments on Colby. Current Anthropology 7: 20– 23. Lamb, Sydney M. 1965 Kinship terminology and linguistic structure. American Anthropologist 67: 37– 64. Leach, E. R. 1965 Claude Lévi-Strauss—anthropologist and philosopher. New Left Review 34: 12– 37. Lenneberg, Eric H. 1967 Biological foundations of language. New York, John Wiley & Sons. Lounsbury, Floyd 1964 A formal account of the Crow- and Omaha-type kinship terminologies. In Explorations in anthropology. W. H. Goodenough, ed New York, McGraw-Hill. Lounsbury, Floyd 1965 Another view of the Trobriand kinship categories. American Anthropologist 67: 142– 185. Nutini, Hugo C. 1967 Anthropology and comparative epistemology. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Washington, D. C., November, 1967. Quine, Willard Van Orman 1960 Word and object. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Romney, A. Kimball, and Roy G. D'Andrade 1964 Cognitive aspects of English kin terms. American Anthropologist 66: 146– 170. Scholte, Bob 1966 Epistemic paradigms: some problems in cross-cultural research on social anthropological history and theory. American Anthropologist 68: 1192– 1201. Suppes, Patrick 1957 Introduction to logic. New York, Van Nostrand. Tyler, S. A. 1966 Whose kinship reckoning? American Anthropologist 68: 513– 516. Voorhees, Thomas E. 1959 The formal analysis and comparison of Yuman kinship systems. M.A. thesis. Stanford University. Citing Literature Volume71, Issue1February 1969Pages 71-79 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)