Pollinator Foraging and the Evolution of Dioecy
1981; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 118; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/283851
ISSN1537-5323
Autores Tópico(s)Fern and Epiphyte Biology
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsPollinator Foraging and the Evolution of DioecyJames H. BeachJames H. Beach Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 118, Number 4Oct., 1981 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/283851 Views: 17Total views on this site Citations: 56Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1981 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:George C. Jarvis, Craig R. White, Dustin J. Marshall Macroevolutionary patterns in marine hermaphroditism, Evolution 4 (Oct 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14639Indiara Nunes Mesquita Ferreira, Raysa Kristine de Oliveira Cavalcante, João Paulo Raimundo Borges, Tamara Poliana de Oliveira Teixeira, Daniel Paiva Silva, Túlio Sá, Edivani Villaron Franceschinelli Two dioecious Simarouba species with a specialized pollination system and low reproductive efficacy in Central Brazil, Rodriguésia 73 (Jan 2022).https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860202273030Rubem S. de Avila Jr, Mardiore Pinheiro Flowering segregation and pollinator distinctiveness contribute to coexistence in an extremely generalist plant group, Plant Ecology & Diversity 14, no.5-65-6 (Feb 2022): 245–253.https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2022.2035839Summar Abbas Naqvi, Waqar Shafqat, Muhammad Salman Haider, Faisal Saeed Awan, Iqrar Ahmad Khan, Muhammad Jafar Jaskani Gender Determination of Date Palm, (Jul 2021): 161–177.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73746-7_7Ting Wu, Ju Tang, Shuang‐Quan Huang Foraging behavior and pollination efficiency of generalist insects in an understory dioecious shrub Helwingia japonica, American Journal of Botany 107, no.99 (Sep 2020): 1274–1282.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1524Jenna T. Draper, John G. Conran, Nicholas Crouch, Philip Weinstein, Bradley S. Simpson Sexual dimorphism in the dioecious monocot Lomandra leucocephala ssp. robusta and its potential ecosystem and conservation significance, Australian Journal of Botany 68, no.44 (Jan 2020): 275.https://doi.org/10.1071/BT20006Eric Wajnberg, Noemi Tel-Zur, Idan Shapira, Yochai Lebber, Simcha Lev-Yadun, Udi Zurgil, Orna Reisman-Berman, Tamar Keasar Pollinator Behavior Drives Sexual Specializations in the Hermaphrodite Flowers of a Heterodichogamous Tree, Frontiers in Plant Science 10 (Oct 2019).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01315Nelson Ramírez, Omaira Hokche Outbreeding and inbreeding strategies in herbaceous-shrubby communities in the Venezuelan Gran Sabana Plateau, AoB PLANTS 11, no.44 (Jun 2019).https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plz032Elsa Youngsteadt, Clyde E Sorenson Failure of Pollen Transport Despite High Bee Visitation in an Endangered Dioecious Shrub, Annals of the Entomological Society of America 112, no.33 (Dec 2018): 169–179.https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/say049Shivani Krishna, Hema Somanathan Intersexual mimicry and flowering phenology facilitate pollination in a dioecious habitat specialist species, Myristica fatua (Myristicaceae), Plant Ecology 219, no.1010 (Aug 2018): 1247–1257.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-018-0875-6Minhua Zhang, Fangliang He Plant sex affects the structure of plant–pollinator networks in a subtropical forest, Oecologia 185, no.22 (Sep 2017): 269–279.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3942-0Itsuki Ohya, Satoshi Nanami, Akira Itoh Dioecious plants are more precocious than cosexual plants: A comparative study of relative sizes at the onset of sexual reproduction in woody species, Ecology and Evolution 7, no.1515 (Jun 2017): 5660–5668.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3117Yoshiaki Kameyama, Manami Watanabe, Hideki Kurosawa, Takuya Nishimori, Daisuke Matsue, Masaaki Takyu Seasonal changes in pollen limitation and femaleness along the snowmelt gradient in a distylous alpine herb, Primula modesta, Ecology and Evolution 5, no.2222 (Oct 2015): 5352–5363.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1803Manju V. Sharma, Joseph E. Armstrong Pollination of Myristica and Other Nutmegs in Natural Populations, Tropical Conservation Science 6, no.55 (Nov 2013): 595–607.https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291300600502M. DUFAY Impact of plant flowering phenology on the cost/benefit balance in a nursery pollination mutualism, with honest males and cheating females, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23, no.55 (May 2010): 977–986.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.01968.xTia-Lynn Ashman Sniffing out patterns of sexual dimorphism in floral scent, Functional Ecology 23, no.55 (Oct 2009): 852–862.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01590.xChristopher J. Borkent, Lawrence D. Harder Flies (Diptera) as pollinators of two dioecious plants: behaviour and implications for plant mating, The Canadian Entomologist 139, no.22 (Apr 2012): 235–246.https://doi.org/10.4039/n05-087Jana C Vamosi, Steven M Vamosi, Spencer C.H Barrett Sex in advertising: dioecy alters the net benefits of attractiveness in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae), Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273, no.15991599 (Jun 2006): 2401–2407.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3599TETSUTO ABE Threatened Pollination Systems in Native Flora of the Ogasawara (Bonin) Islands, Annals of Botany 98, no.22 (Jun 2006): 317–334.https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl117Joseph N. Abraham Insect Choice and Floral Size Dimorphism: Sexual Selection or Natural Selection?, Journal of Insect Behavior 18, no.66 (Nov 2005): 743–756.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-005-8737-1Juan Francisco Ornelas, Clementina González, Leonor Jiménez, Carlos Lara, Armando J. Martínez Reproductive ecology of distylous Palicourea padifolia (Rubiaceae) in a tropical montane cloud forest. II. Attracting and rewarding mutualistic and antagonistic visitors, American Journal of Botany 91, no.77 (Jul 2004): 1061–1069.https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.7.1061Jana C. Vamosi, Steven M. Vamosi THE ROLE OF DIVERSIFICATION IN CAUSING THE CORRELATES OF DIOECY, Evolution 58, no.44 (Jan 2004): 723.https://doi.org/10.1554/03-312Tetsuto Abe Flowering phenology, display size, and fruit set in an understory dioecious shrub, Aucuba japonica (Cornaceae), American Journal of Botany 88, no.33 (Mar 2001): 455–461.https://doi.org/10.2307/2657110Timothy M. A. Utteridge, Richard M. K. Saunders Sexual Dimorphism and Functional Dioecy in Maesa perlarius and M. japonica (Maesaceae/Myrsinaceae)1, BIOTROPICA 33, no.22 (Jan 2001): 368.https://doi.org/10.1646/0006-3606(2001)033[0368:SDAFDI]2.0.CO;2Paulo Eugénio Oliveira, Peter Edward Gibbs Reproductive biology of woody plants in a cerrado community of Central Brazil, Flora 195, no.44 (Dec 2000): 311–329.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0367-2530(17)30990-8Germán Avila-Sakar, César A. Domínguez PARENTAL EFFECTS AND GENDER SPECIALIZATION IN A TROPICAL HETEROSTYLOUS SHRUB, Evolution 54, no.33 (Jan 2000): 866.https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[0866:PEAGSI]2.3.CO;2S. Bopp Peculiarities of the Inner Calyx Surface of Caryophylloideae with Special Regard to Sexual Dimorphism in two Dioecious Species, Plant Biology 1, no.22 (Mar 1999): 207–213.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1999.tb00245.xMarisa Otegui, Andrea Cocucci Flower morphology and biology of Myrsine laetevirens, structural and evolutionary implications of anemophily in Myrsinaceae, Nordic Journal of Botany 19, no.11 (Mar 1999): 71–85.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1999.tb01904.xAnn K. Sakai, Stephen G. Weller Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants: A review of Terminology, Biogeographic Patterns, Ecological Correlates, and Phylogenetic Approaches, (Jan 1999): 1–31.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03908-3_1Anne-Sofie Forfang, Jens M. Olesen Male-biased sex ratio and promiscuous pollination in the dioecious island treeLaurus azorica (Lauraceae), Plant Systematics and Evolution 212, no.3-43-4 (Jan 1998): 143–157.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01089736D.M. Percy, Q.C.B. Cronk Conservation in relation to mating system in Nesohedyotis arborea (Rubiaceae), a rare endemic tree from St Helena, Biological Conservation 80, no.22 (May 1997): 135–145.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00130-9Paulo Eugenio Oliveira Dioecy in the Cerrado vegetation of Central Brazil, Flora 191, no.33 (Jul 1996): 235–243.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0367-2530(17)30718-1Stewart T. Schultz, Fred R. Ganders EVOLUTION OF UNISEXUALITY IN THE HAWAIIAN FLORA: A TEST OF MICROEVOLUTIONARY THEORY, Evolution 50, no.22 (May 2017): 842–855.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03893.xKamaljit S. Bawa Pollinators of tropical dioecious angiosperms: a reassessment? No, not yet, American Journal of Botany 81, no.44 (Apr 1994): 456–460.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1994.tb15470.xSusanne S. Renner, Jan Peter Feil Pollinators of tropical dioecious angiosperms, American Journal of Botany 80, no.99 (Sep 1993): 1100–1107.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1993.tb15337.xMartin T. Morgan ATTRACTIVE STRUCTURES AND THE STABILITY OF HERMAPHRODITIC SEX EXPRESSION IN FLOWERING PLANTS, Evolution 46, no.44 (May 2017): 1199–1213.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb00628.xGuillermo Ibarra-Manríquez, Ken Oyama ECOLOGICAL CORRELATES OF REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS OF MEXICAN RAIN FOREST TREES, American Journal of Botany 79, no.44 (Apr 1992): 383–394.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1992.tb14565.xJoseph E. Armstrong, Anthony K. Irvine FLOWERING, SEX RATIOS, POLLEN‐OVULE RATIOS, FRUIT SET, AND REPRODUCTIVE EFFORT OF A DIOECIOUS TREE, MYRISTICA INSIPIDA (MYRISTICACEAE), IN TWO DIFFERENT RAIN FOREST COMMUNITIES, American Journal of Botany 76, no.11 (Jan 1989): 74–85.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1989.tb11287.xGregory J. Anderson, David E. Symon FUNCTIONAL DIOECY AND ANDROMONOECY IN SOLANUM, Evolution 43, no.11 (May 2017): 204–219.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04218.xKim E. Steiner DIOECISM AND ITS CORRELATES IN THE CAPE FLORA OF SOUTH AFRICA, American Journal of Botany 75, no.1111 (Nov 1988): 1742–1754.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1988.tb11250.xReed S. Beaman, Pamla J. Decker, John H. Beaman POLLINATION OF RAFFLESIA (RAFFLESIACEAE), American Journal of Botany 75, no.88 (Aug 1988): 1148–1162.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1988.tb08828.xM. A. Condon, L. E. Gilbert SEX EXPRESSION OF GURANIA AND PSIGURIA (CUCURBITACEAE): NEOTROPICAL VINES THAT CHANGE SEX, American Journal of Botany 75, no.6Part16Part1 (Jun 1988): 875–884.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1988.tb13511.xJames D. Thomson Effects of variation in inflorescence size and floral rewards on the visitation rates of traplining pollinators ofAralia hispida, Evolutionary Ecology 2, no.11 (Jan 1988): 65–76.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02071589M. Zimmerman Reproduction in Polemonium: factors influencing outbreeding potential, Oecologia 72, no.44 (Jul 1987): 624–632.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378992G. E. Muenchow IS DIOECY ASSOCIATED WITH FLESHY FRUIT?, American Journal of Botany 74, no.22 (Feb 1987): 287–293.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1987.tb08607.xKen Inoue Experimental Studies on Male and Female Reproductive Success: Effects of Variation in Spur Length and Pollinator Activity on Platanthera mandarinorum ssp. hachijoensis (Orchidaceae), Plant Species Biology 1, no.22 (Dec 1986): 207–215.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.1986.tb00028.xJavier Herrera Flowering and fruiting phenology in the coastal shrublands of Doñana, south Spain, Vegetatio 68, no.22 (Dec 1986): 91–98.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045059J. F. Fox Incidence of dioecy in relation to growth form, pollination and dispersal, Oecologia 67, no.22 (Sep 1985): 244–249.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384293PETER G. KEVAN, ANDREW J. LACK Pollination in a cryptically dioecious plant Decaspermum parviflorum (Lam.) A. J. Scott (Myrtaceae) by pollen-collecting bees in Sulawesi, Indonesia, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 25, no.44 (Jan 2008): 319–330.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1985.tb00398.xQ. O. N. Kay, A. J. Lack, F. C. Bamber, C. R. Davies DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SEXES IN FLORAL MORPHOLOGY, NECTAR PRODUCTION AND INSECT VISITS IN A DIOECIOUS SPECIES, SILENE DIOICA, New Phytologist 98, no.33 (Nov 1984): 515–529.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1984.tb04145.x B. Devlin , and A. G. Stephenson Factors that Influence the Duration of the Staminate and Pistillate Phases of Lobelia cardinalis Flowers, Botanical Gazette 145, no.33 (Oct 2015): 323–328.https://doi.org/10.1086/337462 Herbert G. Baker Some Functions of Dioecy in Seed Plants, The American Naturalist 124, no.22 (Oct 2015): 149–158.https://doi.org/10.1086/284260D. CHARLESWORTH Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 22, no.44 (Jan 2008): 333–348.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb01683.xPeter K. Endress, David H. Lorence Diversity and evolutionary trends in the floral structure ofTambourissa (Monimiaceae), Plant Systematics and Evolution 143, no.1-21-2 (Jan 1983): 53–81.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984112ROBERT WYATT Pollinator–Plant Interactions and the Evolution of Breeding Systems, (Jan 1983): 51–95.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-583980-8.50011-9ANDREW G. STEPHENSON, ROBERT I. BERTIN Male Competition, Female Choice, and Sexual Selection in Plants, (Jan 1983): 109–149.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-583980-8.50013-2
Referência(s)