Rawlsians, Christians and Patriots: Maximin justice and individual ethics*
1993; Wiley; Volume: 1; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1468-0378.1993.tb00088.x
ISSN1468-0378
Autores Tópico(s)Philosophical Ethics and Theory
ResumoEuropean Journal of PhilosophyVolume 1, Issue 3 p. 309-342 Rawlsians, Christians and Patriots: Maximin justice and individual ethics* Philippe Van Parijs, Philippe Van Parijs Université catholique de LouvainSearch for more papers by this author Philippe Van Parijs, Philippe Van Parijs Université catholique de LouvainSearch for more papers by this author First published: December 1993 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.1993.tb00088.xCitations: 8 † *This article grew, in directions I did not anticipate, out of a sequence of talks given in various places in the course of the academic year 1992-93: at a meeting of the Institut International de Philosophie on ‘Public and private morality’ (Liège, 2 September 1992), at the Philosophy Department of Bristol University (Bristol, 12 February 1993), at the conference on ‘Democracy and consensus. A debate around John Rawls' (Oxford, 13 February 1993), at the Philosophy Department of the Université du Québec (Montréal, 7 April 1993), at the Legal Theory Workshop of Yale Law School (New Haven, 8 April 1993), at the Séminaire de philosophie comtemporaine of the Université catholique de Louvain (Louvain-la-Neuve, 22 April 1993), at the Faculty of economic and social sciences of the Université catholique de Fribourg (Fribourg, 11 May 1993), at the Theology Faculty of the Université de Genève (Geneva, 12 May 1993), at the Philosophy Department of Fu Jen University (Taipei, 29 May 1993) and at the Faculty of Sociology and Politics of the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (Barcelona, 19 June 1993). I am particularly grateful to Bruce Ackerman, Karl-Otto Apel, Christian Arnsperger, Ruth Barcan-Marcus, Brian Barry, Chris Bertram, John Broome, Jerry Cohen, Jocelyne Couture, Geneviève de Pesloüan, Toni Domènech, Paul Dumouchel, Ronald Dworkin, Owen Fiss, Marc Fleurbaey, Andreas Follesdal, Keith Graham, Steven Lukes, Adam Morton, Robert Nadeau, Kai Nielsen, Onora O'Neill, John Passmore, Michael Rosen, Dan Weinstock, and above all John Baker and Joe Carens, for stimulating oral and/or written comments. A much abridged version of this article is due to appear in the proceedings of two of the meetings at which an earlier version of it was presented: a special issue of Philosophica (Ghent, Belgium) on ’Public and private morality‘ and a special issue of Ratio Juris (Bologna, Italy) on ’Democracy and consensus‘. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Akerlof, G. A. (1982), ‘ Tabor contracts as partial gift exchange’, in G. A. Akerlof & J. L. Yellen (eds.), Efficiency Wage Models of the Labor Market. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. Arneson, R. J. (1990), ‘Liberalism, distributive subjectivism, and equal opportunity for welfare’, in Philosophy and Public Affairs 19, pp. 158–94. Arnold, N. S. (1985), ‘Capitalists and the ethics of contribution’, in Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15, pp. 87–102. Baker, J. (1988), Arguing for Equality. London : Verso. Baker, J. (1992), ‘ An egalitarian case for basic income’, in P. Parijs (ed.), Arguing for Basic Income. Ethical Foundations for a Radical Reform. London : Verso. Barry, B. (1989), Theories of Justice. London : Harvester-Wheatsheaf. Barry, B. (1992), ‘ Equality Yes, Basic Income No’, in P. Parijs (ed.), Arguing for Basic Income: Ethical Foundations for a Radical Reform. London : Verso. Bowles, S. (1985), ‘The production process in a competitive economy: Walrasian, neo-Hobbesian and Marxian models’, in American Economic Review 75, pp. 16–36. Carens, J. H. (1981), Equality, Moral Incentives and the Market. Chicago : University of Chicago Press. Carens, J. H. (1985), ‘Compensatory justice and social institutions’, in Economics and Philosophy 1, pp. 39–67. Carens, J. H. (1986), ‘Rights and duties in an egalitarian society’, in Political Theory 14 (1), pp. 31–49. Cohen, G. A. (1992a), ‘ Incentives, Inequality and Community’, in The Tanner Lectures on Human Values Vol. XIII. Salt Lake City : University of Utah Press. Cohen, G. A. (1992b), ‘ The Pareto Argument for Inequality’, Oxford : All Souls College, June 1992. Cohen, G. A. (1992c), ‘ Mind the Gap’, in London Review of Books 14.5.1992, pp. 15–17. Dworkin, R. (1977), Taking Rights Seriously. London : Duckworth. Dworkin, R. (1981), ‘What is Equality? Part I. Equality of Welfare’, in Philosophy and Public Affairs 10, pp. 185–246. Ezorsky, G. (1981), ‘On Refined Utilitarianism’, in Journal of Philosophy 78, pp. 156–9. Grey, T. C. (1973), ‘The First Virtue’, in Stanford Law Review 25, pp. 286–327. Lange, O. (1937), ‘On the Economic Theory of Socialism. Part II’, in Review of Economic Studies 5, pp. 123–142. Meade, J. E. (1973), Theory of Economic Externalities. Leiden : Sijthoff. Moon, J. D. (1983), ‘Review of Carens’ (1981), in Ethics 93, pp. 146–50. Musgrave, R. A. (1974), ‘Maximin, uncertainty, and the leisure trade-off’, in Quarterly Journal of Economics 88, pp. 625–632. Nagel, T. (1991), Equality and Partiality. Oxford : Oxford University Press. Narveson, J. F. (1976), ‘A Puzzle about Economic Justice in Rawls's Theory’, in Social Theory and Practice 4, pp. 1–27. Narveson, J. F. (1978), ‘Rawls on Equal Distribution of Wealth’, in Philosophia 7, pp. 281–92. Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice. Oxford : Oxford University Press. Rawls, J. (1974), ‘Reply to Alexander and Musgrave’, in Quarterly Journal of Economics 88, pp. 633–55. Rawls, J. (1975), ‘Fairness to Goodness’, in Philosophical Review 84. Rawls, J. (1988), ‘The Priority of Right and Ideas of the Good’, in Philosophy and Public Affairs 17, pp. 251–76. Rawls, J. (1990), Justice as Fairness. A Restatement. Harvard University, unpublished lecture notes. Rawls, J. (1993a), Political Liberalism. New York : Columbia University Press. Rawls, J. (1993b), The Law of Peoples. Amnesty International Lecture, Oxford University, 12 February 1993. Scanlon, T. M. (1991), ‘ The Moral Basis of Interpersonal Comparisons’, in J. Elster & J. E. Roemer (eds.), Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-being. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. Ten, C. L. (1980), Mill on Liberty. Oxford : Clarendon Press. Van Parijs, P. (1990), ‘Equal Endowments as Undominated Diversity’, in Recherches Economiques de Louvain 56, pp. 327–356. Van Parijs, P. (1991) ‘Why Surfers Should be Fed. The liberal case for an unconditional basic income’, in Philosophy and Public Affairs, 20, pp. 101–31. Van Parijs, P. (1992), ‘Basic income capitalism’, in Ethics, 102, pp. 465–84. Van Parijs, P. (1994), ‘ Free riding versus rent sharing. Why even David Gauthier should support a basic income’, in F. Farina & S. Vannucci (eds.), Ethics, Rationality and Economic Behaviour. Oxford : Oxford University Press. Citing Literature Volume1, Issue3December 1993Pages 309-342 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)