Failures of Volition: Female Agency and Infertility in Historical Perspective
1990; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 15; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/494606
ISSN1545-6943
Autores Tópico(s)Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessFailures of Volition: Female Agency and Infertility in Historical PerspectiveMargarete J. SandelowskiMargarete J. SandelowskiPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Signs Volume 15, Number 3Spring, 1990The Ideology of Mothering: Disruption and Reproduction of Patriarchy Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/494606 Views: 81Total views on this site Citations: 70Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1990 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Nolwenn Bühler When Time Becomes Biological: Experiences of Age-Related Infertility and Anticipation in Reproductive Medicine, (Sep 2022): 49–65.https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80071-733-620221006Swayamshree Mishra, Ravinder Kaur "If I cannot give birth to a child, why would anyone accept me?": Menstrual anxieties, late marriage, and reproductive aging, Asian Journal of Women's Studies 27, no.44 (Nov 2021): 535–554.https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2021.1995154Andrea Carson, Fiona Webster, Jessica Polzer, Sandra Bamford The power of potential: Assisted reproduction and the counterstories of women who discontinue fertility treatment, Social Science & Medicine 282 (Aug 2021): 114153.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114153Daniela Bandelli Abolitionist and Regulatory Arguments into Perspectives, (Nov 2021): 123–149.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80302-5_8Camille Bajeux Managing masculinities. Doctors, men, and men's partners facing male infertility in France and French-speaking Switzerland (c. 1890–1970), NORMA 15, no.3-43-4 (Aug 2020): 235–250.https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2020.1805887Rebecca D. Feasey Infertility and the Barren Woman, (Jul 2020): 1–5.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119429128.iegmc160Eleanor Naiman Educated To Death? Women's Higher Education, Reproductive Health, And The Scientific Method In The United States, 1870-1900, Swarthmore Undergraduate History Journal 1, no.11 (Jan 2020): 72–93.https://doi.org/10.24968/2693-244X.1.3Susan Dierickx, Gily Coene, Megan Evans, Julie Balen, Chia Longman, Joshua Amo-Adjei The fertile grounds of reproductive activism in The Gambia: A qualitative study of local key stakeholders' understandings and heterogeneous actions related to infertility, PLOS ONE 14, no.1212 (Dec 2019): e0226079.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226079Ann V. Bell "Trying to Have your Own First; It's What you Do": The Relationship Between Adoption and Medicalized Infertility, Qualitative Sociology 42, no.33 (May 2019): 479–498.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-09421-3Rebecca Feasey Introduction: Infertility and Non-Traditional Family Building, (Jul 2019): 1–36.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17787-4_1Rebecca Feasey Adoption: Eligibility, Assessment and Selection, (Jul 2019): 189–247.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17787-4_5Lisa Guntram Hooked on a feeling? Exploring desires and 'solutions' in infertility accounts given by women with 'atypical' sex development, Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 22, no.33 (Apr 2017): 259–276.https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459317693403Tracey Loughran Conditions of Illusion: Agency, Feminism, and Cultural Representations of Infertility in Britain, c. 1960–80, (Jul 2017): 431–459.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52080-7_23Elizabeth A. Sternke, Kathleen Abrahamson Perceptions of Women with Infertility on Stigma and Disability, Sexuality and Disability 33, no.11 (May 2014): 3–17.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-014-9348-6Robin E. Jensen From Barren to Sterile: The Evolution of a Mixed Metaphor, Rhetoric Society Quarterly 45, no.11 (Jan 2015): 25–46.https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2014.957413Sara Niner, Denise Cuthbert, Yarina Ahmad Good Mothers, Bad Mothers, Feminist Media Studies 14, no.66 (Dec 2013): 993–1011.https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2013.854822Ann V. Bell Diagnostic diversity: The role of social class in diagnostic experiences of infertility, Sociology of Health & Illness 36, no.44 (Oct 2013): 516–530.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12083Jack Simmons, Leigh E. Rich Feminism Ain't Funny: Woman as "Fun-Killer," Mother as Monster in the American Sitcom, Advances in Journalism and Communication 01, no.0101 (Jan 2013): 1–12.https://doi.org/10.4236/ajc.2013.11001Hilla Haelyon The Psychological Needs of Women Undergoing IVF Treatment, Journal of Reproductive and Stem Cell Biotechnology 1, no.22 (Dec 2010): 212–218.https://doi.org/10.1177/205891581000100208Joan Rankin Commentary on Treatment of Infertile Couples Using Reproductive Technologies: A Complex Matrix, Clinical Social Work Journal 37, no.22 (Mar 2009): 150–154.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-009-0197-1Nermin G?rhan, Derya Atici, Ayg?l Aky?z, Sezer Kisa Association of Depression and Anxiety with Oocyte and Sperm Numbers and Pregnancy Outcomes during in vitro Fertilization Treatment, Psychological Reports 104, no.33 (Jun 2009): 796–806.https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.104.3.796-806Fabíola Rohden O império dos hormônios e a construção da diferença entre os sexos, História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos 15, no.supplsuppl (Jan 2008): 133–152.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702008000500007Marianne Johansson, Marie Berg Women's experiences of childlessness 2 years after the end of in vitro fertilization treatment, Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 19, no.11 (Mar 2005): 58–63.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2005.00319.xMaili Malin Good, Bad and Troublesome, European Journal of Women's Studies 10, no.33 (Jul 2016): 301–319.https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506803010003004Irina L.G. Todorova, Tatyana Kotzeva Social discourses, women's resistive voices: facing involuntary childlessness in bulgaria, Women's Studies International Forum 26, no.22 (Mar 2003): 139–151.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(03)00018-9Gayle Letherby Challenging Dominant Discourses: Identity and change and the experience of 'infertility' and 'involuntary childlessness', Journal of Gender Studies 11, no.33 (Aug 2010): 277–288.https://doi.org/10.1080/0958923022000021241Gayle Letherby 'Claims and Disclaimers: Knowledge, Reflexivity and Representation in Feminist Research', Sociological Research Online 6, no.44 (Nov 2017): 81–93.https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.665Helen T. Allan Nursing the clinic and managing emotions in a fertility unit: Findings from an ethnographic study, Human Fertility 4, no.11 (Jul 2009): 18–23.https://doi.org/10.1080/1464727012000199211Miriam Ulrich, Ann Weatherall Motherhood and Infertility: Viewing Motherhood through the Lens of Infertility, Feminism & Psychology 10, no.33 (Jul 2016): 323–336.https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353500010003003Gayle Letherby Other than mother and mothers as others, Women's Studies International Forum 22, no.33 (May 1999): 359–372.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(99)00028-XElizabeth C. Britt Infertility as a medical problem: Recasting feminist accounts of nature, science, and the law, Science as Culture 7, no.22 (Jun 1998): 265–284.https://doi.org/10.1080/09505439809526504Mike Lloyd The Language of Reproduction: Is it Doctored?, Qualitative Health Research 7, no.22 (Jul 2016): 184–201.https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239700700202Irma Van der Ploeg Hermaphrodite Patients: In Vitro Fertilization and the Transformation of Male Infertility, Science, Technology, & Human Values 20, no.44 (Aug 2016): 460–481.https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399502000404Celeste Michelle Condit Hegemony in a mass‐mediated society: Concordance about reproductive technologies 1, Critical Studies in Mass Communication 11, no.33 (Sep 1994): 205–230.https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039409366899JUDITH LORBER, LAKSHMI BANDLAMUDI THE DYNAMICS OF MARITAL BARGAINING IN MALE INFERTILITY, Gender & Society 7, no.11 (Mar 1993): 32–49.https://doi.org/10.1177/089124393007001003Douglas T. Kenrick, Richard C. Keefe Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 75–91.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067595Thomas R. Alley Perceived age, physical attractiveness and sex differences in preferred mates' ages, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 92–92.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067601Betty M. Bayer On the separation of reproduction from mating preferences, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 92–93.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067613Peter Borkenau Age preferences: The crucial studies have yet to be done, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 93–94.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067625Gwen J. Broude The May-September algorithm meets the 20th century actuarial table, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 94–95.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067637Donn Byrne, Kathryn Kelley Differential age preferences: The need to test evolutionary versus alternative conceptualizations, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 96–96.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067649Charles Crawford Sex differences in age preferences for mates: Primary and secondary predictions from evolutionary theory, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 97–98.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067650Donald A. Dewsbury Continuing a long tradition, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 98–98.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067662John Dupré Arbitrariness and bias in evolutionary speculation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 98–99.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067674David C. Funder Toward a nonarbitrary social psychology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 99–100.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067686Norval D. Glenn Toward a more complete integration of evolutionary and other perspectives on age preferences in mates, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 100–100.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067698Karl Grammer Variations on a theme: Age dependent mate selection in humans, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 100–102.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067704Henry Harpending Age differences between mates in southern African pastoralists, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 102–103.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067716George Levinger, Lee A. Kirkpatrick Biological versus social psychological bases of mate selection, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 103–104.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067728Richard Lippa On building bridges between social psychology and evolutionary biology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 104–105.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0006773XLinda Mealey Individual differences in reproductive tactics: Cuing, assessment, and facultative strategies, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 105–106.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067741Christopher A. Moffatt, Randy J. Nelson May/December romance: Adaptive significance non probabilis est, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 106–107.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067753D. W. Rajecki, Jeffrey Lee Rasmussen Personal ads as deviant and unsatisfactory: Support for evolutionary hypotheses, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 107–107.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067765J. Philippe Rushton Age similarity is genetic similarity, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 108–108.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067777P. A. Russell The evolutionary model is synthetic not heuristic, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 108–109.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067789Robert Schoen Marital choice and reproductive strategies, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 109–109.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067790Jeffry A. Simpson Half a theory and half the data for half the people?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 109–110.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067807Steven A. Sloman, Leon Sloman What does evolution tell us about age preferences?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 110–111.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067819Walter G. Stephan Sexual motivation, patriarchy and compatibility, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 111–112.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067820Gillian Stevens Mortality and age-specific patterns of marriage, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 112–113.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067832Donald Symons What do men want?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 113–114.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067844Nancy Wilmsen Thornhill, Patrick A. A. Thornhill The preferred age of a potential mate reflects evolved male sexual psychology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 114–115.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067856John Marshall Townsend Measuring the magnitude of sex differences, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 115–116.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067868Pierre L. van den Berghe Wanting and getting ain't the same, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 116–117.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0006787XArie J. van Noordwijk, Jacqui A. Shykoff Accounting for age preferences in sexual selection, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 117–118.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067881Kim Wallen Evolutionary hypothesis testing: Consistency is not enough, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 118–119.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067893Douglas T. Kenrick, Richard C. Keefe Sex differences in age preference: Universal reality or ephemeral construction?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15, no.11 (May 2011): 119–133.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0006790XJennifer Strickler The new reproductive technology: problem or solution?, Sociology of Health and Illness 14, no.11 (Mar 1992): 111–132.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11007191Franz M. Wuketits Human Society as a Natural Phenomenon, Politics and the Life Sciences 9, no.22 (May 2016): 308–310.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0730938400011035Christine Overall Access to In Vitro Fertilization: Costs, Care and Consent, Dialogue 30, no.33 (Apr 2010): 383–398.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217300011732
Referência(s)