Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Ecology, longevity and naked mole-rats: confounding effects of sociality?

2015; Royal Society; Volume: 282; Issue: 1802 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1098/rspb.2014.1664

1471-2954

Scott A. Williams, Milena R. Shattuck,

Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

You have accessMoreSectionsView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Cite this article Williams Scott A. and Shattuck Milena R. 2015Ecology, longevity and naked mole-rats: confounding effects of sociality?Proc. R. Soc. B.2822014166420141664http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1664SectionSupplemental MaterialYou have accessComments and invited repliesEcology, longevity and naked mole-rats: confounding effects of sociality? Scott A. Williams Scott A. Williams Center for the Study of Human Origins, Department of Anthropology, New York University, 25 Waverly Place, New York, NY 10003, USA New York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology, New York, NY 10024, USA Evolutionary Studies Institute and Center for Excellence in PalaeoSciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa [email protected] Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author and Milena R. Shattuck Milena R. Shattuck Center for the Study of Human Origins, Department of Anthropology, New York University, 25 Waverly Place, New York, NY 10003, USA Department of Anthropology, Hunter College, City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author Scott A. Williams Scott A. Williams Center for the Study of Human Origins, Department of Anthropology, New York University, 25 Waverly Place, New York, NY 10003, USA New York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology, New York, NY 10024, USA Evolutionary Studies Institute and Center for Excellence in PalaeoSciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa [email protected] Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed and Milena R. Shattuck Milena R. Shattuck Center for the Study of Human Origins, Department of Anthropology, New York University, 25 Waverly Place, New York, NY 10003, USA Department of Anthropology, Hunter College, City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Published:07 March 2015https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1664Healy et al. [1] contribute an excellent analysis of maximum lifespan records for nearly 1400 bird and mammal species. Consistent with the predictions of the evolutionary theory of ageing, their results suggest that behaviours which reduce extrinsic mortality have allowed the evolution of increased longevity. Notably, the ability to escape predators in multiple dimensions [2] seems to be particularly important; confirming previous studies (e.g. [3]), Healy et al. find that both volant and non-volant arboreal species demonstrate longer lifespans than non-volant terrestrial species. The authors also find that fossoriality is associated with increased longevity and suggest that this is due to the ability of fossorial mammals to escape predators and other potential sources of extrinsic mortality such as inclement weather or other unfavourable conditions. Naked mole-rats are touted as an example of an extremely long-lived fossorial mammal, especially when body size is taken into account. While we do not contest this fact, we suggest that naked mole-rats and some relatives in the family Bathyergidae are exceptional among fossorial mammals because other factors, such as sociality, play large and perhaps primary roles in their increased longevity [4,5]. Namely, species in the bathyergid genera Heterocephalus and Fukomys are eusocial [4–7], a factor that has been shown to be highly correlated with longevity in insects [8]. Here, we analyse a large dataset of fossorial mammals (N = 101 compared with N = 10 in [1]) and test the hypothesis that increased longevity is related to fossoriality and eusocial tendencies.Many fossorial mammals build elaborate tunnel systems that provide protection from surface predators and climatic extremes [9,10]. Therefore, one hypothesis to explain the exceptional lifespan potential observed in Heterocephalus glaber (naked mole-rats) is fossoriality [1,8,11–13]. Alternatively, social factors may play a primary role in Heterocephalus longevity [4,5]. Keller & Genoud [8] demonstrated convincingly that the evolution of eusociality is associated with significant increases in longevity in ants. Like eusocial insects, Heterocephalus and other eusocial bathyergids (genus Fukomys) are characterized by overlapping generations, reproductive division of labour and cooperative breeding [4,6,7], meeting the original requirements of eusociality [14]. This social system, in which the breeding female (i.e. 'queen') and one to several breeding males are both protected and provisioned by non-breeders, ensures that breeders rarely encounter predators and therefore experience low extrinsic mortality [6]. Among mammals, 'true' eusociality is unknown outside of Bathyergidae; however, some other mammals, namely within Carnivora and Primates, demonstrate eusocial behavioural tendencies [7,15,16], most notably Suricata suricatta (meerkats) and Helogale parvula (dwarf mongooses), cooperatively breeding herpestids that demonstrate marked reproductive skew [7,15,17]. For example, in Helogale, as in eusocial bathyergids, the breeding pair receives food priority and protection from subordinate members and is rarely tasked with predator confrontation [16].To determine the role of both fossoriality and sociality on senescence, maximum lifespan records and average, pooled-sex body masses for ground-dwelling mammals (excluding arboreal and aquatic mammals) were compiled using AnAge (http://genomics.senescence.info/species/) [18] and other sources [19–21]. Since fossorial and eusocial-like species are restricted to smaller body sizes, we do not include mammals larger than 60 kg, a boundary that is approached by the largest semi-fossorial and eusocial-like mammals, aardvarks and humans, respectively. Healy et al. test the efficacy of data for species with at least 10 maximum lifespan records versus those with 100+ as recorded on the AnAge website and demonstrate that the datasets produce similar results. In an effort to increase sample size of usable taxa while bearing in mind that data can be biased by sample size [2,18], we too use the sample size and data quality criteria of AnAge. However, species whose records are considered 'not yet established' due to low sample size or questionable data quality, or those not listed on AnAge, presumably for the same reason, are targeted and compared with closely related taxa using standardized residuals generated from reduced major axis (RMA) regression on the entire dataset. If these species produce residuals that are substantially lower than those of close relatives, they are removed from the dataset; however, if the residuals are similar or higher than those of species with 'acceptable' data quality in AnAge, the longevity records in question are retained in the dataset. The reduced dataset consists of 440 ground-dwelling mammals (electronic supplementary material, appendix 1).Species were organized into two categories: terrestrial (including occasional burrowers that burrow only to construct nests for offspring or those that use shallow, simple burrows, in addition to terrestrial mammals that do not burrow) (N = 339) and fossorial (including mammals that spend time above ground but shelter in sealed or complex burrows, in addition to subterranean mammals that spend the majority of time underground) (N = 101), following Healy et al. [1] and using multiple sources [9,10,19,22] (electronic supplementary material, appendix 1). For social categories, mammals were divided into 'eusocial' (those demonstrating strong eusocial behavioural tendencies) (N = 17) and non-eusocial (solitary and social) (N = 423) species using several sources [7,15,16]. Although the definition of eusociality is debated, authorities are in agreement that cooperative breeding and high reproductive skew are two important requirements [14].ANOVA demonstrates that body mass explains 31.4% of the variation in maximum lifespan, sociality 3.3% and habitat less than 0.01%. A generalized linear model shows that, as with body mass, the inclusion of sociality significantly improves the model (p < 0.001), whereas habitat does not (p = 0.802). Using RMA regression and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with a Bonferroni post-hoc test for multiple comparisons (electronic supplementary material, appendix 2), we find that terrestrial and fossorial slopes are not significantly different (p = 0.807), whereas an elevated 'eusocial' regression line over the non-eusocial line reaches borderline significance (p = 0.064) (figure 1). Analyses of phylogenetically independent contrasts (PIC) take relatedness among species into account and thus correct for phylogenetic structure of the dataset [23]. Results of analyses of PIC generate significant results for both habitat and sociality (p < 0.05), suggesting that both factors play significant roles in increases in longevity (electronic supplementary material, appendix 2). Therefore, we find support for Healy et al.'s [1] results on fossoriality with a 10-fold larger sample size, and we additionally identify eusocial-like behaviour as another factor that is associated with increased longevity. Figure 1. log10–log10 maximum lifespan and mean body mass in ground-dwelling mammals. Data points and ordinary least squares regression lines are shown for fossorial (open circles; (a) solid-black line) and terrestrial (closed circles; (a) dashed-red line) and 'eusocial' (open squares; (b) solid-black line) and non-eusocial (closed squares; (b) dashed-red line) mammals. The human data point is not shown but is included in some analyses; its inclusion or exclusion, however, does not significantly affect the results.Download figureOpen in new tabDownload PowerPointIndeed, high LQs (longevity quotients) are observed in subterranean mammals (e.g. Spalax ehrenbergi, the blind mole-rat, LQ = 1.7, and Spalacopus cyanus, the cururo, LQ = 1.4) and mammals that demonstrate eusocial tendencies (e.g. Helogale = 1.8, and Suricata = 1.6, compared with other herpestids, mean LQ = 1.0) (electronic supplementary material, appendix 1). The family Bathyergidae includes eusocial and non-eusocial species, all of which are entirely fossorial [4–7]. While maximum lifespan records are not yet well-established for the solitary (Georychus capensis) and social (genus Cryptomys) species, the eusocial species produce some of the highest LQs in the dataset (Heterocephalus = 4.9; Fukomys anselli = 2.7; Fukomys damarensis = 1.7). We suggest that these extreme longevities evolved in the context of eusociality and protection in the relative safety of a complex and heavily defended burrow system. By contrast, while pocket gophers live on average slightly less than expected (average LQ = 0.94), afrotherian and placental moles are characteristically short-lived (average LQ = 0.38 and 0.62, respectively).Although not strictly eusocial, another highly social mammal that demonstrates overlapping generations, reproductive division of labour, and a unique kind of cooperative breeding and reproductive skew, Homo sapiens [24,25], has adopted additional cultural and defensive strategies to reduce extrinsic mortality [26] and likewise demonstrates a high LQ (3.5). We commend Healy et al. on their excellent work, probably the best and most sophisticated study of its kind to date. Our preliminary data suggest that other factors such as sociality have influenced the evolution of longevity in birds and particularly mammals, a hypothesis that requires subsequent testing, ideally using nuanced phylogenetic approaches such as those developed by Healy et al. [1].Footnotes© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.References1Healy K, et al.2014Ecology and mode-of-life explain lifespan variation in birds and mammals. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20140298. (10.1098/rspb.2014.0298). Link, ISI, Google Scholar2Møller AP. 2010Up, up, and away: relative importance of horizontal and vertical escape from predators for survival and senescence. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 1689–1698. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02034.x). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar3Shattuck MR& Williams SA. 2010Arboreality has allowed for the evolution of increased longevity in mammals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 4635–4639. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0911439107). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar4Bennett NC& Faulkes CG. 2000African mole-rats: ecology and eusociality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar5Dammann P& Burda H. 2007Senescence patterns in African mole-rats (Bathyergidae, Rodentia). Subterranean rodents: news from underground (eds , Begall S, Burda H& Schleich CE), pp. 251–263. Berlin, Germany: Springer. Crossref, Google Scholar6Lacey EA& Sherman PW. 1991Social organization of naked mole-rat colonies: evidence for a division of labor. The biology of the naked mole-rat (eds , Sherman PW, Jarvis JUM& Alexander RD), pp. 275–336. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar7Solomon NG& French JA. 1997Cooperative breeding in mammals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar8Keller L& Genoud M. 1997Extraordinary lifespans in ants: a test of evolutionary theories of aging. Nature 389, 958–960. (doi:10.1038/40130). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar9Nevo E. 1999Mosaic evolution of subterranean mammals: regression, progression and global convergence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar10Reichman OJ& Smith SC. 1990Burrows and burrowing behavior by mammals. Current mammalogy (ed. & Genoways HH), pp. 197–244. New York, NY: Plenum Press. Google Scholar11de Magalhaes JP, Costa J& Church GM. 2007An analysis of the relationship between metabolism, developmental schedules, and longevity using phylogenetic independent contrasts. J. Gerontol. 62A, 149–160. (doi:10.1093/gerona/62.2.149). Crossref, Google Scholar12Perez VI, et al.2009Protein stability and resistance to oxidative stress are determinants of longevity in the longest-living rodent, the naked mole-rat. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3059–3064. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0809620106). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar13Gorbunova V, Seluanov A, Zhang Z, Gladyshev VN& Vijg J. 2014Comparative genetics of longevity and cancer: insights from long-lived rodents. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 531–540. (doi:10.1038/nrg3728). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar14Costa JT& Fitzgerald TD. 1996Developments in social terminology: semantic battles in a conceptual war. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 285–289. (doi:10.1016/0169-5347(96)10035-5). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar15Clutton-Brock T. 2009Structure and function in mammalian societies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 3229–3242. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0120). Link, ISI, Google Scholar16Hager R& Jones CB. 2009Reproductive skew in vertebrates: proximate and ultimate causes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar17Rasa OAE. 1987The dwarf mongoose: a study of behavior and social structure in relation to ecology in a small, social carnivore. Adv. Stud. Behav. 17, 121–163. (doi:10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60178-3). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar18de Magalhaes JP& Costa J. 2009A database of vertebrate longevity records and their relation to other life-history traits. J. Evol. Biol. 22, 1770–1774. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01783.x). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar19Nowak RM. 1999Walker's mammals of the world, 6th edn. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar20Carey JR& Judge DS. 2000Longevity records: life spans of mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles, and fish. Odense, Denmark: Odense University Press. Google Scholar21Jones KE, et al.2009PanTHERIA: a species-level database of life history, ecology, and geography of extant and recently extinct mammals. Ecology 90, 2648. (doi:10.1890/08-1494.1). Crossref, Google Scholar22Hutchins M, Kleiman DG, Geist V& McDade MC. 2003Grzimek's animal life encyclopedia, 2nd edn. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale Group. Google Scholar23Felsenstein J. 1985Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1–15. (doi:10.1086/284325). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar24Hawkes K. 2003Grandmothers and the evolution of human longevity. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 15, 380–400. (doi:10.1002/ajhb.10156). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar25Foster KR& Ratnieks FLW. 2005A new eusocial vertebrate?Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 263–364. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.03.001). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar26Burkart JM, Hrdy SB& van Schaik CP. 2009Cooperative breeding and human cognitive evolution. Evol. Anthropol. 18, 175–186. (doi:10.1002/evan.20222). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar Next Article VIEW FULL TEXT DOWNLOAD PDF FiguresRelatedReferencesDetailsCited byKorb J and Heinze J (2021) Ageing and sociality: why, when and how does sociality change ageing patterns?, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 376:1823, Online publication date: 26-Apr-2021. Lucas E, Keller L and Lemaître J (2019) The co‐evolution of longevity and social life, Functional Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2435.13445, 34:1, (76-87), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020. Rocha L, Terenius O, Veissier I, Meunier B and Nielsen P (2020) Persistence of sociality in group dynamics of dairy cattle, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104921, 223, (104921), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2020. Gaillard J, Lemaître J and Fox C (2020) An integrative view of senescence in nature, Functional Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2435.13506, 34:1, (4-16), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020. Zhang B and Gladyshev V (2020) How can aging be reversed? Exploring rejuvenation from a damage‐based perspective, Advanced Genetics, 10.1002/ggn2.10025, 1:1, Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020. Moorad J, Promislow D and Silvertown J (2019) Evolutionary Ecology of Senescence and a Reassessment of Williams' 'Extrinsic Mortality' Hypothesis, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10.1016/j.tree.2019.02.006, 34:6, (519-530), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2019. Veitschegger K, Kolb C, Amson E and Sánchez-Villagra M (2018) Longevity and life history of cave bears – a review and novel data from tooth cementum and relative emergence of permanent dentition, Historical Biology, 10.1080/08912963.2018.1441293, 31:4, (510-516), Online publication date: 21-Apr-2019. Minias P, Włodarczyk R, Meissner W and Husak J (2017) Leukocyte profiles are associated with longevity and survival, but not migratory effort: A comparative analysis of shorebirds, Functional Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2435.12991, 32:2, (369-378), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2018. Stark G, Tamar K, Itescu Y, Feldman A and Meiri S (2018) Cold and isolated ectotherms: drivers of reptilian longevity, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 10.1093/biolinnean/bly153, 125:4, (730-740), Online publication date: 26-Nov-2018. Downing P, Cornwallis C and Griffin A (2016) How to make a sterile helper, BioEssays, 10.1002/bies.201600136, 39:1, (e201600136), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017. Schmidt H, Malik A, Bicker A, Poetzsch G, Avivi A, Shams I and Hankeln T (2017) Hypoxia tolerance, longevity and cancer-resistance in the mole rat Spalax – a liver transcriptomics approach, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/s41598-017-13905-z, 7:1, Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017. Bašić T and Britton J (2016) Characterizing the trophic niches of stocked and resident cyprinid fishes: consistency in partitioning over time, space and body sizes, Ecology and Evolution, 10.1002/ece3.2272, 6:14, (5093-5104), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016. Rézouki C, Tafani M, Cohas A, Loison A, Gaillard J, Allainé D, Bonenfant C and Boulinier T (2016) Socially mediated effects of climate change decrease survival of hibernating Alpine marmots, Journal of Animal Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2656.12507, 85:3, (761-773), Online publication date: 1-May-2016. Healy K (2015) Eusociality but not fossoriality drives longevity in small mammals, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282:1806, Online publication date: 7-May-2015.Downing P, Cornwallis C and Griffin A (2015) Sex, long life and the evolutionary transition to cooperative breeding in birds, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282:1816, Online publication date: 7-Oct-2015. Noonan M, Newman C, Buesching C and Macdonald D (2015) Evolution and function of fossoriality in the Carnivora: implications for group-living, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10.3389/fevo.2015.00116, 3 Thorley J (2020) The case for extended lifespan in cooperatively breeding mammals: a re-appraisal, PeerJ, 10.7717/peerj.9214, 8, (e9214) This Issue07 March 2015Volume 282Issue 1802 Article InformationDOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1664PubMed:25631992Published by:Royal SocietyOnline ISSN:1471-2954History: Manuscript received06/07/2014Manuscript accepted13/11/2014Published online07/03/2015Published in print07/03/2015 License:© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved. Citations and impact Subjectsecologyevolution Large datasets are available through Proceedings B's partnership with Dryad