Effects of Blockage on Airfoils and Wings at High Angles of Attack
2015; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; Volume: 52; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2514/1.c033119
ISSN1533-3868
Autores Tópico(s)Aerospace and Aviation Technology
ResumoNo AccessEngineering NoteEffects of Blockage on Airfoils and Wings at High Angles of AttackLance W. TraubLance W. TraubAerospace and Mechanical Engineering Department, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, Arizona 86301*Associate Professor, Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Department. Senior Member AIAA.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:4 Feb 2015https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C033119SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Laino D. J., “AeroDyn,” http://wind.nrel.gov/designcodes/simulators/aerodyn/ [retrieved 22 July 2014]. Google Scholar[2] Wenzinger C. J. and Harris T. A., “Wind Tunnel Force Tests in Wing Systems Through Large Angles of Attack,” NACA Rept. 294, Aug. 1928. Google Scholar[3] Pope A., “The Forces and Pressures over an NACA 0015 Airfoil Through 180 Degrees Angle of Attack,” Georgia Inst. of Technology TR-E-102, Atlanta, 1947. Google Scholar[4] Wick B. H., “Study of the Subsonic Forces and Moments on an Inclined Plate of Infinite Span,” NACA TN-3221, June 1954. Google Scholar[5] Critzos C. C., Heyson H. H. and Boswinkle R. W., “Aerodynamic Characteristics of NACA 0012 Airfoil Section at Angles of Attack from 0 Deg to 180 Deg,” NACA TN-3361, Jan. 1955. Google Scholar[6] Ramsay R. R., Janiszewska J. M. and Gregorek G. M., “Wind Tunnel Testing of Three S809 Aileron Configurations for Use on Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines,” Ohio State Univ., Airfoil Performance Rept., Columbus, OH, July 1996. Google Scholar[7] Ostowari C. and Naik D., “Post Stall Studies of Untwisted Varying Aspect Ratio Blades with a NACA 44XX Series Airfoil Section—Part II,” Wind Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1985, pp. 149–164. WIENDM 0309-524X Google Scholar[8] Smith M. J., Liggett N. D. and Koukol C. G., “Aerodynamics of Airfoils at High and Reverse Angles of Attack,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 48, No. 6, 2011, pp. 2012–2023. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031428 JAIRAM 0021-8669 LinkGoogle Scholar[9] Maskell E. C., “A Theory of the Blockage Effects on Bluff Bodies and Stalled Wings in a Closed Wind Tunnel,” Aeronautical Research Council R&M 3400, London, 1965. Google Scholar[10] Hackett J. E. and Cooper K. R., “Extensions to Maskell’s Theory for Blockage Effects on Bluff Bodies in a Closed Wind Tunnel,” Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 105, Aug. 2001, pp. 409–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[11] von Karman T. and Burgers J. M., “General Aerodynamic Theory: Perfect Fluids,” Aerodynamic Theory, Vol. 2, Springer, Berlin, 1935, pp. 409–418. Google Scholar[12] Barlow J., Rae W. and Pope A., Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing, 3rd ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, Feb. 1999, pp. 328–427. Google Scholar[13] Hackett J. E., “Recent Developments in the Calculation of Low-Speed Solid-Walled Wind Tunnel Wall Interference in Tests on Large Models, Part I: Evaluation of Three Interference Assessment Methods,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 39, Nos. 6–7, 2003, pp. 537–583. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2003.08.001 PAESD6 0376-0421 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] Spera D. A., “Models of Lift and Drag Coefficients of Stalled and Unstalled Airfoils in Wind Turbines and Wind Tunnels,” NASA CR-2008-215434, Oct. 2008. Google Scholar[15] Traub L. W., “High-Incidence Airfoil Lift and Drag Estimates,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 49, No. 1, 2012, pp. 311–314. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031160 JAIRAM 0021-8669 LinkGoogle Scholar[16] Hoerner S. F. and Borst H. V., Fluid Dynamic Lift, Liselotte Hoerner, Brick Town, NJ, 1968, pp. 4–23. Google Scholar Previous article Next article
Referência(s)