Income Distribution in a Dynamic Rural Sector: Some Evidence from Malaysia
1987; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 36; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/451635
ISSN1539-2988
Autores Tópico(s)Socioeconomic Development in Asia
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessIncome Distribution in a Dynamic Rural Sector: Some Evidence from MalaysiaR. T. ShandR. T. Shand Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Economic Development and Cultural Change Volume 36, Number 1Oct., 1987 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/451635 Views: 5Total views on this site Citations: 13Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1987 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Siti Hadijah Che Mat, Salmah Sathiman, Fatimah Hamid PENDAPATAN BUKAN PADI BANTU PESAWAH KELUAR DARIPADA KEMISKINAN LEBIH CEPAT, JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND SUSTAINABILITY 2, no.Number 2Number 2 (Jul 2020): 14–26.https://doi.org/10.32890/jes2020.2.2.2Siti Badariah Saiful Nathan, M. Mohd Rosli Distributional effects of non-farm incomes in a Malaysian rice bowl, International Journal of Social Economics 43, no.22 (Feb 2016): 205–220.https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-09-2013-0200Nong Zhu, Xubei Luo The impact of migration on rural poverty and inequality: a case study in China, Agricultural Economics 41, no.22 (Mar 2010): 191–204.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00434.xK. P. Kalirajan, Yiping Huang Does China Have a Grain Problem? An Empirical Analysis, Oxford Development Studies 29, no.11 (Aug 2010): 45–55.https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810123894S.R.C. Reddy, S.P. Chakravarty Forest Dependence and Income Distribution in a Subsistence Economy: Evidence from India, World Development 27, no.77 (Jul 1999): 1141–1149.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00057-1Kali P. Kalirajan, Yiping Huang Do Chinese Grain Farmers Maximise their Profits?, (Jan 1999): 208–220.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27448-2_10 J. P. Leones and S. Feldman Nonfarm Activity and Rural Household Income: Evidence from Philippine Microdata Leones et al., Economic Development and Cultural Change 46, no.44 (Jul 2015): 789–806.https://doi.org/10.1086/452374Akira Ishida, Azizan Asmuni Poverty eradication and income distribution in Malaysia, Journal of Contemporary Asia 28, no.33 (May 2007): 327–345.https://doi.org/10.1080/00472339880000191K.P. Kalirajan, Yiping Huang An alternative method of measuring economic efficiency: The case of grain production in China, China Economic Review 7, no.22 (Sep 1996): 193–203.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1043-951X(96)90009-7Richard H. Adams Non‐farm income and inequality in rural Pakistan: A decomposition analysis, Journal of Development Studies 31, no.11 (Oct 1994): 110–133.https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389408422350Ganesh Thapa, Keijiro Otsuka, Randolph Barker Effect of modern rice varieties and irrigation on household income distribution in Nepalese villages, Agricultural Economics 7, no.3-43-4 (Oct 1992): 245–265.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1992.tb00216.xJonathan Rigg The new rice technology and agrarian change: guilt by association?, Progress in Human Geography 13, no.33 (Sep 1989): 374–399.https://doi.org/10.1177/030913258901300303V.J. Kirkpatrick, G.T. Harris A note on trends in poverty and inequality in rural Asia, 1950–1985, Journal of Contemporary Asia 19, no.33 (Jan 1989): 324–330.https://doi.org/10.1080/00472338980000361
Referência(s)