Radial and ulnar artery dominance in normal digits
1989; Elsevier BV; Volume: 14; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1016/s0363-5023(89)80012-7
ISSN1531-6564
AutoresJames M. Kleinert, Stephen G. Fleming, Cheri Smith Abel, John Firrell,
Tópico(s)Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
ResumoPulse volume plethysmography was done on 1249 digits in 125 volunteers to determine relative blood flow to each digit. Twenty-five volunteers had diminished pulse contours (24:1 female to male); 20% of these had cold intolerance compared with 1% of the remaining volunteers. The 200 hands without vasospasm were used to calculate vessel dominance by comparing pulse volume plethysmography amplitudes during radial or ulnar artery compression. Only 5% were found to have ulnar artery dominance (ie, pulse volume plethysmography amplitude larger during radial artery compression) in all digits, and 28% were found to have complete radial artery dominance. Ulnar dominance in three or more digits was seen in 21.5% compared with 57% with radial artery dominance; 21.5% had equal dominance. Overall, 87% of thumbs and 70.5% of index, 60% of long, 52% of ring, and 52% of small fingers were radial dominant. Pulse volume plethysmography was done on 1249 digits in 125 volunteers to determine relative blood flow to each digit. Twenty-five volunteers had diminished pulse contours (24:1 female to male); 20% of these had cold intolerance compared with 1% of the remaining volunteers. The 200 hands without vasospasm were used to calculate vessel dominance by comparing pulse volume plethysmography amplitudes during radial or ulnar artery compression. Only 5% were found to have ulnar artery dominance (ie, pulse volume plethysmography amplitude larger during radial artery compression) in all digits, and 28% were found to have complete radial artery dominance. Ulnar dominance in three or more digits was seen in 21.5% compared with 57% with radial artery dominance; 21.5% had equal dominance. Overall, 87% of thumbs and 70.5% of index, 60% of long, 52% of ring, and 52% of small fingers were radial dominant.
Referência(s)