Biological Influences on Human Sex and Gender
1980; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 6; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/493778
ISSN1545-6943
Autores Tópico(s)Gender Studies in Language
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessThe New Scholarship: Review EssaysBiological Influences on Human Sex and GenderSusan W. BakerSusan W. Baker Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Signs Volume 6, Number 1Autumn, 1980Women: Sex and Sexuality, Part 2 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/493778 Views: 63Total views on this site Citations: 12Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1980 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Magdalena Radkowska-Walkowicz, Ewa Maciejewska-Mroczek ‘Should I Buy Her a Doll’? Motherhood and Turner Syndrome in Poland, Medical Anthropology 42, no.22 (Jan 2023): 177–190.https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2023.2170797Aline Beckmann Menezes, Regina Célia Souza Brito, Alda Loureiro Henriques, Relação entre gênero e orientação sexual a partir da perspectiva evolucionista, Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa 26, no.22 (Jun 2010): 245–252.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722010000200006Ethel Spector Person Masculinities, Plural, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 54, no.44 (Jul 2016): 1165–1186.https://doi.org/10.1177/00030651060540041501Celia Roberts Drowning in a Sea of Estrogens: Sex Hormones, Sexual Reproduction and Sex, Sexualities 6, no.22 (Aug 2016): 195–213.https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460703006002003Jim Sidanius, Shana Levin, James Liu, Felicia Pratto Social dominance orientation, anti-egalitarianism and the political psychology of gender: an extension and cross-cultural replication, European Journal of Social Psychology 30, no.11 (Jan 2000): 41–67.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(200001/02)30:1<41::AID-EJSP976>3.0.CO;2-OR. H. Unger Alternative Conceptions of Sex (and Sex Differences), (Jan 1993): 457–476.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1709-8_27Alison Wylie, Kathleen Okruhlik, Leslie Thielen-Wilson, Sandra Morton Feminist critiques of science, Women's Studies International Forum 12, no.33 (Jan 1989): 379–388.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(89)80014-7Lynda I.A. Birke, Gail Vines Beyond nature versus nurture: Process and biology in the development of gender, Women's Studies International Forum 10, no.66 (Jan 1987): 555–570.https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(87)90070-7Sue W. Williams, John C. McCullers MATURATION RATE, ENDOCRINE FUNCTIONING AND FEMALE CAREER TYPICALNESS, Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 15, no.11 (Jan 1987): 71–79.https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1987.15.1.71R.L. Cliquet The relevance of sociobiological theory for emancipatory feminism, Journal of Human Evolution 13, no.11 (Jan 1984): 117–127.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2484(84)80082-2Denise L. Baer, David A. Bositis Authors' Response, Politics and the Life Sciences 1, no.22 (May 2016): 140–146.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0730938400008595Milton Lodge, John C. Wahlke Politicos, Apoliticals, and the Processing of Political Information, International Political Science Review 3, no.11 (Jan 1982): 131–160.https://doi.org/10.1177/019251218200300109
Referência(s)