Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Prevention, Diagnosis, Therapy, and Follow-up of Lung Cancer

2010; Thieme Medical Publishers (Germany); Volume: 65; Issue: 01 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1055/s-0030-1255961

1438-8790

G. Goeckenjan, H. Sitter, Michael Thomas, D. Branscheid, Michael Flentje, Frank Griesinger, N. Niederle, Martin Stuschke, Torsten Blum, KM Deppermann, Joachim H. Ficker, L Freitag, A.S. Lübbe, Thomas Reinhold, E. Späth‐Schwalbe, D. Ukena, Monique Wickert, M. Wolf, Stefan Andreas, Thomas Auberger, R. P. Baum, Birol Baysal, J. Beuth, Heike Bickeböller, Alfred Böcking, R. M. Bohle, Irene Brüske, Otto C. Burghuber, N. Dickgreber, Sven Diederich, Hendrik Dienemann, Wilfried Eberhardt, Stephan Eggeling, Thomas Fink, B. Fischer, Markus Franke, Godehard Friedel, Thomas Gauler, S Gütz, Hŭbert Haŭtmann, A. Hellmann, D. Hellwig, Felix J.F. Herth, Claus Peter Heußel, Wolfgang Hilbe, Frank Hoffmeyer, Markus Horneber, Roman Huber, Julia Hübner, Hans‐Ulrich Kauczor, Klaus Kirchbacher, D Kirsten, Thomas Kraus, Susanne Lang, Uwe M. Martens, Andrea Mohn-Staudner, KM Müller, Jacqueline Müller‐Nordhorn, Dariusz Nowak, Uta Ochmann, Bernward Passlick, Iver Petersen, Robert Pirker, Boris Pokrajac, Martin Reck, S. Riha, Claudia E. Rübe, Alexander Schmittel, Nicolas Schönfeld, W. Schütte, Monika Serke, Georgios Stamatis, M Steingraber, Martin Steins, Erich Stoelben, L. Swoboda, Helmut Teschler, H. Tessen, Marianne Weber, A. Werner, H.‐Erich Wichmann, Elisabeth Wimmer, Christian Witt, H. Worth,

Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

This abridged version is based on an interdisciplinary guideline which corresponds to development stage 3 (S3) of guidelines according to the classification of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF). The guideline development process is characterized by the combination of formal evidence-search, formal consensus, logic (algorithms), decision and outcome analysis, and interdisciplinary development with the cooperation of 15 German and Austrian medical societies. [Table 1] shows the relationship between levels of evidence, consensus, and resulting recommendation grades of the recommendations of this guideline. The recommendation grades A – D are added to the recommendations in the abridged version. For the evidence levels, see the full version [1].