Collaborative Planning Fosters Multiple‐Benefit Restoration Projects on the Sacramento River
2009; Wiley; Volume: 23; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01348.x
ISSN1523-1739
AutoresGregory H. Golet, BEVERLEY ANDERSON, Ryan A. Luster, Gregg Werner,
Tópico(s)Environmental Conservation and Management
ResumoConservation BiologyVolume 23, Issue 6 p. 1634-1637 Comment Collaborative Planning Fosters Multiple-Benefit Restoration Projects on the Sacramento River GREGORY H. GOLET, GREGORY H. GOLET The Nature Conservancy, Northern Central Valley Office, Chico, CA 95928, U.S.A., email [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorBEVERLEY ANDERSON, BEVERLEY ANDERSON Sacramento River Conservation Area Forum, Red Bluff, CA 96080, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this authorRYAN A. LUSTER, RYAN A. LUSTER The Nature Conservancy, Northern Central Valley Office, Chico, CA 95928, U.S.A., email [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorGREGG WERNER, GREGG WERNER The Nature Conservancy, Northern Central Valley Office, Chico, CA 95928, U.S.A., email [email protected]Search for more papers by this author GREGORY H. GOLET, GREGORY H. GOLET The Nature Conservancy, Northern Central Valley Office, Chico, CA 95928, U.S.A., email [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorBEVERLEY ANDERSON, BEVERLEY ANDERSON Sacramento River Conservation Area Forum, Red Bluff, CA 96080, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this authorRYAN A. LUSTER, RYAN A. LUSTER The Nature Conservancy, Northern Central Valley Office, Chico, CA 95928, U.S.A., email [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorGREGG WERNER, GREGG WERNER The Nature Conservancy, Northern Central Valley Office, Chico, CA 95928, U.S.A., email [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 24 November 2009 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01348.xCitations: 6Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Literature Cited Buckley, M. C., and E. E. Crone. 2008. Negative off-site impacts of ecological restoration: understanding and addressing the conflict. Conservation Biology 22: 1118–1124. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01027.x PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar EDAW. 2007. Colusa Sacramento River State recreation area master plan. Report. The Nature Conservancy, Chico , California . Google Scholar EDAW. 2008. Colusa Subreach planning pest and regulatory effects study final project report. Report. The Nature Conservancy, Chico , California . Google Scholar Gardali, T., A. L. Holmes, S. L. Small, N. Nur, G. R. Geupel, and G. H. Golet. 2006. Abundance Patterns of landbirds in restored and remnant riparian forests on the Sacramento River, California, U.S.A. Restoration Ecology 14: 391–403. 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00147.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Golet, G. H., M. D. Roberts, E. W. Larsen, R. A. Luster, R. Unger, G. Werner, and G. G. White. 2006. Assessing societal impacts when planning restoration on large alluvial rivers: a case study of the Sacramento River project, California. Environmental Management 37: 862–879. 10.1007/s00267-004-0167-x PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Golet, G. H., R. J. Bogiatto, J. W. Hunt, D. Koenig, and G. Werner. 2007. Effects of riparian restoration on abundances of small mammal agricultural pest species (California). Ecological Restoration 25: 136–137. Google Scholar Golet, G. H., T. Gardali, C. Howell, J. Hunt, R. Luster, B. Rainey, M. Roberts, H. Swagerty, and N. Williams. 2008. Wildlife response to restoration on the Sacramento River. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science 6: 1–26. Google Scholar Holl, K. D., and E. E. Crone. 2004. Applicability of landscape and island biogeography theory to restoration of riparian understorey plants. Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 922–933. 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00949.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Jones and Stokes . 2003. Socioeconomic assessment of proposed habitat restoration within the riparian corridor of the Sacramento River conservation area. Report. The Nature Conservancy, Chico , California . Google Scholar SRCAF (Sacramento River Conservation Area Forum). 2007. Good neighbor policy. SRCAF, Red Bluff , California . Available from http://www.sacramentoriver.org/SRCAF/publications/03-15-07%20GNP%20Adopted.pdf (accessed July 2009). Google Scholar U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2004. Hamilton City flood damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, California. Final feasibility report and environmental impact statement/environmental impact report. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento , California . Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume23, Issue6December 2009Pages 1634-1637 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)