Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Legal Change, Judicial Behavior, and the Diversity Jurisdiction

1980; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 9; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/467645

1537-5366

William M. Landes, Richard A. Posner,

Judicial and Constitutional Studies

Previous articleNext article No AccessLegal Change, Judicial Behavior, and the Diversity JurisdictionWilliam M. Landes, and Richard A. PosnerWilliam M. Landes Search for more articles by this author , and Richard A. Posner Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Legal Studies Volume 9, Number 2Mar., 1980Change in the Common Law: Legal and Economic Perspectives Sponsored by The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/467645 Views: 18Total views on this site Citations: 23Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Przemysław Banasik, Katarzyna Metelska-Szaniawska, Małgorzata Godlewska, Sylwia Morawska Determinants of judges’ career choices and productivity: a Polish case study, European Journal of Law and Economics 53, no.11 (Jan 2021): 81–107.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-021-09688-4Elliott Ash, W. Bentley MacLeod Reducing partisanship in judicial elections can improve judge quality: Evidence from U.S. state supreme courts, Journal of Public Economics 201 (Sep 2021): 104478.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104478Cécile Bourreau-Dubois, Bruno Deffains, Myriam Doriat-Duban, Bruno Jeandidier Les barèmes, outils d’aide à la décision pour les justiciables et les juges, Revue d'économie politique Vol. 131, no.22 (Apr 2021): 199–222.https://doi.org/10.3917/redp.312.0031Alain Marciano, Alessandro Melcarne, Giovanni B. Ramello JUSTICE WITHOUT ROMANCE: THE HISTORY OF THE ECONOMIC ANALYSES OF JUDGES’ BEHAVIOR, 1960–1993, Journal of the History of Economic Thought 42, no.22 (Jun 2020): 261–282.https://doi.org/10.1017/S105383721900052XFlorian Follert Squeeze-Out and Business Valuation in Germany – A Law and Economics Analysis of Judicial Decision-Making, Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium 0, no.00 (Sep 2020).https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2020-0118Kawin Ethayarajh, Andrew Green, Albert H. Yoon A Rose by Any Other Name: Understanding Judicial Decisions that Do Not Cite Precedent, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 15, no.33 (Aug 2018): 563–596.https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12186Andrew Green, Albert H. Yoon Triaging the Law: Developing the Common Law on the Supreme Court of India, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 14, no.44 (Nov 2017): 683–715.https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12161Adam Bonica and Maya Sen The Politics of Selecting the Bench from the Bar: The Legal Profession and Partisan Incentives to Introduce Ideology into Judicial Selection, The Journal of Law and Economics 60, no.44 (May 2018): 559–595.https://doi.org/10.1086/696575Elliott Ash and W. Bentley MacLeod Intrinsic Motivation in Public Service: Theory and Evidence from State Supreme Courts, The Journal of Law and Economics 58, no.44 (May 2016): 863–913.https://doi.org/10.1086/684293Ryan C. Black, James F. Spriggs The Citation and Depreciation of U.S. Supreme Court Precedent, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10, no.22 (Apr 2013): 325–358.https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12012S. J. Choi, G. M. Gulati, E. A. Posner Professionals or Politicians: The Uncertain Empirical Case for an Elected Rather than Appointed Judiciary, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 26, no.22 (Nov 2008): 290–336.https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewn023Mariusz Jerzy Golecki Some Idealism About Realism. Judging Under Certainty and the Standardization of Adjudication in the EC Law, (Dec 2009): 181–199.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04886-9_10Ryan C. Black, James F. Spriggs The Depreciation of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1421413Virginia Rosales-López Economics of court performance: an empirical analysis, European Journal of Law and Economics 25, no.33 (Feb 2008): 231–251.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-008-9047-9Martin Schneider Careers in a judicial hierarchy, International Journal of Manpower 25, no.55 (Jul 2004): 431–446.https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720410554142Gebhard Kirchg�ssner, Werner W. Pommerehne Low-cost decisions as a challenge to public choice, Public Choice 77, no.11 (Sep 1993): 107–115.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049224 William M. Landes , and Richard A. Posner The Influence of Economics on Law: A Quantitative Study, The Journal of Law and Economics 36, no.1, Part 21, Part 2 (Oct 2015): 385–424.https://doi.org/10.1086/467281Gebhard Kirchgässner, Werner W. Pommerehne Low-cost decisions as a challenge to public choice, (Jan 1993): 107–115.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3402-8_11Gebhard Kirchgässner Towards a theory of low-cost decisions, European Journal of Political Economy 8, no.22 (May 1992): 305–320.https://doi.org/10.1016/0176-2680(92)90028-FLouis De Alessi, Robert J. Staaf The common law process: Efficiency or order?, Constitutional Political Economy 2, no.11 (Dec 1991): 107–126.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393228Ejan Mackaay Economic Analysis of Major Common Law Doctrines, (Jan 1982): 31–79.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5332-6_3 Neil Kent Komesar Legal Change, Judicial Behavior, and the Diversity Jurisdiction: A Comment, The Journal of Legal Studies 9, no.22 (Sep 2015): 387–397.https://doi.org/10.1086/467646Ben Deoorter, Francesco Parisi Legal Precedents and Judicial Discretion, (): 667–671.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47828-4_131