Artigo Revisado por pares

Cost of Mating for Female Insects: Risk of Predation in Photinus collustrans (Coleoptera: Lampyridae)

1988; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 131; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/284780

ISSN

1537-5323

Autores

Steven R. Wing,

Tópico(s)

Plant and animal studies

Resumo

Previous articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsCost of Mating for Female Insects: Risk of Predation in Photinus collustrans (Coleoptera: Lampyridae)Steven R. WingSteven R. WingPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 131, Number 1Jan., 1988 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/284780 Views: 20Total views on this site Citations: 65Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1988 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Samuel Perini, RogerK Butlin, AnjaM Westram, Kerstin Johannesson Very short mountings are enough for sperm transfer in Littorina saxatilis, Journal of Molluscan Studies 88, no.11 (Feb 2022).https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eyab049Christine M. Palmer, Nicole L. Wershoven, Sharon J. Martinson, Hannah M. ter Hofstede, W. John Kress, Laurel B. Symes Patterns of Herbivory in Neotropical Forest Katydids as Revealed by DNA Barcoding of Digestive Tract Contents, Diversity 14, no.22 (Feb 2022): 152.https://doi.org/10.3390/d14020152Nathan C. E. Harness, Tamara Campbell Acoustic ranging in meadow katydids: female preference for attenuated calls, Bioacoustics 31, no.11 (Feb 2021): 59–68.https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2021.1879681Carla H. M. De Lima, Rafaella L. Nόbrega, Maria L. Ferraz, Wendel J. T. Pontes Mating duration and spermatophore transfer in Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Coccinellidae), Biologia 77, no.11 (Oct 2021): 149–155.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-021-00907-6Yan-Da Li, Robin Kundrata, Erik Tihelka, Zhenhua Liu, Diying Huang, Chenyang Cai Cretophengodidae, a new Cretaceous beetle family, sheds light on the evolution of bioluminescence, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 288, no.19431943 (Jan 2021): 20202730.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2730Apoorva Shandilya, Priya Singh, Geetanjali Mishra, Omkar Omkar, Susan Bertram Cost of mating in male Menochilus sexmaculatus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), Ethology 127, no.11 (Oct 2020): 59–67.https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.13099Fátima C. Recalde, Crasso P. B. Breviglieri, Gustavo Q. Romero Allochthonous aquatic subsidies alleviate predation pressure in terrestrial ecosystems, Ecology 101, no.88 (May 2020).https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3074Alexander Koliada, Katarina Gavrilyuk, Nadia Burdylyuk, Olha Strilbytska, Kenneth B. Storey, Vitaliy Kuharskii, Oleh Lushchak, Alexander Vaiserman Mating status affects Drosophila lifespan, metabolism and antioxidant system, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 246 (Aug 2020): 110716.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.110716Alberto Corral‐López, Maksym Romensky, Alexander Kotrschal, Severine D. Buechel, Niclas Kolm Brain size affects responsiveness in mating behaviour to variation in predation pressure and sex ratio, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 33, no.22 (Nov 2019): 165–177.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13556Sebastiano De Bona, Thomas E. White, Kate D.L. Umbers Fight or flight trade-offs and the defensive behaviour of the mountain katydid, Acripeza reticulata, Animal Behaviour 159 (Jan 2020): 81–87.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.11.012Jin-Won Lee, Hae-Ni Kim, Sohyeon Yoo, Jeong-Chil Yoo Common cuckoo females may escape male sexual harassment by color polymorphism, Scientific Reports 9, no.11 (May 2019).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44024-6Yû Suzaki, Satoko Kodera, Haruhi Fujiwara, Rikiya Sasaki, Kensuke Okada, Masako Katsuki Temperature variations affect postcopulatory but not precopulatory sexual selection in the cigarette beetle, Animal Behaviour 144 (Oct 2018): 115–123.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.08.010Stephanie Vaz N. Campos, Luiz Felipe Lima Da Silveira, José Ricardo M. Mermudes Systematic Review of the Giant Firefly Cratomorphus cossyphinus : Sexual Dimorphism, Immature Stages and Geographic Range (Coleoptera: Lampyridae), Annales Zoologici 68, no.11 (Mar 2018): 57–84.https://doi.org/10.3161/00034541ANZ2018.68.1.003Petri Rautiala, Heikki Helanterä, Mikael Puurtinen The evolutionary dynamics of adaptive virginity, sex-allocation, and altruistic helping in haplodiploid animals, Evolution 72, no.11 (Dec 2017): 30–38.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13399P. A. Lagos A review of escape behaviour in orthopterans, Journal of Zoology 303, no.33 (Sep 2017): 165–177.https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12496Chihiro Himuro, Yusuke Ikegawa, Atsushi Honma Males Use Accessory Gland Substances to Inhibit Remating by Females in West Indian Sweetpotato Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Annals of the Entomological Society of America 110, no.44 (Mar 2017): 374–380.https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/sax036Patricio A. Lagos, Marie E. Herberstein Are males more scared of predators? Differential change in metabolic rate between males and females under predation risk, Physiology & Behavior 173 (May 2017): 110–115.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.02.002R. Brian Langerhans, Christopher M. Anderson, Justa L. Heinen-Kay Causes and Consequences of Genital Evolution, Integrative and Comparative Biology 56, no.44 (Sep 2016): 741–751.https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icw101Xiao-Wei Li, Jozsef Fail, Anthony M. Shelton Female multiple matings and male harassment and their effects on fitness of arrhenotokous Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 69, no.1010 (Jul 2015): 1585–1595.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1970-5Christopher M. Anderson, R. Brian Langerhans Origins of female genital diversity: Predation risk and lock-and-key explain rapid divergence during an adaptive radiation, Evolution 69, no.99 (Aug 2015): 2452–2467.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12748Vivek Rohidas Vartak, Vishwanath Varma, Vijay Kumar Sharma Effects of polygamy on the activity/rest rhythm of male fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster, The Science of Nature 102, no.1-21-2 (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-014-1252-5Raphaλl De Cock, Lynn Faust, Sara Lewis Courtship and Mating in Phausis reticulata (Coleoptera: Lampyridae): Male Flight Behaviors, Female Glow Displays, and Male Attraction to Light Traps, Florida Entomologist 97, no.44 (Dec 2014): 1290–1307.https://doi.org/10.1653/024.097.0404D. J. Power, L. Holman Polyandrous females found fitter populations, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 27, no.99 (Jul 2014): 1948–1955.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12448Beatriz Willink, Federico Bolaños, Heike Pröhl Conspicuous displays in cryptic males of a polytypic poison-dart frog, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 68, no.22 (Nov 2013): 249–261.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1640-4Kelly B. Miller, Johannes Bergsten Predaceous Diving Beetle Sexual Systems, (Jun 2014): 199–233.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9109-0_5C. T. D. Dickman, A. J. Moehring Contribution of the X chromosome to a marked reduction in lifespan in interspecies female hybrids of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 27, no.11 (Oct 2013): 25–33.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12262Deanna M. Soper, Lynda F. Delph, Curt M. Lively Multiple paternity in the freshwater snail, Potamopyrgus antipodarum, Ecology and Evolution 2, no.1212 (Nov 2012): 3179–3185.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.408G. SAKURAI, C. HIMURO, E. KASUYA Intra-specific variation in the morphology and the benefit of large genital sclerites of males in the adzuki bean beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis), Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25, no.77 (Apr 2012): 1291–1297.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02517.xChihiro Himuro, Kenji Fujisaki The effects of male harassment on mating duration in the seed bug, Togo hemipterus, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 142, no.11 (Dec 2011): 53–59.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2011.01199.xScott B. Fleenor, John C. Abbott, Ellison Wang Seasonal Appearance, Diel Flight Activity, and Geographic Distribution of Male Telegeusis texensis Fleenor and Taber (Coleoptera: Telegeusidae), The Coleopterists Bulletin 65, no.44 (Dec 2011): 345–349.https://doi.org/10.1649/072.065.0404PRISCILA FORTES, FERNANDO L. CÔNSOLI Are there costs in the repeated mating activities of female Southern stink bugs Nezara viridula?, Physiological Entomology 36, no.33 (Apr 2011): 215–219.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.2011.00786.xS. S. Suni, O. T. Eldakar High mating frequency and variation with lineage ratio in dependent-lineage harvester ants, Insectes Sociaux 58, no.33 (Jan 2011): 357–364.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-011-0150-5Thomas Madsen COST OF MULTIPLE MATINGS IN FEMALE ADDERS ( VIPERA BERUS ), Evolution 65, no.66 (Apr 2011): 1823–1825.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01291.xBenjamin Jellen, Robert Aldridge Paternity Patterns, (May 2011): 619–644.https://doi.org/10.1201/b10879-17Stuart Wigby, Cathy Slack, Sebastian Grönke, Pedro Martinez, Federico C. F. Calboli, Tracey Chapman, Linda Partridge Insulin signalling regulates remating in female Drosophila, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278, no.17041704 (Aug 2010): 424–431.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1390Akiko Matsumoto-Oda, Yasuo Ihara Estrous asynchrony causes low birth rates in wild female chimpanzees, American Journal of Primatology 73, no.22 (Sep 2010): 180–188.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20885Marc Rhainds Female mating failures in insects, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 136, no.33 (Aug 2010): 211–226.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2010.01032.xChihiro Himuro, Kenji Fujisaki Males of the seed bug Togo hemipterus (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae) use accessory gland substances to inhibit remating by females, Journal of Insect Physiology 54, no.1212 (Dec 2008): 1538–1542.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2008.09.002Darrell J. Kemp, Joseph M. Macedonia, Tamara S. Ball, Ronald L. Rutowski Potential direct fitness consequences of ornament-based mate choice in a butterfly, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62, no.66 (Dec 2007): 1017–1026.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0529-5 Male Mating Strategies through Manipulation of Female-perceived Predation Risk: A Minireview and a Hypothesis, Journal of Ecology and Field Biology 31, no.11 (Feb 2008): 1–7.https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2008.31.1.001Jeffrey A. Stoltz, Jeremy N. McNeil, Maydianne C.B. Andrade Males assess chemical signals to discriminate just-mated females from virgins in redback spiders, Animal Behaviour 74, no.66 (Dec 2007): 1669–1674.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.03.011Steven K. Schwartz, Merrill A. Peterson Strong material benefits and no longevity costs of multiple mating in an extremely polyandrous leaf beetle, Chrysochus cobaltinus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), Behavioral Ecology 17, no.66 (Aug 2006): 1004–1010.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arl033Katri Ronkainen, Arja Kaitala, Riikka Huttunen The Effect of Abdominal Spines on Female Mating Frequency and Fecundity in a Water Strider, Journal of Insect Behavior 18, no.55 (Sep 2005): 619–631.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-005-7015-6Tamar Erez, Jutta M. Schneider, Yael Lubin Is Male Cohabitation Costly for Females of the Spider Stegodyphus lineatus (Eresidae)?, Ethology 111, no.77 (Jul 2005): 693–704.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01090.xGöran Arnqvist, Tina Nilsson, Mari Katvala Mating rate and fitness in female bean weevils, Behavioral Ecology 16, no.11 (Jul 2004): 123–127.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh119R. Hardling, A. Kaitala The evolution of repeated mating under sexual conflict, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, no.11 (Jan 2005): 106–115.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00795.xKELLY B. MILLER The phylogeny of diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) and the evolution of sexual conflict, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 79, no.33 (Jul 2003): 359–388.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00195.xG. T. Miller, S. Pitnick Functional significance of seminal receptacle length in Drosophila melanogaster, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16, no.11 (Jan 2003): 114–126.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00476.xDerek W. Dunn, Caroline S. Crean, André s. Gilburn The effects of exposure to seaweed on willingness to mate, oviposition, and longevity in seaweed flies, Ecological Entomology 27, no.55 (Sep 2002): 554–564.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00445.xScott Pitnick, William D. Brown, Gary T. Miller Evolution of female remating behaviour following experimental removal of sexual selection, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 268, no.14671467 (Mar 2001): 557–563.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1400François Mougeot, Vincent Bretagnolle Predation as a cost of sexual communication in nocturnal seabirds: an experimental approach using acoustic signals, Animal Behaviour 60, no.55 (Nov 2000): 647–656.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1491Göran Arnqvist, Tina Nilsson The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects, Animal Behaviour 60, no.22 (Aug 2000): 145–164.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1446T.ULMAR GRAFE Costs and benefits of mate choice in the lek-breeding reed frog,, Animal Behaviour 53, no.55 (May 1997): 1103–1117.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0427Fred Singer, Susan E. Riechert Mating system and mating success of the desert spider Agelenopsis aperta, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 36, no.55 (May 1995): 313–322.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167792Gerhard Maier Mating frequency and interspecific matings in some freshwater cyclopoid copepods, Oecologia 101, no.22 (Feb 1995): 245–250.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317290Hannu Ylönen, Heidi Ronkainen Breeding suppression in the bank vole as antipredatory adaptation in a predictable environment, Evolutionary Ecology 8, no.66 (Nov 1994): 658–666.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01237848H. Ronkainen, H. Ylönen Behaviour of cyclic bank voles under risk of mustelid predation: do females avoid copulations?, Oecologia 97, no.33 (Apr 1994): 377–381.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317328Konstantine Souroukis, Anne-Marie Murray Female mating behavior in the field cricket,Gryllus pennsylvanicus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) at different operational sex ratios, Journal of Insect Behavior 8, no.22 (Mar 1994): 269–279.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01988910Svein Dale, Helge Rinden, Tore Slagsvold Competition for a mate restricts mate search of female pied flycatchers, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 30, no.3-43-4 (Apr 1992): 165–176.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166699Paul A. Verrell Illegitimate exploitation of sexual signalling systems and the origin of species, Ethology Ecology & Evolution 3, no.44 (Oct 1991): 273–283.https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.1991.9525356Carin Magnhagen Predation risk as a cost of reproduction, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 6, no.66 (Jun 1991): 183–186.https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(91)90210-O Leslie Real Search Theory and Mate Choice. I. Models of Single-Sex Discrimination, The American Naturalist 136, no.33 (Oct 2015): 376–405.https://doi.org/10.1086/285103Yves Carrière, Jeremy N. McNeil Effect of age and mating status on the mating behaviour and pheromone titre in alfalfa blotch leafminer females Agromyza frontella (Diptera: Agromyzidae), Journal of Insect Physiology 36, no.77 (Jan 1990): 457–461.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(90)90095-WSteven R. Wing Energetic costs of mating in a flightless female firefly,Photinus collustrans (Coleoptera: Lampyridae), Journal of Insect Behavior 2, no.66 (Nov 1989): 841–847.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049405Göran Arnqvist Multiple mating in a water strider: mutual benefits or intersexual conflict?, Animal Behaviour 38, no.55 (Nov 1989): 749–756.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80107-1

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX